1
|
Wang AJ, Hircock C, Sferrazza D, Goonaratne E, Cella D, Bottomley A, Lee SF, Chan A, Chow E, Wong HCY. The EORTC QLQ breast modules and the FACT-B for assessing quality of life in breast cancer patients - an updated literature review. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2024:01263393-990000000-00089. [PMID: 39269251 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Two commonly used quality of life questionnaires in breast cancer are EORTC QLQ-BR23, the FACT-B, and the extended FACT-B + 4. More recently, the EORTC EORTC QLQ-BR42 was developed. This systematic review compares the various versions of the EORTC QLQ and FACT tools for breast cancer in terms of their content, validity, and psychometric properties. RECENT FINDINGS Thirty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. All questionnaires have been proven to be valid, reliable and responsive. The provisional EORTC QLQ-BR45 transitioned to the EORTC QLQ-BR42 in Phase IV of its development, which encompasses the side effects associated with the latest breast cancer treatments. Both the EORTC and FACT measures assess physical and mental dimensions of quality of life, with the EORTC measure placing relatively more emphasis on physical content and FACT placing relatively more emphasis on mental (social and emotional) content. The four additional items in the FACT-B + 4 were developed to address arm lymphoedema following axillary surgery. SUMMARY The development and uptake of quality of life tools are essential in the evaluation of breast cancer treatments. The EORTC QLQ-BR42 and FACT-B are both valid, reliable, and responsive QoL questionnaires.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa J Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caroline Hircock
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, USA
| | | | - Shing Fung Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Adrian Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Edward Chow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Henry C Y Wong
- Department of Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Kowloon West Cluster, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xie S, Wu J, Chen G. Comparative performance and mapping algorithms between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among the Chinese general population. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:7-19. [PMID: 36709458 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01566-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the comparative performance and develop the mapping algorithms between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in China. METHODS Respondents recruited from the Chinese general population completed both EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 during face-to-face interviews. Ceiling/floor effects were reported. Discriminative validity in self-reported chronic conditions was investigated using the effect sizes (ES). Test-retest reliability was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots in a subsample. Correlation and absolute agreements between the two measures were estimated with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and ICC, respectively. Ordinary least squares (OLS), generalized linear model, Tobit model, and robust MM-estimator were explored to estimate mapping equations between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2. RESULTS 3320 respondents (50.3% males; age 18-90 years) were recruited. 51.1% and 12.2% of respondents reported no problems on all EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 dimensions, respectively. The mean EQ-5D-5L utility was higher than SF-6Dv2 (0.947 vs. 0.827, p < 0.001). Utilities were significantly different across all chronic conditions groups for both measures. The mean absolute difference of utilities between the two tests for EQ-5D-5L was smaller (0.033 vs. 0.043) than SF-6Dv2, with a slightly higher ICC (0.859 vs. 0.827). Fair agreement (ICC = 0.582) was observed in the utilities between the two measures. Mapping algorithms generated by the OLS models performed the best according to the goodness-of-fit indicators. CONCLUSIONS Both measures showed comparable discriminative validity. Systematic differences in utilities were found, and on average, the EQ-5D-5L generates higher values than the SF-6Dv2. Mapping algorithms between the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 are reported to enable transformations between these two measures in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shitong Xie
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jing Wu
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
- Center for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
| | - Gang Chen
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oliveira Gonçalves AS, Werdin S, Kurth T, Panteli D. Mapping Studies to Estimate Health-State Utilities From Nonpreference-Based Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review on How Repeated Measurements are Taken Into Account. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:589-597. [PMID: 36371289 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.09.2477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Mapping algorithms are developed using data sets containing patient responses to a preference-based questionnaire and another health-related quality-of-life questionnaire. When data sets include repeated measurements from the same individuals over time, the assumption of observations' independence, required by standard models, is violated, and standard errors are underestimated. This review aimed to identify how studies deal with methodological challenges of repeated measurements, provide an overview of practice to date, and potential implications for future work. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, specialized databases, and previous systematic reviews. A data template was used to extract, among others, start and target instruments if the data set(s) used for estimation and validation had repeated measurements per patient, used regression techniques, and which (if any) adjustments were made for repeated measurements. RESULTS We identified 278 publications developing at least 1 mapping algorithm. Of the 278 publications, 121 used a data set with repeated measurements, among which 92 used multiple time points for estimation, and 39 selected specific time points to have 1 observation per participant. A total of 36 studies did not account for repeated measurements. An adjustment was conducted using cluster-robust standard errors (21), random-effects models (30), generalized estimating equations (7), and other methods (7). CONCLUSIONS The inconsistent use of methods to account for interdependent observations in the literature indicates that mapping guidelines should include recommendations on how to deal with repeated measurements, and journals should update their guidelines accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sophia Werdin
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Kurth
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dimitra Panteli
- Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang D, Peng J, Chen N, Yang Q, Jiang L. Mapping study of papillary thyroid carcinoma in China: Predicting EQ-5D-5L utility values from FACT-H&N. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1076879. [PMID: 36908441 PMCID: PMC9998072 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1076879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To develop a mapping algorithm that can be used to predict EQ-5D-5L health utility scores from FACT-H&N and obtain health utility parameters for Chinese patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), which can be used for cost-utility analysis in health economic. Methods A total of 1,050 patients with PTC from a tertiary hospital in China were included, and they completed FACT-H&N and EQ-5D-5L. Four mapping algorithms of direct mapping functions were used to derive the models: Ordinary least squares (OLS), Tobit model (Tobit), Two-part model (TPM), and Beta mixture regression model (Beta). The goodness-of-fit of models was assessed by the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), Akaike information criteria (AIC), Bayesian information criteria (BIC), and absolute error (AE). A fivefold cross-validation method was used to test the stability of the models. Results The mean utility value of the EQ-5D-5L was 0.870 ± 0.094. The mean EQ-VAS score was 76.5 ± 13.0. The Beta mixture regression model mapping FACT-H&N to EQ-5D-5L achieved the best performance [fivefold cross-validation MAE = 0.04612, RMSE = 0.06829, AIC = -2480.538, BIC = -2381.137, AE > 0.05 (%) = 32.48, AE > 0.1 (%) = 8.95]. The independent variables in this model were Physical Well-Being (PWB), Emotional Well-Being (EWB), Head & Neck Cancer Subscale (HNCS) scores and its square term and interaction term scores. Conclusions This study calculated the health utility score of Chinese patients with PTC. The reported algorithms can be used to map the FACT-H&N into the EQ-5D-5L, which can be applied in the cost-utility related study of patients with PTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deyu Huang
- School of Nursing, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Jialing Peng
- School of Nursing, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Na Chen
- School of Nursing, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Qing Yang
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Longlin Jiang
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gray LA, Hernandez Alava M, Wailoo AJ. Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-3L in patients with breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1237. [PMID: 34794404 PMCID: PMC8600775 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08964-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The types of outcomes measured collected in clinical studies and those required for cost-effectiveness analysis often differ. Decision makers routinely use quality adjusted life years (QALYs) to compare the benefits and costs of treatments across different diseases and treatments using a common metric. QALYs can be calculated using preference-based measures (PBMs) such as EQ-5D-3L, but clinical studies often focus on objective clinician or laboratory measured outcomes and non-preference-based patient outcomes, such as QLQ-C30. We model the relationship between the generic, preference-based EQ-5D-3L and the cancer specific quality of life questionnaire, QLQ-C30 in patients with breast cancer. This will result in a mapping that allows users to convert QLQ-C30 scores into EQ-5D-3L scores for the purposes of cost-effectiveness analysis or economic evaluation. METHODS We use data from a randomized trial of 602 patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer provided 3766 EQ-5D-3L observations. Direct mapping using adjusted, limited dependent variable mixture models (ALDVMM) is compared to a random effects linear regression and indirect mapping using seemingly unrelated ordered probit models. EQ-5D-3L was estimated as a function of the summary scales of the QLQ-C30 and other patient characteristics. RESULTS A four component mixture model outperformed other models in terms of summary fit statistics. A close fit to the observed data was observed across the range of disease severity. Simulated data from the model closely aligned to the original data and showed that mapping did not significantly underestimate uncertainty. In the simulated data, 22.15% were equal to 1 compared to 21.93% in the original data. Variance was 0.0628 in the simulated data versus 0.0693 in the original data. The preferred mapping is provided in Excel and Stata files for the ease of users. CONCLUSION A four component adjusted mixture model provides reliable, non-biased estimates of EQ-5D-3L from the QLQ-C30, to link clinical studies to economic evaluation of health technologies for breast cancer. This work adds to a growing body of literature demonstrating the appropriateness of mixture model based approaches in mapping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Gray
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Monica Hernandez Alava
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Allan J Wailoo
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Putman S, Preda C, Girard J, Duhamel A, Migaud H. Mapping and Crosswalk of the Oxford Hip Score and Different Versions of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479:1534-1544. [PMID: 34128911 PMCID: PMC8208448 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures such as the Oxford-12 Hip Score and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) are used in daily orthopaedic practice to evaluate patients. Because different studies use different scores, it would be important to build conversion tables between scores (crosswalk) to compare the results of one study with those of another study. Various mapping methods can be used to develop crosswalk tables that convert Oxford-12 scores to the HOOS (and its derivatives, including the HOOS physical function short form, HOOS joint replacement, and HOOS-12) and vice versa. Although prior studies have investigated this issue, they are limited to short forms of the HOOS score. Consequently, they cannot be applied to hip preservation surgery and do not include quality-of-life items, whereas the Oxford-12 Hip Score is used for all hip evaluations. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We prospectively studied the Oxford-12 and HOOS and its derivatives to (1) determine which version of the HOOS has the best mapping with the Oxford-12, (2) define the most-appropriate mapping method using selected indicators, and (3) generate crosswalk tables between these two patient-reported outcome measures. METHODS The study enrolled 500 adult patients before primary THA (59% men [294 of 500 patients]) with hip osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis of the femoral head who completed the HOOS and Oxford-12. Patients were recruited from January 2018 to September 2019 in a tertiary-care university hospital, and we included all primary THAs in patients older than 18 years with a BMI lower than 35 kg/m2 and greater than 18 kg/m2. After a minimum of 6 months of follow-up, 39% (195 of 500) of the patients were assessed using the same tools. To determine which version of the HOOS mapped best to the Oxford-12 and what the most-appropriate mapping method was, we used preoperative data from all 500 patients. Because there is no consensus on the method to establish crosswalk, various mapping methods (linear regression, tobit regression, and quantile regression) and equating methods (linear equating and equipercentile method) were applied along with cross-validation to determine which method was the most suitable and which form of the HOOS provided the best result according to different criteria (mean absolute error, r2, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance).To generate crosswalk tables, we created a conversion table (between the Oxford-12 and the HOOS form that was chosen after answering our first research question and the method chosen after answering our second question) using preoperative and postoperative data (n = 695). This table was meant to be simple to use and allows easy conversions from one scoring system to another. RESULTS The Oxford-12 and HOOS were strongly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient range 0.586-0.842) for the HOOS subcategories and HOOS physical function, HOOS joint replacement, and HOOS-12. The correlation between the HOOS-12 and Oxford-12 was the strongest (r = 0.825). According to the three different criteria and five methods, the HOOS-12 was the best suited for mapping. The goal was to minimize the mean absolute error (perfect model = 0), have a Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance as close as possible to 0, and have the r2 as close as possible to 1. Regarding the most-suitable method for the crosswalk mapping (research question 2), the five methods generated similar results for the r2 (range 0.63-0.67) and mean absolute error (range 6-6.2). For the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance, the equipercentile method was the best (Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance 0.04), with distance reduced by 43% relative to the regression methods (Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance 0.07). A graphical comparison of the predicted and observed scores showed that the equipercentile method provided perfect superposition of predicted and observed values after mapping. Finally, crosswalk tables were produced between the HOOS-12 and Oxford-12. CONCLUSION The HOOS-12 is the most complete and suitable form of the HOOS for mapping with the Oxford-12, while the equipercentile method is the most suitable for predicting values after mapping. This study provides clinicians with a reliable tool to crosswalk between these scores not only for joint arthroplasty but also for all types of hip surgeries while also assessing quality of life. Our findings should be confirmed in additional studies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The resulting crosswalk tables can be used in meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or clinical practice to compare clinical studies that did not include both outcome scores. In addition, with these tools, the clinician can collect only one score while still being able to compare his or her results with those obtained in other databases and registries, and to add his or her results to other databases and joint registries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Putman
- Orthopedics Department, Lille University Hospital Lille, Hôpital Salengro, Lille, France
- University of Lille, Lille, France
- ULR2694 – METRICS: évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, University of Lille, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
- Department of Biostatistics, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Cristian Preda
- Laboratory of Mathematics Paul Painlevé, Unité Mixte de Recherche, Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, University of Lille, Lille, France
- Biostatistic Department, Delegation for Clinical Research and Innovation, Lille Catholic Hospitals, Lille Catholic University, Lille, France
| | - Julien Girard
- Orthopedics Department, Lille University Hospital Lille, Hôpital Salengro, Lille, France
- University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Alain Duhamel
- ULR2694 – METRICS: évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, University of Lille, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
- Department of Biostatistics, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Henri Migaud
- Orthopedics Department, Lille University Hospital Lille, Hôpital Salengro, Lille, France
- University of Lille, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nishii T. CORR Insights®: Mapping and Crosswalk of the Oxford Hip Score and Different Versions of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479:1545-1547. [PMID: 33960971 PMCID: PMC8208414 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Nishii
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka General Medical Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Current Status of Research on the Mapping Function of Health Utility Values in the Asia Pacific Region: A Systematic Review. Value Health Reg Issues 2021; 24:224-239. [PMID: 33894684 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This systematic review aimed to analyze the published studies on the use of the mapping method between generic scales and disease-specific scales as well as between 2 universal scales. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, CNKI, Weipa Database, Wanfang Database, and HERC Database to collect articles about the application of the mapping method to the measurement of health utility value from January 2000 to December 2019. RESULTS Overall, 59 articles met the inclusion requirements, and most of them were a mapping study between a disease-specific scale and a generic scale. Then all these articles were classified by the following study types: a clear functional relationship; unclear functional relationship; disease-specific scale and universality; mapping between generic scales and disease-specific scales, and mapping between universal scales. Most studies derived the best mapping model from the ordinary least squares regression, and fewer studies chose to use new regression methods. Sample sizes in the retrieved studies generally affected the reliability of the study results. CONCLUSIONS In recent years, as more attention has been paid to the research of the mapping method, a large number of problems have followed, such as the selection of scale types, the coverage of the study sample, and the selection of evaluation index of model performance and sample size. It is hoped that these problems can be properly solved in the future research.
Collapse
|
9
|
Yang Q, Yu X, Zhang W. Health variations among breast-cancer patients from different disease states: evidence from China. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:1033. [PMID: 33176759 PMCID: PMC7661201 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05872-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to obtain health utility parameters among Chinese breast cancer patients in different disease states for subsequent health economics model. In addition, we aimed to explore the feasibility of establishing a breast cancer health utility mapping model in China. METHODS Multiple patient-reported health attributes were assessed, including quality of life, which was measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) instrument; health utility and self-rated health, which were measured by the EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. Multivariate regression models, including a linear regression model, an ordinal logistic regression model and a Tobit model, were employed to analyze health differences among 446 breast cancer patients. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine differences in multiple dimensions of health derived from the FACT-B and EQ-5D-5L instruments. A mapping function was used to estimate health utility from quality of life. Rank correlation analyses were employed to examine the correlation between estimated and observed health utility values. RESULTS A total of 446 breast cancer patients with different disease states were analyzed. The health utility values of breast cancer patients in the P state (without cancer recurrence and metastasis), R state (with cancer recurrence within a year), S state (with primary and recurrent breast cancer for the second year and above), and M state (metastatic cancer) were 0.81 (SD ± 0.23), 0.90 (SD ± 0.12), 0.78 (SD ± 0.31), and 0.74 (SD ± 0.27), respectively. There were positive correlations between all scores, including every domain of the FACT-B instrument (p < 0.001). Results from multivariate analysis suggested that patients in the R and M states had lower scores for overall quality of life (R, β = - 9.45, p < 0.01; M, β = - 6.72, p < 0.05). Patients in the M state had lower health utility values than patients in the P state (β = - 0.11, p < 0.05). Estimated health utility values, which were derived from quality of life by using a mapping function, were significantly correlated with directly measured health utility values (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS We obtained the health utility and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores of Chinese breast cancer patients in different disease states. Mapping health utility values from quality of life using four disease states could be feasible in health economic modelling, but the mapping function may need further revision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Yang
- Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610040 Sichuan China
| | - Xuexin Yu
- West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610040 Sichuan China
| | - Wei Zhang
- West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610040 Sichuan China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nahvijou A, Safari H, Yousefi M, Rajabi M, Arab-Zozani M, Ameri H. Mapping the cancer-specific FACT-B onto the generic SF-6Dv2. Breast Cancer 2020; 28:130-136. [DOI: 10.1007/s12282-020-01141-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
11
|
Yang Q, Yu XX, Zhang W, Li H. Mapping function from FACT-B to EQ-5D-5 L using multiple modelling approaches: data from breast cancer patients in China. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17:153. [PMID: 31615531 PMCID: PMC6792204 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1224-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) is the most commonly used scale for assessing quality of life in patients with breast cancer. The lack of preference-based measures limits the cost-utility of breast cancer in China. The goal of this study was to explore whether a mapping function can be established from the FACT-B to the EQ-5D-5 L when the EQ-5D health-utility index is not available. METHODS A cross-sectional survey of adults with breast cancer was conducted in China. All patients included in the study completed the EQ-5D-5 L and the disease-specific FACT-B questionnaire, and demographic and clinical data were also collected. The Chinese tariff value was used to calculate the EQ-5D-5 L utility scores. Five models were evaluated using three different modelling approaches: the ordinary least squares (OLS) model, the Tobit model and the two-part model (TPM). Total scores, domain scores, squared terms and interaction terms were introduced into models. The goodness of fit, signs of the estimated coefficients, and normality of prediction errors of the model were also assessed. The normality of the prediction error is determined by calculating the root mean squared error (RMSE), the mean absolute deviation (MAD), and the mean absolute error (MAE). Akaike information criteria (AIC) and Bayes information criteria (BIC) were also used to assess models and predictive performances. The OLS model was followed by simple linear equating to avoid regression to the mean. RESULTS The performance of the models was improved after the introduction of the squared terms and the interaction terms. The OLS model, including the squared terms and the interaction terms, performed best for mapping the EQ-5D-5 L. The explanatory power of the OLS model was 70.0%. The AIC and BIC of this model were the smallest (AIC = -705.106, BIC = -643.601). The RMSE, MAD and MAE of the OLS model, Tobit model and TPM were similar. The MAE values of the 5-fold cross-validation of the multiple models in this study were 0.07155~0.08509; meanwhile, the MAE of the TPM was the smallest, followed by that of the OLS model. The OLS regression proved to be the most accurate for the mean, and linearly equated scores were much closer to observed scores. CONCLUSIONS This study establishes a mapping algorithm based on the Chinese population to estimate the EQ-5D-5 L index of the FACT-B and confirms that OLS models have higher explanatory power and that TPMs have lower prediction error. Given the accuracy of the mean prediction and the simplicity of the model, we recommend using the OLS model. The algorithm can be used to calculate EQ-5D scores when EQ-5D data are not directly collected in a study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Yang
- Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 China
| | - Xue Xin Yu
- Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041 China
| | - Hui Li
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041 China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mapping the Shah-modified Barthel Index to the Health Utility Index Mark III by the Mean Rank Method. Qual Life Res 2019; 28:3177-3185. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02254-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
13
|
Mukuria C, Rowen D, Harnan S, Rawdin A, Wong R, Ara R, Brazier J. An Updated Systematic Review of Studies Mapping (or Cross-Walking) Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life to Generic Preference-Based Measures to Generate Utility Values. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2019; 17:295-313. [PMID: 30945127 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-019-00467-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mapping is an increasingly common method used to predict instrument-specific preference-based health-state utility values (HSUVs) from data obtained from another health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. There have been several methodological developments in this area since a previous review up to 2007. OBJECTIVE To provide an updated review of all mapping studies that map from HRQoL measures to target generic preference-based measures (EQ-5D measures, SF-6D, HUI measures, QWB, AQoL measures, 15D/16D/17D, CHU-9D) published from January 2007 to October 2018. DATA SOURCES A systematic review of English language articles using a variety of approaches: searching electronic and utilities databases, citation searching, targeted journal and website searches. STUDY SELECTION Full papers of studies that mapped from one health measure to a target preference-based measure using formal statistical regression techniques. DATA EXTRACTION Undertaken by four authors using predefined data fields including measures, data used, econometric models and assessment of predictive ability. RESULTS There were 180 papers with 233 mapping functions in total. Mapping functions were generated to obtain EQ-5D-3L/EQ-5D-5L-EQ-5D-Y (n = 147), SF-6D (n = 45), AQoL-4D/AQoL-8D (n = 12), HUI2/HUI3 (n = 13), 15D (n = 8) CHU-9D (n = 4) and QWB-SA (n = 4) HSUVs. A large number of different regression methods were used with ordinary least squares (OLS) still being the most common approach (used ≥ 75% times within each preference-based measure). The majority of studies assessed the predictive ability of the mapping functions using mean absolute or root mean squared errors (n = 192, 82%), but this was lower when considering errors across different categories of severity (n = 92, 39%) and plots of predictions (n = 120, 52%). CONCLUSIONS The last 10 years has seen a substantial increase in the number of mapping studies and some evidence of advancement in methods with consideration of models beyond OLS and greater reporting of predictive ability of mapping functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Sue Harnan
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Andrew Rawdin
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Ruth Wong
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Roberta Ara
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shi Y, Thompson J, Walker AS, Paton NI, Cheung YB. Mapping the medical outcomes study HIV health survey (MOS-HIV) to the EuroQoL 5 Dimension (EQ-5D-3 L) utility index. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17:83. [PMID: 31077251 PMCID: PMC6511158 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1135-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mapping of health-related quality-of-life measures to health utility values can facilitate cost-utility evaluation. Regression-based methods tend to lead to shrinkage of variance. This study aims to map the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) to EuroQoL 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-3 L) utility index, and to characterize the performance of three mapping methods, including ordinary least squares (OLS), equi-percentile method (EPM), and a recently proposed method called Mean Rank Method (MRM). Methods This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized HIV treatment trial. Baseline data from 421 participants were used to develop mapping functions. Follow-up data from 236 participants was used to validate the mapping functions. Results In the training dataset, MRM and OLS, but not EPM, reproduced the observed mean utility (0.731). MRM, OLS and EPM under-estimated the standard deviation by 0.3, 26.6 and 1.7%, respectively. MRM had the lowest mean absolute error (0.143) and highest intraclass correlation coefficient (0.723) with the observed utility values, whereas OLS had the lowest mean squared error (0.038) and highest R-squared (0.542). Regressing the MRM- and OLS-mapped utility values upon body mass index and log-viral load gave covariate associations comparable to those estimated from the observed utility data (all P > 0.10). EPM did not achieve this property. Findings from the validation data were similar. Conclusions Functions are available for mapping the MOS-HIV to the EQ-5D-3 L utility values. MRM and OLS were comparable in terms of agreement with the observed utility values at the individual level. MRM had better performance at the group level in terms of describing the utility distribution. Trial registration NCT00988039. Registered 30 September 2009. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-019-1135-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Shi
- Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jennifer Thompson
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - A Sarah Walker
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas I Paton
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Infectious Disease, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yin Bun Cheung
- Program in Health Services & System Research and Center for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Level 6, Academia, Singapore, Singapore. .,Center for Child Health Research, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cheung YB, Tan HX, Wang VW, Kandiah N, Luo N, Koh GCH, Wee HL. Mapping the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory to the Health Utility Index Mark III. Qual Life Res 2018; 28:131-139. [PMID: 30173315 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1991-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To map the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL) to the Health Utility Index Mark III (HUI3) in people living with dementia (PWD) and to compare the performance of five methods for mapping. METHODS A cross-sectional study of 346 dyads of community-dwelling PWD and family caregiver was carried out in Singapore. ADCS-ADL and HUI3 were rated by the family caregivers. Disease severity ratings and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) results were retrieved from medical records. A recently proposed mapping method called the Mean Rank Method (MRM) was described and applied, and the results were compared with regression-based mapping, including ordinary least squares, censored least absolute deviation (CLAD), Tobit and response mapping. RESULTS The MRM produced a mapped utility distribution that closely resembled the observed utility distribution. The standard deviations (SDs) of the observed and MRM-mapped utility were both 0.340, whereas the SDs of the other mapped utilities ranged from 0.243 (response mapping) to 0.283 (CLAD). Regressing the MRM- and CLAD-mapped and observed utility values upon disease severity and MMSE gave similar regression lines (each P > 0.05). Regressing the other mapped utility values upon the covariates under- (over-) estimated the utility of good (poor) clinical states. However, regression-based mapping methods gave a better fit at the individual level, as measured by root mean square error, mean absolute error and R2. K fold cross-validation gave similar results. CONCLUSIONS The MRM is accurate at the group level. The regression-based mapping methods are more accurate for making individual-level prediction. In addition, CLAD also performed reasonably well at the group level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Bun Cheung
- Center for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Level 6, Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore. .,Center for Child Health Research, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
| | - Hui Xing Tan
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vivian Wei Wang
- Department of Hospital Management, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Nagaendran Kandiah
- Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gerald C H Koh
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hwee Lin Wee
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|