Cervical Ultrasound Utilization in Selective Cervical Nerve Root Injection for the Treatment of Cervical Radicular Pain: a Review

Efficacy and Accuracy of Ultrasound Guided Injections in the Treatment of Cervical Facet Joint Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: Cervical facet joint syndrome (CFJS) is a frequent cause of neck pain and motor disability. Among the available therapies for CFJS, ultrasound (US)-guided injections are becoming more and more widespread, but the evidence about their accuracy and effectiveness is still debated in the scientific literature. The aim of this systematic review is to assess efficacy, accuracy and feasibility of US-guided cervical facet injections for the related chronic neck pain treatment. Methods: This review was conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis 2020 (PRISMA) statement guidelines. The scientific articles were identified through the PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library databases. Qualitative assessment of the selected studies was carried out using the modified Oxford quality scoring system. Nine studies with a total of 958 patients were included in this review. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO 2024 (n°CRD42024512214). Results: The results of this review suggest that the US-guided cervical facet injection for CFJS treatment is an effective technique in terms of accuracy (using the lateral technique it ranges from 92% to 98%), and efficiency (it grants pain relief with a decrease in the procedure time and fewer needle passes in comparison with the X-ray-guided technique, which also involves radiation exposure). Conclusions: US-guided injections are a safe and effective method to treat this musculoskeletal disease, granting a high functional recovery and long-lasting pain relief, net of the used drugs. However, these procedures are strictly operator-dependent and require important training to acquire good expertise.

The Anatomy, Technique, Safety, and Efficacy of Image-Guided Epidural Access

Epidural steroid injections have demonstrable efficacy and safety in treatment of radicular pain syndromes; transforaminal access has greater evidence of efficacy than interlaminar approaches. The interventionalist must understand epidural and foraminal anatomy and imaging to insure delivery of medication to the target, the ventral epidural space at the site of neural compression. This obligates pre-procedural planning. When performed with appropriate risk mitigation strategies, epidural injections by either access are safe. For transforaminal access, the use of dexamethasone as the injectate, and infraneural approaches, provides safety advantages.

Ultrasonographic guidance for perineural injections of the cervical spinal nerves in horses

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonographic guidance for injection near the ventral rami of the cervical spinal nerves (VRCSN).

STUDY DESIGN

Ex vivo study.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Ten cadavers (n = 40 injections).

METHODS

Left and right VRCSN at C4/5 and C5/6 were infiltrated at the intervertebral foramen (IVF) under ultrasonographic guidance. A vertically orientated 3.5-MHz curvilinear probe was used to identify the craniocaudal midpoint of the articular process joint (APJ). The probe was moved ventrally until the IVF was identified. An 18-gauge 15-cm-long spinal needle was aimed immediately below the ventral margin of the cranial articular process, where 1 mL of latex was injected. Cadavers were dissected, and the location of the latex was recorded relative to the ventral ramus, the spinal cord, and the vertebral artery.

RESULTS

Direct infiltration of the ventral ramus occurred in 73% (29/40) of injections; 15% (6/40) of injections were < 0.5 cm from the ventral ramus, and 13% (5/40) of injections were > 0.5 cm (maximum 1.5 cm). Latex was located at a mean of 2.4 cm (range, 0.8-4) from the spinal cord and 0.9 cm (range, 0-1.5) from the vertebral artery.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonographic guidance of perineural injections of the caudal VRCSN was repeatable and accurate, with 88% of injections located within 0.5 cm of the ventral ramus. Iatrogenic damage was limited to one penetration into the vertebral artery.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Ultrasonographic guidance of perineural injections of the caudal VRCSN may be considered by operators experienced in cervical APJ scanning in horses with suspected cervical spinal nerve compression.