Practical Considerations for the Pharmacokinetic and Immunogenic Assessment of Antibody–Drug Conjugates

Programable Albumin-Hitchhiking Nanobodies Enhance the Delivery of STING Agonists to Potentiate Cancer Immunotherapy

Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) is a promising target for potentiating antitumor immunity, but multiple pharmacological barriers limit the clinical utility, efficacy, and/or safety of STING agonists. Here we describe a modular platform for systemic administration of STING agonists based on nanobodies engineered for in situ hitchhiking of agonist cargo on serum albumin. Using site-selective bioconjugation chemistries to produce molecularly defined products, we found that covalent conjugation of a STING agonist to anti-albumin nanobodies improved pharmacokinetics and increased cargo accumulation in tumor tissue, stimulating innate immune programs that increased the infiltration of activated natural killer cells and T cells, which potently inhibited tumor growth in multiple mouse tumor models. We also demonstrated the programmability of the platform through the recombinant integration of a second nanobody domain that targeted programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), which further increased cargo delivery to tumor sites while also blocking immunosuppressive PD-1/PD-L1 interactions. This bivalent nanobody carrier for covalently conjugated STING agonists stimulated robust antigen-specific T cell responses and long-lasting immunological memory, conferred enhanced therapeutic efficacy, and was effective as a neoadjuvant treatment for improving responses to adoptive T cell transfer therapy. Albumin-hitchhiking nanobodies thus offer an enabling, multimodal, and programmable platform for systemic delivery of STING agonists with potential to augment responses to multiple immunotherapeutic modalities.

Development and validation of pharmacokinetics assays for a novel HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (SHR-A1201): Application to its dose-escalation pharmacokinetic study

Approximately 25% of breast cancer patients with HER2 overexpression tend to have a high risk of disease progression and death. Various HER2-targeting therapies have been approved for treatment. Recently, a novel antibody-drug conjugate, SHR-A1201, is being researched and developed. For the pharmacokinetic study of SHR-A1201, suitable bioanalytical methods are needed for quantifying unconjugated cytotoxin, cytotoxin-conjugated antibodies and total antibodies. In this research, bioanalytical methods involving a highly sensitive LC-MS/MS assay for unconjugated cytotoxic payload DM1 in human plasma, ELISA strategies for DM1-conjugated trastuzumab and total trastuzumab in human serum were developed, validated and successfully applied to a phase I dose-escalation pharmacokinetic study of SHR-A1201. The pharmacokinetic properties and exposure-to-dose proportionality was evaluated for SHR-A1201. According to the bioanalytical method validation guidance, the bioanalytical methods were fully validated and the validation results met the acceptance criteria. The nonspecific binding of DM1 and dimer was avoided for the LC-MS/MS assay. In the dose-escalation pharmacokinetic study of SHR-A1201, a potential dose-proportional pharmacokinetics was observed over the dose from 1.2 mg/kg to 4.8 mg/kg. The validated bioanalytical strategies are robust and reproducible and these bioanalytical methods will contribute to better understanding of the pharmacokinetic properties of SHR-A1201.

The Use of Antibody-Antibiotic Conjugates to Fight Bacterial Infections

The emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is rapidly increasing and it is one of the significant twenty-first century’s healthcare challenges. Unfortunately, the development of effective antimicrobial agents is a much slower and complex process compared to the spread of AMR. Consequently, the current options in the treatment of AMR are limited. One of the main alternatives to conventional antibiotics is the use of antibody-antibiotic conjugates (AACs). These innovative bioengineered agents take advantage of the selectivity, favorable pharmacokinetic (PK), and safety of antibodies, allowing the administration of more potent antibiotics with less off-target effects. Although AACs’ development is challenging due to the complexity of the three components, namely, the antibody, the antibiotic, and the linker, some successful examples are currently under clinical studies.

What makes a good antibody-drug conjugate?

Introduction: Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) are becoming increasingly important weapons in the fight against cancer, as evidenced by the growing number of approved products. The complex nature of an ADC means that there is a vast array of choices to consider in the design of such drugs.Areas covered: We provide an overview of developments in each facet of ADC structure: the antibody, linker, and payload. Looking at the current clinical landscape, we discuss trends that have led to the evolution of ADC design.Expert opinion:Following a history of setbacks and high discontinuation rates, the understanding of the ADC field has grown. If developers can obtain a firm grasp of the structure-function relationship of their molecule, we expect the advances in ADC design to translate to improved clinical success. Moreover, the breadth of ADC applications will continue to expand to target new indications with novel targets and payloads.

Antibody-drug conjugates: an evolving approach for melanoma treatment

Melanoma continues to be an aggressive and deadly form of skin cancer while therapeutic options are continuously developing in an effort to provide long-term solutions for patients. Immunotherapeutic strategies incorporating antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have seen varied levels of success across tumor types and represent a promising approach for melanoma. This review will explore the successes of FDA-approved ADCs to date compared to the ongoing efforts of melanoma-targeting ADCs. The challenges and opportunities for future therapeutic development are also examined to distinguish how ADCs may better impact individuals with malignancies such as melanoma.

Durable blockade of PD-1 signaling links preclinical efficacy of sintilimab to its clinical benefit

Blockade of immune checkpoint pathways by programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibodies has demonstrated broad clinical efficacy against a variety of malignancies. Sintilimab, a highly selective, fully human monoclonal antibody (mAb), blocks the interaction of PD-1 and its ligands and has demonstrated clinical benefit in various clinical studies. Here, we evaluated the affinity of sintilimab to human PD-1 by surface plasmon resonance and mesoscale discovery and evaluated PD-1 receptor occupancy and anti-tumor efficacy of sintilimab in a humanized NOD/Shi-scid-IL2rgamma (null) (NOG) mouse model. We also assessed the receptor occupancy and immunogenicity of sintilimab from clinical studies in humans (9 patients with advanced solid tumor and 381 patients from 4 clinical studies, respectively). Sintilimab bound to human PD-1 with greater affinity than nivolumab (Opdivo®, MDX-1106) and pembrolizumab (Keytruda®, MK-3475). The high affinity of sintilimab is explained by its distinct structural binding mode to PD-1. The pharmacokinetic behavior of sintilimab did not show any significant differences compared to the other two anti-PD-1 mAbs. In the humanized NOG mouse model, sintilimab showed superior PD-1 occupancy on circulating T cells and a stronger anti-tumor effect against NCI-H292 tumors. The strong anti-tumor response correlated with increased interferon-γ-secreting, tumor-specific CD8+ T cells, but not with CD4+ Tregs in tumor tissue. Pharmacodynamics testing indicated a sustained mean occupancy of ≥95% of PD-1 molecules on circulating T cells in patients following sintilimab infusion, regardless of infusion dose. Sintilimab infusion was associated with 0.52% (2/381 patients) of anti-drug antibodies and 0.26% (1/381 patients) neutralizing antibodies. These data validate sintilimab as a novel, safe, and efficacious anti-PD-1 mAb for cancer immunotherapy.

Pharmacokinetic and Immunological Considerations for Expanding the Therapeutic Window of Next-Generation Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) development has evolved greatly over the last 3 decades, including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of several new drugs. However, translating ADCs from the design stage and preclinical promise to clinical success has been a major hurdle for the field, particularly for solid tumors. The challenge in clinical development can be attributed to the difficulty in connecting the design of these multifaceted agents with the impact on clinical efficacy, especially with the accelerated development of 'next-generation' ADCs containing a variety of innovative biophysical developments. Given their complex nature, there is an urgent need to integrate holistic ADC characterization approaches. This includes comprehensive in vivo assessment of systemic, intratumoral and cellular pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, toxicodynamics, and interactions with the immune system, with the aim of optimizing the ADC therapeutic window. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic factors influencing the ADC therapeutic window include (1) selecting optimal target and ADC components for prolonged and stable plasma circulation to increase tumoral uptake with minimal non-specific systemic toxicity, (2) balancing homogeneous intratumoral distribution with efficient cellular uptake, and (3) translating improved ADC potency to better clinical efficacy. Balancing beneficial immunological effects such as Fc-mediated and payload-mediated immune cell activation against harmful immunogenic/toxic effects is also an emerging concern for ADCs. Here, we review practical considerations for tracking ADC efficacy and toxicity, as aided by high-resolution biomolecular and immunological tools, quantitative pharmacology, and mathematical models, all of which can elucidate the relative contributions of the multitude of interactions governing the ADC therapeutic window.

Intact Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Immuno-Isolated Human Therapeutic Antibodies from Serum

Antibody-based therapeutics have emerged as novel class of biopharmaceuticals over the last couple of decades with the advancements made in production and downstream processing technologies. The structural diversity of therapeutic antibodies has also evolved with the development of bispecific (and multispecific) antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates. With increased structural complexities and multi-modularity, there is a need to demonstrate that the entire structure is stable in vivo and arriving at its target site in an intact form. Proving that antibodies reach their target site unscathed is a challenging but essential step for showing effective delivery as well as showing whether failure in efficacy (if any) was related to its in vivo instability. This chapter describes a method for highly specific immuno-isolation followed by intact mass spectrometry of human Fc-containing antibody from serum of rats dosed with the antibody. The method provides an opportunity for evaluating antibody stability in the physiological environment by providing accurate validation of its molecular mass in vivo, as well as the potential to identify breakdown products.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates as Cancer Therapeutics: Past, Present, and Future

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent an innovative therapeutic approach that provides novel treatment options and hope for patients with cancer. By coupling monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to cytotoxic small-molecule payloads with a plasma-stable linker, ADCs offer the potential for increased drug specificity and fewer off-target effects than systemic chemotherapy. As evidence for the potential of these therapies, many new ADCs are in various stages of clinical development. Because their structure poses unique challenges to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterization, it is critical to recognize the differences between ADCs and conventional chemotherapy in the design of ADC clinical development strategies. Although some properties may be determined mainly by either the mAb or the small-molecule portion, the behavior of these agents is not always predictable. Furthermore, because the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of ADCs are influenced by all 3 of its components (mAb, linker, and payload), it is important to characterize the intact molecule, any target-mediated catabolic clearance of the mAb, and the ADME properties of the small-molecule payload. Here we describe key issues in the clinical development of ADCs, including considerations for designing first-in-human studies for ADCs. We discuss some difficulties of ADC pharmacokinetic characterization and current approaches to overcoming these challenges. Finally, we consider all aspects of clinical pharmacology assessment required during drug development, using examples from the literature to illustrate the discussion.

Analytical techniques for the characterization of Antibody Drug Conjugates: Challenges and prospects

Antibody drug conjugates are increasingly being researched for the treatment of cancer. Accurate and reliable characterization of ADCs is inevitable for their development as potential therapeutic agent. Different analytical techniques have been used in order to decipher heterogeneous nature of antibody drug conjugates, enabling successful characterization. This review will summarize specially three major analytical tools i.e. UV-Vis spectroscopy, liquid chromatography, and mass spectrometry used in characterization of antibody drug conjugates. In this review, major challenges during analysis due to the inherent features of analytical techniques and antibody drug conjugates are summarized along with the modifications intended to address each challenge.

Proteomic strategies in the search for novel pancreatic cancer biomarkers and drug targets: recent advances and clinical impact

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest cancers; despite a low incidence rate it is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. Improvement of the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment remains the main focus of pancreatic cancer research. Rapid developments in proteomic technologies has improved our understanding of the pancreatic cancer proteome. Here, the authors summarise the recent proteomic strategies undertaken in the search for: novel biomarkers for early diagnosis, pancreatic cancer-specific proteins which may be used for novel targeted therapies and proteins which may be useful for monitoring disease progression post-therapy. Recent advances and findings discussed here provide great promise of having a significant clinical impact and improving the outcome of patients with this malignancy.

Aptamer-Drug Conjugates of Active Metabolites of Nucleoside Analogs and Cytotoxic Agents Inhibit Pancreatic Tumor Cell Growth

Aptamer-drug conjugates (ApDCs) have the potential to improve the therapeutic index of traditional chemotherapeutic agents due to their ability to deliver cytotoxic drugs specifically to cancer cells while sparing normal cells. This study reports on the conjugation of cytotoxic drugs to an aptamer previously described by our group, the pancreatic cancer RNA aptamer P19. To this end, P19 was incorporated with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), or conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) and derivative of maytansine 1 (DM1). The ApDCs P19-dFdCMP and P19-5FdUMP were shown to induce the phosphorylation of histone H2AX on Ser139 (γ-H2AX) and significantly inhibited cell proliferation by 51%–53% in PANC-1 and by 54%–34% in the gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cell line AsPC-1 (p ≤ 0.0001). P19-MMAE and P19-DM1 caused mitotic G2/M phase arrest and inhibited cell proliferation by up to 56% in a dose-dependent manner when compared to the control group (p ≤ 0.001). In addition, the cytotoxicity of P19-MMAE and P19-DM1 in normal cells and the control human breast cancer cell line MCF7 was minimal. These results suggest that this approach may be useful in decreasing cytotoxic side effects in non-tumoral tissue.

Antibody–drug conjugate bioanalysis using LB-LC–MS/MS hybrid assays: strategies, methodology and correlation to ligand-binding assays

Background: Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are complex drug constructs with multiple species in the heterogeneous mixture that contribute to their efficacy and toxicity. The bioanalysis of ADCs involves multiple assays and analytical platforms. Methods: A series of ligand binding and LC–MS/MS (LB-LC–MS/MS) hybrid assays, through different combinations of anti-idiotype (anti-Id), anti-payload, or generic capture reagents, and cathepsin-B or trypsin enzyme digestion, were developed and evaluated for the analysis of conjugated-payload as well as for species traditionally measured by ligand-binding assays, total-antibody and conjugated-antibody. Results & conclusion: Hybrid assays are complementary or viable alternatives to ligand-binding assay for ADC bioanalysis and PK/PD modeling. The fit-for-purpose choice of analytes, assays and platforms and an integrated strategy from Discovery to Development for ADC PK and bioanalysis are recommended.

LC–MS-based quantification of intact proteins: perspective for clinical and bioanalytical applications

Bioanalytical LC–MS for protein quantification is traditionally based on enzymatic digestion of the target protein followed by absolute quantification of a specific signature peptide relative to a stable-isotope labeled analog. The enzymatic digestion, nonetheless, limits rapid method development, sample throughput and turnaround time, and, moreover, makes that essential information regarding the biological function of the intact protein is lost. The recent advancements in high-resolution MS instrumentation and improved sample preparation techniques dedicated to protein clean-up raise the question to what extent LC–MS can be applied for quantitative bioanalysis of intact proteins. This review provides an overview of current and potential applications of LC–MS for intact protein quantification as well as the main limitations and challenges for broad application.

Antibody–drug conjugates nonclinical support: from early to late nonclinical bioanalysis using ligand-binding assays

Seema Kumar is a Principal Scientist at Pfizer. She leads a group that provides regulated bioanalytical support including assay development, validation and sample analysis for the PK and immunogenicity assessment for preclinical and clinical development of Pfizer's biotherapeutics portfolio. She is also responsible for scientific oversight of regulated studies outsourced at CROs. Prior to Pfizer, Dr Kumar held a similar role as Director of CLIA certified Clinical Bioanalytical Laboratory at XBiotech USA, Inc. She holds a PhD in Biophysical Chemistry from Johns Hopkins University, and has published several publications in peer-reviewed journals, and contributed to book chapters.

The objective of antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) bioanalysis at different stages of drug development may vary and so are the associated bioanalytical challenges. While at early drug discovery stage involving candidate selection, optimization and preliminary nonclinical assessments, the goal of ADC bioanalysis is to provide PK, toxicity and efficacy data that assists in the design and selection of potential drug candidates, the late nonclinical and clinical drug development stage typically involves regulated ADC bioanalysis that delivers TK data to define and understand pharmacological and toxicological properties of the lead ADC candidate. Bioanalytical strategies and considerations involved in developing successful ligand binding assays for ADC characterization from early discovery to late nonclinical stages of drug development are presented here.