Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring: Current Devices, New Technological Advances, and Use in Clinical Practice

Comparison of onset of neuromuscular blockade with electromyographic and acceleromyographic monitoring: a prospective clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Reliable devices that quantitatively monitor the level of neuromuscular blockade after neuromuscular blocking agents' administration are crucial. Electromyography and acceleromyography are two monitoring modalities commonly used in clinical practice. The primary outcome of this study is to compare the onset of neuromuscular blockade, defined as a Train-Of-Four Count (TOFC) equal to 0, as measured by an electromyography-based device (TetraGraph) and an acceleromyography-based device (TOFscan). The secondary outcome was to compare intubating conditions when one of these two devices reached a TOFC equal to 0.

METHODS

One hundred adult patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring neuromuscular blockade were enrolled. Prior to induction of anesthesia, TetraGraph electrodes were placed over the forearm of patients' dominant/non-dominant hand based on randomization and TOFscan electrodes placed on the contralateral forearm. Intraoperative neuromuscular blocking agent dose was standardized to 0.5 mg.kg-1 of rocuronium. After baseline values were obtained, objective measurements were recorded every 20 seconds and intubation was performed using video laryngoscopy once either device displayed a TOFC = 0. The anesthesia provider was then surveyed about intubating conditions.

RESULTS

Baseline TetraGraph train-of-four ratios were higher than those obtained with TOFscan (Median: 1.02 [0.88, 1.20] vs. 1.00 [0.64, 1.01], respectively, p < 0.001). The time to reach a TOFC = 0 was significantly longer when measured with TetraGraph compared to TOFscan (Median: 160 [40, 900] vs. 120 [60, 300] seconds, respectively, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in intubating conditions when either device was used to determine the timing of endotracheal intubation.

CONCLUSIONS

The onset of neuromuscular blockade was longer when measured with TetraGraph than TOFscan, and a train-of-four count of zero in either device was a useful indicator for adequate intubating conditions.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY

URL NCT05120999, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05120999.

The impact of electrosurgical devices on electromyography-based neuromuscular monitoring during abdominal laparotomy: a case series

The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of electrosurgical devices on neuromuscular monitoring using an electromyography (EMG)-based neuromuscular monitor during abdominal laparotomy. Seventeen women (aged 32-64 years) undergoing gynecological laparotomy under total intravenous general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. A TetraGraph™ was placed to stimulate the ulnar nerve and to monitor the abductor digiti minimi muscle. After device calibration, train-of-four (TOF) measurements were repeated at intervals of 20 s. Rocuronium 0.6 to 0.9 mg/kg was administered for induction, and additional doses of 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg were administered to maintain TOF counts ≤ 2 during the surgery. The primary outcome of the study was the ratio of measurement failure. The secondary outcomes of the study were the total number of measurements, the number of measurement failures, and the most extended consecutive number of measurement failures. The data are expressed as median (range). Of the 3091 (1480-8134) measurements, the number of measurement failures was 94 (60-200), resulting in a failure ratio of 3.5% (1.4-6.5%). The most extended consecutive number of measurement failures was 8 (4-13). All attending anesthesiologists were able to maintain and reverse neuromuscular blocks under EMG guidance. This prospective observational study demonstrated that the use of EMG-based neuromuscular monitoring does not seem to be heavily affected by electrical interference during lower abdominal laparotomic surgery. Trial registration This trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network under registration number UMIN000048138 (registration date; June 23, 2022).