1
|
Madero S, Anmella G, Sagué-Vilavella M, Pons MT, Giménez A, Murru A, Gómez-Ramiro M, Gil-Badenes J, Rios J, Bioque M, Vieta E, Benabarre A. Evaluating maintenance electroconvulsive therapy in Bipolar Disorders: 3-year mirror-image study. J Affect Disord 2022; 298:58-64. [PMID: 34715196 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGORUND Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy (mECT) is underused in the treatment of bipolar disorder (BD). We aimed to study the real-life effectiveness of mECT in BD. METHODS Naturalistic 3-year mirror-image study in individuals diagnosed with BD who underwent mECT at a tertiary hospital. Intra-subject comparisons of psychiatric hospitalization were performed using McNemar test. Days and number of psychiatric hospitalizations before and during mECT were compared through wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mean annual days and mean annual number of psychiatric hospitalizations per patient were compared by means of the rate ratio (RR) estimation through a generalized estimating equation (GEE) model. RESULTS A total of 43 patients were included and 37 required psychiatric hospitalization during the study. The use of mECT showed an effectiveness of 62.2% for preventing psychiatric hospitalizations (p<0.01). We found significant reduction in days and number of psychiatric hospitalizations during mECT compared to before mECT (p<0.01). Comparison of the 3-year period before/during mECT showed a reduction in mean annual days (RR=0.14; 95%CI: 0.07-0.29) and mean annual number (RR=0.24; 95%CI: 0.13-0.43) of psychiatric hospitalizations, without substantial changes for adjusted models for gender and age of onset of the illness. LIMITATIONS The main limitations of this study consisted of the mirror-image retrospective naturalistic study design, the relatively small sample size, and possibly patient selection bias. CONCLUSIONS mECT reduced the number of psychiatric hospitalizations and hospitalization days in BD. The use of mECT outlines a mood stabilizing effect in BD. This naturalistic study supports the effectiveness of mECT in BD across several mood states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Madero
- Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Barcelona Clínic Schizophrenia Unit (BCSU), Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Cliníc de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de investigación biomédica en Red en Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gerard Anmella
- Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Cliníc de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de investigación biomédica en Red en Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Sagué-Vilavella
- Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Cliníc de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Maria Teresa Pons
- Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Giménez
- Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Cliníc de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de investigación biomédica en Red en Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea Murru
- Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Cliníc de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de investigación biomédica en Red en Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Gómez-Ramiro
- Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Barcelona Clínic Schizophrenia Unit (BCSU), Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Cliníc de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Joaquín Gil-Badenes
- Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Barcelona Clínic Schizophrenia Unit (BCSU), Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Cliníc de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - José Rios
- Medical Statistics Core Facility, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS) and Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain; Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miquel Bioque
- Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Barcelona Clínic Schizophrenia Unit (BCSU), Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Cliníc de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de investigación biomédica en Red en Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduard Vieta
- Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Cliníc de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de investigación biomédica en Red en Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Antonio Benabarre
- Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Cliníc de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de investigación biomédica en Red en Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Atashnama A, Aly H, Krishnan V, Howari R, Mayur P. Naturalistic outcomes of continuation right unilateral ultrabrief ECT in major depression: a retrospective chart review. Australas Psychiatry 2020; 28:286-290. [PMID: 32391725 DOI: 10.1177/1039856220917070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Continuation treatment of major depression following an acute course of electroconvulsive treatment (ECT) may be often required to prevent relapse. Data on continuation phase of right unilateral ultrabrief ECT are sparse and there are doubts if it is inherently capable of relapse prevention. METHODS All consecutive adult patients with major depression who received the first 'run' of continuation phase of right unilateral ultrabrief ECT over a 10-year period were routinely followed up. ECT frequency varied from weekly to up to once every 4 weeks for a maximum period of 6 months. The data were extracted from a retrospective chart review. RESULTS 20 out of 22 patients persisted with ultrabrief pulses (0.3 ms) with two needing 0.5 ms pulse widths. The median duration of continuation treatment was 51 days (range: 14-460). At the end of 1 month (n = 17), treatment gap in days mean (SD): 10.18 (7.08), widening to mean (SD): 20.11 (16.85) at 4 months (n = 9). Stimulus dose increased throughout the continuation phase: p = 0.026. In 16 out of 22 patients, more than 70% of the visits were charted as being 'in remission'. CONCLUSION As most patients receiving ultrabrief ECT remained well, this study suggests that ultrabrief ECT can be used effectively in continuation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Husayn Aly
- Western Sydney Local Health District, Australia
| | | | | | - Prashanth Mayur
- Cumberland Hospital, Australia.,University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hausmann A, Post T, Post F, Dehning J, Kemmler G, Grunze H. Efficacy of Continuation/Maintenance Electroconvulsive Therapy in the Treatment of Patients With Mood Disorders: A Retrospective Analysis. J ECT 2019; 35:122-126. [PMID: 30346352 DOI: 10.1097/yct.0000000000000547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to contribute evidence for the efficacy of continuation and maintenance electroconvulsive therapy (c/mECT) going beyond the existing literature by examining longer-term outcomes from a single center. METHODS We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study for a 14-year period, in which a group of 27 individuals with mood disorders, as defined by International Classification of Diseases-10, were examined and received acute ECT, followed by c/mECT. Mirror-image comparison of individual data sets, 5 years before and after c/mECT, was conducted for the number and mean duration of hospitalizations, as well as inpatient days per year. Statistical analysis was performed using general equation estimation modeling. RESULTS In 27 patients (63% female, mean ± SD age = 54.3 ± 11.7 years) experiencing either from bipolar (41%) or unipolar (59%) mood disorder, with most patients presenting with a depressive episode at hospital admission (93%), c/mECT was initiated after a successful course of acute ECT in addition to treatment as usual. In a 5-year period before and after starting c/mECT, we observed a significant decline in the mean number of hospitalizations per year (0.64 vs 0.32, P = 0.031), the average number of inpatient days per year (23.7 vs 6.1 days, P < 0.001), and the mean duration of hospital stays (41.6 vs 22.1 days, P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS The findings provide further support for the efficacy of c/mECT as an augmentation therapy to psychopharmacological treatment in patients experiencing mood disorders, who have responded to acute ECT. Further studies, however, using a controlled study design and larger sample sizes are needed.
Collapse
|
4
|
Müller HHO, Moeller S, Lücke C, Lam AP, Braun N, Philipsen A. Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) and Other Augmentation Strategies for Therapy-Resistant Depression (TRD): Review of the Evidence and Clinical Advice for Use. Front Neurosci 2018; 12:239. [PMID: 29692707 PMCID: PMC5902793 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In addition to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is one of the approved neurostimulation tools for treatment of major depression. VNS is particularly used in therapy-resistant depression (TRD) and exhibits antidepressive and augmentative effects. In long-term treatment, up to two-thirds of patients respond. This mini-review provides a comprehensive overview of augmentation pharmacotherapy and neurostimulation-based treatment strategies, with a special focus on VNS in TRD, and provides practical clinical advice for how to select TRD patients for add-on neurostimulation treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helge H O Müller
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Sebastian Moeller
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Caroline Lücke
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Alexandra P Lam
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Niclas Braun
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany.,Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Alexandra Philipsen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|