1
|
Abu-Omar A, Murray N, Ali IT, Khosa F, Barrett S, Sheikh A, Nicolaou S, Tamburrini S, Iacobellis F, Sica G, Granata V, Saba L, Masala S, Scaglione M. Utility of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Clinical Conundra. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:775. [PMID: 38611688 PMCID: PMC11012177 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14070775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Advancing medical technology revolutionizes our ability to diagnose various disease processes. Conventional Single-Energy Computed Tomography (SECT) has multiple inherent limitations for providing definite diagnoses in certain clinical contexts. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) has been in use since 2006 and has constantly evolved providing various applications to assist radiologists in reaching certain diagnoses SECT is rather unable to identify. DECT may also complement the role of SECT by supporting radiologists to confidently make diagnoses in certain clinically challenging scenarios. In this review article, we briefly describe the principles of X-ray attenuation. We detail principles for DECT and describe multiple systems associated with this technology. We describe various DECT techniques and algorithms including virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI), virtual non-contrast (VNC) imaging, Iodine quantification techniques including Iodine overlay map (IOM), and two- and three-material decomposition algorithms that can be utilized to demonstrate a multitude of pathologies. Lastly, we provide our readers commentary on examples pertaining to the practical implementation of DECT's diverse techniques in the Gastrointestinal, Genitourinary, Biliary, Musculoskeletal, and Neuroradiology systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Abu-Omar
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada (I.T.A.)
| | - Nicolas Murray
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada (I.T.A.)
| | - Ismail T. Ali
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada (I.T.A.)
| | - Faisal Khosa
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada (I.T.A.)
| | - Sarah Barrett
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada (I.T.A.)
| | - Adnan Sheikh
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada (I.T.A.)
| | - Savvas Nicolaou
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada (I.T.A.)
| | - Stefania Tamburrini
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale del Mare-ASL NA1 Centro, Via Enrico Russo 11, 80147 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Iacobellis
- Department of General and Emergency Radiology, A. Cardarelli Hospital, Via A. Cardarelli 9, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Giacomo Sica
- Department of Radiology, Monaldi Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS Di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Saba
- Medical Oncology Department, AOU Cagliari, Policlinico Di Monserrato (CA), 09042 Monserrato, Italy
| | - Salvatore Masala
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Viale S. Pietro, 07100 Sassari, Italy; (S.M.)
| | - Mariano Scaglione
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Viale S. Pietro, 07100 Sassari, Italy; (S.M.)
- Department of Radiology, Pineta Grande Hospital, 81030 Castel Volturno, Italy
- Department of Radiology, James Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huda F, LeBedis CA, Qureshi MM, Anderson SW, Gupta A. Acute cholecystitis: diagnostic value of dual-energy CT-derived iodine map and low-keV virtual monoenergetic images. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:5125-5133. [PMID: 34223959 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03202-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 06/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare conventional and dual-energy CT (DECT) for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis and gangrene. METHODS Fifty-seven consecutive adult patients with abdominal pain who underwent IV contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT on a dual-layer (dlDECT) or rapid-switching (rsDECT) scanner from September, 2018 to April, 2021 with cholecystectomy and pathology-confirmed cholecystitis were retrospectively reviewed, and compared with 57 consecutive adult patients without cholecystitis from the same interval scanned with DECT. Images were reviewed independently by two abdominal radiologists with 12 and 16 years of experience in two sessions 4 weeks apart, blinded to clinical data. Initially, only blended reconstructions (simulating conventional single-energy CT images) were reviewed (CT). Subsequently, CT and DECT reconstructions including low-keV virtual monoenergetic images and iodine maps were reviewed. Gallbladder fossa hyperemia, pericholecystic fluid, subjective presence of gangrene, heterogeneous wall enhancement, sloughed membranes, intramural air, abscess, overall impression of the presence of acute cholecystitis, and intramural iodine density were assessed. RESULTS Gallbladder fossa hyperemia was detected with increased sensitivity on DECT (R1, 61.4%; R2, 75.4%) vs. CT (R1, 22.8%; R2, 15.8%). DECT showed increased sensitivity for gangrene (R1, 24.6%; R2, 38.6%) vs. CT (R1, 5.3%; R2, 14%), heterogeneous wall enhancement (DECT: R1, 33.3%; R2, 63.2% vs. CT: R1, 7%; R2, 31.6%), and cholecystitis (DECT: R1, 86%; R2, 89.5% vs. CT: R1, 77.2%; R2, 70.2%). In addition, DECT was more sensitive for the detection of acute cholecystitis (R1, 86%; R2, 89.5%) vs. CT (R1, 77.2%; R2, 70.2%). Iodine density threshold of 1.2 mg/ml, 0.8 mg/mL, and 0.5 mg/mL showed specificity for gangrenous cholecystitis of 78.26%, 86.96%, and 95.65%, respectively, using the rsDECT platform. CONCLUSION DECT showed improved sensitivity compared to conventional CT for detection of acute cholecystitis. Iodine density measurements may be helpful to diagnose gangrene.
Collapse
|
3
|
Split-bolus CTA for mesenteric ischemia with a single scan opacifying arterial and mesenteric venous systems. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:3987-3995. [PMID: 32157410 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06769-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of split-bolus single-scan computed tomography angiography (CTA) protocol for evaluation of acute mesenteric ischemia and alternate diagnoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, consecutive patients from 21 October 2016 to 6 May 2018 evaluated for mesenteric ischemia with split-bolus CTA (a single scan in concurrent arterial and portal venous phase) in a single tertiary academic institution were included. Intravenous contrast was administered on weight-based basis. Quantitative and qualitative assessments of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) attenuation and patency were performed by two independent reviewers. CT imaging findings were correlated with clinical reference outcomes. RESULTS One hundred fifty-four patients (age 66.3 ± 14.1 years, BMI 27.3 ± 6, 86 (56%) female) were included. CTA studies were performed with a volumetric CT dose index of 15.9 ± 5.5 mSv and dose length product of 1042.9 ± 389.4 mGy cm. Average intravenous contrast volume administered was 164.3 ± 12.1 cc. SMA attenuation was 263.6 ± 92.4HU, SMV was 190 ± 50.2HU. Qualitative assessment of SMA and SMV showed good opacification in all patients. 17/154 (11%) patients were diagnosed on CT with mesenteric ischemia; in 6/154 (4%), CTA studies were indeterminate; in 131/154 (85%), CTA confidently ruled out mesenteric ischemia. Alternate diagnoses were made in 38/154 (25%) patients. Using composite clinical outcomes as a reference standard, sensitivity of split-bolus CTA protocol for diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia is 100% (95% CI 79-100%), and specificity is 99% (95% CI 96-100%). CONCLUSIONS Split-bolus CTA has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia. KEY POINTS • Split-bolus CTA protocol for mesenteric ischemia has great diagnostic accuracy with lower radiation exposure and fewer images to interpret compared with standard multiphasic CTA.
Collapse
|
4
|
Murray N, Darras KE, Walstra FE, Mohammed MF, McLaughlin PD, Nicolaou S. Dual-Energy CT in Evaluation of the Acute Abdomen. Radiographics 2019; 39:264-286. [DOI: 10.1148/rg.2019180087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Murray
- From the Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9 (N.M., K.E.D., F.E.W., P.D.M., S.N.); and the Medical Imaging Department, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of the National Guard, Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (M.F.M.)
| | - Kathryn E. Darras
- From the Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9 (N.M., K.E.D., F.E.W., P.D.M., S.N.); and the Medical Imaging Department, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of the National Guard, Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (M.F.M.)
| | - Frances E. Walstra
- From the Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9 (N.M., K.E.D., F.E.W., P.D.M., S.N.); and the Medical Imaging Department, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of the National Guard, Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (M.F.M.)
| | - Mohammed F. Mohammed
- From the Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9 (N.M., K.E.D., F.E.W., P.D.M., S.N.); and the Medical Imaging Department, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of the National Guard, Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (M.F.M.)
| | - Patrick D. McLaughlin
- From the Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9 (N.M., K.E.D., F.E.W., P.D.M., S.N.); and the Medical Imaging Department, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of the National Guard, Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (M.F.M.)
| | - Savvas Nicolaou
- From the Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9 (N.M., K.E.D., F.E.W., P.D.M., S.N.); and the Medical Imaging Department, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of the National Guard, Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (M.F.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dual-Energy CT in Differentiating Nonperforated Gangrenous Appendicitis From Uncomplicated Appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 211:776-782. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.17.19274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|