Reduction of Isoagglutinin in Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) Using Blood Group A- and B-Specific Immunoaffinity Chromatography: Industry-Scale Assessment

Management of the sensitized pediatric renal transplant candidate

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with ESRD as it is associated with improved patient survival and better quality of life, especially in children. There are several barriers to a successful transplant including organ shortage, anatomic barriers, and immunologic barriers. One of the biggest immunologic barriers that precludes transplantation is sensitization, when patients have antibodies prior to transplantation, resulting in positive crossmatches with donor. 30%-40% of adult patients on the wait list are sensitized. There is a growing number of pediatric patients on the wait list who are sensitized. This poses a unique challenge to the pediatric transplant community. Therefore, attempts to perform desensitization to remove or suppress pathogenic HLA antibodies resulting in acceptable crossmatches, and ultimately a successful transplant, while reducing the risk of acute rejection, are much needed in these children. This review article aims to address the management of such patients both prior to transplantation, with strategies to overcome sensitization, and after transplantation with monitoring for allograft rejection and other complications.

A retrospective analysis of haemolytic reactions to intravenous immunoglobulin using data from the Transfusion-Transmitted Injuries Surveillance System (Ontario)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Haemolysis can occur following intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) infusion. Haemovigilance data were analysed using a novel approach for including two control groups with no haemolysis to IVIG. Objectives included a summary of all reactions to IVIG, rate estimates and analysis of haemolytic reactions including risk factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Canadian haemovigilance data from Ontario (2013-2021), IVIG distribution and transfusion data from the blood supplier, and data from a large local transfusion registry were used. An 'other-reactions' control group included patients with IVIG reactions that were not haemolytic, and registry patients with no-reaction were the 'no-reaction controls'. Descriptive analysis and two logistic regression models for the different control groups were performed.

RESULTS

One thousand one hundred and seventy reactions were included. Most common were febrile non haemolytic (26.1%), minor allergic (24.5%) and IVIG headache (15.3%) followed by haemolytic 10.9% (128/1170). Haemolytic reaction rates decreased over time: rates since 2020 estimated between 1.5 and 2.9/1000 kg IVIG used. The regression model for other-reaction controls identified two risk factors for haemolysis: non-O blood group recipients compared with group O recipients (p value = 0.0106) and IVIG dose per 10 g increase (OR 1.359; 95% CI 1.225-1.506). The model using no-reaction controls gave similar results and also showed no pre-medication was associated with a higher risk of haemolysis (OR 29.084; 95% CI 1.989-425.312).

CONCLUSION

The frequency of haemolytic reactions has decreased over time. We confirmed non-O blood group recipients and IVIG dose as risk factors for haemolysis and raise the hypothesis that no pre-medication may increase the risk of haemolysis.

Incidence and risk factors for intravenous immunoglobulin-related hemolysis: A systematic review of clinical trial and real-world populations

Background

Severe hemolysis rarely occurs in patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy. A systematic review was performed to assess the incidence of IVIG‐related hemolysis and the impact of patient and product risk factors.

Study Design and Methods

A systematic literature search for terms related to “IVIG products”, “hemolysis,” and “adverse events” was conducted in Embase for articles published between January 1, 2015, and May 31, 2021. Studies with no clinical datasets, no IVIG treatment, or where IVIG was used to treat hemolytic conditions were excluded. Of the 430 articles retrieved, 383 were excluded based on titles/abstracts and 14 were excluded after in‐depth review.

Results

In total, 33 articles were analyzed and separated into observational studies (n = 16), clinical trials (n = 8), and case reports (n = 9). The incidence proportion for IVIG‐related hemolysis ranged from 0% to 19% in observational studies and 0%–21% in clinical trials. A higher incidence of IVIG‐related hemolysis was consistently reported in patients with blood groups A and AB. Hemolysis occurred more frequently in patients treated with IVIG for some conditions such as Kawasaki disease; however, this may be confounded by the high dose of IVIG therapy. IVIG‐related hemolysis incidence was lower in studies using IVIG products citing manufacturing processes to reduce isoagglutinin levels than products that did not.

Conclusion

This analysis identified patient and product risk factors including blood group, IVIG dose, and IVIG manufacturing processes associated with elevated IVIG‐related hemolysis incidence.

Assessment of severity and mortality of COVID-19 with anti-A1 and anti-B IgM isohaemagglutinins, a reflection of the innate immune status

AIMS

The relationship between the innate immune system that creates the polysaccharide antibody response and COVID-19 is not fully understood. In this study, it was aimed to determine the predictive values of isohaemagglutinins in COVID-19 severity/mortality.

METHODS

Approximately 15 440 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were examined, and a total of 286 patients with anti-B and anti-A1 IgM isohaemagglutinins test results were randomly enrolled in the study. These patients were stratified into two groups according to anti-A1 (n: 138 blood type B or O) and anti-B (n: 148 blood type A) IgM isohaemagglutinins. Anti-A1 or/and anti-B IgM, biochemical parameters, symptoms, chronic diseases, hospitalisation status, intubation status, admission to intensive care unit (ICU) and exitus status were recorded and evaluated for all patients.

RESULTS

Anti-A1 IgM and anti-B IgM were significantly lower in ICU patients (7.5 ± 9.9 vs 18.0 ± 20.4 and 5.5 ± 6.3 vs 19.3 ± 33.6 titres, respectively; P < .01) and in exitus patients (3.8 ± 3.6 vs 16.7 ± 18.7 and 3.5 ± 4.7 vs 16.9 ± 29.6 titres respectively; P < .01). In the ROC analysis performed to differentiate between exitus and discharge within groups, the sensitivity of anti-B IgM and anti-A1 IgM at cut-off ≤4 was 88.9% and 79.6%, specificity 66.0% and 73.4%, and AUC 0.831 and 0.861, respectively (P < .01). Anti-A1 IgM decreased the mortality risk 0.811 times per unit while anti-B IgM decreased 0.717 times (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Anti-B and anti-A1 isohaemagglutinins, which are an expression of the innate immune system, can be used to predict the severity and mortality of COVID-19 disease.

Intravenous immunoglobulin and the current risk of moderate and severe anaphylactic events, a cohort study

This large cohort study from the US Premier Healthcare Database evaluated the risk and predictors of anaphylaxis in association with intravenous immunoglobulin (IvIg) therapy in the inpatient and outpatient setting. Data were collected retrospectively (January 2009-December 2018) from 24 919 patients administered IgPro10 IvIg, median age 54 years. Immunoglobulins of interest were IgPro10 and other IvIg given before or after IgPro10. Moderate and severe anaphylaxis was identified from same-day parenteral epinephrine and IvIg use and reviews of patient record summaries. Predictors for first anaphylactic reactions associated with IvIg administration were derived from adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) using Poisson regression. Moderate anaphylaxis in IvIg use was rare and severe anaphylaxis very rare based on a total of 124 moderate and four non-fatal severe first anaphylactic events, incidence rate of 7.11 and 0.23/10 000 IvIg administrations, respectively. Age under 18 years was an independent predictor of moderate or severe anaphylactic events [adjusted incidence rate ratio = 2.94, 0.95 confidence interval  = 1.91-4.52] compared with those aged 18 years and older. First IvIg administration was a strong predictor of anaphylaxis. The IRR in those with a subsequent IvIg administration in the preceding 42 days decreased to 0.27 (0.17-0.42) and in those effectively IvIg-naive (no IvIg for > 42 days) to 0.76 (0.44-1.32) compared with first IvIg use. The key conclusions from this study are that the risk of anaphylaxis has progressively reduced over the last decade, from 14.87 of 10 000 in 2009-10 to 4.39 of 10 000 IvIg administrations in 2017-18 and is rare overall, and that the risk of anaphylaxis is increased in those aged under 18 years.

Expanding the Role of the Pharmacist: Immunoglobulin Therapy and Disease Management in Neuromuscular Disorders

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is a commonly used treatment for chronic neuromuscular disorders (NMDs), such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and multifocal motor neuropathy. IgG therapy has also shown promise in treating other NMDs including myasthenia gravis, polymyositis, and dermatomyositis. IgG is administered as either intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg), with SCIg use becoming more popular due to the treatment burden associated with IVIg. IVIg requires regular venous access; long infusions (typically 4-6 hours); and can result in systemic adverse events (AEs) for some patients. In contrast, SCIg can be self-administered at home with shorter infusions (approximately 1 hour) and fewer systemic AEs. As patient care shifts toward home-based settings, the role of the pharmacist is paramount in providing a continuation of care and acting as the bridge between patient and clinic. Pharmacists with a good understanding of current recommendations, dosing strategies, and administration routes for IgG therapy are best placed to support patients. The aims of this review are to highlight the evidence supporting IgG therapy in the treatment of NMDs and provide practical information on patient management and IVIg/SCIg dosing in order to guide pharmacists on optimizing clinical outcomes and patient care.

Anti-A/B isoagglutinin reduction in an intravenous immunoglobulin product and risk of hemolytic anemia: a hospital-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) are derived from large human plasma pools. IVIG-associated hemolytic anemia (HA) is a known class effect, likely attributed to dose-dependent passive transfer of anti-A/B isoagglutinins. Two isoagglutinin reduction steps were implemented in the manufacturing process of Privigen (human 10% liquid IVIG): exclusion of high-anti-A-titer donors in 2013, replaced by specific immunoaffinity chromatography in 2015. We aim to estimate the clinical effectiveness of both measures.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Using the US hospital-based Premier Healthcare Database, three Privigen cohorts were generated based on calendar periods indicative of manufacturing changes: Period 1 (baseline) January 2008 to December 2012, Period 2 (high-anti-A-titer donor exclusion) October 2013 to December 2015, and Period 3 (immunoaffinity chromatography) October 2016 to April 2019. HA within a 10-day at-risk period after Privigen administrations was identified from review of patient record summaries. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated from Poisson regression (Period 1 reference) adjusting for hospital setting, sex, age, Privigen indication, dose, and first use.

RESULTS

Crude incidence rates of HA were 1.49 per 10,000 person-days in Period 1 (38 HA, 9439 patients), 1.01 in Period 2 (20 HA, 7710 patients), and 0.14 in Period 3 (3 HA, 7759 patients). Adjusted IRR for HA in Period 2 was 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-1.23), and in Period 3 was 0.10 (0.03-0.33) compared with Period 1. The IRR for HA in Period 3 compared with Period 2 was 0.14 (95% CI, 0.04-0.47).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of immunoaffinity chromatography in Privigen manufacturing resulted in a significant 90% reduction of HA risk. HA has become a rare event in association with Privigen use.

Isoagglutinin reduction in intravenous immunoglobulin (IgPro10, Privigen) by specific immunoaffinity chromatography reduces its reporting rates of hemolytic reactions: an analysis of spontaneous adverse event reports

BACKGROUND

Hemolysis is an infrequent but recognized and potentially serious adverse effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Relatively elevated hemolysis reporting rates were seen with some IVIG products with high anti-A/B isoagglutinin content, among which IgPro10 (Privigen, CSL Behring). For IgPro10, two isoagglutinin reduction measures were successively implemented: 1) anti-A donor screening and 2) immunoaffinity chromatography (IAC; Ig IsoLo)-based isoagglutinin reduction step included in the production process. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the effects of these isoagglutinin reduction measures on the reporting rates of IgPro10 hemolysis worldwide.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Between February 2008 and December 2018, hemolysis reports from the CSL Behring Global Safety Database were analyzed in relationship to changes in IVIG IgPro10 production methods. Further analysis classified hemolysis reports by indication and blood group.

RESULTS

Median (minimum-maximum) anti-A/anti-B titers were 32 (8-64)/16 (8-32) at baseline, 32 (8-64)/16 (8-32) after donor screening, and 8 (8-32)/4 (2-8) after implementation of IAC. The reporting rate of hemolytic reactions per 1000 kg IgPro10 sold was 4.05 cases at baseline, 2.00 after donor screening, and 0.50 after implementation of IAC. In 2018, there were seven reports of hemolytic reactions; representing 0.18 cases per 1000 kg IgPro10 sold, with a reduction of 95.6% versus baseline.

CONCLUSION

Following implementation of the IAC isoagglutinin reduction step, spontaneous reports of hemolytic events with IgPro10 were significantly and consistently reduced versus IgPro10 without isoagglutinin reduction, offering patients a more favorable benefit-risk profile.

Measurement of isoagglutinins in immunoglobulins for intravenous application by flow cytometry

Isoagglutinins present in intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) products have been linked to haemolysis. Therefore, accurately assessing isoagglutinin content in IVIG products is important. The standard European Pharmacopoeia (Ph.Eur.) direct assay is limited by low precision. Here, we describe the development of a fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) method for assessing isoagglutinin levels. Serially diluted IVIG samples were incubated with red blood cells (RBCs), RBC-bound anti-A and anti-B antibodies were detected using a fluorescently-labelled antibody and the median fluorescence intensity of samples was assessed by FACS. Results were compared with the Ph.Eur. direct assay. The method was used to determine isoagglutinins in commercial products produced with and without isoagglutinin reduction steps. Assay precision, reported as the coefficient of variation, for the FACS method was 14% and 8% for anti-A and anti-B, respectively versus 33% and 20% with the Ph.Eur. direct assay. Application of the method on commercially available IVIGs revealed differences in isoagglutinin content between products produced with and without isoagglutinin reduction steps. This FACS assay allows for quantification of isoagglutinin concentrations in IVIGs with higher precision than the Ph.Eur. direct assay. Also the FACS assay confirms differences in isoagglutinin levels between IVIG products and the efficacy of isoagglutinin reduction measures.

Isoagglutinin-reduced immunoglobulin retains efficacy in mouse models of immune thrombocytopenia and rheumatoid arthritis and is less likely to cause intravenous immunoglobulin-associated hemolysis

BACKGROUND

Immunoglobulin therapy including intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been used as an effective treatment for autoimmune/inflammatory conditions with few side effects. However, high‐dose IVIg (1‐2 g/kg) has been recognized as a cause of hemolytic anemia in non–blood group O patients. Hemolysis when observed has been due to anti‐A/anti‐B isoagglutinins contained in the IVIg. Recently, an isoagglutinin‐reduced IVIg, whereby the anti‐A and anti‐B titers have been reduced by immunoaffinity chromatography, has been introduced; however, whether this new product is as efficacious as nonreduced immunoglobulin (Ig) or will result in less IVIg‐associated hemolysis has not been resolved.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We used in vitro phagocytosis by monocytes and proinflammatory/anti‐inflammatory macrophages, with isoagglutinin‐reduced and ‐nonreduced Ig opsonized group A₁, B, and A₁B red blood cells, to estimate clinical significance of the IgG isoagglutinins. We also used immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) mouse models to examine the in vivo efficacy of isoagglutinin‐reduced versus ‐nonreduced Ig on the amelioration of the diseases.

RESULTS

In contrast to nonreduced Ig, phagocytosis was largely absent when isoagglutinin‐reduced Ig was used at a concentration equivalent to a patient receiving 2 g/kg.

The in vivo efficacy of isoagglutinin‐reduced versus nonreduced Ig on the amelioration of experimental ITP and RA was similar, indicating no loss of efficacy due to the chromatographic removal of isoagglutinins.

CONCLUSION

Isoagglutinin‐reduced Ig should have efficacy similar to nonreduced Ig and result in less IVIg‐associated hemolysis.

Efficacy and safety of IVIG in CIDP: Combined data of the PRIMA and PATH studies

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a potential therapy for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). To investigate the efficacy and safety of the IVIG IgPro10 (Privigen) for treatment of CIDP, results from Privigen Impact on Mobility and Autonomy (PRIMA), a prospective, open‐label, single‐arm study of IVIG in immunoglobulin (Ig)‐naïve or IVIG pre‐treated subjects (NCT01184846, n = 28) and Polyneuropathy And Treatment with Hizentra (PATH), a double‐blind, randomized study including an open‐label, single‐arm IVIG phase in IVIG pre‐treated subjects (NCT01545076, IVIG restabilization phase n = 207) were analyzed separately and together (n = 235). Efficacy assessments included change in adjusted inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment (INCAT) score, grip strength and Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and ADRs/infusion were recorded. Adjusted INCAT response rate was 60.7% in all PRIMA subjects at Week 25 (76.9% in IVIG pre‐treated subjects) and 72.9% in PATH. In the pooled cohort (n = 235), INCAT response rate was 71.5%; median time to INCAT improvement was 4.3 weeks. No clear demographic differences were noticed between early (responding before Week 7, n = 148) and late responders (n = 21). In the pooled cohort, median change from baseline to last observation was −1.0 (interquartile range −2.0; 0.0) point for INCAT score; +8.0 (0.0; 20.0) kPa for maximum grip strength; +3.0 (1.0; 7.0) points for MRC sum score. In the pooled cohort, 271 ADRs were reported in 105 subjects (44.7%), a rate of 0.144 ADRs per infusion. This analysis confirms the efficacy and safety of IgPro10, a recently FDA‐approved IVIG for CIDP, in a population of mainly pre‐treated subjects with CIDP [Correction added on 14 March 2019 after first online publication: the INCAT response rate has been corrected.].

What can be learned in the snake antivenom field from the developments in human plasma derived products?

Human plasma-derived medicinal products and snake antivenom immunoglobulins are unique and complex therapeutic protein products. Human plasma products are obtained by fractionating large pools of plasma collected from blood plasma donors. They comprise a wide range of protein products, including polyvalent and hyperimmune immunoglobulins, coagulation factors, albumin, and various protease inhibitors that are transfused to patients affected by congenital or acquired protein deficiencies, immunological disorders, or metabolic diseases. Snake antivenoms are manufactured from pools of plasma collected from animals, typically horses, which have been immunized against snake venoms. Transfusing antivenoms is the cornerstone therapy to treat patients affected by snakebite envenoming. Over the last thirty years, much technical and regulatory evolution has been implemented to ensure that this class of biologicals meets modern quality requirements. The purpose of this review is to compare the main developments that took place in plasma production, protein fractionation, pathogen safety, quality control, preclinical and clinical studies, and regulations of these products. We also analyze whether both fields have been influencing and cross-fertilizing each other technically and in regulatory aspects to reach modern safety and efficacy standards at global levels, and how experience in the human plasma fractionation industry can further impact the manufacture of snake antivenom and that of other animal-derived antisera.

Historical Aspects of Polyclonal IgG Preparations

Today we can choose between several polyclonal IgG products for both replacement and immunomodulation. However, it was a long way to go to reach this stage. In this chapter, we try to illustrate the major stages of IgG product development which began more than 70 years ago.

Hemolysis related to intravenous immunoglobulins is dependent on the presence of anti-blood group A and B antibodies and individual susceptibility

BACKGROUND

Patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) rarely experience symptomatic hemolysis. Although anti-A and anti-B isoagglutinins from the product are involved in most cases, the actual mechanisms triggering hemolysis are unclear.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial in 57 patients with immune thrombocytopenia treated with IVIG (Privigen, CSL Behring) was conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients received one infusion (1 g/kg) and 36 received two infusions (2 × 1 g/kg) of IVIG. After a study duration of more than 2 years, no cases of clinically significant hemolysis as defined in the protocol were identified. Data of patients with mild hematologic and biochemical changes were analyzed in more detail. Twelve cases (10/23 patients with blood group A1 and 2/11 patients with blood group B, all having received 2 g/kg IVIG) were adjudicated as mild hemolysis (median hemoglobin [Hb] decrease, -3.0 g/dL); Hb decreases were transient, with partial or full recovery achieved by last visit. Eighteen patients (31.6%), all with non-O blood group, of whom 16 (88.9%) received 2 g/kg IVIG, fulfilled post hoc criteria for hemolytic laboratory reactions. Red blood cell (RBC) eluates of all direct antiglobulin test-positive samples were negative for non-ABO blood group antibodies. Blood groups A and B antigen density on RBCs appeared to be a risk factor for hemolytic laboratory reactions. Platelet response to treatment was observed in 42 patients (74%); eight of 12 patients with complete response had blood group A1.

CONCLUSION

Isoagglutinins are involved in clinically nonsignificant hemolysis after treatment with IVIG, but individual susceptibility varies greatly.