1
|
Hysong AA, Melamed E, Delarosa MR, Daley DN, Loeffler BJ, Gaston RG. Feasibility of Nerve Transfer to Palmaris Longus in Forearm-Level TMR: Anatomic Study and Clinical Series. Hand (N Y) 2024; 19:562-567. [PMID: 36510365 PMCID: PMC11141416 DOI: 10.1177/15589447221137615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted muscle re-innervation (TMR) is increasingly being used for treatment of postamputation pain and myoelectric prosthesis (MYP) control. Palmaris longus (PL) is a potential target following transradial amputation. The purpose of this study was to determine the branching pattern of the median nerve (MN) as it pertains to the PL motor branch entry point (MEP) and to present clinical results of patients who had PL used as a target. METHODS Eight cadaveric arms were dissected and branching patterns of the MN were documented. Additionally, we reviewed adult patients from a prospectively collected database who underwent TMR using PL. We recorded patient-reported outcomes and signal strength generated by the PL. RESULTS The average distance from the medial epicondyle to PL MEP was 53 mm. All palmaris motor branches passed through a chiasm within the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle belly, which was a mean of 18 mm away from the MN proper. Patients with long-term follow-up reported an average Pain visual analog scale of 3.3 and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand of 46.2. All but one patient were using an MYP, and all generated at least 10 mV of signal from the PL, which is ample signal for surface electrode detection and MYP control. There were no postoperative neuromas and only one patient-reported postoperative phantom limb pain. CONCLUSIONS Palmaris longus is a suitable target for TMR. Our objective measurements and anatomic relationships may help surgeons consistently find the PL's motor branch. Our series of patients reveal sufficient signal strength and acceptable clinical outcomes following TMR using the PL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Dane N. Daley
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sun H, He C, Vujaklija I. Design trends in actuated lower-limb prosthetic systems: a narrative review. Expert Rev Med Devices 2023; 20:1157-1172. [PMID: 37925668 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2279999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Actuated lower limb prostheses, including powered (active) and semi-active (quasi-passive) joints, are endowed with controllable power and/or impedance, which can be advantageous to limb impairment individuals by improving locomotion mechanics and reducing the overall metabolic cost of ambulation. However, an increasing number of commercial and research-focused options have made navigating this field a daunting task for users, researchers, clinicians, and professionals. AREAS COVERED The present paper provides an overview of the latest trends and developments in the field of actuated lower-limb prostheses and corresponding technologies. Following a gentle summary of essential gait features, we introduce and compare various actuated prosthetic solutions in academia and the market designed to provide assistance at different levels of impairments. Correspondingly, we offer insights into the latest developments of sockets and suspension systems, before finally discussing the established and emerging trends in surgical approaches aimed at improving prosthetic experience through enhanced physical and neural interfaces. EXPERT OPINION The ongoing challenges and future research opportunities in the field are summarized for exploring potential avenues for development of next generation of actuated lower limb prostheses. In our opinions, a closer multidisciplinary integration can be found in the field of actuated lower-limb prostheses in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haoran Sun
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, P.R. China
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
| | - Chaoming He
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, P.R. China
| | - Ivan Vujaklija
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pettersen E, Sassu P, Reinholdt C, Dahm P, Rolfson O, Björkman A, Innocenti M, Pedrini FA, Breyer JM, Roche A, Hart A, Harrington L, Ladak A, Power H, Hebert J, Ortiz-Catalan M. Surgical treatments for postamputation pain: study protocol for an international, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:304. [PMID: 37131180 PMCID: PMC10155377 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07286-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Painful conditions such as residual limb pain (RLP) and phantom limb pain (PLP) can manifest after amputation. The mechanisms underlying such postamputation pains are diverse and should be addressed accordingly. Different surgical treatment methods have shown potential for alleviating RLP due to neuroma formation - commonly known as neuroma pain - and to a lesser degree PLP. Two reconstructive surgical interventions, namely targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI), are gaining popularity in postamputation pain treatment with promising results. However, these two methods have not been directly compared in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Here, we present a study protocol for an international, double-blind, RCT to assess the effectiveness of TMR, RPNI, and a non-reconstructive procedure called neuroma transposition (active control) in alleviating RLP, neuroma pain, and PLP. METHODS One hundred ten upper and lower limb amputees suffering from RLP will be recruited and assigned randomly to one of the surgical interventions (TMR, RPNI, or neuroma transposition) in an equal allocation ratio. Complete evaluations will be performed during a baseline period prior to the surgical intervention, and follow-ups will be conducted in short term (1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery) and in long term (2 and 4 years post-surgery). After the 12-month follow-up, the study will be unblinded for the evaluator and the participants. If the participant is unsatisfied with the outcome of the treatment at that time, further treatment including one of the other procedures will be discussed in consultation with the clinical investigator at that site. DISCUSSION A double-blind RCT is necessary for the establishment of evidence-based procedures, hence the motivation for this work. In addition, studies on pain are challenging due to the subjectivity of the experience and the lack of objective evaluation methods. Here, we mitigate this problem by including different pain evaluation methods known to have clinical relevance. We plan to analyse the primary variable, mean change in NRS (0-10) between baseline and the 12-month follow-up, using the intention-to-treat (ITT) approach to minimise bias and keep the advantage of randomisation. The secondary outcomes will be analysed on both ITT and per-protocol (PP). An adherence protocol (PP population) analysis will be used for estimating a more realistic effect of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClincialTrials.gov NCT05009394.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Pettersen
- Center for Bionics and Pain Research, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Center for Advanced Reconstruction of Extremities, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Paolo Sassu
- Center for Bionics and Pain Research, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Orthoplastic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carina Reinholdt
- Center for Advanced Reconstruction of Extremities, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Hand Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Peter Dahm
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ola Rolfson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anders Björkman
- Department of Hand Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marco Innocenti
- Department of Orthoplastic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Orthoplastic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Alice Pedrini
- Center for Bionics and Pain Research, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Orthoplastic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Orthoplastic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Aidan Roche
- College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Andrew Hart
- Canniesburn Plastic Surgery Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G40SF UK
- College of Medicine, Veterinary & Life Sciences, The University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ UK
| | - Lorraine Harrington
- Department of Anaesthesia, St John’s Hospital at Howden, NHS Lothian, Livingston, UK
| | - Adil Ladak
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada
| | - Hollie Power
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada
| | | | - Max Ortiz-Catalan
- Center for Bionics and Pain Research, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Bionics Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Valero EG, Acosta Acosta CDP, Vargas Useche W, Orozco Sandoval L, Seija-Butnaru D, Sánchez-Flórez JC, Linares Escobar R, Amaya S. Perioperative Management of Painful Phantom Limb Syndrome: A Narrative Review and Clinical Management Proposal. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 2023:1-15. [PMID: 36929710 DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2023.2187005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Objective: Painful Phantom Limb Syndrome (PPLS) occurs in 50 to 80% of patients undergoing amputation, having a great impact on quality of life, productivity and psychosocial sphere. The objective of this review is to summarize the pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies, surgical optimization, and provide a multidisciplinary approach aimed at reducing the incidence of chronic pain associated with PPLS in patients undergoing limb amputation.Methods: A narrative review was carried out using Medline, Pubmed, Proquest, LILACS and Cochrane, searching for articles between 2000 and 2021. Articles describing the epidemiology, pathophysiological considerations, and current treatments were selected after a screening process.Results: A multidisciplinary and multimodal approach is required in PPLS, and should include the use of regional techniques, and adjuvants such as NSAIDs, ketamine, lidocaine and gabapentinoids. In addition, an evaluation and continuous management of risk factors for chronic pain in conjunction with the surgical team is necessary.Conclusion: The current literature does not support that a single technique is effective in the prevention of PPLS. However, adequate acute pain control, rehabilitation and early restoration of the body scheme under a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach have shown benefit in the acute setting.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
When nerves are damaged by trauma or disease, they are still capable of firing off electrical command signals that originate from the brain. Furthermore, those damaged nerves have an innate ability to partially regenerate, so they can heal from trauma and even reinnervate new muscle targets. For an amputee who has his/her damaged nerves surgically reconstructed, the electrical signals that are generated by the reinnervated muscle tissue can be sensed and interpreted with bioelectronics to control assistive devices or robotic prostheses. No two amputees will have identical physiologies because there are many surgical options for reconstructing residual limbs, which may in turn impact how well someone can interface with a robotic prosthesis later on. In this review, we aim to investigate what the literature has to say about different pathways for peripheral nerve regeneration and how each pathway can impact the neuromuscular tissue’s final electrophysiology. This information is important because it can guide us in planning the development of future bioelectronic devices, such as prosthetic limbs or neurostimulators. Future devices will primarily have to interface with tissue that has undergone some natural regeneration process, and so we have explored and reported here what is known about the bioelectrical features of neuromuscular tissue regeneration.
Collapse
|