Initiation, Switching, and Cessation of Psoriasis Treatments Among Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis in the United States

Use of systemic and biological therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis are candidates for systemic treatment, but it is unknown how many receive such therapy at a national level in Denmark.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the prevalence of conventional systemic therapy use in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and, further, to investigate the time to discontinuation of conventional systemic therapy and initiation of biological therapy among biologic-naïve patients.

METHODS

This registry-based study identified a cohort of patients with psoriasis in Denmark. We estimated the prevalence of moderate-to-severe psoriasis at a national level using registry data. Inverse probability weighting was used to mitigate potential selection bias in the prevalence estimate of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Analyses were then performed on the weighted cohort.

RESULTS

Of patients with psoriasis in Denmark, 10.9% were estimated to have moderate-to-severe psoriasis, of whom 62.3% received either conventional systemic or biological therapy, meaning 37.7% who were considered candidates for systemic therapy did not receive any systemic treatment. The study demonstrated that, comparing previous time periods with more recent years: (i) time on conventional systemic therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis has become shorter, with a median (interquartile range) of 3.0 years (0.6-10.0) in 1985-1994 vs. 0.6 years (0.3-2.0) in 2014-2018; (ii) more patients initiated biologics as second-line therapy, with 69.5% in 2010-2013 vs. 71.2% in 2014-2018; and (iii) the median time from initiation of systemic therapy to initiation of biological therapy decreased from 13.3 years (11.5-16.8) in 2010-2013 to 1.9 years (1.7-2.4) in 2014-2018.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that nearly 37.7% of Danish patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis do not receive systemic treatment even though they would qualify for this. Furthermore, for patients treated with conventional systemics, drug survival decreased during the observation period.

Trajectories of systemic agent use and associated depression- and anxiety-related health care costs among patients with psoriasis

Background

Systemic treatment patterns and related mental health disorders and economic burden among patients with psoriasis are largely unknown.

Objective

To assess systemic treatment patterns and associated depression and anxiety-related health care costs among patients with psoriasis initiating a conventional systemic treatment (CST).

Methods

Using a retrospective cohort design with sequence and cluster analyses, we assessed systemic treatment trajectories (CST and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors or ustekinumab, [TNFi/UST]) over a 2-year period following CST initiation. We compared health care costs between trajectories using 2-part models.

Results

We included 781 patients and identified 8 trajectories: persistent methotrexate users, persistent acitretin users, early CST discontinuation, late methotrexate discontinuation, switch to TNFi/UST, adding TNFi/UST, discontinuation then restart on methotrexate, and discontinuation then restart on acitretin or multiple CST switches. Overall, 165 (21%) patients incurred depression- and anxiety-related health care costs (median annual cost, CAN$56; quartiles, $14-$127). Compared with persistent methotrexate users, adding a TNFi/UST (cost ratio, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.47-5.97) and discontinuation then restart on acitretin or multiple switches between systemic agents (cost ratio, 13.3; 95% CI 5.76-22.47) had higher costs.

Limitations

Trajectory misclassification may have occured. These date represent an association, and causality cannot be inferred, particularly given the risk of confounding.

Conclusion

Depression- and anxiety-related health care costs were high among patients adding TNFi/UST and those discontinuing then restarting on acitretin or experiencing multiple switches between systemic agents.

Systemic glucocorticoid use and the occurrence of flares in psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a systematic review

Objectives

The use of systemic glucocorticoids (SGCs) is traditionally discouraged in the treatment of PsA and psoriasis due to the risk of psoriatic flares. However, despite this recommendation, SGCs are frequently prescribed for these patients. In this study we reappraise the old paradigm that SGCs are contra-indicated in the treatment of PsA and psoriasis.

Methods

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases was performed in November 2019 to identify articles on any SGC use compared with no use in the PsA and psoriasis population. Topical glucocorticoid treatment was excluded. Our two primary outcomes focused on the prescribing characteristics and the occurrence of any type of flare.

Results

Our search yielded 4922 articles, and of these 21 full-text articles were eligible for inclusion. There were 11 retro- and prospective cohorts involving a total of 4,171,307 patients. Of these, 6727 (37.82%) of the patients with PsA and 1 460 793 (35.17%) of the patients with psoriasis were treated with any type of SGC. Ten observational/interventional studies did not report an increased risk or occurrence of psoriatic flares related to SGC use.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that SGCs are frequently prescribed for PsA and psoriasis patients. The occurrence of psoriatic flares appears to be low upon SGC exposure. In patients with a clear indication for SGCs, e.g. in need of rapid anti-inflammatory therapy or bridging of therapies, the use of SGCs should be considered in view of the low risk of skin flaring. It remains of importance to weigh risks for short- and long-term SGC-related side effects in clinical decision making.

Treatment utilization and drug survival of systemic medications among commercially insured children with psoriasis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Systemic medications and phototherapy are used to treat pediatric psoriasis, but real-world data on treatment utilization and persistence are limited. The study objective was to determine systemic and phototherapy treatment utilization and compare drug survival among systemics in pediatric psoriasis.

METHODS

Using United States commercial insurance claims data, a cross-sectional analysis was conducted to describe the prevalence of systemic treatment and phototherapy use among patients <18 years old with psoriasis. We compared drug survival among new users of methotrexate, adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab using a retrospective cohort design.

RESULTS

Among 13 759 patients, 14.6% used systemic or phototherapy treatment during 2001-2016, with rising utilization of systemics over this period. Among 579 new users of methotrexate, adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab, the median durations of the initial treatment course were 141 (IQR 59-314), 179 (79-339), 175 (90-419), and 216 (64-435) days, respectively (P = .04). Drug discontinuation was less likely among ustekinumab (HR 0.47 [95% CI 0.27-0.83]), etanercept (0.74 [0.59-0.92]), and adalimumab (0.75 [0.55-1.02]) initiators than methotrexate initiators after adjustment for sociodemographic factors and psoriatic arthritis. Drug survival differences were limited to systemic-naïve patients. Potential limitations include short follow-up and residual confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilization of systemic therapies for pediatric psoriasis is increasing, but differences in drug survival exist.

Systemic treatment of psoriasis: from methotrexate to biologics

Psoriasis is one of the most frequent chronic inflammatory skin diseases and it has been of interest to many scientists for ages. The review presents data on all systemic treatment options, that are to date officially registered in Russian Federation for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Aspects of the mechanism of action, efficacy and tolerability of both basic drugs (methotrexate, cyclosporine, acitretin) and biologics (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab pegol, ustekinumab, guselkumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, netakimab) and small molecules (tofacitinib, apremilast) are considered in detail. Special emphasis is placed on the important nuances of biological therapy: immunogenicity, drugs' survival and switch due to lack of efficacy. Invention of biologics signified a new era of moderate-to-severe psoriasis treatment. It became possible to achieve complete clinical remission more safely, which significantly improved the quality of life of patients. However, due to the unknown etiology of psoriasis, there is still no universal remedy that would allow to cure every patient, this fact makes scientists from all over the world keep conducting numerous clinical trials to find even more effective and safe therapeutic options.

Long-term Safety of Oral Systemic Therapies for Psoriasis: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Oral systemic therapies are important treatment options for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, either as monotherapy or in therapy-recalcitrant cases as combination therapy with phototherapy, other oral systemics or biologics. Long-term treatment is needed to maintain sufficient disease control in psoriasis, but continuous use of systemic treatments is limited by adverse events (AEs) and cumulative toxicity risks. The primary aim of this comprehensive literature review was to examine the long-term safety profiles of oral agents commonly used in the treatment of adults with psoriasis. Searches were conducted in EMBASE and PubMed up to November 2018, and 157 relevant publications were included. Long-term treatment with acitretin could be associated with skeletal toxicity and hepatotoxicity, although evidence for skeletal toxicity is mixed and hepatotoxicity is rare, particularly at low doses. Other safety issues include hyperlipidaemia and potential for teratogenicity up to 2-3 years after discontinuation of treatment. There is a paucity of data on long-term treatment with apremilast. Continued exposure to apremilast does not seem to increase the incidence of common AEs, such as gastrointestinal (GI) AEs, upper respiratory tract infections and headache, while the long-term risks for depression, suicidal thoughts and weight loss are unknown. Long-term ciclosporin treatment is associated with renal toxicity, hypertension, non-melanoma skin cancer, neurological AEs and GI AEs. Long-term methotrexate treatment is associated with hepatotoxicity, GI AEs, haematological toxicity, renal toxicity and alopecia. Finally, long-term treatment with fumaric acid esters (FAE) is associated with GI AEs, flushing, lymphocytopenia, proteinuria and elevated liver enzymes. Median drug survival estimates varied considerably: ~  2.9-9.7 months for apremilast; ~ 5.4 months for ciclosporin; ~ 8.6 months for acitretin; ~ 12.1-21.6 months for methotrexate; and ~  54.8 months for FAE. These long-term safety profiles may help to guide clinicians to select the optimal oral systemic treatment for the long-term treatment of psoriasis in adults.

Serlopitant for psoriatic pruritus: A phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Pruritus, a common symptom of psoriasis, negatively affects quality of life; however, treatment of lesional skin does not consistently alleviate psoriatic itch.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of serlopitant, an oral, once-daily neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist, for treatment of psoriatic pruritus in a phase 2, randomized clinical trial (NCT03343639).

METHODS

Patients (n = 204) were randomized to receive serlopitant, 5 mg, or placebo daily for 8 weeks. Eligible adult patients had plaque psoriasis for ≥6 months, plaques covering ≤10% of body surface area, pruritus for ≥4 weeks, and Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) score ≥7 at the initial screening.

RESULTS

Participants (54.2% women) had a mean age of 47.5 years and 85.2% were white. Mean baseline WI-NRS scores were 8.3 for serlopitant and 8.1 for placebo. The WI-NRS 4-point response rate at 8 weeks (primary end point) was 33.3% for serlopitant vs 21.1% for placebo (P = .028); at 4 weeks the rates were 20.8% for serlopitant vs 11.5% for placebo (P = .039). Treatment-related adverse events were reported for 4.9% of serlopitant-treated and 4.0% of placebo-treated patients.

LIMITATIONS

This was a phase 2 study with a small study population. Patients with severe psoriasis were excluded.

CONCLUSION

Serlopitant significantly reduced pruritus associated with mild to moderate psoriasis, supporting continued development of serlopitant for this patient population.

Guselkumab Efficacy after Withdrawal Is Associated with Suppression of Serum IL-23-Regulated IL-17 and IL-22 in Psoriasis: VOYAGE 2 Study

BACKGROUND

Guselkumab selectively inhibits IL-23 and in psoriasis, produces high clinical responses, including durable maintenance after treatment withdrawal in some patients. The relationships between IL-23 blockade, serum markers downstream of IL-23 signaling, and withdrawal were explored with guselkumab in VOYAGE 2.

METHODS

At week 28, patients with ≥90% Psoriasis Area and Severity Index improvement from baseline (PASI 90) were rerandomized to withdrawal and received placebo (n = 182), or maintenance therapy (n = 193). The guselkumab withdrawal group reinitiated guselkumab upon loss of ≥50% of week- 28 PASI improvement or by week 72. Cytokine changes associated with psoriasis recurrence (serum IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22, and IL-23) after withdrawal were evaluated.

RESULTS

Efficacy in the guselkumab maintenance group was sustained through week 72, whereas efficacy diminished in the guselkumab withdrawal group (PASI 90, 86.0% vs. 11.5%). After 20 weeks of retreatment, 80.4% of guselkumab withdrawal patients achieved PASI 90 responses versus baseline. Maintenance of response after withdrawal was associated with suppression of IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22. Increases in cytokine levels had poor predictive power for psoriasis reoccurrence as these increases lagged behind increases in PASI scores.

CONCLUSION

Upon guselkumab withdrawal, most patients lost clinical response and regained responses with retreatment. Correlation of IL-23 signaling serum cytokines increased with disease recurrence, supporting the role of IL-23 in expansion and maintenance of CD4+ T helper type 17, T helper type 22, and related CD8+ T-cell subsets producing IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22.

Psoriasis treatment patterns: a retrospective claims study

Objective: The objective was to characterize psoriasis treatment patterns, including estimating persistence and describing subsequent events (i.e. switching and restarting) for all systemic therapies. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized Truven MarketScan databases from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016 to investigate persistence, switching and restarting in new users of systemic psoriasis medications. Descriptive statistics, time-to-event analyses and a Cox proportional hazards regression were conducted. Results: A total of 5205 patients met inclusion criteria. Regardless of treatment type, >50% lost persistence by 12 months. Patients newly initiating acitretin or non-TNF biologic experienced the highest loss of persistence (85.2%, 73.8%, respectively). Patients initiating a TNF-α inhibitor or apremilast experienced the lowest loss (51.8%, 56.4% respectively). Treatment type had a statistically significant effect on persistence loss (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.81, 0.91). Restarting was the most commonly observed event for patients on an oral or biologic (60.2%, 79.9%, respectively). The most common switch from an oral was to a TNF-α inhibitor, while apremilast often followed biologics. Conclusion: Most patients lost persistence on initial treatment by 12 months, and the majority restarted treatment. This may indicate poor compliance or the cyclical nature of psoriasis. More patients switched from an oral to biologic than vice versa, likely due to formulary design and preference for orals. Studies are needed to investigate underlying reasons and patient characteristics that differentiate treatment utilization.

Serial biologic therapies in psoriasis patients: A 12-year, single-center, retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Biologic therapy for psoriasis is effective but not always long-lasting and sometimes needs to be switched.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the drug survival (ie, the time from initiation to discontinuation) of each biologic and the factors affecting survival to identify better switching strategies and improve drug survival.

METHODS

In total, 195 psoriasis patients treated in our unit during 2006-2018 were retrospectively observed. Descriptive statistical analyses and logistic regression models were performed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariate Cox models adjusted for confounding variables were used to estimate and compare drug survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 90.6% of patients achieved an ≥75% reduction in their baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score. In 2018, the most frequently used biologic was ustekinumab (47/169, 27.8%). Patients with higher baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores were more likely to be switched (P = .0399, odds ratio 1.08). In naive patients, ustekinumab showed longer drug survival (>7.0 years), but in biologic-experienced patients, we found no significant differences in drug survival. Previous biologic therapies increased the need for switching (P = .014, hazard ratio 1.20). Switching between biologic classes yielded longer drug survival than switching within biologic classes (P = .003, hazard ratio 0.48).

LIMITATIONS

As a single-center, retrospective real-life study, the data were not perfectly homogeneous.

CONCLUSION

Switching between biologic classes might increase drug survival but retrospective studies designed ad hoc are needed to confirm this better switching strategy.

Health Care Utilization and Cost Associated with Biologic Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: Analyses from a Large U.S. Claims Database

BACKGROUND

Discontinuation or switching of biologic treatment among patients with psoriasis imposes a great economic burden.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the health care utilization and costs associated with nonswitchers, switchers, and discontinuers of biologics among patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years with ≥ 1 pharmacy claim for a biologic (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, and ustekinumab) between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2015 (identification period), were identified in the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases. At the time of biologic initiation (index date), eligible patients were continuously enrolled with medical and pharmacy claims for ≥ 1 year before (baseline period) and ≥ 1 year after the index date (follow-up period). Patients had ≥ 1 psoriasis diagnosis and had no pharmacy claims for the index biologic during the baseline period. Patients were categorized into 3 mutually exclusive groups based on their biologic treatment pattern during the 1-year follow-up period: nonswitchers (patients who remained on their index biologic), switchers (patients who had a prescription for a biologic therapy other than their index biologic), and discontinuers (patients who had gaps in prescription claims [> 90 days for adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept; > 120 days for ustekinumab]). Descriptive analyses were used to summarize baseline patient demographics, clinical characteristics, resource utilization, and health care costs (inflated to 2016 costs) across the 3 groups. Adjusted health care resource utilization and costs during the 1-year follow-up were estimated, controlling for age, sex, geographic region, insurance plan type, index drug, index year, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, resource utilization, total health care costs, and nonbiologic medications during the baseline period.

RESULTS

Of the 8,710 patients with psoriasis included in the study, 5,000 (57.4%) were categorized as nonswitchers, 1,001 (11.5%) as switchers, and 2,709 (31.1%) as discontinuers. Emergency department and inpatient visits, respectively, were more common among switchers (adjusted incidence rate ratio [95% CI]: 1.10 [0.93-1.30] and 1.13 [0.84-1.53]) and discontinuers (1.50 [1.34-1.63] and 2.05 [1.70-2.48]) than among nonswitchers. Compared with nonswitchers, switchers had higher adjusted mean total health care costs (mean difference [95% CI]: $10,120 [$8,235-$12,033]), which were driven by increased prescription costs ($8,988 [$7,535-$10,610]) and medical costs ($2,746 [$1,090-$4,677]). Conversely, the adjusted mean total health care cost for discontinuers was lower than that for nonswitchers (mean difference [95% CI]: -$18,611 [-$20,254, -$17,025]) due to reduced prescription costs (-$20,486 [-$21,319, -$19,636]); however, discontinuers had a higher mean medical cost ($3,729 [$1,970-$5,527]).

CONCLUSIONS

Switching or discontinuing biologics resulted in higher health care utilization and increased medical costs than remaining on the same biologic. These updated findings highlight the clinical and economic effects of discontinuing or switching biologic therapies in patients with psoriasis in clinical practice and may inform treatment and/or formulary decision making.

DISCLOSURES

This study was sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Feldman has received consulting, speaking, and/or research support from Novartis, AbbVie, Celgene, Sun Pharma, Janssen, Lilly, and Ortho. Tian and Germino are employees of Novartis. Wang was an employee of KMK Consulting and worked as a consultant for Novartis at the time of this study. Portions of this work were presented at the 2017 Fall Clinical Dermatology Conference; October 12-15, 2017; Las Vegas, NV; the 2017 Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar; November 2-4, 2017; Las Vegas, NV; and the 2018 American Academy of Dermatology Annual Meeting; February 16-20, 2018; San Diego, CA.