Comparison of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of fidaxomicin in healthy Japanese and caucasian subjects

Effective Colonization by Nontoxigenic Clostridioides difficile REA Strain M3 (NTCD-M3) Spores following Treatment with Either Fidaxomicin or Vancomycin

Colonization with nontoxigenic Clostridioides difficile strain M3 (NTCD-M3) has been demonstrated in susceptible hamsters and humans when administered after vancomycin treatment. NTCD-M3 has also been shown to decrease risk of recurrent C. difficile infection (CDI) in patients following vancomycin treatment for CDI. As there are no data for NTCD-M3 colonization after fidaxomicin treatment, we studied the efficacy of NTCD-M3 colonization and determined fecal antibiotic levels in a well-studied hamster model of CDI. Ten of 10 hamsters became colonized with NTCD-M3 after 5 days of treatment with fidaxomicin when NTCD-M3 was administered daily for 7 days after treatment discontinuation. The findings were nearly identical to 10 vancomycin-treated hamsters also given NTCD-M3. High fecal levels of OP-1118, the major fidaxomicin metabolite, and vancomycin were noted during treatment with the respective agents and modest levels noted 3 days after treatment discontinuation at the time when most of the hamsters became colonized. These findings support the ongoing development of NTCD-M3 for the prevention of recurrent CDI. IMPORTANCE NTCD-M3 is a novel live biotherapeutic, that has been shown in a Phase 2 clinical trial to prevent recurrence of C. difficile infection (CDI) when administered shortly after antibiotic treatment of the initial CDI episode. Fidaxomicin was not, however, in widespread use at the time this study was conducted. A large multi-center Phase 3 clinical trial is now currently in the planning stage, and it is anticipated that many patients eligible for this study will be treated with fidaxomicin. Since efficacy in the hamster model of CDI has predicted success in patients with CDI, we studied the ability of NTCD-M3 to colonize hamsters after treatment with either fidaxomicin or vancomycin.

Antibiotic fidaxomicin is an RdRp inhibitor as a potential new therapeutic agent against Zika virus

BACKGROUND

Zika virus (ZIKV) infection is a global health problem, and its complications, including congenital Zika syndrome and Guillain-Barré syndrome, constitute a continued threat to humans. Unfortunately, effective therapeutics against ZIKV infection are not available thus far.

METHODS

We screened the compounds collection consisting of 1789 FDA-approved drugs by a computational docking method to obtain anti-ZIKV candidate compounds targeting ZIKV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). SPR (BIAcore) assay was employed to demonstrate the candidate compounds' direct binding to ZIKV RdRp, and polymerase activity assay was used to determine the inhibitory effect on ZIKV RdRp-catalyzed RNA synthesis. The antiviral effects on ZIKV in vitro and in vivo were detected in infected cultured cells and in Ifnar1^-/- mice infected by ZIKV virus using plaque assay, western blotting, tissue immunofluorescence, and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Here, we report that a first-in-class macrocyclic antibiotic, which has been clinically used to treat Clostridium difficile infection, fidaxomicin, potently inhibits ZIKV replication in vitro and in vivo. Our data showed that fidaxomicin was effective against African and Asian lineage ZIKV in a wide variety of cell lines of various tissue origins, and prominently suppressed ZIKV infection and significantly improved survival of infected mice. In addition, fidaxomicin treatment reduced the virus load in the brains and testes, and alleviated ZIKV-associated pathological damages, such as paralysis, hunching, and neuronal necrosis in the cerebra. Furthermore, our mechanistic study showed that fidaxomicin directly bound ZIKV NS5 protein and inhibited the RNA synthesis-catalyzing activity of ZIKV RdRp.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that fidaxomicin may represent an effective anti-ZIKV agent. In the light that fidaxomicin is already a clinically used drug, there might be a promising prospect in the development of fidaxomicin to be an antiviral therapeutic.

Efficacy and safety of fidaxomicin for the treatment of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in a randomized, double-blind, comparative Phase III study in Japan

We assessed the efficacy and safety of fidaxomicin, a narrow-spectrum macrocyclic antibiotic, for treating inpatients with Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) in Japan. The objective was to demonstrate the non-inferior efficacy of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin. This Phase III, vancomycin-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study enrolled adults with CDI. Patients were randomly assigned to receive fidaxomicin (200 mg twice daily, orally) or vancomycin (125 mg four-times daily, orally) for 10 days. The primary endpoint was global cure rate of CDI (proportion of patients cured at end of treatment with no recurrence during 28-day follow-up). Non-inferiority margin of 10% was pre-specified. Two-hundred and twelve patients were randomized and received treatment at 82 hospitals. Global cure rate was 67.3% (70/104) with fidaxomicin and 65.7% (71/108) with vancomycin: difference 1.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) -11.3-13.7]. Non-inferiority was not demonstrated. Post-hoc analysis in full analysis set patients who received at least 3 days' treatment revealed a higher global cure rate for fidaxomicin [70/97 (72.2%)] than vancomycin [71/106 (67.0%)]: difference 4.6% (95% CI -7.9-17.1). Recurrence rate in the full analysis set for recurrence was lower in fidaxomicin- [17/87 (19.5%)] than vancomycin-treated [24/95 (25.3%)] patients. Adverse event incidences and profiles were similar for both treatments. Though non-inferiority was not demonstrated for fidaxomicin versus vancomycin, global cure rate was numerically higher and recurrence rate lower for fidaxomicin than vancomycin. Fidaxomicin could be an option for the treatment of CDI in an era of reduced antibiotic susceptibility, and to reduce the incidence of recurrence in Japanese patients. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02179658.

Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin for the Treatment of a First Episode of Clostridium Difficile Infection: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) continues to possess a significant disease burden in the United States (US) as well as all over the world. Given the increase in severity and recurrence rate, the decrease in cure rate, and the fact that the virulent ribotype 027 strain remains one of the most commonly identified strains in the US, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) published a clinical practice guideline in February 2018 moving away from metronidazole as the first-line treatment for initial CDI and recommending either oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical data available comparing the efficacy of primary treatment of CDI between those two antibiotics. We performed a PubMed, PubMed Central, and ScienceDirect database search without restriction to regions, publication types, or languages. A comprehensive literature search was performed from January 1, 1980 up to March 20, 2018. We used the following keywords in different combinations: Clostridium difficile, Clostridium difficile infection, CDI, C. diff, C. difficile, fidaxomicin, vancomycin, pseudomembranous colitis, and antibiotic-associated colitis. The search was limited to human studies. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers with disagreements resolved by a third author. We pooled an odds ratio (OR) on two primary outcomes: Clinical cure rate and rate of recurrence during the follow-up period. The computer search was also supplemented with manual searches by the authors of the retrieved review articles and primary studies. The search phrase “((Clostridium difficile) AND vancomycin) AND fidaxomicin” had the highest yield results. We identified four observational studies with a total of 2,303 patients with CDI that met our inclusion criteria. Compared with vancomycin, fidaxomicin use was associated with a significantly lower recurrence of CDI with a pooled OR of 0.47 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37 - 0.60, I2 = 0). On the other hand, there was no significant association of fidaxomicin use with CDI cure rate compared to vancomycin with a pooled OR of 1.22 (95% CI, 0.93 - 1.60, I2 = 0). In light of the recently updated clinical practice guidelines by the IDSA, our review suggests that fidaxomicin has a more sustained clinical response with a statistically significant lower recurrence rate. Although fidaxomicin appears to be the better drug with statistical significance, its cost-effectiveness continues to be an ongoing controversy. More randomized clinical trials are needed to shed light on this matter to assess if there is any clinical significance in fidaxomicin superiority.

Susceptibility of Clostridium species isolated in Japan to fidaxomicin and its major metabolite OP-1118

The narrow-spectrum macrocyclic antibiotic fidaxomicin is approved for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in many countries and is currently under evaluation in Japan for this indication. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of fidaxomicin and its major metabolite, OP-1118, on Clostridium spp. isolated in Nagasaki University Hospital, Japan. Isolates were cultured and antimicrobial susceptibility analyses performed according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute methods. Ninety-eight isolates were obtained between 2012 and 2015, 50 of C. difficile and 48 of eight other Clostridium spp. Fidaxomicin had the lowest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the antimicrobials tested against C. difficile, with MIC₉₀ (MIC range) 0.12 μg/mL (0.015-0.25), versus vancomycin MIC₉₀ 0.5 μg/mL (0.5), metronidazole MIC₉₀ 0.5 μg/mL (0.12-0.5), and OP-1118 MIC₉₀ 4.0 μg/mL (0.5-4.0). Fidaxomicin and OP-1118 each had a similar spectrum of activity against the other Clostridium spp. C. butyricum and the 29 fidaxomicin- and OP-1118-susceptible C. perfringens isolates had the lowest MIC values, and C. bolteae and C. hathewayi higher. All the C. ramosum isolates (n = 6) and one of 30 C. perfringens isolates had low susceptibility to fidaxomicin and OP-1118 (i.e., MIC >64 μg/mL). In summary, this study showed that fidaxomicin was active against a number of Clostridium spp., including C. difficile. Fidaxomicin was generally more effective than its major metabolite OP-1118, but both showed a similar spectrum of activity, suggesting that OP-1118 contributes to the antimicrobial activity of fidaxomicin. These findings were broadly in accordance with those of similar studies conducted in other settings.

The efficacy of fidaxomicin in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in a real-world clinical setting: a Spanish multi-centre retrospective cohort

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fidaxomicin in the real-life clinical setting. This was a retrospective cohort of patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) treated with fidaxomicin in 20 Spanish hospitals between July 2013 and July 2014. Clinical cure, 30-day recurrence, 30-day mortality, sustained cure, and factors associated with the failure to achieve sustained cure were analyzed. Of the 72 patients in the cohort 41 (56.9 %) had a fatal underlying disease. There were 44 (61.1 %) recurrent episodes and 26 cases (36.1 %) with a history of multiple recurrences. Most episodes were severe (26, 36 %) or severe-complicated (14, 19.4 %). Clinical cure rate was 90.3 %, recurrence rate was 16.7 % and three patients (4.2 %) died during the follow-up period. Sustained cure was achieved in 52 cases (72.2 %). Adverse events were reported in five cases (6.9 %). Factors associated with the lack of sustained cure were cardiovascular comorbidity (OR 11.4; 95 %CI 1.9-67.8), acute kidney failure (OR 7.4; 95 %CI 1.3-43.1), concomitant systemic antibiotic treatment (OR 6.2; 95 %CI 1.1-36.8), and C-reactive protein value at diagnosis (OR 1.2 for each 1 mg/dl increase; 95 %CI 1.03-1.3). Fidaxomicin is an effective and well tolerable treatment for severe CDI and for cases with elevated recurrence risk.