Airway Management in Cervical Spine Injury

Comparison of Three Airway Maneuvers of Jaw Thrust, Two-Handed E-C Technique With Head in Neutral Position, and Two-Handed E-C Technique With Head Fully Extended: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Crossover Study

Background Bag-mask ventilation is an essential life-saving skill. The E-C technique of mask holding is the most popular. In patients with suspected cervical injury, the jaw thrust maneuver is recommended instead of the E-C technique with head tilt-chin lift. Should jaw thrust fail to produce adequate chest rise, the operator is advised to switch to the E-C technique with the head tilt-chin lift maneuver with head extension as it is vital to move oxygen into the lungs. We hypothesized that the E-C clamp with the head in the neutral position without head tilt might permit adequate ventilation without producing excessive movement of the cervical spine, which in turn might translate as less strain to the cervical spine. Methods In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover study, we evaluated the relative efficacy of three airway maneuvers in opening the airway in anesthetized and paralyzed adults: jaw thrust, two-handed E-C technique with head in the neutral position, and two-handed E-C technique with head fully extended. The tidal volume generated during mechanical ventilation using these three techniques was considered as the primary outcome. Seventy-two subjects were recruited for this trial and all three techniques of mask holding were performed in each of these subjects in a sequence as dictated by a randomization table. Results The jaw thrust technique provided a mean tidal volume significantly higher than the two-handed E-C technique, with the head in the neutral position (p<0.001). Similarly, the two-handed E-C technique with the head fully extended provided a mean tidal volume significantly higher than the two-handed E-C technique with the head in neutral position (p<0.011). The mean tidal volume obtained with jaw thrust and two-handed E-C technique with head fully extended were comparable (p=0.78). Conclusion The two-handed E-C technique with the head fully extended, and the jaw thrust technique both produce good and comparable tidal volumes. The two-handed E-C technique with the head in a neutral position provides adequate though lower tidal volumes as compared to the other two techniques.

Evaluating prehospital care of patients with potential traumatic spinal cord injury: scoping review

PURPOSE

To gain insight into current research regarding prehospital care (PHC) in patients with potential traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) and to disseminate the findings to the research community.

METHODS

In March 2019, we performed a literature search of publications from January 1990 to March 2019 indexed in PubMed, gray literature including professional websites; and reference sections of selected articles for other relevant literature. This review was performed according to Arksey and O'Malley's framework.

RESULTS

There were 42 studies selected based on the inclusion criteria for review; 18 articles regarding immobilization; 12 articles regarding movement, positioning and transport; four for spinal clearance; three for airway protection; and two for the role of PHC providers. There were some articles that covered two topics: one article was regarding movement, positioning and transport and airway protection, and two were regarding spinal clearance and the role of PHC providers.

CONCLUSION

There was no uniform opinion about spinal immobilization of patients with suspected TSCI. The novel lateral trauma position and one of two High Arm IN Endangered Spine (HAINES) methods are preferred methods for unconscious patients. Controlled self-extrication for patients with stable hemodynamic status is recommended. Early and proper identifying of potential TSCI by PHC providers can significantly improve patients' outcomes and can result in avoiding unwanted spinal immobilization. Future prospective studies with a large sample size in real-life settings are needed to provide clear and evidence-based data in PHC of patients with suspected TSCI.

Minimalistic reconstruction of exposed skull in a complex craniovertebral polytrauma

Background:

In stable craniovertebral injuries complicated by polytrauma, rigorous spinal immobilization is essential for neuroprotection. Scalp and forehead reconstruction in these circumstances are safest when performed under local anesthesia, maintaining cervical immobilization.

Case Description:

A sizeable 10 × 6.5 cm forehead defect was reconstructed utilizing regenerative principles under local anesthesia and sedation in a 54-year-old woman. After adequate debridement of gangrenous soft tissues, exposed outer skull bones were trephined, forehead defect covered with a synthetic biomaterial, and the patient was discharged thereafter. Granulating neodermis regenerated within the biomaterial over the next 6 weeks. Weekly platelet-rich plasma injections along the wound margins facilitated wound regeneration. Dimensions reduced by two-thirds to 6.5 × 3.5 cm with wound regeneration and contraction, while granulating neodermis covered the remaining skull-bones. Split skin-grafting over the neodermis ensured satisfying long-term results, with similar color, texture, soft-tissue thickness, and sensation. Multiple occipitocervical, spinal, scapular, and rib fractures healed well with strict immobilization.

Conclusion:

Good long-term results were achieved with significantly reduced dangers, complications, hospitalization, and costs than traditional reconstructive flap surgeries. Minimalistic reconstruction utilizing tissue engineering and regenerative medicine principles appears beneficial for patients with grave spinal injuries.

Trauma Airway Management: Induction Agents, Rapid Versus Slower Sequence Intubations, and Special Considerations

Trauma patients who require intubation are at higher risk for aspiration, agitation/combativeness, distorted anatomy, hemodynamic instability, an unstable cervical spine, and complicated injuries. Although rapid-sequence intubation is the most common technique in trauma, slow-sequence intubation may reduce the risk for failed intubation and cardiovascular collapse. Providers often choose plans with which they are most comfortable. However, developing a flexible team-based approach, through recognition of complicating factors in trauma patients, improves airway management success.