1
|
Stajszczyk M, Batko K, Żuber ZM, Kwiatkowska B, Krajewska-Włodarczyk M, Batko B. Charting the Etanercept Journey: Tracing Cost Dynamics in Poland's Off-Patent Market from Reference Drug Rivalry to Biosimilar Monopoly. BioDrugs 2024:10.1007/s40259-024-00663-4. [PMID: 38861154 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00663-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the pricing of etanercept (ETN) reference and biosimilar drugs in a changing competitive to monopolized market. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive, retrospective analysis of ETN market competition, specifically changes in tender price based on shifts in market monopoly, including the effects on cost evolution, in the off-patent market in Poland. We included a total of 473 tenders for ETN purchase in dedicated biologic drug reimbursement programs, covering both pre-filled syringes and automatic injectors. This study covers the timeframe from November 2017 to December 2023, throughout which we evaluated a unique setting of ETN market re-monopolization from the perspective of payer, hospital and patient benefits resulting from changing cost calculations. RESULTS Between 2017 and 2022, Erelzi was recorded as having the largest total tender volume (59%), with a mean price [per ETN daily defined dose (DDD)] of €7.28, followed by Enbrel (31%, €8.34) and Benepali (10%, €9.45), respectively. Over the last 6 months of waning market competition, the mean price for winning bids was estimated at €5.69. After market re-monopolization by an ETN biosimilar, the mean price of winning bids increased to €8.09, and continued to increase (€9.71) in the last 6 months of available follow-up. In contrast to the competitive era, no significant relationship between tender volume and winning price was recorded after re-monopolization. In the most recent tenders, mean ETN prices increased up to €15.82, nearly tripling the lowest prices of the competitive market period. In the early re-monopolization market, mean annual treatment cost per patient is estimated at over €3800, which exceeds therapy costs in the prior competitive market years, and is expected to increase to over €6200 based on the most recent tenders. On a healthcare system level, this corresponds to over €3.42 million excess costs due to market monopoly. Higher ETN prices resulted in downstream failure of regulatory incentives to promote affordable biologics. Due to higher pricing, hospitals lost over an estimated €2.52 million, with possible risk of treatment restrictions. For the same reason, the public payer achieved comparable savings, allowing for partial coverage of higher reimbursement expenses. CONCLUSIONS This nation-level scenario of market re-monopolization by a biosimilar drug confirms net loss and excess costs for the healthcare payer, as can be expected from economic theory. The upwards drug repricing and restriction of treatment availability occurs much more rapidly than the decrement in a period of market competition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Stajszczyk
- Department of Rheumatology and Autoimmune Diseases, Silesian Center for Rheumatology, Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Ustroń, Poland.
| | - Krzysztof Batko
- Department of Dermatology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Zbigniew Michał Żuber
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Brygida Kwiatkowska
- Early Arthritis Clinic, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warszawa, Poland
| | | | - Bogdan Batko
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski University, Kraków, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Río-Álvarez I, Cruz-Martos E. Overview of biosimilar medicines in Spain: market dynamics, policies, evidence-based insights and avenues for a sustainable market. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2024:1-15. [PMID: 38842367 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2363229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION After 17 years on the market, biosimilar medicines have contributed significantly to the sustainability of healthcare in Spain, providing cost-effective treatment options and savings of more than €1 billion by 2022 alone. To fully exploit this potential and meet the European pharmaceutical strategy's objectives of increased access and a resilient supply chain, Member States need to optimize their biosimilars policies. AREAS COVERED We conducted an exhaustive review of biosimilar medicines in Spain, first describing their regulatory framework. Biosimilar policies at both national and regional level have been collected and updated figures on the biosimilars market are provided based on official data. Knowledge and acceptance of biosimilar medicines among patients and medical societies based on biosimilar positioning documents is reviewed. National evidence on the contribution of biosimilars to savings and sustainability is also included in this study. EXPERT OPINION In Spain, there is a need to further build confidence in biosimilars, develop a strong national biosimilars policy and address regional variability, improve public procurement and adapt clinical practice guidelines following the commercialization of biosimilars. By implementing a holistic and evidence-based policy, Spain can fully exploit the benefits of biosimilar medicines and ensure better and equitable access across the healthcare system.
Collapse
|
3
|
Mestre-Ferrandiz J, Czech M, Smolen JS, Cornes P, Aapro MS, Danese S, Deitch S, Tyldsley H, Foster W, Shah P, Latymer M, Vulto AG. Capturing the holistic value of biosimilars in Europe - part 1: a historical perspective. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2024; 24:237-250. [PMID: 38175140 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2297926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approved biosimilars exhibit comparable efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity to reference products. This report provides perspectives on the societal value of biosimilars within Europe and potential factors that have influenced market dynamics. METHODS An independent, self-administered survey or one-on-one in-depth interview was used to collect viewpoints about the impact of biosimilar medicines within European markets. Key insights were also sought from an expert panel of European stakeholders. RESULTS Survey respondents were clinicians, pharmacists, and payers from Europe (N = 103). Perceived benefits of biosimilars included increased access to innovative medicines (73% of respondents) or biologic treatments (66%). Biosimilar competition was thought to expand access to biologics (~50% of respondents) or drug combinations (~36%) and reduce biologic access time (34%). Key drivers of biologic access after biosimilar competition included increased biologic awareness (51%) and changes to prescribing guidelines (37%) and/or treatment paradigms (28%). The expert panel developed a market maturity framework of biosimilar adoption/opportunities comprising three stages: 'Invest,' 'Expand,' and 'Harvest.' Findings were supported by published literature. CONCLUSIONS In Europe, the perceptions of well-informed survey/interview respondents are that biosimilars have improved patient outcomes via increased access to biologics and innovative biologic products, contributing to earlier and longer treatment of a broader population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marcin Czech
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Matti S Aapro
- Cancer Center, Clinique de Genolier, Vaud, Switzerland
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Stephen Deitch
- Life Science Practice, Charles River Associates, London, UK
| | | | - Will Foster
- Life Science Practice, Charles River Associates, London, UK
| | - Pooja Shah
- US Medical Affairs, Pfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Mark Latymer
- Global Medical Affairs, Biosimilars Portfolio, Pfizer, Sandwich, UK
| | - Arnold G Vulto
- Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alnaqbi KA, Bellanger A, Brill A, Castañeda-Hernández G, Clopés Estela A, Delgado Sánchez O, García-Alfonso P, Gyger P, Heinrich D, Hezard G, Kakehasi A, Koehn C, Mariotte O, Mennini F, Mayra Pérez-Tapia S, Pistollato M, Saada R, Sasaki T, Tambassis G, Thill M, Werutsky G, Wilsdon T, Simoens S. An international comparative analysis and roadmap to sustainable biosimilar markets. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1188368. [PMID: 37693908 PMCID: PMC10484585 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1188368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Although biosimilar uptake has increased (at a variable pace) in many countries, there have been recent concerns about the long-term sustainability of biosimilar markets. The aim of this manuscript is to assess the sustainability of policies across the biosimilar life cycle in selected countries with a view to propose recommendations for supporting biosimilar sustainability. Methods: The study conducted a comparative analysis across 17 countries from North America, South America, Asia-Pacific, Europe and the Gulf Cooperation Council. Biosimilar policies were identified and their sustainability was assessed based on country-specific reviews of the scientific and grey literature, validation by industry experts and 23 international and local non-industry experts, and two advisory board meetings with these non-industry experts. Results: Given that European countries tend to have more experience with biosimilars and more developed policy frameworks, they generally have higher sustainability scores than the other selected countries. Existing approaches to biosimilar manufacturing and R&D, policies guaranteeing safe and high-quality biosimilars, exemption from the requirement to apply health technology assessment to biosimilars, and initiatives counteracting biosimilar misconceptions are considered sustainable. However, biosimilar contracting approaches, biosimilar education and understanding can be ameliorated in all selected countries. Also, similar policies are sometimes perceived to be sustainable in some markets, but not in others. More generally, the sustainability of the biosimilar landscape depends on the nature of the healthcare system and existing pharmaceutical market access policies, the experience with biosimilar use and policies. This suggests that a general biosimilar policy toolkit that ensures sustainability does not exist, but varies from country to country. Conclusion: This study proposes a set of elements that should underpin sustainable biosimilar policy development over time in a country. At first, biosimilar policies should guarantee the safety and quality of biosimilars, healthy levels of supply and a level of cost savings. As a country gains experience with biosimilars, policies need to optimise uptake and combat any misconceptions about biosimilars. Finally, a country should implement biosimilar policies that foster competition, expand treatment options and ensure a sustainable market environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid A. Alnaqbi
- Tawam Hospital, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Agnès Bellanger
- Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Alex Brill
- Matrix Global Advisors, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC, United States
| | | | | | | | - Pilar García-Alfonso
- Medical Oncology Department, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pius Gyger
- Independent Consultant, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Adriana Kakehasi
- Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Cheryl Koehn
- Arthritis Consumer Experts, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Francesco Mennini
- Economic Evaluation and HTA (EEHTA), CEIS, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Sonia Mayra Pérez-Tapia
- Unidad de Investigacion, Desarollo e Innovacion Médica y Biotecnológica (UDIMEB), Unidad de Desarollo e Investigacion de Bioterapeuticos (UDIBI), Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | | | - Rowan Saada
- Charles River Associates, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Marc Thill
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Tim Wilsdon
- Charles River Associates, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Phan DB, Bewley AP, Smith CH, Mackenzie T, Griffiths CEM, Lunt M, Warren RB, Yiu ZZN. Uptake of tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor biosimilars for psoriasis: a drug utilization study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR). Br J Dermatol 2023; 189:62-70. [PMID: 37016153 DOI: 10.1093/bjd/ljad107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi) have revolutionized the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Following patent expiry of the originator biologics, TNFi biosimilars became available, presenting the opportunity for significant reductions in drug costs. OBJECTIVES To describe the uptake of TNFi biosimilars for psoriasis treatment in the UK and Ireland. METHODS This observational cohort study utilizes data from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR), a national pharmacovigilance study register for patients with psoriasis on systemic treatments. We analysed biosimilar uptake trends over time in nine geographical regions of England along with Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. We assessed the incidence of switching to biosimilars in an originator-user cohort (switchers). Patients on originators infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab at the time originator patents expired, entered the cohort on 1 February 2015, August 2015 and October 2018, respectively, and were followed up until 31 October 2021. Trends in biosimilar initiations were assessed in an adalimumab-naïve cohort who started adalimumab between 1 October 2018 and 31 July 2019 (starters). We assessed the associations between patient factors and originator-to-biosimilar switching and biosimilar initiation using a multivariable Cox regression model and a multivariable logistic regression model, respectively. RESULTS Included in the originator-user cohort were 4202 patients (209 on infliximab, 742 on etanercept and 3251 on adalimumab). For infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab, respectively, the cumulative incidence of originator-to-biosimilar switching increased with time to 14.8%, 23.6% and 66.6% after 3 years. Across geographical regions, 3-year switching rates varied from 0% to 43.7% for infliximab; from 0% to 40.4% for etanercept; and from 12.5% to 84.3% for adalimumab. Out of the 528 patients included in the adalimumab-naïve cohort, 67.8% started on biosimilars. Originator-to-biosimilar switching and biosimilar initiation were more common in men and in patients who had lower Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at cohort entry. CONCLUSIONS The uptake of biosimilars increased over time and varied considerably across the UK and Ireland; adalimumab had the highest biosimilar uptake rate compared with that of other TNFi drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duc Binh Phan
- Manchester Centre for Dermatology Research, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Anthony P Bewley
- Department of Dermatology, Barts Health NHS Trust and Queen Mary College (University of London), London, UK
| | - Catherine H Smith
- King's College London and St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Christopher E M Griffiths
- Manchester Centre for Dermatology Research, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark Lunt
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard B Warren
- Manchester Centre for Dermatology Research, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Zenas Z N Yiu
- Manchester Centre for Dermatology Research, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Böhm AK, Steiner IM, Stargardt DT. Market Diffusion of Biosimilars in Off-Patent Biologic Drug Markets across Europe. Health Policy 2023; 132:104818. [PMID: 37086662 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
Biologics are among the most expensive pharmaceuticals but have begun to lose their exclusivity rights over the past 15 years, offering the possibility for biosimilar competition. Therefore, we examine the market diffusion of biosimilars across Europe. Using revenues and sales data from IQVIA, we identified 12 biologic substances facing first biosimilar competition between 2014 and 2020 in 25 European countries. We investigated biosimilar market share depending on product and market characteristics with beta regression. Moreover, we compared market diffusion across countries using multilevel modelling. The average market share of biosimilars at first biosimilar entry was about seven percent in the retail and hospital market and grew to 34.69% and 38.29% after 16 quarters, respectively. Quarters since first biosimilar entry had a positive but decreasing effect on biosimilar market share (p<.001 for both markets). Quarterly growth ranged from 0.006 (Netherlands) to 0.026 (Slovakia) in the retail market and from 0.007 (Hungary) to 0.040 (United Kingdom) in the hospital market. The diffusion increased over time across all European markets, although at different rates. Biosimilar market share was higher in the hospital market. Compared to generics, diffusion of biosimilars is much slower. If policymakers desire to increase biosimilar diffusion, they should aim at policies that increase competition and use countries with the highest diffusion rates as benchmarks.
Collapse
|
7
|
Improving access to care for rheumatology services in Canada. Clin Rheumatol 2023; 42:1205-1211. [PMID: 36746833 PMCID: PMC9901822 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-023-06532-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Rheumatic diseases are becoming increasingly prevalent in Canada, and its associated strain on the healthcare system is expected to increase over the next decades. Furthermore, there is an increasing body of evidence to suggest that access to rheumatology care is currently not meeting established quality of care benchmarks. To frame issues affecting access to care for rheumatology services in Canada, a proposed chronological framework from a rheumatology patient's perspective is proposed. Illustrating principles from a health policy lens including drawing from the stages heuristic framework and multiple streams theory, issues surrounding access to rheumatology assessment, to rheumatological investigations and lastly to appropriate treatment are explored. In particular, the current supply and demand mismatch within the rheumatology workforce presents challenges for patients in accessing rheumatic diseases providers. Potential policy solutions including increasing the pool of rheumatic diseases care providers, enhancing the clinical capacity with extended role providers and increasing uptake of virtual care are discussed. To ameliorate access to rheumatology investigations, the concept of provider education surrounding the appropriateness of investigations and merit-based funding are explored. Lastly, access to rheumatological treatment is framed using biologic therapies as an example, highlighting the policy challenges in biosimilar uptake and associated ethical and political considerations. By using a health policy lens to explore deficiencies within Canada's current system, the overarching goal of this analysis is to set the stage for reasoned and timely solutions in the future.
Collapse
|
8
|
Barcina Lacosta T, Vulto AG, Huys I, Simoens S. An exploration of biosimilar TNF-alpha inhibitors uptake determinants in hospital environments in Italy, Portugal, and Spain. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 9:1029040. [PMID: 36703896 PMCID: PMC9871571 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1029040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The availability of biosimilar medicines in Southern European markets has allowed purchasing biologics at a lower cost for healthcare systems. However, the capacity to seize this cost-reduction opportunity in the long run depends on fostering a sustainable competitive environment for all the market players involved. Diverse policies and information campaigns have been launched in Italy, Portugal and Spain to support uptake of "best-value" biologics (BVB). Despite these measures, the utilization of lower-cost biologics in certain regions is low, especially when it comes to the treatment of chronic conditions. Objective We aim to identify biosimilar uptake determinants in hospital environments in Italy, Portugal and Spain, using the class of TNF-alpha inhibitors as an example. Methods This is a mixed-methods study based on (1) the quantitative analysis of regional uptake data for TNF-alpha inhibitor biosimilars and (2) the qualitative processing of semi-structured interviews capturing experts' views on uptake determinants for biosimilars. Results The organization of multi-stakeholder information campaigns supporting TNF-alpha inhibitor biosimilars use in Italy, Portugal and Spain has resulted in an increased familiarity of healthcare professionals and patients with the prescription/use of these products. However, barriers persist that impede high biosimilars uptake, especially in chronic patient populations eligible for a switch. These are: (1) the late publication of position statements on biosimilars interchangeability by regulatory health authorities; (2) the vague positioning of (national/regional) health authorities on best switching practices (including multiple biosimilar-to-biosimilar switches); (3) the existence of policy frameworks that do not necessarily support the initiation of switching protocols; (4) the establishment of sometimes inefficient purchasing procedures that limit biosimilars potential to compete for market shares. Diverse approaches taken regionally to address these barriers have contributed to heterogeneous TNF-alpha inhibitor biosimilars uptake across Southern Europe. Conclusion Our research signaled the limited reach of biosimilar policies implemented locally, if not supported by a national policy framework. This study highlights the need for the coordinated implementation of policy measures fostering biosimilars use at the regional and national level in Italy, Portugal and Spain. These measures should account for the particularities of off-patent biologic and biosimilar markets and should jointly address supply- and demand-side challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Barcina Lacosta
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium,*Correspondence: Teresa Barcina Lacosta,
| | - Arnold G. Vulto
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium,Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Car E, Vulto AG, Houdenhoven MV, Huys I, Simoens S. Biosimilar competition in European markets of TNF-alpha inhibitors: a comparative analysis of pricing, market share and utilization trends. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1151764. [PMID: 37153785 PMCID: PMC10160635 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1151764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Factors like the number of biosimilar competitors and competitive pricing strategies from originator companies may influence price competition and biosimilar uptake. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze multiple facets of biosimilar competition of TNF-alpha inhibitors in Europe by exploring the existence of a biosimilar first-mover advantage, pricing strategies of originator companies, and the evolution in patient access. Methods: Sales and volume data on biosimilar and originator infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab between 2008 and 2020 were provided by IQVIA. Countries included 24 European Union Member States, Norway, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Serbia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sales value was expressed as ex-manufacturer price per defined daily dose (DDD), and volume data were transformed into the number of DDDs per 1,000 inhabitants per day. Descriptive analyses were conducted based on the evolution in price per DDD, trends in biosimilar and originator market shares and utilization trends. Results: Market entry of the first biosimilars of infliximab and adalimumab resulted in a decrease of the volume-weighted average price (VWAP) per DDD by 13.6% and 0.9% on average, whilst the second biosimilars resulted in a decrease by 26.4% and 27.3%, respectively. The first and second etanercept biosimilars generated a similar decrease in the VWAP per DDD by 9.3% and 9.1% on average, respectively. Average market share captured by the first biosimilars was at least twice as large as the second biosimilars for all molecules. In addition, sharp reductions in price per DDD of Humira® in most countries indicated a pricing strategy resulting in low uptake of adalimumab biosimilars. Lastly, utilization of infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab following biosimilar entry increased by an average of 88.9%, 14.6%, and 22.4%, respectively. However, introduction of (multiple) biosimilar competitors did not necessarily translate into increase in treatment access for all three molecules across some European countries indicating a shift in utilization from one molecule towards the other(s). Conclusion: Overall, this study revealed that biosimilar entry results in increased utilization and price reduction, although at a heterogenous rate among TNF-alpha inhibitors. Observed trends in market shares indicate a biosimilar first-mover advantage whereas pricing strategies considered to be anti-competitive can limit market uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elif Car
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Elif Car,
| | - Arnold G. Vulto
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
- Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Perelman J, Duarte-Ramos F, Melo Gouveia A, Pinheiro L, Ramos F, Vogler S, Mateus C. How do hospital characteristics and ties relate to the uptake of second-generation biosimilars? A longitudinal analysis of Portuguese NHS hospitals, 2015-2021. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 23:99-109. [PMID: 36356294 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2146579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited evidence on within-country discrepancies in biosimilar uptake. This study analyzes differences in timing and diffusion of biosimilar uptake across Portuguese NHS hospitals and explores possible determinants. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We analyzed publicly accessible consumption data of originator biologic and biosimilar drugs for adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, rituximab, and trastuzumab, by hospital and month for the years 2015-2021 (N = 9,467). We modeled the time to biosimilar adoption using survival regression models and the share of biosimilar consumption using generalized estimated equations with random hospital effects. RESULTS Academic hospitals were characterized by a quicker uptake of adalimumab and infliximab biosimilars but lower shares for other drugs. A higher total consumption of biologics was related to a lower share of biosimilar uptake. A stronger participation in randomized controlled trials was linked to higher biosimilar shares and quicker uptake, except for rituximab. If all NHS hospitals had biosimilar shares equal to the highest ones, potential annual savings could reach 13.9 million euros. CONCLUSION The findings suggest a need for capacity-building on biosimilar prescribing, including for doctors of academic hospitals and those working in settings where high biosimilar use would be expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Perelman
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.,Comprehensive Health Research Center, Nova University of Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Filipa Duarte-Ramos
- EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | - Luis Pinheiro
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte, Portugal
| | - Francisco Ramos
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sabine Vogler
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Pharmacoeconomics Department, Austrian National Public Health Institute (Gesundheit Österreich GmbH/GÖG), Austria
| | - Céu Mateus
- Health Economics at Lancaster, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Barcina Lacosta T, Vulto AG, Huys I, Simoens S. Evaluating the benefits of TNF-alfa inhibitor biosimilar competition on off-patent and on-patent drug markets: A Southern European analysis. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:1031910. [PMID: 36588696 PMCID: PMC9802634 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1031910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The level of competition achieved following biosimilars market availability varies by country, care setting and molecule. Hence, biosimilars contribution to attaining price reductions and extended access to treatments can also vary. Objective: The aim of this study is to capture market dynamics for tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors and competing molecules in Southern European markets (2011-2020), and to evaluate the benefits of the competition generated by the availability of biosimilars. Methods: This study is based on a literature review examining market characteristics for TNF-alfa inhibitors and competing immunomodulator molecules, and on the quantitative analysis of market data for these molecules in Italy, Portugal and Spain. Results: Following biosimilars availability in Italian, Portuguese and Spanish markets, there has been an expansion in the overall access to TNF-alfa inhibitor pharmaceuticals. Further, savings have been generated within the TNF-alfa inhibitors class even after the increased use of these molecules. However, the potential of infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab biosimilars to generate price competition outside of their own drug class appeared limited in the studied markets. Considering this limitation and that shifts towards on-patent and higher-cost therapies have occurred after TNF-alfa inhibitor biosimilars availability, the importance of investing in biosimilars development for still on-patent immunology biologics is emphasized. Conclusion: This study highlights the need for policies that do not only seek higher utilization of biosimilars, but that also support a sustainable market for these products. This is expected to foster the future development of biosimilar medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Barcina Lacosta
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium,*Correspondence: Teresa Barcina Lacosta,
| | - Arnold G. Vulto
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium,Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Arnet I, Verbeek M, Almarsdóttir Anna B, Barbier L, Clifford R, Eickhoff C, Hersberger K, Huys I, Lee K, Saramunee K, Schulz M, Zgarrick D, Sarnola K. Community pharmacists' preparedness for substituting biologics and dispensing biosimilars - Lessons learned from a multinational survey. EXPLORATORY RESEARCH IN CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PHARMACY 2021; 4:100084. [PMID: 35479848 PMCID: PMC9032461 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Interchangeability between biological medicines and biosimilars, and subsequent substitution by pharmacists represent an important opportunity for costs savings for health care systems. Because biological medicines are complex products, the expert role of the pharmacist to inform patients and support physicians is indispensable. However, regulations on substitution of biosimilars differ around the globe, such that a substitution that is allowed in one country may be forbidden in another. Overall, pharmacists' knowledge of biosimilar medicines is incomplete and hesitancy to engage in substitutions is perceptible. As counter-balancing remedy, continued education about biosimilars is needed among practicing community pharmacists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Arnet
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, University of Basel, Petersplatz 14, P.O. Box 4128 4001, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Melina Verbeek
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, University of Basel, Petersplatz 14, P.O. Box 4128 4001, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Birna Almarsdóttir Anna
- University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Pharmacy, Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Universitetsparken 2, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Liese Barbier
- KU Leuven, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, O&N II Herestraat 49, box 521, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rhonda Clifford
- School of Allied Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawlex WA 6009, Australia
| | - Christiane Eickhoff
- Department of Medicine, ABDA - Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Heidestr. 7, 10557 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kurt Hersberger
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, University of Basel, Petersplatz 14, P.O. Box 4128 4001, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Huys
- KU Leuven, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, O&N II Herestraat 49, box 521, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kenny Lee
- School of Allied Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawlex WA 6009, Australia
| | - Kritsanee Saramunee
- Social Pharmacy Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, 44150, Thailand
| | - Martin Schulz
- Department of Medicine, ABDA - Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Heidestr. 7, 10557 Berlin, Germany
| | - David Zgarrick
- Department of Pharmacy and Health Systems Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kati Sarnola
- The Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela), Research at Kela, P.O. Box 450, 00056 Kela, Finland
| |
Collapse
|