Robotic Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Quantification of the Impact of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Transoral Robotic Tongue Base Reduction

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in the base of the tongue (BOT) reduction has been shown to decrease the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and improve daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOU) can be employed to guide the surgery and prevent massive bleeding.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study with historical control.

METHODS

A cohort study to compare the outcomes between OSA patients who received TORS with and without IOU assistance.

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2019, this study enrolled 80 OSA patients who underwent TORS in BOT: 57 in the IOU(+) and 23 in IOU(-) groups. The TORS with IOU presented with shorter operative time, less blood loss, and greater excised BOT volume. The IOU(+) group had greater improvement in the AHI and subjective questionnaire evaluation. The excised volume of BOT was significantly associated with the change in AHI.

CONCLUSION

The IOU could improve outcomes in BOT reduction surgery without raising the risk of surgical complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 2021.

Comparison of fiber delivered CO2 laser and electrocautery in transoral robot assisted tongue base surgery

To compare intra-operative and post-operative effectiveness of fiber delivered CO₂ laser to monopolar electrocautery in robot assisted tongue base surgery. Prospective non-randomized clinical study. Twenty moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients, non-compliant with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), underwent Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) using the Da Vinci surgical robot in our University Hospital. OSA was treated with monopolar electrocautery in 10 patients, and with flexible CO₂ laser fiber in another 10 patients. The following parameters in the two sets are analyzed: Intraoperative bleeding that required cauterization, robot operating time, need for tracheotomy, postoperative self-limiting bleeding, length of hospitalization, duration until start of oral intake, pre-operative and post-operative minimum arterial oxygen saturation, pre-operative and post-operative Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, postoperative airway complication and postoperative pain. Mean follow-up was 12 months. None of the patients required tracheotomy and there were no intraoperative complications related to the use of the robot or the CO₂ laser. The use of CO₂ laser in TORS-assisted tongue base surgery resulted in less intraoperative bleeding that required cauterization, shorter robot operating time, shorter length of hospitalization, shorter duration until start of oral intake and less postoperative pain, when compared to electrocautery. Postoperative apnea-hypopnea index scores showed better efficacy of CO₂ laser than electrocautery. Comparison of postoperative airway complication rates and Epworth sleepiness scale scores were found to be statistically insignificant between the two groups. The use of CO₂ laser in robot assisted tongue base surgery has various intraoperative and post-operative advantages when compared to monopolar electrocautery.

Transoral robotic surgery for the management of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is a serious social health problem with significant implications on quality of life. Surgery for OSAHS has been criticized due to a lack of evidence to support its efficacy as well as the heterogeneous reporting of published outcomes. Moreover, the transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in the management of OSAHS is still in a relative infancy. Nevertheless, a review and meta-analysis of the published articles may be helpful. Among 195 articles, eight studies were included in the analysis. The mean of enrolled patients was 102.5 ± 107.9 (range 6-289) comprising a total of 820 cases. The mean age was 49 ± 3.27 and 285 patients underwent a previous sleep apnea surgery. The uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) was the most common palatal procedure. The mean rate of failure was 34.4 % (29.5-46.2 %). Complications occurred in 21.3 % of the patients included in the analysis, most of them were classified as minor. Transient dysphagia represented the most common complication (7.2 %) followed by bleeding (4.2 %). TORS for the treatment of OSAHS appears to be a promising and safe procedure for selected patients seeking an alternative to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), although further researches are urgently needed.

Clinical outcomes and complications associated with TORS for OSAHS: a benchmark for evaluating an emerging surgical technology in a targeted application for benign disease

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to create benchmarks for evaluating clinical outcomes and complications of transoral robotic surgeries (TORS) in a multicenter setting.

METHODS

243 TORS for obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) operations, carried out between 2008 and 2012, were analyzed at 7 different centers. The average hospitalization was 3.5 days. The mean patient age was 50 ± 12 years, the average BMI at the time of the procedure was 28.53 ± 3.87 and the majority of the patients were men (81%).

RESULTS

The mean preoperative and postoperative apnea/hypopnea index was 43.0 ± 22.6 and 17.9 ± 18.4, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean preoperative and postoperative Epworth Sleepiness Scale score was 12.34 ± 5.19 and 5.7 ± 3.49, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean pre- and postoperative lowest O2 saturation was 79.5 ± 8.77 and 83.9 ± 6.38%, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing TORS as part of a multilevel approach for the treatment of OSAHS have a reasonable expectation of success with minimal long-term morbidity.