1
|
Wu L, Yang L, Yang Y, Wu X, Zhang J. Ultrasound-guided versus conventional lung recruitment manoeuvres in thoracic surgery: a randomised controlled study. J Clin Monit Comput 2024; 38:731-739. [PMID: 38368302 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-024-01134-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
Lung recruitment manoeuvres (RMs) during mechanical ventilation may reduce atelectasis, however, the optimal recruitment strategy for patients undergoing thoracic surgery remains unknown. Our study was designed to investigate whether ultrasound-guided lung RMs is superior to conventional RMs in reducing perioperative atelectasis during thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation. We conducted a randomised controlled clinical trial from August 2022 to September 2022. Sixty patients scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) under general anaesthesia were enrolled. Subjects were randomly divided into the ultrasound-guided RMs group (manual inflation guided by lung ultrasound) or conventional RMs group (manual inflation with 30 cmH2O pressure). Lung ultrasound were performed at three predefined time points (1 min after anaesthetic induction; after RMs at the end of surgery; before discharge from postanesthesia care unit [PACU]). The primary outcome was lung ultrasound score before discharge from the PACU after extubation. In the early postoperative period, lung aeration deteriorated in both groups even after lung RMs. However, ultrasound-guided lung RMs had significantly lower lung ultrasound scores when compared with conventional RMs in bilateral lungs (2.0 [0.8-4.0] vs. 8.0 [3.8-10.3], P < 0.01) at the end of surgery, which remained before patients discharged from the PACU. Accordingly, the lower incidence of atelectasis was found in ultrasound-guided RMs group than in conventional RMs group (7% vs. 53%; P < 0.01) at the end of surgery. Ultrasound-guided RMs is superior to conventional RMs in improving lung aeration and reducing the incidence of lung atelectasis at early postoperative period in patients undergoing VATS. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (No. 220,825,810; date of approval: August 5, 2022) and registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2200062761).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong'An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Li Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong'An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yanyan Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong'An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xin Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong'An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong'An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 270, Dong'An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ferrando C, Carramiñana A, Piñeiro P, Mirabella L, Spadaro S, Librero J, Ramasco F, Scaramuzzo G, Cervantes O, Garutti I, Parera A, Argilaga M, Herranz G, Unzueta C, Vives M, Regi K, Costa-Reverte M, Sonsoles Leal M, Nieves-Alonso J, García E, Rodríguez-Pérez A, Fariña R, Cabrera S, Guerra E, Gallego-Ligorit L, Herrero-Izquierdo A, Vallés-Torres J, Ramos S, López-Herrera D, De La Matta M, Gokhan S, Kucur E, Mugarra A, Soro M, García L, Sastre JA, Aguirre P, Salazar CJ, Ramos MC, Morocho DR, Trespalacios R, Ezequiel-Fernández F, Lamanna A, Pia Cantatore L, Laforgia D, Bellas S, López C, Navarro-Ripoll R, Martínez S, Vallverdú J, Jacas A, Yepes-Temiño MJ, Belda FJ, Tusman G, Suárez-Sipmann F, Villar J. Individualised, perioperative open-lung ventilation strategy during one-lung ventilation (iPROVE-OLV): a multicentre, randomised, controlled clinical trial. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2024; 12:195-206. [PMID: 38065200 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(23)00346-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is uncertain whether individualisation of the perioperative open-lung approach (OLA) to ventilation reduces postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing lung resection. We compared a perioperative individualised OLA (iOLA) ventilation strategy with standard lung-protective ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation. METHODS This multicentre, randomised controlled trial enrolled patients scheduled for open or video-assisted thoracic surgery using one-lung ventilation in 25 participating hospitals in Spain, Italy, Turkey, Egypt, and Ecuador. Eligible adult patients (age ≥18 years) were randomly assigned to receive iOLA or standard lung-protective ventilation. Eligible patients (stratified by centre) were randomly assigned online by local principal investigators, with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Treatment with iOLA included an alveolar recruitment manoeuvre to 40 cm H2O of end-inspiratory pressure followed by individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titrated to best respiratory system compliance, and individualised postoperative respiratory support with high-flow oxygen therapy. Participants allocated to standard lung-protective ventilation received combined intraoperative 4 cm H2O of PEEP and postoperative conventional oxygen therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of severe postoperative pulmonary complications within the first 7 postoperative days, including atelectasis requiring bronchoscopy, severe respiratory failure, contralateral pneumothorax, early extubation failure (rescue with continuous positive airway pressure, non-invasive ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation, or reintubation), acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary infection, bronchopleural fistula, and pleural empyema. Due to trial setting, data obtained in the operating and postoperative rooms for routine monitoring were not blinded. At 24 h, data were acquired by an investigator blinded to group allocation. All analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03182062, and is complete. FINDINGS Between Sept 11, 2018, and June 14, 2022, we enrolled 1380 patients, of whom 1308 eligible patients (670 [434 male, 233 female, and three with missing data] assigned to iOLA and 638 [395 male, 237 female, and six with missing data] to standard lung-protective ventilation) were included in the final analysis. The proportion of patients with the composite outcome of severe postoperative pulmonary complications within the first 7 postoperative days was lower in the iOLA group compared with the standard lung-protective ventilation group (40 [6%] vs 97 [15%], relative risk 0·39 [95% CI 0·28 to 0·56]), with an absolute risk difference of -9·23 (95% CI -12·55 to -5·92). Recruitment manoeuvre-related adverse events were reported in five patients. INTERPRETATION Among patients subjected to lung resection under one-lung ventilation, iOLA was associated with a reduced risk of severe postoperative pulmonary complications when compared with conventional lung-protective ventilation. FUNDING Instituto de Salud Carlos III and the European Regional Development Funds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Ferrando
- Institut D'investigació August Pi I Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Albert Carramiñana
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Piñeiro
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lucia Mirabella
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Savino Spadaro
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Julián Librero
- UPNA, REDISSEC Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud, Navarrabiomed, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando Ramasco
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gaetano Scaramuzzo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Oriol Cervantes
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Germans Trías i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Garutti
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Parera
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Argilaga
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gracia Herranz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Unzueta
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marc Vives
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Kevin Regi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Marta Costa-Reverte
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jesús Nieves-Alonso
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther García
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aurelio Rodríguez-Pérez
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrín, Gran Canarias, Spain
| | - Roberto Fariña
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrín, Gran Canarias, Spain
| | - Sergio Cabrera
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrín, Gran Canarias, Spain
| | - Elisabeth Guerra
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrín, Gran Canarias, Spain
| | - Lucia Gallego-Ligorit
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón IIS Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Alba Herrero-Izquierdo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón IIS Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - J Vallés-Torres
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón IIS Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Silvia Ramos
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel López-Herrera
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Manuel De La Matta
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Sertcakacilar Gokhan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Bakirkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Evrim Kucur
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Bakirkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ana Mugarra
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marina Soro
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Laura García
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - José Alfonso Sastre
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Pilar Aguirre
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Spain
| | - Claudia Jimena Salazar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Ntra Sra de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - María Carolina Ramos
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Ntra Sra de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | | | - Ramón Trespalacios
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Félix Ezequiel-Fernández
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Angella Lamanna
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Leonarda Pia Cantatore
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Donato Laforgia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Soledad Bellas
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos López
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Ricard Navarro-Ripoll
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Samira Martínez
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jordi Vallverdú
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Adriana Jacas
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María José Yepes-Temiño
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Francisco Javier Belda
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Gerardo Tusman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Privado de Comunidad, Mar de Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Fernando Suárez-Sipmann
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias CIBERES, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Hedenstierna Laboratory, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jesús Villar
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Dr Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute for Medical Science, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sagiroglu G, Baysal A, Karamustafaoglu YA. The use of oxygen reserve index in one-lung ventilation and its impact on peripheral oxygen saturation, perfusion index and, pleth variability index. BMC Anesthesiol 2021; 21:319. [PMID: 34930139 PMCID: PMC8685494 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01539-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Our goal is to investigate the use of the oxygen reserve index (ORi) to detect hypoxemia and its relation with parameters such as; peripheral oxygen saturation, perfusion index (PI), and pleth variability index (PVI) during one-lung ventilation (OLV). Methods Fifty patients undergoing general anesthesia and OLV for elective thoracic surgeries were enrolled in an observational cohort study in a tertiary care teaching hospital. All patients required OLV after a left-sided double-lumen tube insertion during intubation. The definition of hypoxemia during OLV is a peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) value of less than 95%, while the inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) is higher than 50% on a pulse oximetry device. ORi, pulse oximetry, PI, and PVI values were measured continuously. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and accuracy were calculated for ORi values equal to zero in different time points during surgery to predict hypoxemia. At Clinicaltrials.gov registry, the Registration ID is NCT05050552. Results Hypoxemia was observed in 19 patients (38%). The accuracy for predicting hypoxemia during anesthesia induction at ORi value equals zero at 5 min after intubation in the supine position (DS5) showed a sensitivity of 92.3% (95% CI 84.9–99.6), specificity of 81.1% (95% CI 70.2–91.9), and an accuracy of 84.0% (95% CI 73.8–94.2). For predicting hypoxemia, ORi equals zero show good sensitivity, specificity, and statistical accuracy values for time points of DS5 until OLV30 where the sensitivity of 43.8%, specificity of 64%, and an accuracy of 56.1% were recorded. ORi and SpO2 correlation was found at DS5, 5 min after lateral position with two-lung ventilation (DL5) and at 10 min after OLV (OLV10) (p = 0.044, p = 0.039, p = 0.011, respectively). Time-dependent correlations also showed that; at a time point of DS5, ORi has a significant negative correlation with PI whereas, no correlations with PVI were noted. Conclusions During the use of OLV for thoracic surgeries, from 5 min after intubation (DS5) up to 30 min after the start of OLV, ORi provides valuable information in predicting hypoxemia defined as SpO2 less than 95% on pulse oximeter at FiO2 higher than 50%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonul Sagiroglu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Ayse Baysal
- Pendik District Hospital, Clinic of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Pendik, 34980, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | | |
Collapse
|