Dupilumab Provides Favorable Safety and Sustained Efficacy for up to 3 Years in an Open-Label Study of Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

European Guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema: Living update

The evidence- and consensus-based living guideline on atopic eczema was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. The original EuroGuiDerm Guideline on atopic eczema was published in June 2022. Since then, the part of the guideline dealing with systemic therapy has been updated twice. This paper summarizes the results of the second update. Twenty-eight experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. The updated guideline provides guidance on which patients should be treated with systemic therapies, as well as recommendations and detailed information on each systemic drug. The systemic treatment options discussed in the guideline comprise conventional immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, ciclosporin, glucocorticosteroids, methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil), biologics (dupilumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab and tralokinumab) and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib). Additionally, the updated guidelines address considerations for paediatric, adolescent, pregnant and breastfeeding patients. For all other aspects, please refer to the 2022 version.

Clinical Effects and Response Time of Biological Drugs in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Patients: Real-life Experience

OBJECTIVE

Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) is a challenging condition often managed with biologic therapies. This study compares the clinical effects and response times of dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab in Italian patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP.

METHODS

This bicentric, retrospective study included 33 patients treated at two Italian hospitals between April and December 2023. Inclusion criteria followed EPOS 2020 guidelines, focusing on adults with bilateral polyposis, history of endoscopic sinus surgery, and evidence of type 2 inflammation. Patients self-administered biologics according to AIFA protocols. Outcomes were assessed using SNOT-22 for quality of life, Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) for polyp size, and Sniffin' Sticks-12 for olfactory function at baseline, 4 weeks, 3, 6, and 9 months.

RESULTS

All three treatment groups (dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab) showed significant improvements in SNOT-22 scores from baseline to 9 months, with no significant differences between groups. Dupilumab showed the most rapid and sustained improvement in NPS, with significant reductions observed from 4 weeks onward. Both omalizumab and mepolizumab showed significant NPS reductions by 6 months. Olfactory function improved significantly in the dupilumab group, with a notable decrease in anosmic patients from 64.3% to 28.6% at 9 months. Asthma control, measured by Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, improved across all groups.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab significantly improve quality of life and reduce nasal polyp size in CRSwNP patients, with dupilumab showing the fastest response. These findings support the effectiveness of biologics in real-world settings for managing severe CRSwNP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 135:1628-1635, 2025.

An Overview of Atopic Dermatitis Disease Burden, Pathogenesis, and the Current Treatment Landscape: Recommendations for Appropriate Utilization of Systemic Therapies

Objective

To review the disease impact, immunopathogenesis, and treatment landscape of atopic dermatitis (AD), including recommendations for appropriate utilization of systemic treatments.

Methods

A PubMed search for relevant articles on AD and the treatment landscape was conducted using the key words "atopic dermatitis," "biologic," "therapeutic inertia," "Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor," and "systemic treatment."

Results

AD is a common, chronic inflammatory skin disease that can have a profound negative impact on quality of life. With recent advancements and approvals of systemic treatments, it is now possible to offer targeted therapy to patients with moderate-to-severe AD. When topical treatments are no longer sufficient for managing AD, recently published AD management guidelines recommend that providers consider/offer advanced systemic treatments.

Limitations

More data are needed on the use of systemic treatments in special populations, including head-to-head comparisons of available systemic treatments in these populations.

Conclusion

An increased awareness of the immunopathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment landscape of AD is needed amongst healthcare providers (HCPs). Special consideration of diagnosis and treatment options should be given to certain populations, including patients of different ages, those who may be pregnant or become pregnant, are biologic-experienced, and/or have comorbidities. Of note, HCPs should be aware of the clinical presentation in patients with skin of color. Therapeutic inertia can prevent HCPs from intensifying treatment when needed, and HCPs should know when it is appropriate to offer systemic treatments, including biologics and JAK inhibitors.

Infections in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis and the Influence of Treatment

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a T helper 2-mediated chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects children and adults. Patients with AD are prone to recurrent infections of the skin and other organs, which can severely worsen the disease course. This review summarises the current evidence on the aetiology, pathogenesis, treatment and prevention of infections in patients with AD. PubMed was searched for English-language research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and guidelines published until February 2023 using the key term "atopic dermatitis" and terms relevant to infections. Patients with AD have an increased risk of bacterial, viral and fungal infections of the skin, mainly due to impaired barrier function, altered immune response and frequent scratching. The most common pathogens are Staphylococcus aureus and herpes simplex virus, which can cause impetigo, folliculitis, abscesses, eczema herpeticum and other complications. They also appear to increase susceptibility to systemic infections, including respiratory and urinary tract infections and sepsis. Certain systemic treatments for AD, such as mycophenolate mofetil and Janus kinase inhibitors, increase the risk of viral infections. Prevention and treatment of recurrent infections in patients with AD require a multifaceted approach that includes topical and systemic antimicrobials, skin care and effective control of AD symptoms (to break the itch-scratch cycle). Preventing and limiting the development of infections are important considerations in choosing an AD treatment.

Profiling Blood Hypereosinophilia in Patients on Dupilumab Treatment for Respiratory Conditions: A Real-Life Snapshot

BACKGROUND

A transient and usually asymptomatic increase in blood eosinophil count (BEC) associated with dupilumab treatment has been described. Predicting factors related to the increase in BEC and the occurrence of symptoms are still poorly investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate frequency, timing, duration, clinical relevance, and potential predictors of the increase in BEC in a real-life multicenter cohort of patients affected by asthma and/or chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) treated with dupilumab.

METHODS

BEC and clinical conditions at baseline and every 3 months after the start of dupilumab treatment were assessed. Any adverse drug reaction was also recorded. Remission of dupilumab-associated eosinophilia was defined by follow-up BEC values <0.5 × 109 cells/L.

RESULTS

Overall, 108 of 195 (55%) patients experienced an increased BEC after dupilumab initiation, but only 29 of 195 (14.9%) showed hypereosinophilia. BEC peak occurred 6 months after the start of treatment and resolved after 9 months (median time). The probability of developing hypereosinophilia was 3.3 times higher in patients with the baseline BEC between 0.5 × 109 and 1.5 × 109 cells/L. The occurrence of symptoms during BEC peak was higher in patients with comorbidities and in patients showing any increase in BEC.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-life setting, dupilumab treatment in patients with asthma and/or CRSwNP was often associated with a transient increase in BEC, but hypereosinophilia rarely occurred. Onset of symptoms co-occurring with BEC peak was observed in a minority of subjects. BEC should not preclude dupilumab initiation or continuation but should be monitored for at least 8 months after treatment begins, particularly in the case of baseline eosinophilia/hypereosinophilia and/or comorbidities.

English version of clinical practice guidelines for the management of atopic dermatitis 2024

This is the English version of the 2024 clinical practice guidelines for the management of atopic dermatitis (AD). AD is a disease characterized by relapsing eczema with pruritus as a primary lesion. A crucial aspect of AD treatment is the prompt induction of remission via the suppression of existing skin inflammation and pruritus. To achieve this, topical anti-inflammatory drugs, such as topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus ointment, delgocitinib ointment, and difamilast ointment, have been used. However, the following treatments should be considered in addition to topical therapy for patients with refractory moderate-to-severe AD: oral cyclosporine, subcutaneous injections of biologics (dupilumab, nemolizumab, tralokinumab), oral Janus kinase inhibitors (baricitinib, upadacitinib, abrocitinib), and phototherapy. In these revised guidelines, descriptions of five new drugs, namely, difamilast, nemolizumab, tralokinumab, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib, have been added. The guidelines present recommendations to review clinical research articles, evaluate the balance between the advantages and disadvantages of medical activities, and optimize medical activity-related patient outcomes with respect to several important points requiring decision-making in clinical practice.

Clinical curative effect and quality of life evaluation of dupilumab in treating children with atopic dermatitis and its effect on IgE levels, eosinophil count, Th2 cytokines (IL-4 and IL-13), and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic skin inflammatory disease. The traditional treatment shows limited effect and side effects. Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody immunotherapy targeting IL-4 and IL-13, which may become a new direction for treating AD.

Aim

This study was to explore the clinical curative effect of dupilumab in the treatment of children with AD, and its influence on the quality of life (QoL) of children.

Material and methods

54 children with AD, who were treated in the outpatient and inpatient departments of the hospital from August 2023 to July 2024, were included in this study. These children were treated with dupilumab, and their clinical curative effect as well as QoL were evaluated through relevant scales as well as the IgE, eosinophil counts, and Th2 cytokine levels.

Results

After treatment, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score was 8.8 ±4.5, Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score was 15.1 ±8.4, and itching Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score was 1.1 ±0.7. Compared with those before treatment, the scores of 25.4 ±6.2, 38.6 ±10.3, and 6.9 ±2.2 were highly decreased with differences being statistically significant (p < 0.05). Only 3 cases had an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) ≥ 3, which was greatly reduced than that before treatment (p < 0.05). 5 cases had the adverse reaction of conjunctivitis after treatment, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) score was 4.8 ±1.6, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) was scored as 3.3 ±1.8. These were observably lower than those before the patients were treated, exhibiting significant differences (p < 0.05). There were significant reductions in IgE levels, eosinophil count, Th2 cytokines (IL-4 and IL-13), and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) after treatment (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Dupilumab could effectively treat children with AD and improve their QoL, so it had a clinical application value.

Safety of dupilumab in Chinese pediatric patients aged 6 months and older: a prospective real-world study

Objective

This study analyzes the occurrence and characteristics of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of dupilumab in children in a real-world setting. It aims to enhance clinical practice and minimize medication safety risks in pediatric patients.

Methods

This prospective study included children receiving dupilumab in the hospital between January 2022 and December 2023. Information on ADRs was collected and univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to identify high-risk factors for the occurrence of adverse effects in dupilumab treatment.

Results

A total of 65 ADRs occurred in 1,103 treatments in 127 patients, with an incidence of 27.56% (35/127). A total of 62 patients aged 6 or below participated in this study, accounting for 48.82%. Univariate analysis showed that gender, age, duration of medication, frequency of dupilumab use were risk factors for the occurrence of adverse effects (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age [odds ratio [OR]: 0.071, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.012-0.433; P = 0.004] and frequency of dupilumab use (OR: 3.306, 95% CI: 1.078-10.135; P = 0.036) were risk factors for adverse effects. The outcomes of ADRs were improved in 10 cases (15.38%) and completely recovered in 55 cases (84.62%).

Conclusion

Dupilumab has a good safety profile in Chinese children aged 6 months to 18 years for up to 2 years of treatment, with most adverse reactions being mild to moderate, and no serious ocular adverse reactions were reported. Age and frequency of dupilumab use were risk factors for adverse effects. Younger age and higher frequency of dupilumab use were associated with higher odds of ADRs.

Postmarketing Analysis of Eosinophilic Adverse Reactions in the use of Biologic Therapies for Type 2 Inflammatory Conditions

BACKGROUND

Temporary eosinophilia is a potential adverse reaction of monoclonal antibody therapies in the treatment of a variety of type 2 inflammatory conditions, including asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). The pathophysiology, epidemiology, and clinical significance of eosinophilia and eosinophilic adverse reactions following the initiation of biologic therapy are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the postmarketing, eosinophilic adverse reactions with clinical significance in patients treated with the 3 biologic therapies approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for CRSwNP: dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab.

METHODS

The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard was searched for eosinophilic adverse reactions related to dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab treatments from November 2004 to December 2022. Data regarding each of the eosinophilic adverse reactions were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 218, 270, and 134 reports of eosinophilic adverse reactions were reported among patients who were treated with dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab, respectively. The most common eosinophilic adverse reaction was eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (338 patients), followed by eosinophilic respiratory tract reactions (158 patients). The most common indication for biological treatment among the reaction groups was asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Eosinophilic adverse reactions are rare but consequential complications of biological treatment. They are more common among patients treated for asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Measuring and monitoring blood eosinophil levels may be appropriate in specific clinical instances when patients are started on different biologic therapies for type 2 inflammatory conditions.

Drug Survival, Retention, and Persistence of Dupilumab in Adults and Adolescents with Atopic Dermatitis: A Narrative Literature Review

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin condition that can have a negative impact on a patient's quality of life. Long-term effectiveness is required to manage the symptoms of AD (skin inflammation, eczematous lesions, and itching). Because some of the systemic immunosuppressants used to treat AD have been associated with serious adverse events (AEs), other safer, more effective options, including dupilumab, have been proven effective long-term for treatment of adult and adolescent patients with moderate-to-severe AD. The long-term safety and effectiveness of a drug are usually confirmed in real-world studies by evaluating its performance over time. Measures such as drug survival, drug retention, drug persistence, or retention rates reflect whether treatment may be considered as satisfactory by both patients and physicians, meeting key clinical needs. This review aimed to describe the survival, retention, or persistence of dupilumab therapy in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD by conducting a PubMed search in March 2023 and screening for relevant publications. Globally, real-world studies with dupilumab have regularly reported high drug survival rates after 1, 2, and 3 years of observation, being consistently at 80-90%, with low rates of treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or AEs. These findings are notably higher than 1- and 2-year drug survival rates of systemic immunosuppressants (including cyclosporine [37% and 20%, respectively] and methotrexate [41% and 33%, respectively]). Overall, real-world data on drug survival have confirmed that dupilumab provides long-term sustained efficacy and acceptable safety in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

Atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic skin disorder that can significantly impact the quality of life (QoL) of affected individuals as well as their families. Although the pathogenesis of the disorder is not yet completely understood, it appears to result from the complex interplay between defects in skin barrier function, environmental and infectious agents, and immune dysregulation. There are no diagnostic tests for AD; therefore, the diagnosis is based on specific clinical criteria that take into account the patient's history and clinical manifestations. Successful management of the disorder requires a multifaceted approach that involves education, optimal skin care practices, anti-inflammatory treatment with topical corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) and/or phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE-4) inhibitors, the management of pruritus, and the treatment of skin infections. Systemic immunosuppressive agents may also be used, but are generally reserved for severe flare-ups or more difficult-to-control disease. Newer systemic agents, such as Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors and biologics, have a more favourable safety and efficacy profile than the older, traditional systemic immunosuppressives. Topical corticosteroids are the first-line pharmacologic treatments for AD, and evidence suggests that these agents may also be beneficial for the prophylaxis of disease flare-ups. Although the prognosis for patients with AD is generally favourable, those patients with severe, widespread disease and concomitant atopic conditions, such as asthma and allergic rhinitis, are likely to experience poorer outcomes. Newer systemic agents have been approved which are greatly improving the QoL of these patients.

Patients' preferences for systemic treatment of atopic dermatitis: safety and efficacy count the most

BACKGROUND

The advent of biologics and janus kinase inhibitors has revolutionized treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate preferences of patients with AD for attributes of currently approved systemic treatments and assess influencing factors.

METHODS

An online discrete choice experiment was conducted in patients with AD throughout Germany to analyze preferences for outcome (probability of (almost) clear skin at week 16, probability of significant itch improvement, time to onset of itch relief and type of side effects) and process attributes (application method and frequency of laboratory tests).

RESULTS

Participants (n = 182, 75.3% female) considered side effects (Relative Importance Score (RIS): 31.2), (almost) clear skin (RIS: 24.2) and probability of itch improvement (RIS: 16.0) most important. Application method (RIS: 14.4), time to onset of itch relief (RIS: 7.4) and frequency of laboratory tests (RIS: 6.8) were less relevant. Preferences were significantly influenced by sex, age, psychiatric comorbidity, current therapy and health-related quality of life according to multivariate regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants attached great importance to safety and symptom control. However, preferences were also dependent on individual characteristics, underscoring the importance of personal counseling. Conjoined with medical considerations, patients' preferences have fundamental impact on shared decisions for treatment of AD.

Short-, mid- and long-term efficacy of dupilumab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a real-world multicentre Italian study of 2576 patients

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis (AD) have been defined in clinical trials but limited real-world evidence on long-term treatment outcomes is currently available to inform clinical decisions.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the long-term effectiveness and safety of dupilumab up to 48 months in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

A multicentre, retrospective, dynamic cohort study was conducted to assess long-term effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in patients with moderate-to-severe AD in a real-world setting. Predictors of minimal disease activity (MDA) optimal treatment target criteria [defined as the simultaneous achievement of a 90% reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index score, itch-numeric rating scale (NRS) score ≤ 1, sleep-NRS score ≤ 1 and Dermatology Life Quality Index ≤ 1] were investigated.

RESULTS

In total, 2576 patients were enrolled from June 2018 to July 2022. MDA optimal treatment target criteria were achieved by 506/2309 (21.9%), 769/1959 (39.3%), 628/1247 (50.4%), 330/596 (55.4%) and 58/106 (54.7%) of those that reached 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of follow-up, respectively. Logistic regression revealed a negative effect on MDA achievement for conjunctivitis and food allergy at all timepoints. Adverse events (AEs) were mild and were observed in 373/2364 (15.8%), 166/2066 (8.0%), 83/1291 (6.4%), 27/601 (4.5%) and 5/110 (4.5%) of those that reached 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of follow-up. Conjunctivitis was the most frequently reported AE during the available follow-up. AEs led to treatment discontinuation in < 1% of patients during the evaluated time periods.

CONCLUSIONS

The high long-term effectiveness and safety of dupilumab were confirmed in this dynamic cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe AD, regardless of clinical phenotype and course (persisting or relapsing) at baseline. Further research will be needed to investigate the effect of T helper cell 2 comorbidities and disease duration on the response to dupilumab and other newer therapeutics for AD.

Immunogenicity of dupilumab in adult and pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis

Background

Development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) to monoclonal antibodies may adversely impact pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and/or safety.

Objective

To describe incidence, titer, and persistence of dupilumab ADAs and NAbs, and their effects on pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

Methods

This analysis included seven phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled (N=2,992) and two long-term open-label extension (N=2,287) trials of subcutaneous dupilumab in adults and pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe AD. ADA, NAb, and dupilumab concentration in serum were assessed using validated immunoassays. ADA impacts on efficacy (EASI) and safety were assessed.

Results

Treatment-emergent ADAs were observed in up to 8.6% (aged ≥18 years), 16.0% (12-17 years), 5.3% (6-11 years), and 2.0% (6 months to 5 years) dupilumab-treated patients. Among dupilumab-treated patients, ≤3.7% had persistent responses, <1% had high titers (≥10,000), and ≤5.1% were NAb-positive. NAbs were more common in patients with moderate- and high-titer ADA responses. High-titer ADAs, while infrequent, were the variable most associated with lower dupilumab concentrations in serum and loss of efficacy, independent of NAb status. Efficacy was generally similar in ADA-positive and -negative patients. For most patients with high- or moderate-titer ADAs, titers decreased and efficacy improved over time with continued dupilumab treatment. ADA-positive and -negative patients had similar incidences of treatment-emergent and serious treatment-emergent adverse events. One patient with high-titer ADAs developed serum sickness.

Conclusion

In patients with AD, ADAs and NAbs had minimal impact on dupilumab concentration, efficacy, and safety, except for high-titer ADAs in a small number of patients.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifiers (NCT02277743, NCT02277769, NCT02260986, NCT02395133, NCT01949311, NCT03054428, NCT03345914, NCT02612454, and NCT03346434).

Evolution of dupilumab-associated conjunctivitis in patients with atopic dermatitis after switching dupilumab to tralokinumab or Janus kinase inhibitors (RESO-ADOC study)

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials and real-life data have reported an increased incidence of conjunctivitis in patients treated with dupilumab for their atopic dermatitis (AD). Although mostly mild in severity, in some cases conjunctivitis will appear or increase after dupilumab initiation, which can lead to dupilumab discontinuation.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To describe the characteristics of patients developing conjunctivitis requiring discontinuation of dupilumab; and (2) to analyse the factors associated with a complete conjunctivitis improvement after dupilumab discontinuation and a switch to tralokinumab or Janus kinase inhibitors.

METHODS

This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study that included all patients with AD treated with dupilumab who developed conjunctivitis leading to dupilumab discontinuation and switching to tralokinumab or Janus kinase inhibitors in daily practice. Data on patients, their AD and conjunctivitis were analysed at the inclusion visit (corresponding to discontinuation of dupilumab and the institution of new AD treatment), at visit 2 (3-6 months after inclusion) and at visit 3 (corresponding to the last medical visit).

RESULTS

After multivariate analysis, the only factors associated with a complete resolution of dupilumab-associated conjunctivitis at visit 2 and/or visit 3 were conjunctivitis duration (OR 8.98, 95% CI 1.47-55) (p = 0.018), personal history of asthma (OR 10.66, 95% CI 1.82-62.63) (p = 0.009) and switching from dupilumab to Janus kinase inhibitors (OR 17.11, 95% CI 2.94-99.66) (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Although uncommon, severe dupilumab-associated conjunctivitis is more frequent in daily life compared to its incidence in the dupilumab pivotal trials. In these cases, our study suggests that a rapid switch to another molecule, particularly a Janus kinase inhibitor, should be considered.

[Efficacy of biologics for severe asthma on allergic comorbidities]

Identification of therapeutic targets other than asthma can guide the choice of biologics in cases of severe asthma. Some of the allergic diseases (atopic dermatitis, food allergies, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis) that may be associated with asthma can be treated with biologics. In this review, we aim to assess the effectiveness of these biologic therapies on the allergic comorbidities of asthma. In the treatment of atopic dermatitis, only Dupilumab, an anti-IL4Rα, has proven its effectiveness and has received reimbursement authorization for this indication. In patients presenting with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, Omalizumab has shown effectiveness, but has not been approved for this indication. Data from post-hoc analyses of studies on severe asthma likewise suggest the effectiveness of Dupilumab regarding allergic rhinitis. While these two biologic therapies have shown positive signals, inducing oral food tolerance, the relevant data are not robust. Biologic therapies targeting IL-5 or its receptor (Mepolizumab, Benralizumab) have seldom been evaluated in allergic comorbidities, excepting atopic dermatitis, for which their effectiveness has not been proven. Lastly, there are interesting data on the combination of biologic therapy and allergen immunotherapy in cases of allergic rhinitis and food allergies, but they need to be confirmed by randomized studies.

Does Body Mass Index Impact the Clinical Response to Dupilumab Therapy in Atopic Dermatitis? A Monocentric Study of 170 Patients

Background: Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody used for the treatment of moderate/severe atopic dermatitis (AD). In recent years, several studies have confirmed the positive association between AD and overweight/obesity, and a report demonstrated the effect of weight reduction on the improvement of AD symptoms. Methods: The weight of 170 patients under treatment with dupilumab was recorded at baseline and after 48 weeks (T48). Clinical monitoring was mainly conducted using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI). The study aimed to assess a possible correlation between the clinical outcome of dupilumab therapy and BMI. Results: Although not statistically significant, patients with a BMI < 25 have a higher EASI percentage improvement than patients with a BMI ≥ 25 at any time point, and the percentage of overweight and obese patients that does not reach EASI-75 at T48 is higher compared to normal-weight patients (13.5% vs. 5.9%). Despite this, in the multivariate regression analysis, no baseline characteristic, including BMI, appears to increase the risk of not reaching EASI-75. In addition, the results show no differences in BMI between baseline and T48 in any age/sex group. Conclusions: The results suggest that overweight and obese patients have a lower response to dupilumab when considering the EASI score, but this difference does not appear to be clinically significant. Furthermore, dupilumab treatment does not seem to impact weight.

Dupilumab in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A 5-Year Open-Label Extension Study

Importance

Moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that often requires continuous long-term systemic management. Long-term safety and efficacy data for treatment options are critically important.

Objective

To assess the safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment for up to 5 years in adults with moderate to severe AD.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The 5-year LIBERTY AD open-label extension study was conducted from September 2013 to June 2022 at 550 sites in 28 countries. The study enrolled adult patients with moderate to severe AD who had participated in previous dupilumab clinical trials. Data were analyzed from August 2022 to February 2023.

Exposures

At enrollment, patients initiated a regimen of subcutaneous dupilumab, 200 mg, weekly (400-mg loading dose). The regimen was amended in June 2014 to dupilumab, 300 mg, weekly (600-mg loading dose) based on a dose-ranging study and again in November 2019 to dupilumab, 300 mg, every 2 weeks to align with the regulatory regimen approvals.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end points were the incidence and rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Key secondary end points included incidence and rate of serious TEAEs and adverse events of special interest, proportion of patients achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear), and proportion of patients with 75% or more improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) from the parent study baseline.

Results

A total of 2677 patients were enrolled and treated in the open-label extension study; 1611 (60.2%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 39.2 (13.4) years. A total of 334 patients (12.5%) completed treatment up to week 260. The most common reasons for withdrawal were due to regulatory approval of dupilumab in compliance with the study protocol (810 of 1380 [58.7%]), patient withdrawal (248 of 1380 [18.0%]), and adverse events (116 of 1380 [8.4%]). Exposure-adjusted rates of TEAEs were generally stable or declined throughout the study. Common TEAEs (incidence of 5% or greater) included nasopharyngitis, worsening AD, upper respiratory tract infection, conjunctivitis, conjunctivitis allergic, headache, oral herpes, and injection-site reaction. At week 260, 220 of 326 patients (67.5%) achieved an IGA score of 0 or 1 and 288 of 324 (88.9%) achieved 75% or greater improvement in the EASI. The mean (SD) EASI score was 16.39 (14.60) at baseline and 2.75 (5.62) at end of study.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, there was sustained safety and efficacy of continuous long-term dupilumab treatment for adults with moderate to severe AD.

Dupilumab induces hair regrowth in pediatric alopecia areata: a real-world, single-center observational study

Alopecia areata (AA) is nonscarring hair loss characterized by Th1 and concomitant Th2 skewing, particularly in atopic patients. Despite novel developments for adult AA, safe and effective treatments for pediatric patients remain limited. Dupilumab, with a well-studied safety profile, may have therapeutic potential for atopic pediatric AA. To evaluate the ability of dupilumab to regrow hair in pediatric AA patients. We conducted a single-center, retrospective, observational study to evaluate hair regrowth [using Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT)] with dupilumab in 20 children with both AD and AA (age range 5-16 years, mean 10.8 years; baseline SALT range 3-100, mean 54.4). Patient demographics, atopic history, IgE and SALT scores were collected at 12wk follow-up visits, up to > 72wks, to evaluate hair regrowth. Spearman correlations with clinical data were performed. Patients showed clinical improvement over the follow-up period (range 24 to > 72wks, mean 67.6wks) with significant mean(± SD) reduction in SALT at 48wks versus baseline [20.4(± 35.1) vs 54.4(± 37.6), respectively; p < 0.01] and continued improvement up to > 72wks [2.2(± 4.9), p < 0.01]. Baseline SALT positively correlated with disease duration (r = 0.54, p < 0.01), and negatively correlated with improvement in SALT at weeks 24, 36, and 48 (|r|≥ 0.65, p < 0.01 for all comparisons). Baseline IgE positively correlated with improvement in SALT at week 36 (r > 0.60, p < 0.05). Dupilumab was well-tolerated, with no new safety concerns. These real-world data support the utility of dupilumab to safely treat pediatric AA patients, corroborating the role of Th2 skewing in children with AA and associated atopy, warranting larger clinical trials.

A Comprehensive Review of Biologics in Phase III and IV Clinical Trials for Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a skin condition characterized by significant challenges and a substantial deterioration in the life quality for affected patients. The therapeutic landscape for AD has witnessed a transformative shift with the emergence of biologic therapies. Our focus centers on biologics currently undergoing phase III and IV clinical trials, deeming them to hold the highest potential for significant clinical relevance. To identify biologic drugs under development in phase III and IV clinical trials, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov. Additional relevant trials were identified through JapicCTI/ Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) with a citation search. A search in MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed. There have been 76 clinical trials identified concerning biologic drugs: dupilumab (34 trials), lebrikizumab (14 trials), tralokinumab (10 trials), rocatinlimab (7 trials), amlitelimab (2 trials), nemolizumab (6 trials), MG-K10 (1 trial), CM310 (1 trial), 611 (1 trial). A search in MEDLINE revealed 132 articles concerning phase III and IV clinical trials for AD treatment. A total of 39 articles concerned biologic drugs covering 23 clinical trials. A search in EMBASE revealed 268 relevant articles, allowing us to identify results of an additional six clinical trials. The safety and efficacy of these biologics are comprehensively addressed in this review. This comprehensive review aims to explore the current landscape of biologic therapies for AD, delving into the latest research findings, clinical trial outcomes, and the diverse mechanisms of action employed by these novel interventions.

Atopic dermatitis: treatment and innovations in immunotherapy

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease characterized by itching and skin barrier dysfunction. Moderate to severe AD is often refractory to first-line topical treatments, and systemic immunosuppressants have been shown to be effective but have significant adverse effects. The paucity of basic treatments has contributed to the development of targeted topical and systemic immunotherapies based on the use of small molecules and biologic drugs which can directly interact with AD pathogenetic pathways. They represent a new era of therapeutic innovation. Additional new treatments are desirable since AD is a heterogeneous disease marked by different immunological phenotypes. This manuscript will review the mechanism of action, safety profile, and efficacy of promising new systemic immunological treatments for AD. Since moderate to severe AD can result in poor quality of life, the development of targeted and well-tolerated immunomodulators is a crucial purpose. The introduction of new pharmacological agents may offer new therapeutic options. However, there is the need to evaluate how "narrow-acting" agents, such as individual interleukin inhibitors, will perform under the safety and efficacy profiles compared with "broad-acting" agents, such as JAK inhibitors.

Pharmacologic Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), swallowed topical corticosteroids (STSs), and dupilumab are highly effective therapies for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. Shared decision-making informs the choice of therapy and factors such as ease of use, safety, cost, and efficacy should be addressed. PPIs are the most common medication utilized early in the disease course; however, for nonresponders, STSs are an excellent alternative. Dupilumab is unlikely to replace PPIs or STSs as first-line therapy, except in highly specific circumstances. Identification of novel biologic pathways and the development of small molecules may lead to a wider range of treatment options in the future.

Ocular surface disease in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis patients and the effect of biological therapy

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease for which new targeted therapies are currently available. Due to the increased rates of ocular surface disease (OSD) reported during treatment with these new targeted treatments, more insight into the occurrence and pathomechanism of OSD in moderate-to-severe AD patients is needed. Therefore, this review's first part highlights that most patients with moderate-to-severe AD already have characteristics of OSD before starting targeted treatment. Remarkably, not all AD patients with OSD report ocular symptoms. OSD in AD is associated with less conjunctival goblet cells (GC) compared to healthy controls. In addition, OSD severity in AD patients is associated with high AD activity, the presence of eyelid and/or facial eczema, and high levels of AD-related severity biomarkers in tear fluid. The second part of this review highlights that pre-existing ocular pathology (e.g. in combination with the use of ophthalmic medication or eyelid eczema) may be associated with the development of dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease (DAOSD). During dupilumab treatment, DAOSD (which can be new-onset OSD or worsening of pre-existing OSD) is observed in approximately one-third of the dupilumab-treated AD patients. Anti-inflammatory ophthalmic treatment improves DAOSD, and dose reduction of dupilumab may also be an effective treatment option. The pathomechanism of DAOSD is still not fully elucidated. In a prospective study low, but stable conjunctival GC numbers were observed in moderate-to-severe AD patients, before and during dupilumab treatment. However, the Mucin 5 AC (MUC5AC) expression of GCs decreased during dupilumab treatment, suggesting an impairment of the GC function by dupilumab treatment. In addition, higher dupilumab tear fluid levels were found in dupilumab-treated AD patients with moderate-to-severe OSD compared to patients with no or mild OSD, whereas the dupilumab serum levels are similar. Clinicians should be aware of the frequent occurrence of OSD in moderate-to-severe AD patients, and a low-threshold referral to an ophthalmologist is recommended.

Real-Life Study of Patient Preference for Dupilumab or Revision Surgery for Recurrent Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

(1) Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) has a high rate of recurrence in patients, despite therapy with local corticosteroids and functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Dupilumab, a recombinant monoclonal human IgG4 antibody directed against the IL-4 receptor α that inhibits both IL-4 and IL-13 signal transduction, is available for symptomatic therapy. Patient preference between repeated surgery and injection therapy with Dupilumab is not known. (2) Methods: Patients who had experienced at least one surgical intervention for nasal polyps and were treated with Dupilumab for at least 3 months completed a retrospective patient questionnaire. (3) Results: In a cohort of 75 previously operated CRSwNP patients, 91.5% preferred therapy with Dupilumab to repeated surgery for nasal polyps. Preference for Dupilumab in the subgroups of patients with concomitant Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Exacerbated Respiratory Disease (N-ERD) (n = 32), patients with concomitant asthma (n = 25), and patients without concomitant disease (n = 18) was 100%, 96%, and 72%, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Patient preference for Dupilumab over repeat surgery is strongest in previously operated CRSwNP patients with concomitant asthma or N-ERD, but remains very high in patients without concomitant disease.

S3 guideline Atopic dermatitis: Part 2 - Systemic treatment

The present S3 guideline was created based on the European English-language S3 guideline, with special consideration given to the medical conditions in the German-speaking region, and with additions from the previous German-language version, in accordance with the criteria of the AWMF. This second part of the guideline addresses the systemic therapy of atopic dermatitis (AD). It covers topics such as the indication for systemic therapy in children, adolescents, and adult patients with AD. Furthermore, it addresses all medications approved for AD, such as the biologics dupilumab and tralokinumab, the Janus kinase inhibitors abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib, as well as conventional immunosuppressive therapies with systemic glucocorticosteroids and ciclosporin. Additionally, it discusses systemic off-label therapies. The first part of the guideline, published separately, includes the definition and diagnostic aspects of AD, describes topical therapy, non-drug therapy approaches, and addresses aspects related to special patient groups.

S3-Leitlinie Atopische Dermatitis: Teil 2 - Systemische Therapie: S3 guideline Atopic dermatitis: Part 2 - Systemic treatment

Die vorliegende S3‐Leitlinie wurde auf der Basis der europäischen englischsprachigen S3‐Leitlinie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der medizinischen Gegebenheiten im deutschsprachigen Raum und mit Ergänzungen der deutschsprachigen Vorgängerversion, entsprechend den Kriterien der AWMF, erstellt. Dieser zweite Teil der Leitlinie behandelt die systemische Therapie der atopischen Dermatitis (AD). Eingegangen wird unter anderem auf die Indikationsstellung für eine Systemtherapie bei Kindern, Jugendlichen und erwachsenen Patienten mit AD. Darüber hinaus werden alle für die AD zugelassenen Medikamente wie die Biologika Dupilumab und Tralokinumab, die Januskinase‐Inhibitoren Abrocitinib, Baricitinib und Upadacitinib sowie die konventionellen immunsuppressiven Therapien mit systemischen Glukokortikosteroiden und Ciclosporin adressiert. Systemische Off‐Label‐Therapien werden ebenfalls behandelt. Der separat publizierte erste Teil der Leitlinie umfasst die Definition und diagnostischen Aspekte der AD, beschreibt die topische Therapie sowie nichtmedikamentöse Therapieverfahren und geht auf Aspekte bei besonderen Patientengruppen ein.

Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 48 Months of Treatment with Dupilumab for Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Single-Center Real-Life Experience with 126 Patients

BACKGROUND

The main objective was to analyze patient-reported outcomes (PRO) trends over a four-year period in severe atopic dermatitis (AD) patients treated with dupilumab.

METHODS

data from 126 severe patients receiving dupilumab for at least 48 months were collected. The clinical scores assessed included the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Sleep NRS, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT).

RESULTS

the study compellingly demonstrates dupilumab's effectiveness in reducing EASI and improving PROs, with sustained enhancements observed beyond the initial twelve months of treatment. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses show that baseline factors do not significantly increase the risk of adverse outcomes related to Pruritus NRS, POEM, or ADCT at T48. The robust correlation between ADCT and other PROs suggests closely aligned changes.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab's benefits endure beyond the first year, emphasizing its long-term efficacy, and consistently improves AD outcomes regardless of individual characteristics or clinical variables. ADCT appears to be a practical and versatile tool for the streamlined assessment of AD treatment outcomes.

Dupilumab and the potential risk of eosinophilic pneumonia: case report, literature review, and FAERS database analysis

Eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is a rare but noteworthy adverse effect linked to dupilumab, an interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13 inhibitor used in the managing atopic diseases. The underlying mechanisms, potential predisposing factors, clinical characteristics, and optimal management strategies for dupilumab-induced EP remain unclear. We report a 71-year-old patient who developed acute EP after the first 600-mg dose of dupilumab. Eosinophils (EOSs) were also transiently increased (up to 1,600 cells/μl). After the acute EP was effectively treated with glucocorticoids, dupilumab treatment was continued. Rash, itching, and immunoglobulin E levels continued to decrease in the patient, and no further pulmonary adverse events occurred. We combined this case with a literature review of nine articles and analyzed data from 93 cases reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database of patients developing EP after dupilumab use. Our findings imply that dupilumab may induce EP, particularly in individuals over 45 years old, those with a history of respiratory diseases, and those who have previously used inhaled or systemic steroids. Vigilance is required, especially when there is a persistent elevation in peripheral blood EOSs during treatment. Although steroid treatment can effectively manage EP, more data are needed to determine the safety of resuming dupilumab treatment after controlling pneumonia.

Topical prebiotics/postbiotics and PRURISCORE validation in atopic dermatitis. International study of 396 patients

Aim: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of a cream (Rilastil Xerolact PB) containing a mixture of prebiotics and postbiotics, and to validate the PRURISCORE itch scale in the management of atopic dermatitis.Methods: The study is based on 396 subjects of both sexes in three age groups (i.e., infants, children, adults) suffering from mild/moderate Atopic Dermatitis, recruited from 8 European countries and followed for 3 months.Results: The product demonstrated good efficacy combined with good/very good tolerability in all age groups. In particular, SCORAD, PRURISCORE and IGA scores decreased significantly over the course of the study. The PRURISCORE was preferred to VAS by the vast majority of patients.Conclusion: Even though the role of prebiotics and postbiotics was not formally demonstrated since these substances were part of a complex formulation, it can be reasonably stated that prebiotics and postbiotics have safety and standardization features that probiotics do not have. In addition they are authorized by regulatory authorities, whereas topical probiotics are not.

Changes in eotaxin-3 and pulmonary and activation-regulated chemokine levels in patients after dupilumab treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Dupilumab is approved for a variety of type 2 inflammatory diseases. Changes in chemokine levels during treatment require further analysis.

Aim

We evaluated changes in eotaxin-3 and PARC levels after dupilumab treatment through a meta-analysis, aiming to provide more comprehensive results.

Material and methods

Databases were searched to select eligible publications. The study quality was assessed after inclusion. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used for evaluation.

Results

Four studies were included. Eotaxin-3 levels were not seen significantly decreased at weeks 1 and 12, with SMD = -0.39 (95% CI: -1.78, 0.99) and -2.60 (95% CI: -5.77, 0.57), respectively (p > 0.05). Eotaxin-3 levels decreased significantly at weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 52, with SMD = -0.94 (95% CI: -1.61, -0.27); -1.17 (95% CI: -1.49, -0.84); -1.20 (95% CI: -1.52, -0.88); -1.31 (95% CI: -1.83, -0.79); -4.57 (95% CI: -6.90, -2.33); -5.28 (95% CI: -5.52, -5.04); and -4.03 (95% CI: -4.22, -3.85) (p < 0.05), respectively. PARC levels decreased significantly at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16, with SMD = -1.08 (95% CI: -1.59, -0.58); -1.17 (95% CI: -1.68, -0.66); -1.11 (95% CI: -1.61, -0.60); and -1.15 (95% CI: -1.66, -0.64) (p < 0.05), respectively.

Conclusions

Eotaxin-3 and PARC levels can be significantly reduced in patients treated with dupilumab.

Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with severe chronic hand eczema with inadequate response or intolerance to alitretinoin: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND

Effective treatment options for patients with chronic hand eczema (CHE) are scarce. Dupilumab is licensed for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and has shown promising results for the treatment of hand eczema in other studies.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adult patients with severe CHE (subtypes recurrent vesicular hand eczema or chronic fissured hand eczema) who have an inadequate response/intolerance to alitretinoin, or when alitretinoin is medically inadvisable.

METHODS

In this 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept phase IIb trial, patients with severe CHE were randomized 2 : 1 to dupilumab 300 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 2 weeks. Patients visited the outpatient clinic at the initiation of the study drug, and every 4 weeks until 16 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving at least a 75% improvement on the Hand Eczema Severity Index score (HECSI-75) at week 16. Adverse events were monitored during each visit. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT04512339).

RESULTS

In total, 30 patients were randomized, and 29 patients received the assigned study drug (dupilumab n = 20, placebo n = 9). At week 16, more patients achieved HECSI-75 in the dupilumab group than in the placebo group {95% [95% confidence interval (CI) 73.1-99.7] vs. 33% [95% CI 9.0-69.1]}. Dupilumab also showed greater least square mean percentage change from baseline to week 16 in peak pruritus Numerical Rating Scale compared with placebo [-66.5 ± 10.7 (95% CI -88.6 to -44.5) vs. -25.3 ± 17.0 (95% CI -60.1-9.4)]. Adverse events were similar for the dupilumab and placebo groups and were mostly mild. There were no serious adverse events, nor did any of the adverse events lead to discontinuation of the study drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Dupilumab was efficacious and well tolerated. Larger studies of longer duration are needed to provide more evidence on the -efficacy of dupilumab in CHE. Moreover, larger studies could also enable comparisons between clinical subtypes or aetiological -diagnoses.

Atopic dermatitis: a brief review of recent advances in its management

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disorder characterized by recurrent eczematous lesions and intense itching. The disorder affects people of all ages and ethnicities, has a substantial psychosocial impact on patients and relatives, and is the leading cause of the global burden of skin diseases. Atopic dermatitis is associated with an increased risk of multiple comorbidities, including food allergies, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and mental health disorders. The pathophysiology is complex and involves a strong genetic predisposition, epidermal dysfunction, and T-cell-driven inflammation. Although type-2 mechanisms are dominant, there is increasing evidence that the disorder involves multiple immune pathways. Until recently, the management of AD rested mainly on the judicious use of emollients, topical steroids, and topical calcineurin inhibitors in the majority of patients, and systemic immunosuppressants were advocated in severely diseased patients. However, in the last few years, new therapeutic strategies have been designed and developed to target the various steps in the chain of molecular events that lead to the AD phenotype. This review highlights the recent advancements in the management of AD.

Dupilumab for Chronic Prurigo: Case Series on Effectiveness, Safety, and Quality of Life

BACKGROUND

Chronic prurigo (CPG) is a pruritic skin disease, characterized by an itch-scratch cycle and scarring. It reduces patients' quality of life (QoL). Dupilumab is a monoclonal human IgG antibody that inhibits signaling of the interleukin 4 (IL-4) and interleukin 13 (IL-13) pathways through blockade of the IL-4 receptor. Patients with CPG who receive dupilumab often report great improvement in itch and overall QoL. We therefore reviewed our experience in order to follow up on QoL, safety, and treatment response in patients with CPG who received dupilumab.

METHODS

We conducted a real-world retrospective single-center case series. Outcomes were assessed by phone interviews and photographs using validated questionnaires and scores. Demographic data were obtained from the hospital files. Follow-up was up to 2 years. We assessed QoL with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Itchy quality of life questionnaire (ItchyQoL). Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was used to assess itch. Prurigo lesions were documented with the Prurigo activity and severity score (PAS).

RESULTS

Ten patients were included in this study. Results were reported up to 2 years after treatment with dupilumab. The response variables for DLQI, ItchyQoL, NRS, and PAS analyses showed a statistically significant decrease over time (DLQI: p ≤ 0.0001 [-0.84; -1.27], ItchyQoL: p ≤ 0.0001 [-9.89; -18.69], NRS maximum and average: p ≤ 0.0001 [-0.52; -0.86] and p ≤ 0.0001 [-0.55; -0.94], and PAS number of lesions: p = 0.0005 [-1.70; -5.28]). The percent decrease after 1 year of treatment (this estimate is based on model estimates) ranges from -42% to -82%. Four (40%) patients reported mild side effects. No serious side effects were reported.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab treatment of CGP for up to 2 years is associated with improved QoL and less itching.

Targeting Skin Barrier Function in Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease in the general population. Skin barrier dysfunction is the central abnormality leading to AD. The cause of skin barrier dysfunction is complex and rooted in genetic mutations, interactions between the immune pathway activation and epithelial cells, altered host defense mechanisms, as well as environmental influences that cause epithelial cell activation and release of alarmins (such as thymic stromal lymphopoietin) that can activate the type 2 immune pathway, including generation of interleukins 4 and 13, which induces defects in the skin barrier and increased allergic inflammation. These inflammatory pathways are further influenced by environmental factors including the microbiome (especially Staphylococcus aureus), air pollution, stress, and other factors. As such, AD is a syndrome involving multiple phenotypes, all of which have in common skin barrier dysfunction as a key contributing factor. Understanding mechanisms leading to skin barrier dysfunction in AD is pointing to the development of new topical and systemic treatments in AD that helps keep skin borders secure and effectively treat the disease.

Dupilumab in Inflammatory Skin Diseases: A Systematic Review

Dupilumab was first approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) and blocks the signaling of interleukin (IL)-4 and -13. Several other chronic skin conditions share mechanistic overlaps with AD in their pathophysiology, i.e., are linked to type 2 inflammation. Most recently, dupilumab was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for prurigo nodularis (PN). Given its relatively good safety profile, effective off-label use of dupilumab has been reported for a multitude of dermatologic diseases and several clinical trials for dermatologic skin conditions are currently ongoing. We conducted a systematic review of applications of dupilumab in dermatology other than AD and PN by searching the databases PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library as well as the clinical trial registry ClinicalTrials.gov. We found several reports for effective treatment of bullous autoimmune diseases, eczema, prurigo, alopecia areata, chronic spontaneous urticaria, Netherton syndrome and a variety of other chronic inflammatory skin diseases.

Cost-utility analysis of dupilumab compared with endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Evaluation in Colombia, a developing country

INTRODUCTION

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) compromise's respiratory function, sleep, concentration, work capacity and quality of life, generating high costs for patient and health systems. The aim of the study was to analyze the cost-utility of Dupilumab compared to endoscopic sinus surgery for patients with CRSwNP.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We developed a model-based cost-utility analysis from the perspective of the Colombian health system to compare Dupilumab vs endoscopic nasal surgery in patients with difficult-to-treat CRSwNP. Transition probabilities were extracted from the published literature about CRSwNP and costing was based on local tariffs. We performed probabilistic sensitivity analysis for outcomes, probabilities, and costs (10.000 Monte Carlo simulations).

RESULTS

The cost of dupilumab ($ 142.919) was 7.8 times higher than nasal endoscopic sinus surgery ($ 18.347). In terms of QALYs, surgery generates better results than Dupilumab: 11.78 vs. 9.05 QALYs.

CONCLUSIONS

From the perspective of the health system, endoscopic sinus surgery for the management of CRSwNP is a dominant alternative in all the analyzed scenarios compared to the use of Dupilumab. From a cost-utility point of view, the use of dupilumab should be considered when the patient requires multiple surgeries or when there is a contraindication for surgeries performance.

Efficacy of dupilumab for the treatment of severe skin disease in cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 insufficiency: A role of type 2 inflammation?

We report on the successful treatment of a severe, recalcitrant dermatitis caused by CTLA-4 insufficiency with dupilumab, raising the possibility of a role of type 2 immunity in clinical conditions associated with CTLA-4 insufficiency.

Keratinocytes activated by IL-4/IL-13 express IL-2Rγ with consequences on epidermal barrier function

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a Th2-type inflammatory disease characterized by an alteration of epidermal barrier following the release of IL-4 and IL-13. These cytokines activate type II IL-4Rα/IL-13Rα1 receptors in the keratinocyte. Whilst IL-2Rγ, that forms type I receptor for IL-4, is only expressed in haematopoietic cells, recent studies suggest its induction in keratinocytes, which questions about its role. We studied expression of IL-2Rγ in keratinocytes and its role in alteration of keratinocyte function and epidermal barrier. IL-2Rγ expression in keratinocytes was studied using both reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) exposed to IL-4/IL-13 and AD skin. IL-2Rγ induction by type II receptor has been analyzed using JAK inhibitors and RHE knockout (KO) for IL13RA1. IL-2Rγ function was investigated in RHE KO for IL2RG. In RHE, IL-4/IL-13 induce expression of IL-2Rγ at the mRNA and protein levels. Its mRNA expression is also visualized in keratinocytes of lesional AD skin. IL-2Rγ expression is low in RHE treated with JAK inhibitors and absent in RHE KO for IL13RA1. Exposure to IL-4/IL-13 alters epidermal barrier, but this alteration is absent in RHE KO for IL2RG. A more important induction of IL-13Rα2 is reported in RHE KO for IL2RG than in not edited RHE. These results demonstrate IL-2Rγ induction in keratinocytes through activation of type II receptor. IL-2Rγ is involved in the alteration of the epidermal barrier and in the regulation of IL-13Rα2 expression. Observation of IL-2Rγ expression by keratinocytes inside AD lesional skin suggests a role for this receptor subunit in the disease.

No Increased Risk of Overall Infection in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Treated for up to 4 Years with Dupilumab

INTRODUCTION

Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) have an increased risk for infections. This open-label extension study, LIBERTY AD OLE, reports the incidence of infections in adults with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab for up to 4 years.

METHODS

We evaluated infections in adults with moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab 300 mg weekly (qw) or every 2 weeks (q2w; approved regimen) for up to 4 years. Topical corticosteroids (TCS) and calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) were permitted. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (number of patients with at least one event per 100 patient-years [nP/100 PY]) are reported.

RESULTS

Overall, 2677 patients were enrolled and treated with dupilumab: 352 (13.1%) completed up to week 204; 226 patients (8.4%) switched from qw to q2w during the trial. Rates of overall infections (71.27 nP/100 PY), serious and/or severe infections (1.39 nP/100 PY), and infections leading to discontinuation (0.34 nP/100 PY) were consistent with a previous 3-year analysis of this study and low compared with 1-year results in adults with AD treated with placebo + TCS. The cumulative number of patients with treatment-emergent serious or severe infections, non-herpetic or herpetic infections, and total skin infections decreased year-over-year. Limitations included open-label study design with no placebo arm; decreasing sample size at later time points due to sponsor decision to close sites following regulatory approval; qw dosing differs from approved q2w dosing; and patients could use TCS/TCI throughout the study, which may have impacted infection rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous long-term dupilumab treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe AD is not associated with an increased risk of overall systemic or cutaneous infections.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01949311. Video Abstract INFOGRAPHIC.

Insights into atopic dermatitis pathogenesis lead to newly approved systemic therapies

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease characterized by scaly, oozing skin and itch. In moderate-to-severe AD, treatment options have been historically very limited and off-label use has been a common method for disease management. For decades, ciclosporin A was the only systemic immunosuppressive drug approved in most European countries to address this major unmet medical need. However, increased understanding of the pathophysiology of AD has led to a revolution in the treatment of this potentially debilitating disease. Following the approval of the first biological therapy for AD in 2017, there has been a rapid expansion of compounds under development and four additional systemic therapies have been approved in Europe and the USA within the past 3 years alone. In this review, we underscore how key breakthroughs have transformed the therapeutic landscape of AD, leading to a major expansion of type 2 immunity-targeted biological therapies, exploration of neuroimmune modulatory agents, and interest in Janus kinase inhibition.

Dupilumab in the Treatment of Cheilitis in Atopic Dermatitis Patients

Background/Objectives

The lip is a unique tissue type that acts as a “barrier” to the mouth and receives many external stimuli. It is also a common symptom in atopic dermatitis. Dupilumab was the first targeted biological drug approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). There is no real-world clinical data on the use of dupilumab in patients with AD and cheilitis. This retrospective study compared the improvement in skin lesions in AD patients with cheilitis after dupilumab treatment and evaluated the improvement in cheilitis.

Methods

This is a retrospective case series. We investigated patients with AD treated with dupilumab in our department from September 2020 to May 2022, including those with cheilitis. Demographic information such as age, sex, AD or other atopy history, and the anatomical site of dermatitis was collected. Disease severity was assessed using the eczema area and severity index score (EASI), body surface area (BSA), and severity assessment of cheilitis (the cheilitis symptom score) at baseline and after 16 weeks.

Results

We reviewed 96 patients treated with dupilumab for AD, and including the 10 patients with cheilitis (10.4%). All patients demonstrated significant improvement in skin lesions, and lip symptoms improved in seven patients. Among AD patients with improved cheilitis, the average reduction in EASI was 35.0% for BSA (34.9%) and the cheilitis symptom score was 29.9% at week 8. At week 16, compared with the baseline score, the improvement in cheilitis symptom scores was 58.1%, EASI was 60.8%, and BSA was 56.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

Effective treatment of both the skin and cheilitis was achieved with dupilumab. The improvement in cheilitis involvement was slower than that in skin lesions. This case series confirms that dupilumab could be a valuable approach for treating patients with atopic dermatitis-associated lip involvement.

Effect of Dupilumab on Blood Eosinophil Counts in Patients With Asthma, Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps, Atopic Dermatitis, or Eosinophilic Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Transient increases in blood eosinophil counts have been observed in dupilumab clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To assess eosinophil counts and eosinophilia-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) across 11 dupilumab clinical trials, comparing adult and adolescent patients with asthma and adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), atopic dermatitis, and eosinophilic esophagitis.

METHODS

Eosinophil counts, rates of eosinophilia-related TEAEs or treatment-emergent eosinophilia (>1,500 cells/μL), discontinuations, clinical symptoms, and efficacy in patients with asthma or CRSwNP with treatment-emergent eosinophilia are presented.

RESULTS

Transient increases in mean eosinophil counts were observed in dupilumab-treated patients with asthma (mean range across studies at baseline: 349-370 cells/μL; week 4: 515-578 cells/μL), CRSwNP (baseline: 440-448 cells/μL; week 16: 595 cells/μL), and atopic dermatitis (baseline: 434-600 cells/μL; week 4: 410-710 cells/μL), followed by a decline starting by week 24 to baseline or lower. No increases were seen in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (baseline: 310 cells/μL; week 4: 230 cells/μL). In dupilumab-treated patients across all studies, rates of eosinophilia TEAEs were 0% to 13.6%. Clinical symptoms associated with increased eosinophils were rare (seven of 4,666 dupilumab-treated patients, including six cases of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis) and occurred only in patients with asthma or CRSwNP. Eosinophilia was not associated with reduced dupilumab efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Transient increases in eosinophil counts with dupilumab treatment did not affect efficacy and were rarely of clinical consequence. It remains important for physicians to base judgment on individual patient history and baseline eosinophil counts and to be alert to hypereosinophilic symptoms.

The effects of systemic immunomodulatory treatments on COVID-19 outcomes in patients with atopic dermatitis: Results from the global SECURE-AD registry

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available on the effects of systemic immunomodulatory treatments on COVID-19 outcomes in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate COVID-19 outcomes in patients with AD treated with or without systemic immunomodulatory treatments, using a global registry platform.

METHODS

Clinicians were encouraged to report cases of COVID-19 in their patients with AD in the Surveillance Epidemiology of Coronavirus Under Research Exclusion for Atopic Dermatitis (SECURE-AD) registry. Data entered from 1 April 2020 to 31 October 2021 were analysed using multivariable logistic regression. The primary outcome was hospitalization from COVID-19, according to AD treatment groups.

RESULTS

442 AD patients (mean age 35.9 years, 51.8% male) from 27 countries with strongly suspected or confirmed COVID-19 were included in analyses. 428 (96.8%) patients were treated with a single systemic therapy (n = 297 [67.2%]) or topical therapy only (n = 131 [29.6%]). Most patients treated with systemic therapies received dupilumab (n = 216). Fourteen patients (3.2%) received a combination of systemic therapies. Twenty-six patients (5.9%) were hospitalized. No deaths were reported. Patients treated with topical treatments had significantly higher odds of hospitalization, compared with those treated with dupilumab monotherapy (odds ratio (OR) 4.65 [95%CI 1.71-14.78]), including after adjustment for confounding variables (adjusted OR (aOR) 4.99 [95%CI 1.4-20.84]). Combination systemic therapy which did not include systemic corticosteroids was associated with increased odds of hospitalization, compared with single agent non-steroidal immunosuppressive systemic treatment (OR 8.09 [95%CI 0.4-59.96], aOR 37.57 [95%CI 1.05-871.11]). Hospitalization was most likely in patients treated with combination systemic therapy which included systemic corticosteroids (OR 40.43 [95%CI 8.16-207.49], aOR 45.75 [95%CI 4.54-616.22]).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the risk of COVID-19 complications appears low in patients with AD, even when treated with systemic immunomodulatory agents. Dupilumab monotherapy was associated with lower hospitalization than other therapies. Combination systemic treatment, particularly combinations including systemic corticosteroids, was associated with the highest risk of severe COVID-19.

A Review of Phase 3 Trials of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Adults, Adolescents, and Children Aged 6 and Up

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic pruritic skin disease that can have a profound negative impact on patients' quality of life, especially in cases of inadequate disease control. Dupilumab, a dual inhibitor of IL-4 and IL-13 signaling, is approved in the United States for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD in adults (≥ 18 years old) and in children (≥ 6 years old). In this review, we present results from phase 3 trials evaluating dupilumab's efficacy and safety in adults, adolescents, and children. These trials demonstrate that dupilumab provides rapid improvements (in as little as 1 week) and sustained efficacy (up to 4 years) when used as a treatment for moderate-to-severe AD. Dupilumab not only improves skin signs and symptoms, but also provides multiple health benefits beyond the skin, including improvements in quality of life, itch, sleep disturbances, and pain/discomfort. Dupilumab is generally well tolerated, has a favorable safety profile in adults, adolescents, and children, has no serious drug-drug interactions, does not require routine laboratory testing, and is not an immunosuppressant. Taken together, phase 3 trials demonstrate that dupilumab provides rapid and sustained efficacy and is generally well tolerated for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD across age groups.

European guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema: part I - systemic therapy

The evidence- and consensus-based guideline on atopic eczema was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. Four consensus conferences were held between December 2020 and July 2021. Twenty-nine experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. This first part of the guideline includes general information on its scope and purpose, the health questions covered, target users and a methods section. It also provides guidance on which patients should be treated with systemic therapies, as well as recommendations and detailed information on each systemic drug. The systemic treatment options discussed in the guideline comprise conventional immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, ciclosporin, glucocorticosteroids, methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil), biologics (dupilumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab, omalizumab and tralokinumab) and janus kinase inhibitors (abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib). Part two of the guideline will address avoidance of provocation factors, dietary interventions, immunotherapy, complementary medicine, educational interventions, occupational and psychodermatological aspects, patient perspective and considerations for paediatric, adolescent, pregnant and breastfeeding patients.

The changes of IgE levels in type 2 inflammatory diseases after treatment of dupilumab: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is approved for multiple type 2 inflammatory diseases. In the treatment procedure, the changes of IgE levels need further analysis. We evaluated the changes of IgE levels through a meta-analysis, aiming to provide a more comprehensive result.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Databases were searched to select eligible publications. After being included, study quality was assessed. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used as an evaluation.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included. At week 4, the level of IgE did not decrease significantly, with SMD=-0.12 (95%CI: -0.31, 0.07) (P>0.05). At week 8, 12, 16, 24 and 52, the level of IgE decreased significantly, which was SMD=-0.26 (95%CI: -0.48, -0.03); -0.25 (95%CI: -0.32, -0.18); -0.49 (95%CI: -0.65, -0.33); -0.30 (95%CI: -0.38, -0.22); -0.40 (95%CI: -0.48, -0.32) (P<0.05). In AD studies, with the increase of IgE levels, due to the decrease in the total dose of dupilumab, the efficacy index showed a decreasing trend.

CONCLUSIONS

Levels of IgE can be significantly decreased in patients with dupilumab treatment. In AD patients, the efficacy was related to total dose; for patients with high IgE levels, efficacy may be better with the dose increased.

English Version of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Atopic Dermatitis 2021

This is the English version of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Atopic Dermatitis 2021. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a disease characterized by relapsing eczema with pruritus as a primary lesion. In Japan, from the perspective of evidence-based medicine, the current strategies for the treatment of AD consist of three primary measures: (i) use of topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus ointment, and delgocitinib ointment as the main treatment of the inflammation; (ii) topical application of emollients to treat the cutaneous barrier dysfunction; and (iii) avoidance of apparent exacerbating factors, psychological counseling, and advice about daily life. In the present revised guidelines, descriptions of three new drugs, namely, dupilumab, delgocitinib, and baricitinib, have been added. The guidelines present recommendations to review clinical research articles, evaluate the balance between the advantages and disadvantages of medical activities, and optimize medical activity-related patient outcomes with respect to several important points requiring decision-making in clinical practice.

Long-term 2-Year Safety and Efficacy of Tralokinumab in Adults with Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis: Interim Analysis of the ECZTEND Open-label Extension Trial

BACKGROUND

Additional long-term treatments are needed for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). An ongoing, open-label, 5-year extension trial, ECZTEND (NCT03587805), assesses tralokinumab plus optional topical corticosteroids in participants from previous tralokinumab parent trials (PTs) with moderate-to-severe AD.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate safety and efficacy of up to 2 years tralokinumab treatment in a post hoc interim analysis.

METHODS

Safety analyses included adults from completed PTs enrolled in ECZTEND, regardless of tralokinumab exposure duration. Efficacy analyses included adult participants treated with tralokinumab in ECZTEND for ≥1 year, and subgroup analyses of those on tralokinumab for 2 years (1 year from PT, 1 year in ECZTEND). Primary endpoint was number of adverse events (AEs) with additional efficacy endpoints.

RESULTS

Participants on tralokinumab had an exposure-adjusted rate of 237.8 AEs/100 patient-years exposure (N=1174) in the safety analysis set. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of common AEs were comparable to PTs, although at lower rates. With 2 years of tralokinumab, improvements in extent and severity of AD were sustained, with EASI-75 in 82.5% of participants (N=345).

LIMITATIONS

Possible selection bias; no placebo arm; some participants experienced treatment gaps between PTs and ECZTEND.

CONCLUSION

Over 2 years, tralokinumab was well-tolerated and maintained long-term control of AD signs and symptoms.