Uveitic Macular Edema: Treatment Update

Topical and Subcutaneous Interferon-Alpha for the Treatment of Refractory Inflammatory Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of topical interferon alpha-2b (tIFN a2b) and subcutaneous pegylated interferon alpha-2a (peg-IFN a2a) in the treatment of refractory pseudophakic (PME) and uveitic (UME) macular edema.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of patients with PME or UME that was non-responsive to conventional therapies. Topical IFN a2b drops (1 MIU/ml) were commenced four times a day. Non-responders were offered treatment with subcutaneous peg-IFN a2a starting at 180 mcg weekly.

RESULTS

Seven eyes of seven patients (three UME and four PME) were treated with tIFN a2b. Three eyes had complete ME resolution with tIFN treatment after a mean of 2.66 weeks (range 1-4 weeks) and no recurrence after a mean total course of 11.33 weeks (range 5-20 weeks). Two cases (both PME) had partial responses to tIFN treatment and two cases (both UME) failed to respond. Of the four eyes that incompletely responded to tIFN (treatment range 6 weeks to 4 months), three were treated with peg-IFN a2a, which invariably led to complete and sustained ME resolution. Adverse effects from topical treatment were mild and consisted mainly of superficial irritation. Adverse effects of subcutaneous treatment included nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and leukopenia, though none limited treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical IFNa-2b appears safe and effective in isolation or in conjunction with topical steroids for the treatment of inflammatory macular edema (IME) in about half of patients in our small series. All partial and non-responders had complete disease resolution with systemic IFN. Topical IFN a2b should be considered in patients with refractory IME.

AAV-mediated gene therapies for glaucoma and uveitis: are we there yet?

Glaucoma and uveitis are non-vascular ocular diseases which are among the leading causes of blindness and visual loss. These conditions have distinct characteristics and mechanisms but share a multifactorial and complex nature, making their management challenging and burdensome for patients and clinicians. Furthermore, the lack of symptoms in the early stages of glaucoma and the diverse aetiology of uveitis hinder timely and accurate diagnoses, which are a cause of poor visual outcomes under both conditions. Although current treatment is effective in most cases, it is often associated with low patient adherence and adverse events, which directly impact the overall therapeutic success. Therefore, long-lasting alternatives with improved safety and efficacy are needed. Gene therapy, particularly utilising adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors, has emerged as a promising approach to address unmet needs in these diseases. Engineered capsids with enhanced tropism and lower immunogenicity have been proposed, along with constructs designed for targeted and controlled expression. Additionally, several pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of these conditions have been targeted with single or multigene expression cassettes, gene editing and silencing approaches. This review discusses strategies employed in AAV-based gene therapies for glaucoma and non-infectious uveitis and provides an overview of current progress and future directions.

SER recommendations for the treatment of uveitis

OBJECTIVE

To develop evidence-based expert-consensus recommendations for the management of non-infectious, non-neoplastic, non-demyelinating disease associated uveitis.

METHODS

Clinical research questions relevant to the objective of the document were identified, and reformulated into PICO format (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome) by a panel of experts selected based on their experience in the field. A systematic review of the available evidence was conducted, and evidence was graded according to GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria. Subsequently, recommendations were developed.

RESULTS

Three PICO questions were constructed referring to uveitis anterior, non-anterior and complicated with macular edema. A total of 19 recommendations were formulated, based on the evidence found and/or expert consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

Here we present the first official recommendations of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology for the treatment of non-infectious and non-demyelinating disease associated uveitis. They can be directly applied to the Spanish healthcare system as a tool for assistance and therapeutic homogenisation.

Intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide 0.19 mg (ILUVIEN®) in patients with non-infectious uveitis: real-world effectiveness and safety outcomes at 12 months

PURPOSE

This study assessed the effectiveness of the 0.19-mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant by multimodal measurements in patients with non-infectious uveitis (NIU) in a real-world setting in Spain.

METHODS

A prospective study of patients who had NIU including uveitic macular oedema (UME) with ≥ 12 months follow-up was done. Exclusion criteria include infectious uveitis and uncontrolled glaucoma or ocular hypertension requiring more than 2 medications. Effectiveness was assessed using a multicomponent outcome measure that included nine outcomes. Effectiveness was defined as all components being met at every timepoint. Secondary outcome measures were onset or progression of glaucoma and investigator-reported adverse events.

RESULTS

Twenty-six eyes from 22 patients were included, with 96.2% having an indication including UME. During the 12-month study, the FAc implant was effective in 15 (57.7%) eyes, reaching effectiveness as soon as 2 weeks post-implantation. Mean best-corrected visual acuity and mean central macular thickness (CMT) were significantly improved vs. baseline at all timepoints (all comparisons p < 0.01). During the 12-month study, inflammation markers (anterior chamber cells and vitreous haze) had also significantly declined. Factors predicting effectiveness at month 12 were systemic corticosteroid dose pre-FAc, higher immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) load at baseline and thicker retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) at baseline (all p < 0.05). Factors predicting failure were male gender, thinner RNFL at baseline and treatment ineffectiveness at 1 month (all p < 0.05). In parallel, corticosteroid and IMT use also declined significantly. No significant increase in IOP was detected.

CONCLUSION

The FAc implant is safe and effective at treating NIU over 12 months in a real-world setting in Spain.

Triamcinolone Acetonide Suprachoroidal Injectable Suspension for Uveitic Macular Edema: Integrated Analysis of Two Phase 3 Studies

INTRODUCTION

Macular edema, a common complication of uveitis, may result in vision loss. The aim of this analysis was to report integrated phase 3 trial data for triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension for suprachoroidal use (SCS-TA) in the treatment of macular edema secondary to noninfectious uveitis using strict inclusion criteria.

METHODS

This analysis included patients with central subfield thickness (CST) ≥ 300 µm and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≥ 5 and ≤ 70 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters at both screening and baseline who received ≥ 1 study treatment in either PEACHTREE (randomized, double-masked SCS-TA or sham control) or AZALEA (open-label SCS-TA). Patients received SCS-TA 4.0 mg (0.1 ml of 40 mg/ml) or control at baseline and week 12.

RESULTS

In the SCS-TA group (n = 95), 47.4% of patients gained ≥ 15 ETDRS letters from baseline to week 24 versus 16.7% of patients in the control group (n = 60; P < 0.001). Mean change in BCVA in the SCS-TA group was 9.6 letters at week 4 and 13.9 letters at week 24. CST also improved rapidly in the SCS-TA group (mean change: - 158.4 µm at week 4), with sustained reduction throughout the study (mean change: - 163.9 µm at week 24 versus - 19.3 µm in the control group; P < 0.001). No treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) were reported. Incidence of AEs pertaining to elevated intraocular pressure was 12.6% and 15.0% in the SCS-TA and control groups, respectively; incidence of cataract formation/worsening AEs was 7.4% and 6.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this integrated analysis utilizing strict inclusion criteria, SCS-TA was found effective in the treatment of patients with macular edema associated with noninfectious uveitis and was generally well tolerated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02595398, NCT03097315.

New insights into cataract surgery in patients with uveitis: A detailed review of the current literature

Cataract is a common cause of visual impairment in uveitic eyes. The management of cataract in patients with uveitis is often challenging due to pre-existing ocular comorbidities that may limit the visual outcomes. A meticulous preoperative ophthalmic evaluation is needed to assess the concomitant ocular pathologies with special emphasis on the status of the macula and optic nerve. Preoperative control of inflammation for at least 3 months before surgery is a key prognostic factor for successful surgical outcomes. Perioperative use of systemic and topical corticosteroids along with other immunosuppressive medications is crucial to decrease the risk of postoperative inflammation and cystoid macular edema (CME). Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation is the surgical option of choice for most patients with uveitic cataract. Uveitic cataracts are typically complicated by the presence of posterior synechiae and poor pupil dilation, necessitating manual stretching maneuvers or pupil expansion devices to dilate the pupil intraoperatively. Patients must be closely monitored for postoperative complications such as excessive postoperative inflammation, CME, raised intraocular pressure, hypotony, and other complications. Good outcomes can be achieved in uveitic eyes after cataract extraction with appropriate handling of perioperative inflammation.

Intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide 0.19 mg (Iluvien®) for the treatment of uveitic macular edema: 2-year follow-up of 20 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate intravitreal 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAi) (Iluvien®) for the treatment of chronic non-infectious uveitis with associated cystoid macular edema (CME).

METHODS

A retrospective review of medical reports from a single Danish tertiary centre including 20 patients (20 eyes), treated with 0.19 mg FAi for non-infectious uveitic CME. The primary endpoints were change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). The secondary endpoints were recurrence rate, change in systemic treatment, and intraocular pressure (IOP).

RESULTS

Mean follow-up of the 20 eyes was 2.3 ± 1.1 years. BCVA improved at 6 (p = 0.13), 12 (p = 0.05), 18 (p = 0.03), and 24 months and CRT decreased at 6 (p = 0.004), 12 (p = 0.006), 18, and 24 months after 0.19 mg FAi. Within 18 months after implantation, four of 14 patients (28.6%) relapsed. Three of five patients discontinued systemic corticosteroids within 4 months and one patient continued with reduced dose. Five of 10 patients receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) at time of implantation discontinued within 1 year. No patients started new systemic treatment. Eight eyes were treated with topical IOP-lowering medication at the time of implantation, of these two later underwent trabeculectomy. There were no complications associated with previous glaucoma surgery.

CONCLUSION

This long-term follow-up study showed that intravitreal treatment with 0.19 mg FAi should be considered in the treatment of chronic non-infectious uveitic CME in selected patients. This treatment is safe even in selected glaucoma patients and may offer reduction or cessation of local or systemic anti-inflammatory treatment.

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implants for Refractory Macular Edema in Eyes with Noninfectious Uveitis

Macular edema (ME) is a common cause of visual loss among eyes with uveitis, and its management can be challenging. Steroids are an effective treatment for ME, and intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implants provide sustained steroid release. The purpose of this study is to evaluate intravitreal DEX implant on refractory ME in eyes with noninfectious uveitis. A retrospective study including 52 eyes of 37 patients with refractory uveitic ME was conducted from January 2011 through August 2017 at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan. Patients’ demographic characteristics were collected. In addition, clinical information, including corrected visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and central retinal thickness (CRT) on optical coherence tomography, was recorded and analyzed. During the study period, affected eyes received a total of 110 intravitreal DEX implants (range, one to six in each eye). After the first DEX implant injection in all eyes, VA significantly improved at one and two months. CRT significantly decreased one month after a single DEX implant, and the effect lasted for six months and waned over time. Patients receiving multiple DEX implants still showed significant decreases in CRT one month after the first implant. Increases in IOP were noted one month after the DEX implant, but the IOP could be medically controlled. Intravitreal DEX implants can effectively treat refractory uveitic ME, improving both VA and CRT with an acceptable safety profile. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the effect of multiple implants and long-term outcomes.

Systemic contribution of inflammatory mediators to the severity of diabetic and uveitic macular edema

PURPOSE

To assess whether serum cytokine and growth factor levels are associated with diabetic macular edema (DME) and uveitic macular edema (UME) objective severity.

METHODS

Cross-sectional observational study of 81 patients (1 eye/patient) with DME (n=48) and UME (n=33). Macular edema (ME) was defined upon central macular thickness (CMT) ≥ 300 μm on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). Serum samples were obtained from peripheral blood and IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, MCP-1, TNF-α, and VEGF levels were determined by Luminex analysis. Main outcome measure was the correlation between mediators' levels and CMT and macular volume (MV) on OCT for ME cases.

RESULTS

In DME, IL-6 levels were found to significantly correlate with MV (r=0.324; p=0.028) whereas in UME, IL-8 was significantly associated with both CMT (r=0.401; p=0.021) and MV (r=0.391; p=0.024). IL-8 independently correlated with CMT (ß=177.2; p=0.033) and MV (ß=3.17; p=0.008) in UME multivariate model.

CONCLUSION

Peripheral blood IL-6 and IL-8 levels could play a role in the severity of DME and UME, respectively. IL-8 even seems to be independently associated with CMT and MV in UME cases. Such systemic implications could enforce DME and UME personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Definition of Uveitis Refractory to Treatment: A Systematic Review in the Absence of a Consensus

PURPOSE

To evaluate the different definition of refractoriness in uveitis in the literature.

METHODS

We systematically searched the literature in order to identify definitions of refractory noninfectious uveitis in adult patients. A search strategy in the databases of MEDLINE and Scopus was used to find articles published between January 2005 and October 2018.

RESULTS

Definitions of corticosteroids-refractoriness were related to two main concepts: persistence of inflammation despite the use of corticosteroid and recurrences above a dosage threshold. In terms of immunomodulatory therapy and biologic agents, we observed a great variety of definitions: persistence of inflammation, number of attacks, side effects or complications, symptoms, and best-corrected visual acuity.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this systematic review demonstrate the current lack of consensus on the definition for refractory uveitis, regardless of the treatment being used and revealed a new terminology based on a comprehensive and operational definition for each specific category of refractoriness.

Sustained Control from Recurring Non-Infectious Uveitic Macular Edema with 0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant - A Case Report

In January 2013, a 54-year-old pseudophakic woman was referred to the ocular inflammation clinic with a diagnosis of panuveitis, already on oral cyclosporine (100 mg/day) since 2010. She was a monocular patient, with the left eye eviscerated due to trauma and secondary endophthalmitis in 1995. She had experienced similar recurring episodes between 2010 and 2013. Examination revealed best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/200. The anterior segment revealed the presence of flare and absence of cells. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was 11 mmHg. Fundus examination revealed the presence of anterior vitreous organization, exuberant cystoid macular edema (CME) and peripheral Dalen-Fuchs nodules with no activity. Systemic workup showed no changes, and a presumptive diagnosis of sympathetic ophthalmia was made. Initial therapy included topical and systemic corticosteroids. Cyclosporine was replaced with methotrexate (20 mg/week) due to nephrotoxicity. There was marked improvement in anterior inflammation and vitreous organization, but the ME remained exuberant (central ring thickness of 0.7 mm). Over the subsequent 4 years of follow-up, the patient received two intravitreous injections of a dexamethasone extended-release implant (Ozurdex®), with normalization of macular thickness and improvement in visual acuity (VA), but ME recurred around 6 months post-injection. During this period, the patient also underwent three sub-tenon injections of triamcinolone, with marked improvement of ME, but ME recurred between 4 and 6 months after treatment. She was thus recommended for treatment with a fluocinolone extended-release implant (ILUVIEN®). Post-implantation (3-year follow-up), she had controlled anterior inflammation without ME (central macular thickness of 248 µm). This case suggests that sustained control of inflammation enables better control of ME, and benefits may persist even after cessation of the direct anti-inflammatory effect of the implant. FUNDING: Alimera Sciences Ltd funded the Rapid Service Fees.

Modelling Macular Edema: The Effect of IL-6 and IL-6R Blockade on Human Blood-Retinal Barrier Integrity In Vitro

Purpose

Macular edema (ME) is a leading cause of visual loss in a range of retinal diseases and despite the use of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents, its successful treatment remains a major clinical challenge. Based on the indirect clinical evidence that interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a key additional candidate mediator of ME, we interrogated the effect of IL-6 on blood–retinal barrier (BRB) integrity in vitro.

Methods

Human retinal pigment epithelial cell (ARPE-19) and human retinal microvascular endothelial cell (HRMEC) monolayers were used to mimic the outer and inner BRB, respectively. Their paracellular permeability was assessed by measuring the passive permeation of 40 kDa fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran across confluent cells in the presence of IL-6. Transendothelial/epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) then was measured and the distribution of the tight junction protein ZO-1 was assessed by immunofluorescence using confocal microscopy.

Results

Treatment with IL-6 for 48 hours significantly increased the diffusion rate of FITC-dextran, decreased TEER, and disrupted the distribution of ZO-1 in ARPE-19 cells, which constitutively express the IL-6 transmembrane receptor, and this was reversed with IL-6R blockade. In contrast, IL-6 did not affect the paracellular permeability, TEER, or ZO-1 distribution in HRMECs.

Conclusions

These in vitro data support the hypothesis that IL-6 reversibly disrupts the integrity of ARPE-19 cells, but it does not affect HRMECs.

Translational Relevance

IL-6 is a candidate therapeutic target in the treatment of outer BRB driven ME.

[Intravitreal methotrexate for treatment of uveitic cystoid macular edema]

We present the case of a patient who had several intravitreal methotrexate injections due to a uveitic macular edema and a known steroid response. An earlier off-label therapy with avastin had not been successful. After the intravitreal methotrexate injections a good resorption of the retinal fluid as well as a good intraocular pressure and a good visual acuity could be achieved. Visual acuity was limited by pre-existing glaucomatous optic nerve atrophy and a central scar in the cornea.

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant (OZURDEX®) for macular edema secondary to noninfectious uveitis: a review of the literature

Macular edema (ME) is the leading cause of visual loss in uveitis and may persist long after ocular inflammation has been resolved. Local steroids are the first line treatment for uveitis and uveitic ME. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant (OZURDEX®; Allergan, Inc., CA, USA) has been used to treat diabetic ME and ME secondary to retinal vein occlusion. Recent studies have also demonstrated that Ozurdex may be effective treatment for patients with persistent uveitic ME. In this review, we present the results of the real word studies concerning the efficacy and safety of Ozurdex for the treatment of uveitic ME.

Efficacy and safety of intravitreal anti-tumour necrosis factor drugs in adults with non-infectious uveitis - a systematic review

Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs have been extensively used in non-infectious uveitis (NIU), when corticosteroids or conventional immunosuppressive drugs cannot adequately control inflammation or intolerable side-effects occur. However, systemic anti-TNF therapies are also associated with a myriad of side-effects. Therefore, intravitreal administration of anti-TNF biologics has been employed to minimize patient morbidity and systemic adverse effects, while maintaining therapeutic effectivity. We undertook a systematic review to determine evidence of efficacy and safety of intravitreal administration of anti-TNF drugs in adults with NIU. We conducted this systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016041946). We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE, from inception to April 2017, as well as clinical trial registries and grey literature. The qualitative analysis included all studies of adult patients with a diagnosis of NIU and who received intravitreal anti-TNF drugs with a 4-week minimum follow-up. A total of 4840 references were considered for title and abstract screening. Seven full texts were screened, and five studies were considered for analysis. All studies were open-label, single-centre, prospective, non-randomized, interventional case series with a follow-up between 4 and 26 weeks, employing either adalimumab in two studies and infliximab in three. Three studies showed a treatment effect of anti-TNF intravitreal injections, while one study revealed short-term improvement and one study revealed no efficacy of anti-TNF intravitreal therapy. None of the studies reported ocular adverse effects but only two studies included electrophysiological assessment in the safety analysis and no study assessed systemic human anti-drug antibodies. The available evidence is not sufficiently robust to conclude about the clinical effectivity of intravitreal anti-TNF in NIU and so no recommendation can be made. In conclusion, intravitreal injection of anti-TNF antibodies remains a possible treatment option to be explored through robust clinical investigation.

Difluprednate for the Treatment of Uveitic Cystoid Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To describe clinical outcomes associated with the use of topical difluprednate in treating uveitic cystoid macular edema.

DESIGN

Retrospective, interventional case series.

METHODS

Setting: Medical record review in a tertiary care uveitis center.

PATIENT POPULATION

Fifty-eight patients (72 eyes) with uveitic cystoid macular edema (CME) treated with difluprednate 0.05% ophthalmic solution between June 2012 and May 2016.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Macular central subfield thickness (CST) determined by optical coherence tomography, improvement of CME (≥20% reduction in CST or resolution), and resolution of CME (CST ≤ 320 μm with no cysts) at 30 days after starting treatment. Outcomes were assessed up to 90 days.

RESULTS

CST on average decreased by 17% (95% CI: -33%, -7%) for eyes using only difluprednate (n = 43) and by 6% (95% CI: -17%, -2%) for eyes in patients using concomitant systemic immunosuppressive therapy (n = 29) at 30 days, a 12% difference between groups (95% CI: 2%, 21%, P = .02). Of eyes on difluprednate alone, 76% had improvement and 48% had resolution of CME. In patients using systemic therapy, 37% of eyes had improvement and 17% had resolution. Eight eyes (11%) had an intraocular pressure (IOP) > 24 mm Hg within the first 30 days. By 90 days, CME had improved in 69% of all eyes and resolved in 43% of eyes, with only 9 patients starting or increasing systemic immunosuppressive medications and 2 patients receiving periocular corticosteroid injections.

CONCLUSIONS

Difluprednate was associated with an improvement in uveitic CME and could be a reasonable first-line therapy. IOP should be closely monitored.

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant in the Treatment of Non-Infectious Uveitic Macular Edema

Macular Edema (ME) is a common complication, leading to severe vision loss in patients with Non-Infectious Uveitis (NIU). The treatment of uveitic ME is still very challenging for many ophthalmologists. Various agents, such as corticosteroids, anti-vascular endothelial growth factors, and immune-modulators, have been used for combatting uveitic ME. However, there is not enough evidence to support the efficacy of any of these agents. Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant (IDI) (Ozurdex; Allergan Inc, Irvine, CA) is a widely administered corticosteroid for the long-term management of uveitic ME in certain cases. Ophthalmic implant is made up of a biodegradable copolymer that contains glycolic acid and lactic acid. Recent studies have demonstrated that dexamethasone implant effectively improves uveitis-related ME. The authors suggest that this effect could be sustained for at least six months with close monitoring and re-treatment, as needed. The current study reviewed major clinical studies about IDI in eyes with NIU and briefly overviewed their results.

Primary (Month-6) Outcomes of the STOP-Uveitis Study: Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Tocilizumab in Patients With Noninfectious Uveitis

PURPOSE

To report the primary endpoint analyses of the safety and efficacy of 2 different doses of intravenous (IV) infusions of tocilizumab (TCZ), an IL-6 inhibitor, in eyes with noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial.

METHODS

STOP-Uveitis is a randomized, open-label safety, efficacy, and bioactivity clinical trial conducted at 5 clinical centers across the United States. The study evaluated the role of TCZ in patients with noninfectious uveitis (NIU). Thirty-seven patients with NIU were randomized into one of 2 treatment groups in a ratio of 1:1. Group 1 received IV infusions of 4 mg/kg TCZ and group 2 received IV infusions of 8 mg/kg TCZ. Infusions were given every 4 weeks in both groups until month 6 (primary endpoint). Primary outcome measure was incidence and severity of systemic and ocular adverse events through month 6. Secondary outcome measures included mean change in visual acuity (VA), vitreous haze (VH), and central macular thickness (CMT) at month 6.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients were randomized in the study. At month 6, 43.5% of patients who had the potential for a 2-step decrease in VH demonstrated a 2-step decrease (40% in Group 1 and 46.1% in Group 2). Mean change in CMT was -83.88 ± 136.1 μm at month 6 (-131.5 ± 41.56 μm in Group 1 and -38.92 ± 13.7 μm in Group 2). Mean change in VA was +8.22 ± 11.83 ETDRS letters at month 6 (10.9 ± 14.6 in Group 1 and 5.5 ± 7.8 in Group 2). Repeated infusions of TCZ were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated IV administrations of TCZ are well tolerated. TCZ (both 4 and 8 mg/kg) is effective in improving VA and reducing VH and CMT in eyes with noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis.

Clinical Features and Treatments of Syphilitic Uveitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical features and efficacies of treatments for syphilitic uveitis.

METHODS

PubMed was searched for studies of syphilitic uveitis published between January 1990 and October 2016. The clinical features were summarized and appraised. The pooled success rate was defined as an improved or maintained final visual acuity and was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies involving 670 patients were analyzed. The most common type of syphilitic uveitis was papillitis. The pooled success rate was 0.91 (95% CI 0.84-0.97) for antibacterial agents alone (15 studies, 286 patients); 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.98) for antibacterial agents and systemic corticosteroids combined (11 studies, 245 patients); and 0.91 (95% CI 0.80-0.98) for antibacterial agents, systemic corticosteroids, and other immunosuppressants combined (3 studies, 73 patients). Subgroup analyses revealed no correlations of the efficacy of antibacterial agent monotherapy with study characteristics, such as human immunodeficiency virus coinfection status.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed the efficacy of antibacterial agents for treating syphilitic uveitis. Coadministration of systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressants did not elicit further improvements in the clinical outcomes of antibacterial agents.

New Drugs and New Posterior Delivery Methods in CME

PURPOSE

To discuss the characteristics, indications and adverse events (AEs) of sustained-release corticosteroid devices for the treatment of cystoid macular edema (CME).

RECENT FINDINGS

Ozurdex® is approved for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion related-CME and noninfectious posterior uveitis (NIPU). It releases dexamethasone over a maximum period of 6 months making repeated intravitreal injections necessary for recurrent CME. Iluvien® releases fluocinolone for up to 36 months and is effective for the treatment of chronic DME. Retisert® (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) also releases fluocinolone, and is approved for chronic NIPU. Both Iluvien® and Retisert® are non-biodegradable devices and are highly associated with cataract and glaucoma.

SUMMARY

Long-acting intraocular corticosteroid formulations offer a more predictable drug-release profile and reduced dosing frequency in comparison to conventional formulations of the same compounds but the risk-benefit ratio must be taken into consideration previous to the implantation of those devices.