Comparison of Adverse Events Occurred During Administration of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor in Patients with Diabetes Using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Efficacy of Prednisone Avoidance in Patients With Liver Transplant Using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

Background Immunosuppressants are administered in various combinations to prevent immune-induced transplant rejection in patients with liver transplant, as each immunosuppressant acts on different cellular sites. However, the use of multiple immunosuppressants also increases the risk for adverse events. Therefore, it is desirable to reduce the types of immunosuppressants administered without increasing the incidence of transplant rejection. The effectiveness of prednisone avoidance has been suggested, although this was not based on statistical significance in many instances. To definitively establish the effectiveness of prednisone avoidance, a statistically significant difference from a prednisone-use group should be demonstrated. Additionally, the effectiveness of prednisone avoidance might vary depending on the combination of other immunosuppressants administered. It has therefore been considered necessary to investigate, for various immunosuppressant combinations, the administration patterns in which prednisone avoidance is effective. Objectives This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of prednisone avoidance in patients with liver transplant and discuss the results based on statistically significant differences. Methods Data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) were obtained. In studying immunosuppressant combinations, it was essential to control for confounding. Thus, the immunosuppressant combinations, excluding prednisone, were kept the same in the two groups being compared (prednisone-use and prednisone-avoidance groups). The large sample from FAERS allowed for those various immunosuppressant combinations to be compared. Comparisons of transplant rejection in the prednisone-use and prednisone-avoidance groups used the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the adjusted ROR (aROR), which controlled for differences in patient background. Results With the prednisone-use groups being set as the reference, ROR and aROR were calculated for the prednisone-avoidance groups. Various immunosuppressant combinations were evaluated, and in four patterns - (1) the combination of prednisone and tacrolimus, (2) the combination of prednisone, cyclosporine, and tacrolimus, (3) the combination of prednisone, tacrolimus, and basiliximab, and (4) the combination of prednisone and everolimus) - both the ROR and the aROR for transplant rejection in the prednisone-avoidance group were significantly <1.000. Conclusions This study identified effective immunosuppressant combinations for prednisone avoidance that were not associated with increased transplant rejection. The evidence supporting the effectiveness of prednisone avoidance is strengthened when combined with results from previous studies.

Analysis of Adverse Events Following Phenobarbital Administration for Pediatric Patients Categorized by One-Year Age Increments Using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

Background Organ and body development greatly varies in pediatric patients from year to year. Therefore, the incidence of each adverse event following phenobarbital (PB) administration would vary with age. However, in clinical trials, increasing the sample size of pediatric patients in each age group has been challenging. Therefore, previous studies were conducted by dividing pediatric patients into three or four age groups based on the development stage. Although these results were useful in clinical settings, information on adverse events that occurred at one-year age increments in pediatric patients could further enhance treatment and care. Objectives This study investigated in one-year age increments the occurrence tendency of each adverse event following PB administration in pediatric patients. Methods This study used data obtained from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Two inclusion criteria were set: (1) treatment with PB between January 2004 and June 2023 and (2) age 0-15 years. Using the cutoff value obtained using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test by the minimum p-value approach, this study explored changes in the occurrence tendency of each adverse event in one-year age increments. At the minimum p-value of <0.05, the age corresponding to this p-value was determined as the cutoff value. Conversely, at the minimum p-value of ≥0.05, the cutoff value was considered nonexistent. Results This study investigated all types of adverse events and explored the cutoff value for each adverse event. We identified 34, 16, 15, nine, five, five, eight, three, and eight types of adverse events for the cutoff values of ≤3/>3, ≤4/>4, ≤5/>5, ≤6/>6, ≤7/>7, ≤8/>8, ≤9/>9, ≤10/>10, and ≤11/>11 years, respectively. Conclusions This study demonstrated that adverse events requiring attention in pediatric patients varied with age. The findings help in the improvement of treatment and care in the pediatric clinical settings.

Proteomic changes related to actin cytoskeleton function in the skin of vildagliptin-treated mice

BACKGROUND

Vildagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) is a widely used type 2 diabetes medication that is associated with an up-to 10-fold increased risk for the development of bullous pemphigoid (BP), an autoimmune skin disease. The mechanism by which vildagliptin promotes the development of BP remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate effects of vildagliptin treatment on the mouse cutaneous proteome.

METHODS

We analyzed the cutaneous proteome of nondiabetic mice treated for 12 weeks with vildagliptin using label-free shotgun mass spectrometry (MS), two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE), immunohistochemistry, immunoblotting, and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Although vildagliptin treatment did not cause any clinical signs or histological changes in the skin, separate MS and 2D-DIGE analyses revealed altered cutaneous expression of several proteins, many of which were related to actin cytoskeleton remodeling. Altogether 18 proteins were increased and 40 were decreased in the vildagliptin-treated mouse skin. Both methods revealed increased levels of beta-actin and C->U-editing enzyme APOBEC2 in vildagliptin-treated mice. However, elevated levels of a specific moesin variant in vildagliptin-treated animals were only detected with 2D-DIGE. Immunohistochemical staining showed altered cutaneous expression of DPP-4, moesin, and galectin-1. The changed proteins detected by MS and 2D-DIGE were linked to actin cytoskeleton remodeling, transport, cell movement and organelle assembly.

CONCLUSION

Vildagliptin treatment alters the cutaneous proteome of nondiabetic mice even without clinical signs in the skin. Cytoskeletal changes in the presence of other triggering factors may provoke a break of immune tolerance and further promote the development of BP.

Pharmacovigilance Study of Infigratinib: A Safety Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

BACKGROUND

Infigratinib is a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-specifc tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with previously treated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma. However, few studies have been conducted to evaluated the safety of infigratinib in the real world. In this study, we conducted a pharmacovigilance study to evaluate the adverse events (AEs) of infigratinib by using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHODS

OpenVigil 2.1 was employed to extract the FAERS database. Descriptive analysis was used to describe the characteristics of infigratinib-associated AE reports. Disproportionality analysis was performed by calculating the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratios (ROR), and Bayesian analysis confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) to detect positive signals.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed 149 AE reports, among which 36 significant signals were identified. These significant AE signals were mainly observed in gastrointestinal disorders (N = 26, ROR = 26.03, PRR = 8.44, information component [IC] = 3.08) and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (N = 21, ROR = 92.13, PRR = 40.41, IC = 5.34). Notably, dehydration and skin exfoliation were unexpected AEs, but had relatively high signal intensities (ROR = 29.75, PRR = 26.64, IC = 4.74; ROR = 50.61, PRR = 45.24, IC = 5.50, respectively) despite not being listed on the drug label. Furthermore, our analysis showed that infigratinib dose differed statistically between severe and non-severe reports (113.82 ± 16.13 mg vs 125 ± 0.00 mg, t = - 4.28; p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in sex, age, and types of AEs between the two groups (p  = 0.06, p  = 0.86, and p = 0.93, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that gastrointestinal and skin toxicities are the most common adverse reactions for infigratinib. It is important to recognize skin exfoliation and dehydration in clinical practice, as they are unexpected AEs. Additionally, our study indicates that infigratinib dose may correlate with an increased risk of AE severity, highlighting the need for dose adjustment of infigratinib when exposure to the drug is increased due to internal or external factors.

Analysis of death avoidance by concomitant use of prednisone in patients with renal transplant using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

BACKGROUND

Patients with renal transplant are frequently administered immunosuppressants to prevent transplant-related adverse events. There are mainly nine immunosuppressants on the market, and multiple immunosuppressants are frequently administered for patients with renal transplant. Identifying which immunosuppressant was responsible when efficacy or safety was observed in patients taking multiple immunosuppressants is difficult. This study aimed to identify the immunosuppressant that was effective in reducing death in patients with renal transplant. A very large sample size was required to conduct prospective clinical trials of immunosuppressant combinations, which is impractical. We investigated cases wherein death occurred despite immunosuppressant administration in patients with renal transplant using Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We used FAERS data reported between January 2004 and December 2022 in patients with renal transplant who received one or more immunosuppressants. Groups were defined for each combination of immunosuppressants. Comparison between two identical groups except for the presence or absence of prednisone was performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the adjusted ROR (aROR) controlling for differences in patient background.

RESULTS

When the group without prednisone was set as the reference, the aROR for death was significantly <1.000 in several cases in the group to which prednisone was added.

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion of prednisone in the immunosuppressant combinations was suggested to be effective in reducing death. We provided the sample code of software R that can reproduce the results.