1
|
Mileva M, de Vries EGE, Guiot T, Wimana Z, Deleu AL, Schröder CP, Lefebvre Y, Paesmans M, Stroobants S, Huizing M, Aftimos P, Tol J, Van der Graaf WTA, Oyen WJG, Vugts DJ, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW, Brouwers AH, Piccart-Gebhart M, Flamen P, Gebhart G. Molecular imaging predicts lack of T-DM1 response in advanced HER2-positive breast cancer (final results of ZEPHIR trial). NPJ Breast Cancer 2024; 10:4. [PMID: 38184611 PMCID: PMC10771456 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00610-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Efficacy of the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-targeting trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in breast cancer (BC) relies on HER2 status determined by immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Heterogeneity in HER2 expression, however, generates interest in "whole-body" assessment of HER2 status using molecular imaging. We evaluated the role of HER2-targeted molecular imaging in detecting HER2-positive BC lesions and patients unlikely to respond to T-DM1. Patients underwent zirconium-89 (89Zr) trastuzumab (HER2) PET/CT and [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) PET/CT before T-DM1 initiation. Based on 89Zr-trastuzumab uptake, lesions were visually classified as HER2-positive (visible/high uptake) or HER2-negative (background/close to background activity). According to proportion of FDG-avid tumor load showing 89Zr-trastuzumab uptake (entire/dominant part or minor/no part), patients were classified as HER2-positive and HER2-negative, respectively. Out of 265 measurable lesions, 93 (35%) were HER2-negative, distributed among 42 of the 90 included patients. Of these, 18 (19%) lesions belonging to 11 patients responded anatomically (>30% decrease in axial diameter from baseline) after three T-DM1 cycles, resulting in an 81% negative predictive value (NPV) of the HER2 PET/CT. In combination with early metabolic response assessment on FDG PET/CT performed before the second T-DM1 cycle, NPVs of 91% and 100% were reached in predicting lesion-based and patient-based (RECIST1.1) response, respectively. Therefore, HER2 PET/CT, alone or in combination with early FDG PET/CT, can successfully identify BC lesions and patients with a low probability of clinical benefit from T-DM1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Mileva
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elisabeth G E de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Guiot
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Zéna Wimana
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Radiopharmacy, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anne-Leen Deleu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Carolien P Schröder
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yolene Lefebvre
- Department of Radiology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marianne Paesmans
- Data Center, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sigrid Stroobants
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Manon Huizing
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Philippe Aftimos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jolien Tol
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Winette T A Van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wim J G Oyen
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle J Vugts
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Adrienne H Brouwers
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Martine Piccart-Gebhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Patrick Flamen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Géraldine Gebhart
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|