Efficacy and Safety of Tazarotene 0.1% Plus Clindamycin 1% Gel Versus Adapalene 0.1% Plus Clindamycin 1% Gel in Facial Acne Vulgaris: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

Updates on Topical Dyad and Triple Combination Therapies Approved for Acne Vulgaris

Acne vulgaris is a multifaceted disease characterized by inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions. Topical combination therapies offer a multifaceted approach to acne treatment, with synergistic effects and a broad spectrum of action against multiple factors in acne pathogenesis in one single formulation. Clindamycin phosphate/benzoyl peroxide/adapalene, a combination therapy consisting of clindamycin phosphate 1.2%, benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 3.1%, and adapalene 0.15%, is a novel treatment, the only FDA-approved triple combination drug that offers effective treatment of acne vulgaris. This review aims to provide information on clindamycin phosphate/benzoyl peroxide/adapalene and review the literature on combination topical acne medications approved in the United States. This search was conducted on topical combination therapies for acne, their efficacy, adverse effects, and impacts on quality of life with a specific focus on the newly approved clindamycin phosphate/benzoyl peroxide/adapalene and its sub-component dyads, along with other combinations. PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched for publications in 2018-2023. Primary sources were given priority, and secondary sources such as other reviews were considered to supplement any missing information. It was found that various topical dyad and triad combinations exist for acne vulgaris, including adapalene/BPO, tazarotene/clindamycin, clindamycin/BPO, adapalene/clindamycin, topical tretinoin/azelaic acid, topical tretinoin/BPO, and clindamycin phosphate/benzoyl peroxide/adapalene. Dyad and triple combinations represent a promising, convenient solution for acne management, potentially improving patient adherence due to its single formulation. Clindamycin phosphate/benzoyl peroxide/adapalene exhibited significantly high efficacy in treating both inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions, a minimal side effect profile, although no significant changes in quality-of-life measures. Further research is indicated to assess its long-term efficacy and impact on other acne metrics such as cost, scarring, psychosocial implications, and impact on diverse patient populations.

Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Medicines in Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

 Acne is estimated to affect 9.4% of the global population, making it the 8^th most prevalent disease worldwide. Acne vulgaris (AV) is among the diseases that directly affect quality of life. This trial evaluated the efficacy of individualized homeopathic medicines (IHM) against placebo in AV.

METHODS

 In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted at the National Institute of Homoeopathy, India, 126 patients suffering from AV were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IHM (verum) in centesimal potencies or identical-looking placebo (control). The primary outcome measure was the Global Acne Grading System score; secondary outcomes were the Cardiff Acne Disability Index and Dermatology Life Quality Index questionnaires - all measured at baseline and 3 months after the intervention. Group differences and effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated on the intention-to-treat sample.

RESULTS

 Overall, improvements were greater in the IHM group than placebo, with small to medium effect sizes after 3 months of intervention; however, the inter-group differences were statistically non-significant. Sulphur (17.5%), Natrum muriaticum (15.1%), Calcarea phosphorica (14.3%), Pulsatilla nigricans (10.3%), and Antimonium crudum (7.1%) were the most frequently prescribed medicines; Pulsatilla nigricans, Tuberculinum bovinum and Natrum muriaticum were the most effective of those used. No harms, unintended effects, homeopathic aggravations or any serious adverse events were reported from either group.

CONCLUSION

 There was non-significant direction of effect favoring homeopathy against placebo in the treatment of AV.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

 CTRI/2018/11/016248; UTN: U1111-1221-8164.

Simultaneous determination of tazarotene, clindamycin phosphate and their active metabolites in Bama mini-pig skin by LC-MS/MS: Application to the development of a tazarotene/clindamycin phosphate cream

Topical tazarotene combined with clindamycin phosphate can significantly improve the adherence and outcomes for the treatment of acne vulgaris than monotherapy, a novel tazarotene (0.05%)/clindamycin phosphate (1.2%) cream is thus developed. However, the pharmacokinetics and potential interaction of tazarotene and clindamycin phosphate in skin when formulated together remain unknown, which should be investigated to assess this novel cream. In the present work, a sensitive and rapid LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of tazarotene, clindamycin phosphate and their active metabolites tazarotenic acid, clindamycin in Bama mini-pig skin was developed and reported for the first time. After pretreatment of the skin samples, the analytes were well separated on a Hypersil BDS C₈ column (4.6 × 100 mm, 2.4 μm) using 0.2% (v/v) formic acid-0.1% (w/v) ammonium acetate water solution and acetonitrile as mobile phase in linear gradient elution. Quantification of tazarotene, clindamycin phosphate and their active metabolites tazarotenic acid, clindamycin was conducted under positive electrospray ionization mode using multiple reactions monitoring detection. The LC-MS/MS method was fully validated and then applied to the dermal pharmacokinetic study of the tazarotene/clindamycin phosphate cream. According to the obtained results, tazarotene and clindamycin phosphate did not have any drug-drug interaction when they were formulated together in the cream for topical application. Their absorption and metabolism features in the skin were also characterized, which can support the clinical medication regimen of tazarotene/clindamycin phosphate cream.

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Tazarotene Clindamycin Cream: A Single-Dose, 3-Period Crossover Study

The current study compared the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of the new compound pharmaceutical preparation tazarotene clindamycin cream, and 2 single pharmaceutical preparations, tazarotene cream and clindamycin phosphate gel. Twelve healthy volunteers were enrolled in this single-center, single-blind, 3-treatment, 3-period crossover, single-dose randomized study. An 800-cm² area on volunteers' backs was evenly smeared with 1.6 g of the test preparation to form a film. Blood samples were collected at predetermined time points for pharmacokinetic analysis. Safety and tolerability were assessed via skin reaction evaluation and clinical laboratory tests. The incidences of skin reactions were 18.2% for tazarotene clindamycin cream, 25.0% for tazarotene cream, and 18.2% for clindamycin phosphate gel. There were no significant differences in safety or tolerability among the 3 groups. Erythema, desquamation, and pruritus occurred in 7 volunteers, but no burning or tingling occurred. All adverse events were mild and resolved spontaneously, and there were no severe adverse events. The respective maximum plasma concentrations of tazarotenic acid after local administration of tazarotene clindamycin cream and tazarotene cream were 11 ± 5 pg/mL and 18 ± 12 pg/mL, and the areas under the curve within 72 hours were 444 ± 341 pg · h/mL and 692 ± 462 pg · h/mL.

Topical Retinoids in Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Topical retinoids are a first-line treatment for acne vulgaris.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of topical retinoids approved in the United States for the treatment of acne vulgaris.

METHODS

A PubMed and Embase search was conducted using the search terms 'adapalene,' 'tretinoin,' 'tazarotene,' and 'acne vulgaris.' Selection of articles fit the following inclusion criteria: clinical trials evaluating both efficacy and safety/tolerability of topical retinoids approved in the United States for the treatment of acne vulgaris and published between January 1, 2008 and September 1, 2018. Exclusion criteria included clinical trials involving 20 subjects or fewer, subjects under 12 years of age, and topical retinoid combination therapies with moisturizers or aloe vera. Of 424 search results found, a total of 54 clinical trials were chosen based on selection criteria.

RESULTS

Topical retinoids are superior to vehicle in improving Investigator Global Assessment and Investigator's Static Global Assessment (24.1-28.8% and 13.3-17.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). A topical retinoid combined with benzoyl peroxide led to IGA improvement compared with vehicle (26.1-34.9% vs 7-11.8%; p < 0.001) at Week 12. Topical retinoid plus an oral antibiotic was superior to vehicle in reducing lesion counts (64-78.9% vs 41-56.8%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in efficacy between tretinoin and tazarotene. Tretinoin 0.05% resulted in 62% of patients experiencing AEs compared with adapalene 0.1% (19%) and adapalene 0.3% (40%). More patients receiving adapalene were tolerant of the AEs compared with tazarotene (55.4% vs 24.4%; p < 0.0012).

CONCLUSIONS

Topical retinoids are safe and efficacious for the treatment of acne vulgaris. They should be used in combination with benzoyl peroxide to optimize results in patients. The differences in efficacy of topical retinoids appears minor; therefore, the type of topical retinoid is not as important as choosing a particular strength of topical retinoid and combining it with an antimicrobial agent. Adapalene has a superior tolerability profile amongst topical retinoids.