Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS)—Inside Out Anatomy and Exposure of the Operating Field

Topical Hemostatic Agents and Risk of Postoperative Hemorrhage After Transoral Robotic Surgery

Objective: Postoperative hemorrhage is the most common complication of transoral robotic surgery (TORS). The available research literature on topical hemostatic agents is deficient, despite their wide use. This study aims to evaluate the frequency and severity of hemorrhagic events after TORS procedures, performed with various topical hemostatic agents. Methods: This study was planned as a retrospective review to identify postoperative hemorrhage events in a database of all consecutive adult patients who required TORS from January 1, 2015, to April 1, 2020. All procedures were performed in one single institution by the same surgeon. In 2017, bovine gelatin matrix with thrombin (BgMT) was replaced by the porcine gelatin matrix with thrombin (PgMT) for all procedures. Postoperative hemorrhage was identified, along with hemostatic agents employed and other variables. Results: A cohort of 80 TORS procedures was obtained from a population of 78 individuals (60 males:18 females). BgMT was used in 28 procedures (35%), and five cases of postoperative hemorrhage were identified (17.8%), two of them were severe. PgMT was used in 52 procedures (65%) just observing one minor hemorrhagic event (1.92%). Although a significant difference was observed for total events between groups (P = .0183), there was no difference between major or severe hemorrhagic events (P = .1196). The overall rate of major and severe postoperative hemorrhage in the study population was 2.5% (n = 80). Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate topical hemostatic agents during TORS procedures. The PgMT group had a reduced incidence of total postoperative hemorrhages, although there was no difference in the number of severe hemorrhagic events. The overall simplicity and cost-effectiveness of these agents would support their use, particularly considering the potential risk associated with airway hemorrhage.

Advances in anatomical visualization on the head and neck through robotic surgery: A Brazilian perspective

Trans Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) is an emerging technique that provides several benefits over existing treatment regimens for head and neck cancer, including smaller incisions, less bleeding, shorter term inpatient hospitalization, and reduced intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. TORS allows a high resolution, magnified, three-dimensional wide view of the surgical field through an endoscope, avoiding large external cervical incisions and split-lip mandibulotomy, usually required in cancer surgeries of the oropharynx. The anatomy of the Oropharynx viewed from the perspective of the robotic surgeon is different from the anatomy taught in medical schools and residence/fellowship programs, which is more directly related to emergency procedures, open field surgery, and imaging exams. Developing an understanding of the anatomic relationships and landmarks from the "inside out" perspective is critical for any surgeon willing to perform surgical procedures through a transoral robotic approach. Here we address the major anatomic landmarks and structures in head and neck robotic surgeries and advantages and disadvantages of this approach. We emphasize the importance of imaging for successful outcomes, pointing out important anatomic landmarks considered as blind spots for surgeons in clinical and endoscopic evaluations. We also describe the Brazilian current scenario and future perspectives of Robotic Surgery in terms of training and access to this technique, including institutions that currently offer this service in the different regions of Brazil.