Hearing Preservation Surgery for Vestibular Schwannomas

Cochlear Implantation after Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma: Initial Hearing Improvement and Longevity of Hearing Restoration

OBJECTIVE

The following research question was asked: In patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) that underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and cochlear implantation, were improvements in hearing function observed, and what was the cochlear implant (CI) failure rate of in these patients?

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/Medline, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Web of Science articles without restrictions on publication dates were searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria required that the article was a report, a series, or a retrospective review with individual case data available. Non-English articles were excluded. Inclusion criteria required that patients were with VS and underwent subsequent SRS and cochlear implantation. Patients receiving microsurgery or stereotactic radiotherapy on the ipsilateral ear were excluded from this study.

DATA EXTRACTION

Included studies were evaluated using full-text evaluation, and data on study characteristics (author names, gender), clinical data (syndromic information, SRS modality), hearing outcomes, and device failure were extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Means and averages were obtained for all continuous variables. Percentages were ascertained for all categorical variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients undergoing CI placement in VS treated with SRS achieved open-set speech perception (79.2%) or environmental sound awareness (6.8%). Twelve implants (20.3%) failed. Three patterns were associated with failure: 1) immediate-onset failure, 2) initial benefit with delayed failure, 3) poor local control with device explantation.

Hearing Preservation, Facial Nerve Dysfunction, and Tumor Control in Small Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Versus Microsurgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common type of tumor found in the cerebellopontine angle that accounts for 8% of all intracranial tumors. VS management is currently a challenge due to the unpredictable nature of the tumor. Few studies have compared the results and complications of various therapeutic approaches to VS. Therefore, as a treatment option for VSs smaller than 25 mm, we conducted a systematic review to compare Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) with conventional surgery.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted of four online databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect) using the following keyword search: ("vestibular schwannoma" OR "acoustic neuroma") AND ("gamma knife" OR "gamma knife radiosurgery") AND ("resection" OR "open surgery") AND ("hearing preservation" OR "facial nerve" OR "tumor growth").

RESULTS

We identified six retrospective cohort studies, five of which were of fair-to-good quality. All studies showed that GKRS was superior to surgery in hearing preservation. Two studies indicated that surgery was superior to GKRS in maintaining tumor control, one indicated that GKRS was superior, and the remainder indicated that there was no significant difference in maintaining tumor control between GKRS and microsurgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the three outcomes chosen for this review, GKRS was superior to microsurgery in small VS.

A Novel Imaging Grading Biomarker for Predicting Hearing Loss in Acoustic Neuromas

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate an imaging biomarker based on contrast enhanced T1-weighted and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine the hearing loss related to acoustic neuromas (AN).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 441 acoustic neuromas treated with microsurgery were included. The diagnostic and follow-up MRI and audiometry of these patients were compared.

RESULTS

We discovered a new MRI grading biomarker based on the percentage of tumor filling the inner auditory canal (TFIAC classification). The area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve was highest for TFIAC (0.675), followed by period of observation (0.615) and tumor size (0.6) (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients in TFIAC grade III (90.1%) experiencing hypoacusis prior to microsurgery was significantly higher than that in TFIAC grade I (72.7%, P = 0.037) and TFIAC grade IV patients had a higher rate of non-serviceable hearing compared to TFIAC grade III patients (P < 0.001). During the follow-up, TFIAC grade IV patients experienced a significantly higher rate of non-serviceable hearing than TFIAC grade III patients in all ANs (P < 0.001) and in serviceable hearing acoustic neuroma cases prior to surgery (TFIAC grade IV 55.4%, TFIAC grade III 69.0%, P = 0.045). The TFIAC grade IV patients experienced a significantly higher rate of facial nerve dysfunction than TFIAC grade III patients after surgery (grade IV 48.0%, grade III 26.1%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The TFIAC classification serves as a potential imaging biomarker for preoperative and postoperative hearing prediction in ANs, which may aid neurosurgeons in predicting hearing loss and selecting optimal surgical strategies.