Diaphragm Pacers in Pediatric Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: a Review and Implications for Inpatient Rehabilitation

Co-activation of the diaphragm and external intercostal muscles through an adaptive closed-loop respiratory pacing controller

Introduction

Respiratory pacing is a promising alternative to traditional mechanical ventilation that has been shown to significantly increase the survival and quality of life after the neural control of the respiratory system has been compromised. However, current pacing approaches to achieve adequate ventilation tend to target only the diaphragm without pacing external intercostal muscles that are also activated during normal inspiration. Furthermore, the pacing paradigms do not allow for intermittent sighing, which carries an important physiological role. We hypothesized that simultaneous activation of the diaphragm and external intercostal muscles would improve the efficiency of respiratory pacing compared to diaphragm stimulation alone.

Materials and Methods

We expanded an adaptive, closed-loop diaphragm pacing paradigm we had previously developed to include external intercostal muscle activation and sigh generation. We then investigated, using a rodent model for respiratory pacing, if simultaneous activation would delay the fatigability of the diaphragm during pacing and allow induction of appropriate sigh-like behavior in spontaneously breathing un-injured anesthetized rats (n = 8) with pacing electrodes implanted bilaterally in the diaphragm and external intercostal muscles, between 2nd and 3rd intercostal spaces.

Results

With this novel pacing system, we show that fatigability of the diaphragm was lower when using combined muscle stimulation than diaphragm stimulation alone (p = 0.014) and that combined muscle stimulation was able to induce sighs with significantly higher tidal volumes compared to diaphragm stimulation alone (p = 0.014).

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate that simultaneous activation of the inspiratory muscles could be used as a suitable strategy to delay stimulation-induced diaphragmatic fatigue and to induce a sigh-like behavior that could improve respiratory health.

Diaphragm Pacing: A Safety, Appropriateness, Financial Neutrality, and Efficacy Analysis of Treating Chronic Respiratory Insufficiency

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and applicability of treating chronic respiratory insufficiency with diaphragm pacing relative to mechanical ventilation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review and analysis were conducted using the safety, appropriateness, financial neutrality, and efficacy principles.

RESULTS

Although mechanical ventilation is clearly indicated in acute respiratory failure, diaphragm pacing improves life expectancy, increases quality of life, and reduces complications in patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency.

CONCLUSION

Diaphragm pacing should be given more consideration in appropriately selected patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency.

Diaphragm Pacing in Spinal Cord Injury Can Significantly Decrease Mechanical Ventilation in Multicenter Prospective Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) can lead to dependence on mechanical ventilation (MV) with significant morbidity and mortality. The diaphragm pacing system (DPS) was developed as an alternative to MV.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective single arm study of DPS in MV dependent patients with high SCI and intact phrenic nerves. Following device acclimation, pacing effectiveness to provide ventilation was evaluated. The primary endpoint was the number who could use DPS to breathe for four continuous hours without MV. Secondary endpoints included the number of patients that could use DPS 24 hours/day free of MV and the ability of DPS to maintain clinically acceptable tidal volume (Vt). In addition, we conducted a meta-analysis that included the prospective study along with data from four recently published studies to evaluate DPS hourly use.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were implanted in the prospective study. Most were male (77.4%) with a median time from injury to treatment of 28.3 (IQR 12.1, 83.3) months. Four- and 24-hour use occurred in 96.2% (95%CI - 87.0%, 99.5%) and 58.5% (95% CI - 44.1%, 74.9%), respectively. Four and 24-hour results in the meta-analysis cohort (n=196) exhibited similar results 92.2% (95% CI - 82.6%,96.7%) and 52.7% (95% CI - 36.2%,68.6%) using DPS for four and 24 hours, respectively. DPS use significantly exceeded the calculated basal tidal volume requirements by a mean of 48.4% (95% CI - 37.0, 59.9%; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that in most ventilator-dependent patients, diaphragm pacing can effectively supplement or completely replace the need for MV and support basal metabolic requirements.

A Review of Different Stimulation Methods for Functional Reconstruction and Comparison of Respiratory Function after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Background

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a common severe trauma in clinic, hundreds of thousands of people suffer from which every year in the world. In terms of injury location, cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) has the greatest impact. After cervical spinal cord injury, the lack of innervated muscles is not enough to provide ventilation and other activities to complete the respiratory function. In addition to the decline of respiratory capacity, respiratory complications also have a serious impact on the life of patients. The most commonly used assisted breathing and cough equipment is the ventilator, but in recent years, the functional electrical stimulation method is being used gradually and widely.

Methods

About hundred related academic papers are cited for data analysis. They all have the following characteristics: (1) basic conditions of patients were reported, (2) patients had received nerve or muscle stimulation and the basic parameters, and (3) the results were evaluated based on some indicators.

Results

The papers mentioned above are classified as four kinds of stimulation methods: muscle electric/magnetic stimulation, spinal dural electric stimulation, intraspinal microstimulation, and infrared light stimulation. This paper describes the stimulation principle and application experiment. Finally, this paper will compare the indexes and effects of typical stimulation methods, as well as the two auxiliary methods: training and operation.

Conclusions

Although there is limited evidence for the treatment of respiratory failure by nerve or muscle stimulation after cervical spinal cord injury, the two techniques seem to be safe and effective. At the same time, light stimulation is gradually applied to clinical medicine with its strong advantages and becomes the development trend of nerve stimulation in the future.

Early use of an implantable diaphragm pacing stimulator for a child with severe acute flaccid myelitis-a case report

Introduction

Acute Flaccid Myelitis (AFM) is a recently recognized, polio-like illness of children that can be functionally devastating. Severe cases can lead to ventilatory failure. Incomplete phrenic nerve injuries in other populations has been shown to respond to diaphragmatic stimulation. We therefore proposed an early assessment for incomplete denervation by laparoscopic direct stimulation of the diaphragm and placement of a diaphragmatic pacing system to enhance diaphragm function.

Case presentation

A 3 year-old girl presented with AFM with clinically and electrodiagnostically severe involvement of all four limbs and muscles of respiration. Direct stimulation of the diaphragm demonstrated contraction and a diaphragmatic stimulator was placed at 3 weeks post presentation. The patient was immediately able to tolerate short bouts of reduced ventilation settings. Electromyography via the pacing wires demonstrated intact motor units consistent with partial denervation/reinnervation in the left hemidiaphragm, and no motor units in the right hemidiaphragm. At three months, she tolerated 6 h of pacing on pressure support setting. At 5 months she demonstrated larger tidal volumes with active pacing than without.

Discussion

In our experience, AFM patients who require chronic ventilator support are rarely able to be weaned. Despite clinical and surface electrodiagnostic evidence of complete phrenic nerve involvement, the patient's diaphragm responded to direct stimulation. The patient preferred pacing over non-pacing times and showed improved ventilatory ability with pacing as opposed to without, though remains ventilator-dependent. These findings support augmentation of diaphragm function and possible enhanced recovery of spontaneous function.