1
|
Vitiello L, Salerno G, Coppola A, De Pascale I, Abbinante G, Gagliardi V, Lixi F, Pellegrino A, Giannaccare G. Switching to an Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant after Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Review. Life (Basel) 2024; 14:725. [PMID: 38929708 PMCID: PMC11204630 DOI: 10.3390/life14060725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Revised: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Among working-age people, diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema are currently considered the main causes of blindness. Nowadays, intravitreal injections are widely acknowledged as a significant milestone in ophthalmology, especially for the treatment of several retinal diseases, including diabetic macular edema. In particular, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are typically the first line of treatment; however, monthly injections are required, at least, during the loading dosage. Notably, an intravitreal 0.7 mg dexamethasone (DEX) implant (Ozurdex®, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA) is considered a legitimate substitute treatment for diabetic eyes that have not responded to anti-VEGF treatment. In fact, clinical trials and real-life studies have demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of an intravitreal DEX implant in treating such conditions over a period of three to six months. For this reason, wisely selecting diabetic patients might be crucial to decreasing the load of injections in clinics and hospitals. The purpose of this review is to analyze the available scientific literature to highlight the benefits, efficacy, and clinical criteria for choosing whether to switch from intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy to an intravitreal DEX implant in diabetic macular edema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Livio Vitiello
- Eye Unit, “Luigi Curto” Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Salerno, 84035 Polla, SA, Italy; (G.S.); (A.C.); (I.D.P.); (G.A.); (V.G.); (A.P.)
| | - Giulio Salerno
- Eye Unit, “Luigi Curto” Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Salerno, 84035 Polla, SA, Italy; (G.S.); (A.C.); (I.D.P.); (G.A.); (V.G.); (A.P.)
| | - Alessia Coppola
- Eye Unit, “Luigi Curto” Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Salerno, 84035 Polla, SA, Italy; (G.S.); (A.C.); (I.D.P.); (G.A.); (V.G.); (A.P.)
| | - Ilaria De Pascale
- Eye Unit, “Luigi Curto” Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Salerno, 84035 Polla, SA, Italy; (G.S.); (A.C.); (I.D.P.); (G.A.); (V.G.); (A.P.)
| | - Giulia Abbinante
- Eye Unit, “Luigi Curto” Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Salerno, 84035 Polla, SA, Italy; (G.S.); (A.C.); (I.D.P.); (G.A.); (V.G.); (A.P.)
| | - Vincenzo Gagliardi
- Eye Unit, “Luigi Curto” Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Salerno, 84035 Polla, SA, Italy; (G.S.); (A.C.); (I.D.P.); (G.A.); (V.G.); (A.P.)
| | - Filippo Lixi
- Eye Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, CA, Italy; (F.L.); (G.G.)
| | - Alfonso Pellegrino
- Eye Unit, “Luigi Curto” Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Salerno, 84035 Polla, SA, Italy; (G.S.); (A.C.); (I.D.P.); (G.A.); (V.G.); (A.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Giannaccare
- Eye Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, CA, Italy; (F.L.); (G.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boscia F, Veritti D, Iaculli C, Lattanzio R, Freda S, Piergentili B, Varano M. Management of treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema patients: Review of real-world clinical data. Eur J Ophthalmol 2024:11206721241237069. [PMID: 38462923 DOI: 10.1177/11206721241237069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
The high prevalence of Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a real global health problem. Its complex pathophysiology involves different pathways. Over the last decade, the introduction of intravitreal treatments has dramatically changed the management and prognosis of DME. Among the different treatment options, inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and intravitreal steroids implants represent the first-line therapy of DME. We conducted a review of electronic databases to compile the available evidence about the clinical management of DME in a clinical setting, with a special focus on treatment-naïve patients. Anti-VEGF therapies represent a valuable option for treating DME patients. However, many patients do not respond properly to this treatment and, due to its administration regimen, many patients receive suboptimal treatment in real life. Current evidence demonstrated that in patients with DME, DEX-i improved significantly both anatomic and visual outcomes. Besides eyes with insufficient anti-VEGF respond or recalcitrant DME cases, DEX-i can be effectively and safely used in treatment-naïve DME patients as first line therapy. DEX-i may be considered first line therapy in different clinical scenarios, such as DME eyes with a greater inflammatory component, patients with cardiovascular events, vitrectomized eyes, or those requiring cataract surgery. In conclusion, there are still many points for improvement pending in the clinical management of the patient with DME. Since DME treatment must follow a patient-tailored approach, selecting the best therapeutic approach for each patient requires a good understanding of the pathophysiology of DME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Boscia
- Department of Translational Medicine and Neurosciences (DiBraiN), University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Daniele Veritti
- Department of Medicine - Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Cristiana Iaculli
- Department of Ophthalmology, Policlinico Riuniti Di Foggia, University of Foggia, 71122, Foggia, Italy
| | - Rosangela Lattanzio
- Department of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Simona Freda
- AbbVie S.r.l., SR 148 Pontina, 04011, Campoverde, LT
| | | | - Monica Varano
- Ophthalmology Department, IRCCS - Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moreno-Martinez A, Blanco-Marchite C, Copete S. Influence of prior treatment protocol on intravitreal dexamethasone implant behavior in patients with diabetic macular edema in real-world practice. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2024; 23:199-205. [PMID: 38234187 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2305361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEXI) has been placed as an effective option to treat diabetic macular edema (DME). However, there is no consensus on the best time to introduce it. We conducted a study to evaluate anatomical and functional behavior after the first DEXI according to previous treatment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This retrospective, real-world study between 2013 and 2020 investigated changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT at months 2 and 6 after the first DEXI in DME. Patients were divided into naive, early switch (≤3 anti-VEGF injections), or late switch (>3 anti-VEGF injections) groups. RESULTS Among 112 consecutive eyes, mean BCVA and CMT improved significantly in all groups at month 2, with no difference between them. However, this improvement was not maintained at 6 months. The Naíve group presented better BCVA all over the study period. The previously treated groups, which started with worse initial visual acuity, showed more visual gain without reaching the BCVA of the naive group. CMT performance was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS There was similar anatomical and functional behavior in all groups. Poorer visual acuity at baseline was associated with worse functional outcome despite good anatomic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sergio Copete
- Department of Ophthalmology, Albacete University Hospital Complex, Albacete, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mitchell P, Arnold J, Fraser-Bell S, Kang HK, Chang AA, Tainton J, Simonyi S. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in diabetic macular oedema refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factors: the AUSSIEDEX study. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 2023; 8:e001224. [PMID: 37541745 PMCID: PMC10407411 DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate effectiveness of dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (DEX) monotherapy in the AUSSIEDEX study non-responder subgroup, defined by diabetic macular oedema (DME) refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. METHODS This prospective, open-label, observational, real-world study included pseudophakic and phakic (scheduled for cataract surgery) eyes that did not achieve a ≥5-letter best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) gain and/or clinically significant central subfield retinal thickness (CRT) improvement after 3-6 anti-VEGF injections for DME (N=143 eyes), regardless of baseline BCVA and CRT. After an initial DEX injection (baseline visit), reinjection was permitted at ≥16-week intervals. PRIMARY ENDPOINTS changes in mean BCVA and CRT from baseline to week 52. Safety assessments included adverse events. RESULTS Of 143 eyes, 53 (37.1%) and 89 (62.2%) switched to DEX after 3-6 (early) and >6 (late) anti-VEGF injections, respectively; 1 (0.7%) had missing information. With 2.3 injections (mean) over 52 weeks, the change in mean BCVA from a baseline of 57.8 letters was not significant at week 52. Mean CRT improved significantly from a baseline of 417.8 μm at week 52 (mean change -60.9 μm; p<0.001). Outcomes were similar in eyes switched to DEX early and late. No unexpected adverse events were reported; no filtration surgeries were required. CONCLUSION To date, AUSSIEDEX is the largest prospective, real-world study of DEX monotherapy for treatment-naïve or anti-VEGF-refractory DME. Following early or late switch from anti-VEGF agents, DEX significantly improved anatomic outcomes at 52 weeks without new safety concerns, supporting use in anti-VEGF-refractory DME. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02731911.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Mitchell
- Westmead Institute for Medical Research / Sydney West Retina, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Samantha Fraser-Bell
- The University of Sydney Save Sight Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Hospital and Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hyong Kwon Kang
- Retina & Vitreous Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew A Chang
- Sydney Retina Clinic & Day Surgery, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jodi Tainton
- Allergan, an AbbVie Company, Gordon, New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yuen YS, Gilhotra JS, Dalton M, Aujla JS, Mehta H, Wickremasinghe S, Uppal G, Arnold J, Chen F, Chang A, Fraser-Bell S, Lim L, Shah J, Bowditch E, Broadhead GK. Diabetic Macular Oedema Guidelines: An Australian Perspective. J Ophthalmol 2023; 2023:6329819. [PMID: 36824442 PMCID: PMC9943607 DOI: 10.1155/2023/6329819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The number of people living with diabetes is expected to rise to 578 million by 2030 and to 700 million by 2045, exacting a severe socioeconomic burden on healthcare systems around the globe. This is also reflected in the increasing numbers of people with ocular complications of diabetes (namely, diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and diabetic retinopathy (DR)). In one study examining the global prevalence of DR, 35% of people with diabetes had some form of DR, 7% had PDR, 7% had DMO, and 10% were affected by these vision-threatening stages. In many regions of the world (Australia included), DR is one of the top three leading causes of vision loss amongst working age adults (20-74 years). In the management of DMO, the landmark ETDRS study demonstrated that moderate visual loss, defined as doubling of the visual angle, can be reduced by 50% or more by focal/grid laser photocoagulation. However, over the last 20 years, antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and corticosteroid therapies have emerged as alternative options for the management of DMO and provided patients with choices that have higher chances of improving vision than laser alone. In Australia, since the 2008 NHMRC guidelines, there have been significant developments in both the treatment options and treatment schedules for DMO. This working group was therefore assembled to review and address the current management options available in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jaskirat S. Aujla
- South Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Hemal Mehta
- Save Sight Registries, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Strathfield Retina Clinic, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sanj Wickremasinghe
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gurmit Uppal
- Moreton Eye Group, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Fred Chen
- Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Incorporating Lions Eye Institute), The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Chang
- Sydney Institute of Vision Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Retina Clinic and Day Surgery, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Save Sight Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Samantha Fraser-Bell
- Department of Ophthalmology, Save Sight Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lyndell Lim
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Janika Shah
- Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
| | - Ellie Bowditch
- Save Sight Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hertzberg SNW, Moe MC, Jørstad ØK, Petrovski BÉ, Burger E, Petrovski G. Healthcare expenditure of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors compared with dexamethasone implant for diabetic macular oedema. Acta Ophthalmol 2022; 100:e1630-e1640. [PMID: 35467793 PMCID: PMC9790387 DOI: 10.1111/aos.15151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to estimate the 1-year costs associated with treating diabetic macular oedema (DME) patients using current intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) biologics compared with the dexamethasone implant. METHODS We conducted a descriptive cost-evaluation analysis using data from Oslo University Hospital and literature to compare three different intravitreal drugs for DME: bevacizumab, aflibercept and dexamethasone. Stratification of patients into 'Naive' or 'Switch' group was based on treatment history. We estimated the costs from healthcare and 'extended' healthcare perspectives. Sensitivity analysis evaluated the impact of various parameters. RESULTS The average injections per patient per year for the Naive group (bevacizumab), Switch group (aflibercept) and dexamethasone were 9.5, 9.1 and 3.0 respectively. From a healthcare perspective, the 1-year costs for the Naive group were 15% lower (bevacizumab, €3619), and for the Switch group, 23% higher (aflibercept, €5226) compared with dexamethasone (€4252). The 'extended' healthcare perspective showed the cost per patient per year for bevacizumab remained nominally lower in the Naive group, while dexamethasone remained lower for the Switch group (€5116 for dexamethasone, compared to €4987 for bevacizumab and €6537 for aflibercept). CONCLUSIONS From a primary healthcare perspective, the dexamethasone as a first-line DME treatment may increase economic costs in settings where bevacizumab is used off-label. Treating resistant DMEwith dexamethasone may reduce the costs and treatment burden compared with switching to aflibercept.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia NW Hertzberg
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Eye Research, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Morten Carstens Moe
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Eye Research, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Øystein Kalsnes Jørstad
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Eye Research, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Beáta Éva Petrovski
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Eye Research, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Emily Burger
- Department of Health Management and Health EconomicsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway,Center for Health Decision ScienceHarvard T. H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMAUSA
| | - Goran Petrovski
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Eye Research, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Early-switch versus late-switch in patients with diabetic macular edema: a cost-effectiveness study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2022; 261:941-949. [PMID: 36370170 PMCID: PMC10050055 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05892-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of early- versus late-switch to the intravitreal-dexamethasone implant (DEX-i) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who did not adequately respond to vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (anti-VEGF).
Methods
Retrospective analysis of a multicenter Clinical Data Registry. The registry included DME eyes who received 3 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (early-switch) or > 3 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (late-switch) before switching to DEX-i injections. The primary outcome was to estimate the incremental cost needed to obtain a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement ≥ 0.1 or a central-retinal thickness CRT ≤ 250 μm.
Results
The analysis included 108 eyes, 32 (29.6%) and 76 (70.4%) in the early- and late-switch groups, respectively. Early-switch strategy was associated with a cost saving of €3,057.8; 95% CI: €2,406.4–3,928.4, p < 0.0001). Regarding incremental-cost-effectiveness ratio, late-switch group was associated with an incremental cost of €25,735.2 and €13,533.2 for achieving a BCVA improvement ≥ 0.1 at month 12 and at any of the time-point measured, respectively. At month 12, 38 (35.2%) eyes achieved a BCVA improvement ≥ 0.1. At month 12, 52 (48.1) eyes had achieved a CRT ≤ 250 micron. As compared to baseline, the mean (95% CI) CRT reduction was − 163.1 (− 212.5 to − 113.7) µm and − 161.6 (− 183.8 to − 139.3) µm in the early-switch and late-switch groups, respectively, p = 0.9463.
Conclusions
In DME eyes, who did not adequately respond to anti-VEGF, switching to DEX-i at early stages (after the first 3-monthly injections) was found to be more cost-effective than extending the treatment to 6-monthly injections of anti-VEGF.
Collapse
|
8
|
Grzybowski A, Markeviciute A, Zemaitiene R. Treatment of Macular Edema in Vascular Retinal Diseases: A 2021 Update. J Clin Med 2021; 10:5300. [PMID: 34830582 PMCID: PMC8619917 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Macular edema (ME) is associated with various conditions; however, the main causes of ME are retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and diabetes. Laser photocoagulation, formerly the gold standard for the treatment of ME, has been replaced by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) intravitreal injections. Despite its efficiency, this treatment requires frequent injections to preserve the outcomes of anti-VEGF therapy, and as many patients do not sufficiently respond to the treatment, ME is typically a chronic condition that can lead to permanent visual impairment. Generalized recommendations for the treatment of ME are lacking, which highlights the importance of reviewing treatment approaches, including recent anti-VEGFs, intravitreal steroid implants, and subthreshold micropulse lasers. We reviewed relevant studies, emphasizing the articles published between 2019 and 2021 and using the following keywords: macular edema, diabetic macular edema, retinal vein occlusion, laser photocoagulation, anti-VEGF, and intravitreal injections. Our results revealed that a combination of different treatment methods may be beneficial in resistant cases. Additionally, artificial intelligence (AI) is likely to help select the best treatment option for patients in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Grzybowski
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-561 Olsztyn, Poland;
- Institute for Research in Ophthalmology, 60-836 Poznan, Poland
| | - Agne Markeviciute
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 50161 Kaunas, Lithuania;
| | - Reda Zemaitiene
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 50161 Kaunas, Lithuania;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Intravitreal Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: An Update. J Ophthalmol 2021; 2021:6654168. [PMID: 33688431 PMCID: PMC7925023 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6654168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Diabetic macular edema (DME) represents a prevalent and disabling eye condition. Despite that DME represents a sight-threatening condition, it is also among the most accessible to treatment. Many different treatment options including photocoagulation, intravitreal medical treatment (either vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors or corticosteroids therapies), and surgical removal are currently available. Although laser has been considered as the gold standard for many years, over the past several years vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (anti-VEGFs) have become first-line therapy. However, many patients do not adequately respond to them. With the development of sustained-release corticosteroid devices, steroids have gained a presence in the management of the DME. We review and update the role of anti-VEGF and intravitreal sustained-release corticosteroid management of DME. According to the currently available scientific evidence, the choice of one anti-VEGF over another critically depends on the baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). While aflibercept may be the drug of choice in low baseline BCVA, the three anti-VEGFs (bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept) provided similar functional outcomes when the baseline BCVA was higher. DEX implants are a valuable option for treating DME, although they are usually seen as a second choice, particularly in those eyes that have an insufficient response to anti-VEGF. The new evidence suggested that, in eyes that did not adequately respond to anti-VEGF, switching to a DEX implant at the time to 3 monthly anti-VEGF injections provided better functional outcomes.
Collapse
|
10
|
Medina-Baena M, Cejudo-Corbalán O, García-Pulido JI, Huertos-Carrillo MJ, Girela-López E. Intravitreal dexamethasone implant in naïve and previously treated patients with diabetic macular edema: a retrospective study. Int J Ophthalmol 2020; 13:1597-1605. [PMID: 33078111 DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2020.10.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To assess the effect of the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX) Ozurdex on the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS Totally 43 eyes (24 naïve and 19 previously treated) were included in the study. Retrospective and single-center study involved patients with a clinical diagnosed of DME, who received treatment with DEX implant and had a follow-up of at least 12mo. Primary endpoints included changes in BCVA and CRT. RESULTS At month 12, mean improvement in BCVA from baseline was 20.4±20.8 letters and 6.8±6.9 letters in naïve and previously treated patients, respectively (P=0.0132). The naïve patients achieved the BCVA improvement significantly faster (2.4±1.5mo) than the previously treated ones (3.5±2.4mo, P=0.0298; Mann-Whitney test). The proportion of eyes gaining ≥15 letters was 54.2% and 21.1% in the non-previously treated and previously treated groups, respectively (P=0.0293). CRT was significantly reduced from 484.0±119.8 and 487.5±159.9 µm to 272.0±39.2 and 233.5±65.7 µm in the naïve and previously treated patients, respectively; P<0.0001 each, respectively. The presence of subretinal fluid was significantly associated with the proportion of patients achieving a BCVA improvement ≥5 letters [HR (95%CI), 1.23 (1.04 to 1.45), P=0.0145]; ≥10 letters [HR (95%CI), 1.75 (1.10 to 2.77), P=0.0182]; and ≥15 letters [HR (95% CI), 2.04 (1.03 to 4.02), P=0.0407]. Naïve patients received less DEX implants throughout the study than the previously treated ones (1.8±0.6 vs 2.3±0.6, P=0.0172, respectively). Totally 9 patients (20.9%) have developed ocular hypertension, which was successfully controlled with topical hypotensive drugs. Of the 23 phakic eyes at baseline, 5 eyes (21.7%) either had new onset lens opacity or progression of an existing opacity during the study follow-up. Four of them (2 in the naïve group and 2 in the previously treated one) required cataract surgery at months 4, 6, 6, and 6, respectively. CONCLUSION The results obtained in this study may support the early use of DEX Ozurdex as first line therapy in naïve patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Castro-Navarro V, Monferrer-Adsuara C, Navarro-Palop C, Montero-Hernández J, Cervera-Taulet E. Effect of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant on Visual Acuity and Foveal Photoreceptor Integrity in Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vascular Disease. Ophthalmologica 2020; 244:83-92. [PMID: 33045712 DOI: 10.1159/000512195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the dexamethasone intravitreal (DEX) implant on the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity in treatment-naïve patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vascular disease (RVD). METHODS This is a retrospective study conducted on patients with ME secondary to RVD, who underwent a DEX implant. RESULTS One-hundred eyes were included. Mean age was 70.3 ± 11.1 years. Mean ELM integrity significantly improved from 1,575.9 ± 285.9 μm at baseline to 1,711.7 ± 244.0 μm at month 3 (p < 0.0001). Similarly, there was a significant improvement in EZ integrity from baseline to month 3 (1,531.5 ± 317.1 vs. 1,694.3 ± 252.8 μm, respectively, p < 0.0001). At month 3, mean visual acuity (VA) gain was 9.9 ± 14.1 letters (p < 0.0001). Mean central retinal thickness (CRT) significantly decreased by -193.2 ± 185.7 μm from baseline to month 3 (p < 0.0001). Mean changes in VA and CRT were significantly correlated with baseline ELM integrity (p = 0.0065 and p = 0.0046, respectively) and EZ integrity (p = 0.0300 and p = 0.0035, respectively). At month 3, the proportion of eyes which had an intact ELM (mean difference 16.0%, 95% CI 5.4-26.4%, p = 0.0033) and EZ (mean difference 12.0%, 95% CI 1.8-22.1%, p = 0.0210) was significantly higher than at baseline. CONCLUSIONS DEX implant was able to significantly improve ELM and EZ integrity in naïve patients with ME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verónica Castro-Navarro
- Department of Ophthalmology, Consorci Hospital General Universitari de Valencia, Valencia, Spain,
| | - Clara Monferrer-Adsuara
- Department of Ophthalmology, Consorci Hospital General Universitari de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Catalina Navarro-Palop
- Department of Ophthalmology, Consorci Hospital General Universitari de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Javier Montero-Hernández
- Department of Ophthalmology, Consorci Hospital General Universitari de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Enrique Cervera-Taulet
- Department of Ophthalmology, Consorci Hospital General Universitari de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ruiz-Medrano J, Rodríguez-Leor R, Almazán E, Lugo F, Casado-Lopez E, Arias L, Ruiz-Moreno JM. Results of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex) in diabetic macular edema patients: Early versus late switch. Eur J Ophthalmol 2020; 31:1135-1145. [PMID: 32493065 DOI: 10.1177/1120672120929960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the functional and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal dexamethasone implant Ozurdex® in eyes with diabetic macular edema that did not adequately respond to vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. METHODS Multicenter, retrospective, and real-life case series study conducted on consecutive diabetic macular edema patients who underwent treatment with one or more dexamethasone implant injections and were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. Subjects were divided into three groups: I-naïve patients, II-previously treated eyes that received three intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors injections before the study (early switch), and III-previously treated eyes that received >3 intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors injections before the study (late switch). Primary endpoints were best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness at month 12. RESULTS A total of 129 eyes (21 naïve and 108 previously treated, Group II: 32 and Group III: 76) were included. At month 12, best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved from 0.27 ± 0.23 and 0.31 ± 0.22 at baseline to 0.36 ± 0.25 and 0.37 ± 0.23 at month 12 in naïve and previously treated eyes, respectively, and p = 0.0063 and 0.0060, respectively. Central retinal thickness, in naïve and previously treated eyes, was significantly reduced from 483.0 ± 143.4 and 431.3 ± 115.5 µm, at baseline, to 278.8 ± 72.1 and 269.3 ± 66.2 µm, at month 12, respectively, and p < 0.0001 each, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity improvement was significantly greater in both absolute and percentage values, p = 0.0393 and 0.0118, respectively, in Group II than in Group III. CONCLUSION In eyes with insufficient response to antivascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, switching to dexamethasone at the time to 3-monthly antivascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors injections provided better functional outcomes than those that received >3 antivascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors injections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Elena Almazán
- Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Luis Arias
- Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José M Ruiz-Moreno
- Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Vissum Alicante, Alicante, Spain
- Department of Ophthalmology, Castilla La Mancha University, Albacete, Spain
- Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Salud: ""Prevención, detección precoz, y tratamiento de la patología ocular prevalente, degenerativa y crónica" (RD16/0008/0021), Spanish Ministry of Health, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cidad-Betegón MDP, Armadá-Maresca F, Amorena-Santesteban G, Coca-Robinot J, D'Anna-Mardero O, de la Rosa-Pérez I, Manzano-Muñoz B, García-Martínez J, Asencio-Durán M, Casado-Abad G. Can the dexamethasone intravitreal implant Ozurdex be safely administered in an out-of-operating room setting? J Drug Assess 2020; 9:66-71. [PMID: 32341839 PMCID: PMC7170356 DOI: 10.1080/21556660.2020.1742723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To describe a standardized protocol of the dexamethasone intravitreal (DEX) implant Ozurdex (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) performed in a controlled environment surgical cabin (CESC). Methods Retrospective and observational study conducted on patients who underwent a DEX implant between May 2011 and June 2019, in a third level University Hospital. The controlled environment surgical cabin (ArcSterile, Imex, Valencia, Spain) used in this study was the MB 20 (2 m width, 1.60 m depth, and 2 m height) with an uninterrupted power system (ARSSAI1) to keep the cabin working for 20 min. The cabin was used in the open mode. A standardized protocol of intravitreal injections in controlled environment surgical cabin was designed. Results From May 2011 to February 2015, a total of 454 DEX implants were performed in the operating room, whereas from March 2015 to June 2019, 1054 DEX devices were implanted using the CESC. The mean number of DEX implants/per week was significantly lower in the operating room than in the CESC [2.3 (2.1 to 2.5) versus 3.8 (3.6 to 4.1), mean difference 1.5 (1.2 to 1.8), p < 0.0001]. The incidence of endophthalmitis was similar in the two populations, 0/454 (0.0%; 95% CI 0.0 to 0.81%) and 0/1054 (0.0%; 95% CI 0.0 to 0.35%) in the operating room and in the CESC, respectively. Conclusions The CESC may be a good alternative to the conventional operating room for the administration of the intravitreal DEX implant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gema Casado-Abad
- Hospital Pharmacy Service, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Park YG, Park YH. Quantitative Analysis of Retinal Microvascular Perfusion and Novel Biomarkers of the Treatment Response in Diabetic Macular Edema. J Diabetes Res 2020; 2020:2132037. [PMID: 33282960 PMCID: PMC7685832 DOI: 10.1155/2020/2132037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to assess the changes of retinal microvascular parameters using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) between diabetes macular edema (DME) and controls. We assessed the changes between the baseline microvascular parameters and final treatment response in patients with DME, initially treated with intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant followed by antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections on an as-needed basis. METHODS This retrospective study included 90 DME patients and 24 healthy control subjects. All subjects had their best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) measured at baseline and after 12 months. Vessel density (VD) in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP) and the deep/superficial flow ratio at baseline were analyzed. A subgroup analysis was used to compare the treatment response. A poor-response group was defined by five or more retreatments at 12 months. RESULTS BCVA and CMT showed a significant improvement at 12 months (all p < 0.001). The VD in the whole and parafoveal areas of the DCP was significantly reduced in DME patients compared to that in controls (all p < 0.05). The DCP/SCP flow ratio was also significantly reduced in the DME group (1.08 ± 0.03 vs. 1.05 ± 0.02, p = 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the VD in the foveal and whole DCP areas was significantly lower in the poor-response group than that in the good-response group (p = 0.043 and p = 0.048, respectively). The DCP/SCP flow ratio was also significantly lower in the poor-response group (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION DME correlated with significant retinal microvascular impairment in the DCP. A decreased DCP/SCP flow ratio was observed in patients with DME that exhibited a poor treatment response. Retinal microvascular parameters could predict the treatment response in DME and help optimize clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Gun Park
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Hoon Park
- Catholic Institute for Visual Science, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|