Ocular Graft-Versus-Host Disease Topic Review

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Route of Ocular Graft-Versus-Host Disease Progression That Drives a Vicious Cycle of Ocular Surface Inflammatory Damage

PURPOSE

To investigate the role of aggressive meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in the immune pathogenesis of ocular graft-vs-host disease (GVHD).

METHODS

In mice, an allogeneic GVHD model was established by transferring bone marrow (BM) and purified splenic T cells from C57BL/6J mice into irradiated C3-SW.H2b mice (BM+T). Control groups received BM only. Mice were scored clinically across the post-transplantation period. MGD severity was categorized using the degree of atrophy on harvested lids. Immune disease was analyzed using flow cytometry of tissues along with fluorescent tracking of BM cells onto the ocular surface. In humans, parameters from 57 patients with ocular GVHD presenting to the Duke Eye Center were retrospectively reviewed. MGD was categorized using the degree of atrophy on meibographs. Immune analysis was done using high-parameter flow cytometry on tear samples.

RESULTS

Compared with BM only, BM+T mice had higher systemic disease scores that correlated with tear fluid loss and eyelid edema. BM+T had higher immune cell infiltration in the ocular tissues and higher CD4+-cell cytokine expression in draining lymph nodes. BM+T mice with worse MGD scores had significantly worse corneal staining. In patients with ocular GVHD, 96% had other organs affected. Patients with ocular GVHD had abnormal parameters on dry eye testing, high matrix metalloproteinase-9 positivity (92%), and abundance of immune cells in tear samples. Ocular surface disease signs were worse in patients with higher MGD severity scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Ocular GVHD is driven by a systemic, T-cell-dependent process that causes meibomian gland damage and induces a robust form of ocular surface disease that correlates with MGD severity. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

Ocular Surface Inflammatory Disorders (OSID): A Collective of Systemic Etiologies Which Cause or Amplify Dry Eye Syndrome

The ocular surface inflammatory disorders (OSID) are caused by systemic disorders that conduct a persistent inflammatory reaction in the ocular adnexal connective tissues, such as the conjunctiva, lacrimal gland (LG) and meibomian glands (MGs), which cause an inflammatory dry eye. The etiologies of OSID are a subset of systemic pathologies such as graft versus host disease, Sjögren’s syndrome, allergies, cicatrizing conjunctivitis, and more. These cause a purely inflammatory dry eye syndrome as a consequence of the persistent surrounding inflammation in the adnexal tissues, which is distinct from the age-related dry eye disease. A limitation toward management of these conditions is the lack of available biomarkers that can detect presence of inflammation and quantify damage on the conjunctiva and LG, even though these are considered to be drivers of the inflammatory milieu. The OSID and dry eye syndrome are caused by different immune cells which are not exclusively limited to T cell lymphocytes, but rather derive from an orchestrated multicellular immunologic response. Recognition of this syndrome is crucial to direct research in a direction that clarifies the potential role of inflammation and its associated immune phenotype on the conjunctiva and adnexal ocular tissues in OSID and dry eye syndrome. On this paper, we review the basic and clinical research evidence for the existence of OSID with focus on the different immune cells involved, the target tissues and potential consequences and OSIDs diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

A multicenter report of the use of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) for the treatment of patients with ocular surface diseases in North America

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) eyedrops in the management of patients with ocular surface diseases in North America.

METHODS

Multicenter interventional case series of patients using PRGF eyedrops for the first time. A cohort of patients was analyzed for corneal staining score at initial visit and at 3 months of therapy with PRGF. Another cohort responded to a 10-item questionnaire that evaluated patients' satisfaction and safety, which included the symptom assessment questionnaire in dry eye (SANDE) score, after 6 months of PRGF treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients were analyzed. Of these, 102 were reviewed for corneal epitheliopathy and 99 patients responded to the questionnaire. The mean (±SD) age of the population was 63.7 ± 17 years and 72.5% were female. The clinical indications for PRGF usage were dry eye (60%), neurotrophic keratopathy (15%), dormant corneal ulcers (12%), limbal stem cell deficiency (10%), and cicatrizing conjunctivitis (4%). At the final visit, 74.3% of patients showed an improvement of their corneal staining. Those who had punctate epithelial erosions or epithelial defects were reduced from 76.5% to 47% and 23.5%-7.8% respectively (p < 0.0001). Symptoms, measured via SANDE score, significantly decreased from a median of 90 to 34.6 out of 100 points on follow-up (p < 0.0001). Only one patient (0.98%) complained of ocular burning sensation as a side effect.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicentric study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of the use of PRGF for treating signs and symptoms in patients with significant ocular surface diseases.