Commentary: Interpreting Data of Celiac Plexus Block in Patients with Pancreatic Pain: Timing, Patients, Survival

EUS-guided interventional therapies for pancreatic diseases

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an integrated diagnostic technique merging endoscope and ultrasound to examine the digestive system. EUS has emerged as a primary diagnostic method for pancreatic diseases due to its distinctive benefits. Over the past four decades, EUS has undergone a transformation, shifting its role from primarily diagnostic to increasingly therapeutic. Additionally, in recent years, EUS has emerged as an increasingly prominent adjunctive or alternative approach to conventional surgical interventions. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of current technological approaches in the treatment of pancreatic diseases. The dynamic interplay with diverse therapeutic approaches has reinvigorated EUS and shaped its trajectory in the management of pancreatic diseases.

Computed Tomography-Guided Coeliac Plexus Neurolysis in Palliative in-Patients with Intra-Abdominal Malignancy: Retrospective Evaluation of Neurolytic Solution Spread as a Predictive Factor

INTRODUCTION

Computed tomography (CT)-guided coeliac plexus neurolysis (CPN) is considered effective at controlling pain in patients with intra-abdominal malignancies. The primary objective was to correlate pain outcomes with the spread of neurolytic solution in the coeliac area and to evaluate the predictive value for the spread of injectate for pain outcomes and side effects.

METHODS

Blinded CT scans were reviewed. The coeliac area was divided into nine quadrants. Assessors evaluated quadrants according to contrast spread, needle tip position, and the contact between the injectate and other organs and plexuses. Efficacy of CPN and complications were estimated.

RESULTS

In 54.9% there was complete spread of the neurolytic in the coeliac area with no correlation between pain relief and spread of injectate. In 85% the neurolytic had contact with viscera with no correlation with pain relief or complications. There was no correlation between needle tip position and spread of the neurolytic and contact of the neurolytic with viscera. In 71.6% the injectate was found to have spread into "other" plexuses. In 13.3% hampered spread of the injectate was observed. There was no correlation between patterns of injectate spread and pain relief, pain relief and spread of injectate in any particular quadrants, and expected and documented post-procedural pain scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the spread of contrast medium clinicians can neither correctly anticipate the pain relief or post-procedural NRS, nor the duration of pain relief and complications. It is not essential to have the perfect sickle-shaped spread of the injectate for adequate pain control.