1
|
Tennison JM, Fu JB, Hui D. Palliative Rehabilitation in Patients with Cancer: Definitions, Structures, Processes and Outcomes. Curr Oncol Rep 2024:10.1007/s11912-024-01585-8. [PMID: 39102013 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01585-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSEOF REVIEW This review examines the literature on palliative rehabilitation for patients with advanced cancer, focusing on definitions, structures, processes, and outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS Palliative cancer rehabilitation targets comfort and functional improvement for patients with limited rehabilitation potential across various settings. The palliative cancer rehabilitation team, typically led by a physician, coordinates symptom management and referrals to rehabilitation and other allied healthcare professionals as needed. The outcomes of palliative cancer rehabilitation varied widely by goals, settings, and interventions. Studies in hospice settings generally reported improved symptom control; inpatient rehabilitation had mixed functional outcomes; and outpatient palliative rehabilitation may contribute to enhanced functional and symptom outcomes, especially among patients with higher baseline function. Palliative cancer rehabilitation emphasizes a collaborative approach that integrates palliative care with rehabilitation interventions, aiming to enhance quality of life and address diverse patient needs. Further research and standardization are necessary to realize its full potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jegy M Tennison
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, Section of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1414, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Jack B Fu
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, Section of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1414, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - David Hui
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, Section of Palliative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of General Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Habib MH, Zheng J, Radwan A, Tolchin DW, Smith S, Inzana RS, Keeney T, Arora A, Beckley A, Choudhary S, Jones CA, Schlögl M. Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, and Speech Language Pathology. J Palliat Med 2024; 27:681-687. [PMID: 37831919 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
This article provides guidance on the integral role of physical therapy, occupational therapy (OT), and speech language pathology (SLP) in palliative care (PC), underlining the necessity for effective communication between physicians and therapists, the importance of caregiver education and support, the application of holistic treatment modalities in OT, the underutilization of resources in PC settings, the role of SLP professionals in feeding and nutrition, and the challenges in communication during the advanced stages of illness. The article draws on various studies and expert opinions to elucidate these issues, offering a valuable resource to health care professionals in ensuring high-quality patient-centered PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Hamza Habib
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
- Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jasmine Zheng
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ahmed Radwan
- Department of Physical Therapy, Center for Ergonomic Analysis and Research (CEAR), Utica University, Utica, New York, USA
| | - Dorothy W Tolchin
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sean Smith
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Michigan Medicine: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Rebecca S Inzana
- Department of Speech, Language, and Swallowing Disorders, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Center for Interprofessional Education and Practice, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tamra Keeney
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Mongan Institute Center for Aging and Serious Illness, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Arpit Arora
- Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Akinpelumi Beckley
- Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shaloo Choudhary
- AMP Physical Therapy, Zenith Rehabilitation Services, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Christopher A Jones
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mathias Schlögl
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Clinic Barmelweid, Barmelweid, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The Complexities of Prescribing Assistive Equipment at the End of Life—Patient and Caregivers’ Perspectives. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10061005. [PMID: 35742056 PMCID: PMC9222988 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10061005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Ongoing participation in valued and essential everyday activities remains a priority for people with advanced disease. This study sought to understand factors influencing patients with advanced disease and caregivers’ utilisation of assistive equipment that enable this participation. Employing a pragmatic approach, purposive sampling identified participants who were interviewed in their homes. A semi-structured interview guide was employed to elicit community dwelling patients’ and caregivers’ perspectives about assistive equipment utilisation. Recorded interviews were analysed inductively and themes were constructed from the data. Fourteen interviews were conducted with patients and caregivers. Patients had a range of cancers and COPD. Three empirically developed themes demonstrate the complexities associated with the use of assistive equipment at the end of life: 1. Enabling engagement in everyday activities; 2. Dependency—a two-way street; 3. The pragmatics of choosing, using or declining assistive equipment. Participants were motivated to use assistive equipment when it optimised their function, enabled participation and supported their values, roles and interests. Conversely, use of assistive equipment could be met with ambivalence as it represented deterioration or could cause conflict within relationships. Caregivers found assistive equipment made it easier for them to provide physical care. Skilled proactive assistive equipment prescription and training by allied health professionals enhanced patient and caregiver confidence and capacity to engage in everyday activities.
Collapse
|