Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Versus MIGS: Forgotten Art or First-Step Procedure in Selected Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma

Meta-Analysis of MINIject vs. Two iStents as Standalone Treatment for Glaucoma with 24 Months of Follow-Up

Background: This study compares the long-term intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of standalone MINIject (iSTAR Medical, Belgium) suprachoroidal implantation and two iStent (Glaukos, CA, USA) trabecular bypass implantation using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Systematic review of standalone implantation of MINIject or iStent inject with at least 24 months of follow up. The mean and standard deviation of IOP and the number of IOP-lowering medications at baseline and at 24 months were extracted. Weighted estimates of the outcome variables were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis models. Heterogeneity in the outcome measures among the studies was quantified using I². Results: Seven studies (three studies for MINIject and four for iStent) comprising 280 eyes were included. At 24 months, there was a greater reduction in IOP from baseline in the MINIject vs. two iStent cohorts (-9.57 vs. -4.92 mmHg, p = 0.03). The change from baseline in mean medication use was -1.00 with MINIject and -0.56 medications with iStent (p = 0.26). The mean percentage IOP reduction at 24 months ranged from 36.3-42.2% with MINIject compared to 5.2-40.7% with iStent, with greater variability in mean change from baseline in IOP observed in the iStent group (I2 = 96.5% vs. 0%). The most frequent adverse events for MINIject were anterior chamber inflammation, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) loss, hyphema, and conjunctival hemorrhage, and for iStent, these were device obstruction, BCVA loss, IOP spike, and cataract progression. Conclusions: While both MINIject and iStent inject devices resulted in significant reductions in IOP and IOP medication use, standalone MINIject may provide a greater and more consistent reduction in IOP.

Historical and Contemporary Debates in Schlemm's Canal-Based MIGS

Glaucoma is one of the primary causes of blindness worldwide. Canal opening surgery, a type of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) applied in cases of mild to moderate glaucoma, has gained increasing popularity in recent years due to its efficacy in reducing the intraocular pressure, its safety profile, the simplicity of its technique, and the reduced likelihood of compromised vision. Nevertheless, the existing body of histopathological studies remains insufficient for a comprehensive understanding of post-surgical wound healing. Consequently, debates persist among researchers regarding the mechanism through which Schlemm's canal opening surgery reduces the intraocular pressure, as well as the surgical techniques that may impact the outcomes and the factors influencing surgical success. As the history of MIGS is relatively short and lacks sufficient systemic reviews or meta-analyses evaluating the influence of individual factors, this review was conducted to illuminate the disparities in researchers' opinions at the current stage of research.

Two-Year Performance and Safety Results of the MINIject Supraciliary Implant in Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Meta-Analysis of the STAR-I, II, III Trials

PURPOSE

To evaluate the performance and safety of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery with a supraciliary drainage device (MINIject; iSTAR Medical, Wavre, Belgium) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) as a stand-alone procedure.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

At 11 sites in Colombia, France, Germany, India, Panama, and Spain, 82 patients were treated in 3 prospective, multicenter, interventional, nonrandomized trials (STAR-I, II, III). Data were pooled in a meta-analysis of up to 2 years of follow-up postimplantation. The main outcome measures were mean relative and absolute reduction in diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes included patients with IOP ≤18 mmHg, patients with IOP reduction ≥20%, number of IOP-lowering medications, adverse events, and endothelial cell density loss.

RESULTS

At the 2-year follow-up (n = 66), mean IOP was reduced from 23.8 ± 3.3 mmHg at baseline to 14.4 ± 4.5 mmHg (-39.3%; P < 0.0001). An IOP reduction of ≥20% was achieved in 89.4% of patients, with 84.8% having an IOP ≤18 mmHg. IOP-lowering medications were reduced from a mean of 2.4 ± 1.1 to 1.4 ± 1.4 (P < 0.0001), with 37.9% of patients being medication-free at 2 years. Mean endothelial cell density loss at 2 years was 6.2 ± 9.1% compared to baseline and no patient had a loss >30%.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates the favorable safety and efficacy profile of a supraciliary device implanted in a stand-alone, ab-interno procedure in patients with mild-to-moderate POAG. The data demonstrate that MINIject is a safe and effective, bleb-free treatment option for patients requiring low target IOP up to 2 years.

Challenging the "Topical Medications-First" Approach to Glaucoma: A Treatment Paradigm in Evolution

Topical glaucoma medications are effective and safe, but they have numerous well-documented limitations that diminish their long-term utility and sustainability. These limitations can include high rates of nonadherence (with associated glaucoma progression), concerning side effects, inconsistent circadian intraocular pressure (IOP) control, complex dosing regimens, difficulty with self-administration, costs, and decreased quality of life. Despite these limitations, topical medications traditionally have been first-line in the glaucoma treatment algorithm, as no other minimally invasive treatment alternatives existed. In recent years, however, novel interventional therapies-including sustained-release drug-delivery platforms, selective laser trabeculoplasty, and micro-invasive glaucoma surgery procedures-have made it possible to intervene earlier without relying on topical medications. As a result, the topical medication-first treatment approach is being reevaluated in an overall shift toward earlier more proactive interventions.

[Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery-Comparison of angle based procedures]

Surgical procedures are playing an increasing role in the care of patients with glaucoma. Within the last decade, new surgical procedures have been established, which are summarized under the term minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). A wide variety of different procedures are aimed at the structures in the angle of the anterior chamber, such as the trabecular meshwork and Schlemm's canal, to improve the physiological outflow or to improve the alternative uveoscleral outflow. The implementation of the treatment goal differs in the individual procedures, as does the maximum pressure reduction that can be achieved. Compared to trabeculectomy with the use of cytostatic agents, the achievable pressure reduction is usually significantly lower. In contrast, the significantly lower intraoperative and postoperative complication rates are emphasized as an advantage of these procedures. With increasing clinical experience and the growth of sufficient data on these new surgical procedures, a well-founded classification in the treatment algorithm of glaucoma surgery becomes easier; nevertheless, due to the small differences with respect to efficacy and safety profile, the final decision for an individual procedure often remains dependent on the surgeon's personal preferences.

Systematic Literature Review of Clinical, Economic, and Humanistic Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery or Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty for the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma with or Without Cataract Extraction

Introduction

Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) are increasingly used options for mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma (OAG) care. While most MIGS devices are indicated for use in combination with cataract surgery only, with phacoemulsification playing a role in lowering IOP, newer technologies can also be used as standalone glaucoma surgery.

Methods

This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to assess the clinical, economic, and humanistic outcomes of MIGS and SLT for the treatment of OAG and was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies that assessed MIGS or SLT in at least one treatment arm versus any other glaucoma treatment in adults with mild-to-moderate OAG were included. Clinical, humanistic (health-related quality of life [HRQoL] and patient burden), and economic data were extracted, and the methodological quality of included studies was evaluated.

Results

A total of 2720 articles were screened, and 81 publications were included. Fifty-eight reported clinical outcomes. The majority assessed iStent or iStent inject (n=41), followed by OMNI (n=9), gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) or the Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) (n=7), Hydrus (n=6), SLT (n=5), Xen Gel Stent (n=2), PreserFlo (n=1), and iTrack (n=1). IOP reduction was observed across prospective studies, varying from -31% to -13.7% at month 6 and from -39% to -11.4% at year 1 versus baseline. Most adverse events were transient and non-serious. Limited humanistic and economic data were identified.

Conclusion

Given their established efficacy and safety, there is a rationale for wider use of MIGS in mild-to-moderate OAG. Of the MIGS devices, iStent and OMNI have the largest clinical evidence base supporting their sustained effectiveness.

XEN® implantation: an effective strategy to stop glaucoma progression despite prior minimally invasive glaucoma surgery

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether XEN® implantation is a reasonable and safe method to lower the intraocular pressure (IOP) and amount of medication for adult primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) over a 3-year period. The influence of the type of anesthesia, previous glaucoma surgery, and postoperative interventions on the outcome were examined.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 96 eyes were included. XEN® implantation was performed as sole procedure under general (n = 86) or local anesthesia (n = 10). IOP and number of glaucoma medication were assessed preoperatively: day 1, week 6, month 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36. Further outcome parameters were Kaplan–Meier success rates, secondary intervention, and complication rates.

Results

IOP decreased from 20.7 ± 5.1 to 12.8 ± 2.5 mmHg at the 36-month follow-up (p < 0.001) and glaucoma therapy was reduced from 3.3 ± 0.8 to 1.2 ± 1.6 (36 months, p < 0.001). Transient postoperative hypotony was documented in 26 eyes (27.1%). General anesthesia resulted in a significant improvement of the survival rate compared to local anesthesia (77% vs. 50%, p = 0.044). Prior iStent inject®, Trabectome®, or SLT laser had no significant impact, such as filter bleb revision. The number of postoperative needlings had a significantly negative influence (p = 0.012).

Conclusion

XEN® implantation effectively and significantly lowers the IOP and number of glaucoma therapy in POAG in the 36-month follow-up with a favorable profile of side effects and few complications. In case of IOP, general anesthesia has a significant positive influence on the survival rate, whereas prior SLT or MIGS does not have significant impact.

A Review of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: "The Hype Is Real"

Presently, there is no efficacious treatment for glaucomatous optic neuropathy; the current treatment is focused on lowering intraocular pressure (IOP). Studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in reducing the IOP in eyes with open-angle (OAG) glaucoma or ocular hypertension (OH). Moreover, the European Glaucoma Society has instated SLT as the first-line or adjunctive treatment in OAG or OH, reiterating its clinical significance. In this review, we outline the old and the new roles of SLT, with an emphasis on clinical practice, and look further into its renewed appeal and future developments.