Efficacy, tolerability and consumer acceptability of terbinafine topical spray versus terbinafine topical solution: a phase IIa, randomised, observer-blind, comparative study

Co-delivery of terbinafine hydrochloride and urea with an in situ film-forming system for nail targeting treatment

Onychomycosis is a chronic nail disorder consisting of a fungal infection that causes physical and psychosocial discomfort to patients. However, its treatment remains challenging owing to the barrier of the highly keratinized nail plate and the short time that conventional formulations reside on nails. In this work, we developed an in situ film-forming system(IFFS) based on Eudragit® RLPO to co-deliver terbinafine hydrochloride (TBH) and urea, i.e., TBH-urea-RLPO IFFS, with the aim of overcoming the nail barrier, prolonging the residence time, and efficiently treating onychomycosis. The IFFS formulation formed a thin film with good appearance and adhesion upon application in situ. The physical states of TBH and urea in the film were evaluated with polarization microscopy and powder X-ray diffraction. TBH and urea were both amorphousmiscible components within the RLPO film. TBH release from TBH-urea-RLPO IFFS fitted to the Korsmeyer-Pappas model, and the cumulative release at 72 h was significantly higher than that from commercial preparations (Lamisil Pedisan® once). In vitro permeation of TBH from TBH-urea-RLPO IFFS through bovine hoof membranes was evaluated in comparison with the film containing TBH alone (TBH-RLPO) and commercial preparations. The retention and cumulative permeated amount of TBH were significantly enhanced for the TBH-urea-RLPO IFFS (170.80 ± 44.63 μg/cm²vs 75.49 ± 21.50 μg/cm²vs 60.25 ± 27.38 μg/cm²; 61.81 ± 16.09 μg/cm²vs 21.80 ± 11.56 μg/cm²vs 7.91 ± 1.03 μg/cm², respectively), and the membranes treated with different formulations were observed with SEM and FTIR to identify the denaturing effect of urea on bovine hoof keratin. In vitro antifungal tests against Trichophyton rubrum,Microsporum canis, Fusarium, and Aspergillus fumigatus were cultured on Muller-Hinton agar; the findings indicated that TBH-urea-RLPO IFFS enhanced TBH antifungal activity. Overall, the results support that TBH-urea-RLPO IFFS is an efficient and promising approach for onychomycosis targeting treatment.

Medicated Foams and Film Forming Dosage Forms as Tools to Improve the Thermodynamic Activity of Drugs to be Administered Through the Skin

Medicated foams and film forming systems are dosage forms formulated to undergo a con-trolled metamorphosis when applied on the skin. Indeed, due to the presence of propellant or a particular air-spray foam pump, a liquid can generate foam when applied on the stratum corneum, or a liquid or conventional dosage form can form on the skin a continuous film as a consequence of the solvent evapora-tion. Thanks to these controlled modifications, the drug thermodynamic activity increases favoring the skin penetration and, therefore, the bioavailability with respect to conventional semi-solid and liquid dosage forms. Furthermore, the available clinical data also evidence that these dosage forms improve the patient’s compliance. The main formulative aspects of medicated foams and film forming systems are reviewed with the aim to underline the possible advantages in terms of biopharmaceutical performances and pa-tient’s adherence.

The potential of polymeric film-forming systems as sustained delivery platforms for topical drugs

INTRODUCTION

Dosing regimens requiring multiple daily applications frequently result in poor patient compliance, especially in the treatment of chronic skin diseases. Consequently, development of sustained delivery systems for topical drugs permitting less frequent dosing is of continuing interest for dermatological therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This potential of polymeric film-forming systems (FFS), created in situ on the skin, as sustained delivery platforms for topical drug delivery is reviewed. Key formulation parameters that determine delivery efficiency are considered focussing on those that permit a drug reservoir to be established in the upper layers of the skin and/or on the skin surface from which release can be sustained over a prolonged period. The advantageous and superior cosmetic attributes of FFS (compared to conventional semi-solid formulations) that offer significantly improved patient compliance are also addressed.

EXPERT OPINION

The promise of polymeric FFS as convenient and aesthetic platforms for sustained topical drug delivery is clear. Manipulation of the formulation allows the delivery profile to be customized and optimized to take advantage of both a rapid, initial input of drug into the skin (likely due to a transient period of supersaturation) and a slower, controlled release over an extended time from the residual film created thereafter.

Statistical reporting in randomized controlled trials from the dermatology literature: a review of 44 dermatology journals

BACKGROUND

The validity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is determined by several statistical factors.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the level of recent statistical reporting in RCTs from the dermatology literature.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE for all RCTs published between 1 May 2013 and 1 May 2014 in 44 dermatology journals.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ten articles were screened, of which 181 RCTs from 27 journals were reviewed. Primary study outcomes were met in 122 (67.4%) studies. Sample size calculations and beta values were reported in 52 (28.7%) and 48 (26.5%) studies, respectively, and nonsignificant findings were supported in only 31 (17.1%). Alpha values were reported in 131 (72.4%) of studies with 45 (24.9%) having two-sided P-values, although adjustment for multiple statistical tests was performed in only 16 (9.9% of studies with ≥ two statistical tests performed). Sample size calculations were performed based on a single outcome in 44 (86.3%) and multiple outcomes in six (11.8%) studies. However, among studies that were powered for a single primary outcome, 20 (45.5%) made conclusions based on multiple primary outcomes. Twenty-one (41.2%) studies relied on secondary/unspecified outcomes. There were no differences for primary outcome being met (Chi-square, P = 0.29), sample size calculations (P ≥ 0.55), beta values (P = 0.89), alpha values (P = 0.65), correction for multiple statistical testing (P = 0.59), two-sided alpha (P = 0.64), support of nonsignificant findings (Fisher's exact, P = 0.23) based on the journal's impact factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Levels of statistical reporting are low in RCTs from the dermatology literature. Future work is needed to improve these levels of reporting.