1
|
Li Y, Qi L, Bai H, Liu Y, Fan R, Tu Y, Sun Y, Wang J, Qi Q, Feng X, Zhou D, Wang X. Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Rasagiline Tablets in Chinese Healthy Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions: An Open, Randomized, Single-Dose, Double-Cycle, Two-Sequence, Crossover Trial. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:571747. [PMID: 33364947 PMCID: PMC7750811 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.571747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and bioequivalence (BE) of two formulations of rasagiline tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. Methods: An open, randomized, single-dose, double-cycle, two-sequence, self-crossover pharmacokinetic study in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and high-fat postprandial conditions was performed. A total of 108 healthy subjects (36 in the fasting group and 72 in the postprandial group) were recruited. In each cycle of the study under both conditions, subjects received a single oral dose of 1 mg of a test or reference preparation of rasagiline tablets (1 mg each). A washout period of 3 days was observed. Blood samples were obtained up to 10 h post-intake. Primary endpoints were the BE of major pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC0–t and AUC0–∞) and the maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax). Secondary endpoints were safety parameters. Results: The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the test drug vs. the reference drug for rasagiline was 94.16–105.35% for the AUC0–t under fasting conditions and 99.88–107.07% under postprandial conditions. The 90% CIs for the AUC0–∞ were 93.55–105.01% and 99.59–107.05% under fasting and postprandial conditions, respectively. The 90% CIs for the Cmax were 88.26–108.46% and 89.54–118.23% under fasting and postprandial conditions, respectively. The 90% CIs for the test/reference AUC ratio and Cmax ratio were within the acceptable range (0.80–1.25) for BE. In this BE study, there were no serious adverse events (AEs). Conclusion: BE between the test and the reference products was established in both fasting and postprandial conditions. The two formulations of rasagiline showed good tolerability and a similar safety profile. Clinical Trial Registration:chinaDrugtrials.org.cn, identifier CTR20181466.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinjuan Li
- Department of Phase I Clinical Trail Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Qi
- Department of Phase I Clinical Trail Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Haihong Bai
- Department of Phase I Clinical Trail Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Liu
- Department of Phase I Clinical Trail Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Rongxia Fan
- Department of Phase I Clinical Trail Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yongrui Tu
- Changzhou Siyao Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China
| | - Yongqiang Sun
- Changzhou Siyao Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China
| | - Juxiang Wang
- Changzhou Siyao Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China
| | - Qi Qi
- Changzhou Siyao Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiaohui Feng
- Changzhou Siyao Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China
| | - Da Zhou
- Changzhou Siyao Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China
| | - Xinghe Wang
- Department of Phase I Clinical Trail Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bali NR, Shinde MP, Rathod SB, Salve PS. Enhanced transdermal permeation of rasagiline mesylate nanoparticles: design, optimization, and effect of binary combinations of solvent systems across biological membrane. INT J POLYM MATER PO 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/00914037.2019.1706507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil R. Bali
- University Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mahesh P. Shinde
- University Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shahadev B. Rathod
- University Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| | - Pramod S. Salve
- University Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang Z, Shao M, Chen S, Liu C, Peng R, Li Y, Wang J, Zhu S, Qu Q, Zhang X, Chen H, Sun X, Wang Y, Sun S, Zhang B, Li J, Pan X, Zhao G. Adjunct rasagiline to treat Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations: a randomized, double-blind study in China. Transl Neurodegener 2018; 7:14. [PMID: 29988514 PMCID: PMC6026338 DOI: 10.1186/s40035-018-0119-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The use of adjunct rasagiline in levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson’s disease and motor fluctuations is supported by findings from large-scale clinical studies. This study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of adjunct rasagiline in Chinese patients with Parkinson’s disease, as a product registration study. Methods This 16-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, placebo-controlled study of rasagiline 1 mg/day included levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson’s disease and motor fluctuations. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean change from baseline in total daily OFF time over 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints were Clinical Global Impressions – Improvement (CGI-I), and change in Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Activities of daily living (ADL) and Motor scores. Patient well-being (EQ-5D), and the frequency of adverse events were also assessed. Results In total, 324 levodopa-treated patients were randomized to rasagiline 1 mg/day (n = 165) or placebo (n = 159). Over 16 weeks, rasagiline statistically significantly reduced the mean [95% confidence interval] total daily OFF time versus placebo (− 0.5 h [− 0.92, − 0.07]; p = 0.023). There were also statistically significant improvements versus placebo in CGI-I (− 0.4 points [− 0.61, − 0.22]; p < 0.001), UPDRS-ADL OFF (− 1.0 points [− 1.75, − 0.27]; p = 0.008), and UPDRS-Motor ON (− 1.6 points [− 3.05, − 0.14]; p = 0.032) scores, as well as the EQ-5D utility index (p < 0.05). Rasagiline was safe and well tolerated. Conclusions In levodopa-treated Chinese patients with Parkinson’s disease and motor fluctuations, adjunct rasagiline 1 mg/day statistically significantly reduced OFF time, and improved daily function and overall well-being, versus placebo. Consistent with findings in other countries, adjunct rasagiline was proven efficacious and well tolerated in Chinese patients. Trial registration number NCT01479530. Registered 22 November 2011.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenxin Zhang
- 1Department of Neurology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 53 Dongdan N St, Dongcheng, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Shao
- 2Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shengdi Chen
- 3Department of Neurology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chunfeng Liu
- 4Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Rong Peng
- 5Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yansheng Li
- 6Department of Neurology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Wang
- 7Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Suiqiang Zhu
- 8Department of Neurology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Qiumin Qu
- 9Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xiaoying Zhang
- 10Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Haibo Chen
- 11Department of Neurology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiangru Sun
- 12Department of Neurology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yanping Wang
- 13Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shenggang Sun
- 14Department of Neurology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Baorong Zhang
- 15Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang, Hangzhou China
| | - Jimei Li
- 16Department of Neurology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoping Pan
- 17Department of Neurology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Gang Zhao
- 18Department of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| |
Collapse
|