Idarucizumab: A Review as a Reversal Agent for Dabigatran

A mini review of supramolecular antagonists based on macrocyclic host compounds

In the interdisciplinary domains of medicine and chemistry, addressing the issue of residual drugs (toxicants) that fail to fully exert therapeutic effects while potentially inducing toxic side effects has become increasingly critical. Researchers are actively seeking innovative solutions to this multifaceted challenge. Conventional small-molecule antagonists, commonly used in clinical settings, typically depend on "drug-receptor interactions" yet pose substantial developmental challenges. Recent advancements in the investigation of macrocyclic host compounds present a promising alternative. By leveraging the principles of host-guest chemistry, these macrocyclic hosts form stable inclusion complexes with residual drugs (toxicants), thereby decreasing their free concentration in the bloodstream and effectively mitigating associated toxic side effects. Consequently, macrocyclic host compounds represent a novel class of supramolecular antagonists (SAs). This article reviews recent progress in the application of macrocyclic host molecules-such as cyclodextrin, calix[n]arene, pillar[n]arene, and cucurbit[n]uril-as SA and examines current issues and future development prospects within the field.

Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran Reversal with Idarucizumab in the Taiwanese Population: A Comparison Based on Eligibility for Inclusion in Clinical Trials

Background and Objectives: The effectiveness and safety of idarucizumab for the reversal of the effects of dabigatran have been proven. However, there remains a paucity of literature comprehensively investigating outcomes in real-world patients. This is especially true when comparing patients who were eligible for inclusion in the RE-VERSE AD trial with patients who were ineligible. As the prescription of dabigatran has become increasingly popular, the generalizability of the results to real-world populations has come into question due to the broad variability of real-world patients receiving dabigatran. Our study aimed to identify all patients who were prescribed idarucizumab and examined how effectiveness and safety varied among those patients who were eligible and ineligible for the trial. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the largest medical database in Taiwan. We enrolled all patients who were prescribed and received idarucizumab from when it became available in Taiwan up until May 2021. A Total of 32 patients were included and analyzed, and they were further divided into subgroups based on their eligibility for inclusion in the RE-VERSE AD trial. Multiple outcomes were evaluated, including successful hemostasis rate, complete reversal efficacy of idarucizumab, 90-day thromboembolic events, intra-hospital mortality, and adverse event rate. Results: In our study, we found that 34.4% of real-world cases of idarucizumab use were ineligible for the RE-VERSE AD trials. The eligible group had higher successful hemostasis rates (95.2% vs. 80%) and anticoagulant effect reversal rates compared to the ineligible group (73.3% vs. 0%). The mortality rates were 9.5%, compared to 27.3% in the ineligible group. Few adverse effects (n = 3) and 90-day thromboembolic events (n = 1) were observed in either group. Among the ineligible cases, all acute ischemic stroke patients (n = 5) received definite, timely treatments without complications. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the real-world effectiveness and safety of idarucizumab infusion for trial-eligible patients and all acute ischemic stroke patients. However, although it seems to be effective and safe, idarucizumab appears to be less effective in other trial-ineligible patients. Despite this result, our study provides further evidence for extending the applicability of idarucizumab in real-world scenarios. Our study suggests that idarucizumab can be a safe and effective option for reversing the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran, particularly for eligible patients.

Translational PK/PD and model-informed development of JNJ-67842125, a Fab reversal agent for JNJ-64179375, a long-acting thrombin inhibitor

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Antigen-binding fragment (F_ab ) reversal agents were developed to reverse, in bleeding emergency, the long-acting anticoagulant effect of JNJ-64179375 (JNJ-9375), a monoclonal antibody that binds exosite-1 on thrombin.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) activities of three reversal agents of varying in vitro binding affinities to JNJ-9375 were characterised in cynomolgus monkeys. The time course of JNJ-9375 anticoagulant activity and reversal effects of each agent were evaluated. A mechanism-based PK/PD model, which integrated free serum concentrations of reversal agent, total and free serum concentrations of JNJ-9375, and thrombin time, was developed to quantitatively relate JNJ-9375 neutralisation to reversal of induced thrombin time prolongation. Model-based allometric scale-up of the lead reversal agent and the PK/PD relationship of JNJ-9375 in healthy volunteers were utilised to predict clinical dosing regimens.

KEY RESULTS

Lowering of free JNJ-9375 by the reversal agents corresponded with reversal of thrombin time prolongation. Total JNJ-9375 displayed typical mAb clearance at 2.75 ml·day^-1 ·kg^-1 , whereas reversal agents cleared faster between 1400 and 2400 ml·day^-1 ·kg^-1 . The model-estimated in vivo K_D values for JNJ-9375 reversal agents were 9 nM (ICHB-256), 0.4 nM (ICHB-281) and 13.7 pM (ICHB-164), in rank-ordered agreement of their K_D values determined in vitro. The three reversal agents exhibited different neutralisation characteristics in vivo, governed primarily by their binding kinetics to JNJ-9375. The model predicted a priori free JNJ-9375 kinetics after dosing ICHB-164 (JNJ-67842125) and JNJ-9375 under a different regimen.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The results enabled selection of JNJ-67842125 as the reversal agent for JNJ-9375.

A comprehensive appraisal of dabigatran etexilate clinical evidence and applications: a 10-year-long story

During the last decade, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) revolutionized the thromboprophylaxis management of several medical conditions, including atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Dabigatran etexilate was the first NOAC widely available worldwide, and it is currently the only one that directly inhibits thrombin. More recently, the availability of idarucizumab, a specific reversal agent, has increased the safety of dabigatran use in clinical practice, especially for those patients with severe and life-threatening bleeding. This review aims to summarize current evidence on dabigatran, starting from its pharmacological characteristics, and providing an updated overview of pivotal randomized controlled trials and real-world data on its efficacy and safety.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Adults With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

All evidence regarding benefits and harms of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention has not been appraised yet.

STUDY QUESTION

What are the comparative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?

DATA SOURCES

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and observational studies were identified in several databases in October 2018.

STUDY DESIGN

Rapid review with evidence appraisal using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group approach.

RESULTS

Two direct RCTs (23,021 patients) suggest that rivaroxaban is noninferior to warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism (pooled relative risk [RR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-1.24), reduces risk of hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.59, 95% CI, 0.38-0.92), fatal bleeding (RR 0.49, 95% CI, 0.31-0.76), and cardiac arrest (RR 0.45, 95% CI, 0.25-0.82, 2 RCTs), but increases risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 1.46, 95% CI, 1.19-1.78). In observational studies, rivaroxaban is associated with lower risk of ischemic stroke (RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.77-0.99, 222,750 patients), acute myocardial infarction (RR 0.61, 95% CI, 0.48-0.78, 73,739 patients), and intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.64, 95% CI, 0.45-0.92, 197,506 patients) but higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 1.30, 95% CI, 1.19-1.42, 188,968 patients) and higher risk of mortality when compared with warfarin in European studies (RR 1.19, 103,270 patients in the UK; RR 2.02, 22,358 patients in Denmark) but lower risk of mortality in Taiwan (RR 0.58, 40,000 patients). Network meta-analyses and observational studies suggest that rivaroxaban is associated with higher risk of bleeding when compared with apixaban (RR 2.14, 72,586 patients), dabigatran (RR 1.24, 67,102 patients), and edoxaban (RR 1.32, 71,683 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Research on the long-term comparative effectiveness, safety, and effects on quality of life between rivaroxaban and other novel oral anticoagulants is urgently needed.

Comparative Clinical Outcomes of Edoxaban in Adults With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

A critical appraisal of all pooled evidence regarding novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for stroke prevention regardless of publication status or study design has not been conducted yet. Being the latest addition to NOACs, the data on edoxaban are especially scarce.

STUDY QUESTION

What are the comparative clinical outcomes of edoxaban versus warfarin and other NOACs apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban in adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?

DATA SOURCES

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and network meta-analyses were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Pharmapendium, Elsevier Clinical Pharmacology, and the clinicaltrials.gov trial registry in June 2018.

STUDY DESIGN

Rapid review per a priori developed protocol, direct frequentist random-effects meta-analysis of aggregate data, grading the quality of evidence per the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group approach.

RESULTS

Direct 4 RCTs (23,021 patients) suggest that edoxaban is noninferior to warfarin in prevention of stroke and systemic embolism [pooled relative risk (RR): 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23-1.81, 2 RCTs] and reduces the risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.97, 1 RCT), major cardiovascular morbidity (RR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82-0.98, 2 RCTs), and major bleeding events (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71-0.91, 1 RCT) but increases the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (RR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.01-1.46, 1 RCT) and anemia (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.05-1.99, 3 RCTs). Edoxaban is superior to warfarin in patients with increased risk of bleeding with warfarin because of variants in CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genes. Indirect evidence does not allow valid conclusions regarding comparative superiority of NOACs. The quality of evidence was downgraded because of reporting bias, small number of events, and indirectness in comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

Edoxaban is a welcome addition to the NOAC's armamentarium. However, the comparative data with other novel NOACs are mostly nonexisting, and urgently needed for better individual patient assessment.

First Reported Case of Hemopericardium Related to Dabigatran Use Reversed by New Antidote Idarucizumab

Dabigatran, the first novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) with a reversal agent, heralded a paradigm shift in the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The potential for life-threatening hemorrhagic events with the use of NOACs has been highly debated since the effectiveness of reversal agents such as idarucizumab is based primarily on pharmacologic data. It is known that cancer patients are at an increased risk of bleeding with anticoagulation, though specific studies demonstrating the risks or efficacy of NOACs in this population are lacking. We provide the first report of hemopericardium resulting in multiorgan failure related to dabigatran use that was successfully reversed by idarucizumab in a man with prostate cancer on chemotherapy.