The association of dietary insulin load and index with the risk of cancer and cancer mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Dietary insulin indices and low-carbohydrate diet and the odds of colorectal cancer: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Regarding the role of insulin and insulin-inducing dietary factors in some cancers' etiology, we hypothesized that the risk of colorectal cancer may be lessened by following a lower carbohydrate and insulinogenic diet. Therefore, we performed this study to explore the association between a low-carbohydrate diet and insulin indices and the odds of colorectal cancer.

METHOD

This hospital-based case-control study was conducted on 150 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients and 300 healthy age- and sex-matched hospitalized controls. A valid and reliable food frequency questionnaire was used to calculate the insulin indices and low-carbohydrate diet score. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the association between insulin indices and low-carbohydrate diet and the odds of colorectal cancer.

RESULT

After adjusting for potential confounders, individuals in the highest tertile of insulin indices had a higher risk of colorectal cancer (OR insulin index  = 3.46; 95% CI, 2.00-5.96; OR insulin load  = 2; 95% CI, 1.17-3.41). No association was found between a low-carbohydrate diet and colorectal cancer (OR = 1.55; 95% CI, 0.85-2.84).

CONCLUSION

Current results demonstrated that a high insulinemic diet was associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer.

The Association of Empirical Dietary Index for Hyperinsulinemia with the Risk of Cancer and Cancer Mortality: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

This meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between the empirical dietary index for hyperinsulinemia (EDIH) and cancer mortality risk. We performed a comprehensive search across the online literature up to November 2022 databases. Then, hazard ratio (H.R.) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted. A total of 14 and seven cohort studies that reported H.R. for the risk of cancer incidence and cancer mortality respectively were included. The pooled H.R. (95% CI) of the association between EDIH and cancer incidence was 1.13 (1.05-1.23) in overall meta-analyses, 1.15 (1.08-1.22) in female subgroups, 1.27 (1.14-1.41) in digestive cancer subgroups, and 1.15 (1.07-1.24) in breast cancer subgroups. Also, the pooled H.R. (95% CI) of the association between EDIH and incidence of cancer mortality was 1.19 (1.13-1.26) in overall meta-analyses, 1.23 (1.13-1.34) in males, 1.18(1.10-1.28) in females, and 1.20 (1.13-1.27) in studies conducted on all cancers as an outcome. Our findings revealed that a higher EDIH was significantly associated with an increased risk of cancer incidence, particularly in females, digestive cancers, and breast cancer. Also, a higher EDIH score was related to a higher risk of cancer mortality overall in both male and female subgroups and with all cancers.

Carbohydrate quality indices and colorectal cancer risk: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth and third most common cancer in Iran and the world, respectively. Carbohydrates can lead to the proliferation of cancer cells, including CRC. The current study aimed to investigate the association between glycemic load (GL), insulin load (IL), glycemic index (GI), insulin index (II), low-carbohydrate diet score (LCDS), and carbohydrate quality index (CQI) with CRC odds.

METHODS

The present case-control study was performed on 71 CRC cases and 142 controls in the Hospital Cancer Organization and three general hospitals in Tehran, Iran. We calculated the dietary GI, GL, IL, II, CQI, and LCDS by a validated food frequency questionnaire.

RESULTS

The results indicated that people who were in the highest tertile of the GI had higher odds of CRC compared to the lower tertile (in the adjusted model: odds ratio (OR) = 3.89; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.71-8.84). On the contrary, people who were in the highest tertile of the CQI and LCDS had significantly lower odds of CRC compared to the lower tertile (in the adjusted model: tertile (T) ₂-OR = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.11-0.53 and T₃-OR = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.06-0.39 for CQI and T₂-OR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.13-0.79 and T₃-OR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.10-0.82 for LCDS). Also, IL was positively associated with the odds of CRC after adjusting for confounding factors (T₂-OR = 2.46; CI: 1.08-5.61 and T₃- OR = 2.80; 95% CI: 1.07-7.31). Regarding the GL, only individuals who were in the second tertile had significantly higher odds of CRC compared to the first tertile (OR = 2.42; CI: 1.07-5.47).

CONCLUSION

According to the findings, it is recommended to use a diet with high-quality carbohydrates and low GI and GL to minimize the odds of developing CRC. People should also be encouraged to have a balanced carbohydrate intake.