Paralytic Lagophthalmos: Comprehensive Approach to Management

Periocular management in recent facial palsy patients treated with triple innervation technique: A retrospective case series

Facial paralysis decreases eye protection mechanisms leading to ocular problems up to corneal ulceration, and blindness. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of periocular procedures for recent facial paralysis. Medical records of patients with unilateral recent complete facial palsy who did periocular procedures at the Maxillofacial Surgery Department of San Paolo Hospital (Milan, Italy) between April 2018 and November 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. 26 patients were included. All patients were evaluated 4 months after surgery. The first group included 9 patients who underwent upper eye lid lipofilling and midface suspension with fascia lata graft; they had no ocular dryness symptoms and no need for eye protection measures in 33.3% of cases, significant reduction of ocular symptoms and need for eye protection measures in 66.6% of patient, 0-2 mm lagophthalmos in 66.6% and 3-4 mm lagophthalmos in 33.3%. The second group of 17 patients who underwent upper eyelid lipofilling, midface suspension with fascia lata graft and lateral tarsorrhaphy, had no ocular dryness symptoms and no need for eye protection measures in 17.6% of patient, significant reduction of ocular symptoms and need for eye protection measures in 76.4% of patient, 0-2 mm lagophthalmos in 70.5%, 3-4 mm lagophthalmos in 23.5% and one patient 5,8%had 8 mm lagophthalmos and persistent symptoms. No ocular complication, cosmetic complain or donner site morbidity were reported. Upper eyelid lipofilling, midface suspension with fascia lata graft and lateral tarsorrhaphy decrease ocular dryness symptoms and need for eye protection measures and improve lagophthalmos: the association of the reinnervation with these complementary techniques is therefore highly recommended in order to immediately protect the eye.

A Comprehensive Approach to Facial Reanimation: A Systematic Review

Purpose: To create a systematic overview of the available reconstructive techniques, facial nerve grading scales, physical evaluation, the reversibility of paralysis, non-reconstructive procedures and medical therapy, physical therapy, the psychological aspect of facial paralysis, and the prevention of facial nerve injury in order to elucidate the gaps in the knowledge and discuss potential research aims in this area. A further aim was to propose an algorithm simplifying the selection of reconstructive strategies, given the variety of available reconstructive methods and the abundance of factors influencing the selection. Methodological approach: A total of 2439 papers were retrieved from the Medline/Pubmed and Cochrane databases and Google Scholar. Additional research added 21 articles. The primary selection had no limitations regarding the publication date. We considered only papers written in English. Single-case reports were excluded. Screening for duplicates and their removal resulted in a total of 1980 articles. Subsequently, we excluded 778 articles due to the language and study design. The titles or abstracts of 1068 articles were screened, and 134 papers not meeting any exclusion criterion were obtained. After a full-text evaluation, we excluded 15 papers due to the lack of information on preoperative facial nerve function and the follow-up period. This led to the inclusion of 119 articles. Conclusions: A thorough clinical examination supported by advanced imaging modalities and electromyographic examination provides sufficient information to determine the cause of facial palsy. Considering the abundance of facial nerve grading scales, there is an evident need for clear guidelines regarding which scale is recommended, as well as when the postoperative evaluation should be carried out. Static procedures allow the restoral of facial symmetry at rest, whereas dynamic reanimation aims to restore facial movement. The modern approach to facial paralysis involves neurotization procedures (nerve transfers and cross-facial nerve grafts), muscle transpositions, and microsurgical free muscle transfers. Rehabilitation provides patients with the possibility of effectively controlling their symptoms and improving their facial function, even in cases of longstanding paresis. Considering the mental health problems and significant social impediments, more attention should be devoted to the role of psychological interventions. Given that each technique has its advantages and pitfalls, the selection of the treatment approach should be individualized in the case of each patient.

Augmented fascia temporalis sling for paralytic ectropion of the lower lid

PURPOSE

To report the effect of lower eyelid temporalis fascia sling combined with lateral canthoplasty and tarsorrhaphy for paralytic ectropion.

METHODS

Prospective case series of 10 patients with lower lid paralytic ectropion who were treated with lower eyelid fascia temporalis sling and lateral canthoplasty in addition to lateral tarsorrhaphy as a single-session procedure. Additional medial tarsorrhaphy was applied if the medial lower lid apposition was not adequate at the end of the procedures. Eyelid configuration and function were compared before and after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 65.8 ± 10 years. Mean marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD1) and MRD2 changed from 3.5 ± 1.4 and 8.6 ± 2.4 mm to 2.2 ± 1.4 and 5.3 ± 1.2 mm respectively (p = 0.001 and 0.006). Mean pre-operative lagophthalmos improved from 9.2 ± 4.9 to 3.4 ± 1.3 mm (p = 0.001). The mean follow-up was 28.9 ± 12.1 months. Three patients required additional medial tarsorrhaphy to address residual medial ectropion in the same session.

CONCLUSION

Combination of lower lid fascia temporalis sling, lateral canthoplasty and tarsorrhaphy as a single-session procedure can effectively improve the functional and aesthetic complications of paralytic ectropion.

Advances in facial nerve management in the head and neck cancer patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize best practices in facial nerve management for patients with head and neck cancer. In addition, we provide a review of recent literature on novel innovations and techniques in facial reanimation surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although recommended when tumor ablation surgery requires facial nerve sacrifice, facial reanimation procedures are not always performed. Concurrent dynamic facial reanimation with masseteric nerve transfers and cable graft repair can preserve native facial muscle function. Static suspension can provide facial support and immediate resting symmetry for patients. Eyelid weight and eye care should not be delayed, particularly in patients with trigeminal sensory deficits. Choice of neural source to innervate a gracilis-free muscle transfer for smile reanimation remains controversial; however, new techniques, such as dual innervation and multivector muscle transfer, may improve aesthetic and functional outcomes.

SUMMARY

Management of the facial nerve in the setting of head and neck cancer presents unique challenges. When possible, simultaneous oncologic resection and facial reanimation is ideal given the open surgical field, newly dissected and electrically stimulatable facial nerve branches, as well as minimizing postoperative healing time to prevent postsurgical treatment delays. A coordinated approach to facial nerve management with a multidisciplinary surgical team may help provide optimal, comprehensive care.