Pharmacokinetics of orally administered duloxetine in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder

Deprescribing Antidepressants in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Discontinuation Approaches, Cross-Titration, and Withdrawal Symptoms

Background: Antidepressant medications, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), are commonly used to treat depressive, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive disorders in youth. Yet, data on discontinuing these medications, withdrawal symptoms, and strategies to switch between them are limited. Methods: We searched PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov through June 1, 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials assessing antidepressant discontinuation in youth. We summarized pediatric pharmacokinetic data to inform tapering and cross-titration strategies for antidepressants and synthesized these data with reports of antidepressant withdrawal. Results: Our search identified 528 published articles, of which 28 were included. In addition, 19 records were obtained through other methods, with 14 included. The corpus of records included 13 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (3026 patients), including SSRIs (K = 10), SNRIs (K = 4), and TCAs (K = 1), ranging from 4 to 35 weeks. Deprescribing antidepressants requires considering clinical status, treatment response, and, in cross-titration cases, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of both medications. Antidepressant withdrawal symptoms are related to the pharmacokinetics of the medication, which vary across antidepressants and may include irritability, palpitations, anxiety, nausea, sweating, headaches, insomnia, paresthesia, and dizziness. These symptoms putatively involve changes in serotonin transporter expression and receptor sensitivity, impacting the serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine pathways. Conclusions: Although approaches to deprescribing antidepressants in pediatric patients are frequently empirically guided, accumulating data related to the course of relapse and withdrawal symptoms, as well as the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of medications, should inform these approaches. Recommendations within this review support data-informed discussions of deprescribing-including when and how-that are critically important in the clinician-family-patient relationship.

Population pharmacokinetics of duloxetine in Japanese pediatric patients with major depressive disorder

The objectives of this analysis were to characterize the pharmacokinetics of duloxetine in Japanese pediatric patients aged 9-17 years with major depressive disorder (MDD) and to explore potential intrinsic factors affecting its pharmacokinetics. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed with plasma steady-state duloxetine concentrations from Japanese pediatric patients with MDD in an open-label long-term extension trial in Japan (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03395353). Duloxetine pharmacokinetics in Japanese pediatric patients was well described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption. The population mean estimates of CL/F and V/F of duloxetine were 81.4 L/h and 1170 L, respectively. Patient intrinsic factors were assessed for their potential influence on duloxetine apparent clearance (CL/F). Only sex was identified as a statistically significant covariate of duloxetine CL/F. Duloxetine pharmacokinetic parameters and model-predicted duloxetine concentrations at steady state in the Japanese pediatric population were compared with those in Japanese adults. The mean duloxetine CL/F in pediatrics is slightly higher than adults, it is, however, expected that comparable steady-state duloxetine exposure in pediatric patients can be achieved with the approved dose regimen for adults. The population PK model provides useful information to understand the pharmacokinetic characteristics of duloxetine for Japanese pediatric patients with MDD. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03395353.

New generation antidepressants for depression in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorders have a significant impact on children and adolescents, including on educational and vocational outcomes, interpersonal relationships, and physical and mental health and well-being. There is an association between major depressive disorder and suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide. Antidepressant medication is used in moderate to severe depression; there is now a range of newer generations of these medications.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate, via network meta-analysis (NMA), the comparative effectiveness and safety of different newer generation antidepressants in children and adolescents with a diagnosed major depressive disorder (MDD) in terms of depression, functioning, suicide-related outcomes and other adverse outcomes. The impact of age, treatment duration, baseline severity, and pharmaceutical industry funding was investigated on clinician-rated depression (CDRS-R) and suicide-related outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Specialised Register, the Cochrane Library (Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR)), together with Ovid Embase, MEDLINE and PsycINFO till March 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials of six to 18 year olds of either sex and any ethnicity with clinically diagnosed major depressive disorder were included. Trials that compared the effectiveness of newer generation antidepressants with each other or with a placebo were included. Newer generation antidepressants included: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs); norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors; norepinephrine dopamine reuptake inhibitors; norepinephrine dopamine disinhibitors (NDDIs); and tetracyclic antidepressants (TeCAs).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We analysed dichotomous data as Odds Ratios (ORs), and continuous data as Mean Difference (MD) for the following outcomes: depression symptom severity (clinician rated), response or remission of depression symptoms, depression symptom severity (self-rated), functioning, suicide related outcomes and overall adverse outcomes. Random-effects network meta-analyses were conducted in a frequentist framework using multivariate meta-analysis. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-analysis (CINeMA). We used "informative statements" to standardise the interpretation and description of the results.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included. There were no data for the two primary outcomes (depressive disorder established via clinical diagnostic interview and suicide), therefore, the results comprise only secondary outcomes. Most antidepressants may be associated with a "small and unimportant" reduction in depression symptoms on the CDRS-R scale (range 17 to 113) compared with placebo (high certainty evidence: paroxetine: MD -1.43, 95% CI -3.90, 1.04; vilazodone: MD -0.84, 95% CI -3.03, 1.35; desvenlafaxine MD -0.07, 95% CI -3.51, 3.36; moderate certainty evidence: sertraline: MD -3.51, 95% CI -6.99, -0.04; fluoxetine: MD -2.84, 95% CI -4.12, -1.56; escitalopram: MD -2.62, 95% CI -5.29, 0.04; low certainty evidence: duloxetine: MD -2.70, 95% CI -5.03, -0.37; vortioxetine: MD 0.60, 95% CI -2.52, 3.72; very low certainty evidence for comparisons between other antidepressants and placebo). There were "small and unimportant" differences between most antidepressants in reduction of depression symptoms (high- or moderate-certainty evidence). Results were similar across other outcomes of benefit. In most studies risk of self-harm or suicide was an exclusion criterion for the study. Proportions of suicide-related outcomes were low for most included studies and 95% confidence intervals were wide for all comparisons. The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of mirtazapine (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.03, 8.04), duloxetine (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.72, 1.82), vilazodone (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.68, 1.48), desvenlafaxine (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.59, 1.52), citalopram (OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.76, 3.87) or vortioxetine (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.29, 8.60) on suicide-related outcomes compared with placebo. There is low certainty evidence that escitalopram may "at least slightly" reduce odds of suicide-related outcomes compared with placebo (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.43, 1.84). There is low certainty evidence that fluoxetine (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.87, 1.86), paroxetine (OR 1.81, 95% CI 0.85, 3.86), sertraline (OR 3.03, 95% CI 0.60, 15.22), and venlafaxine (OR 13.84, 95% CI 1.79, 106.90) may "at least slightly" increase odds of suicide-related outcomes compared with placebo. There is moderate certainty evidence that venlafaxine probably results in an "at least slightly" increased odds of suicide-related outcomes compared with desvenlafaxine (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01, 0.56) and escitalopram (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01, 0.56). There was very low certainty evidence regarding other comparisons between antidepressants.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, methodological shortcomings of the randomised trials make it difficult to interpret the findings with regard to the efficacy and safety of newer antidepressant medications. Findings suggest that most newer antidepressants may reduce depression symptoms in a small and unimportant way compared with placebo. Furthermore, there are likely to be small and unimportant differences in the reduction of depression symptoms between the majority of antidepressants. However, our findings reflect the average effects of the antidepressants, and given depression is a heterogeneous condition, some individuals may experience a greater response. Guideline developers and others making recommendations might therefore consider whether a recommendation for the use of newer generation antidepressants is warranted for some individuals in some circumstances. Our findings suggest sertraline, escitalopram, duloxetine, as well as fluoxetine (which is currently the only treatment recommended for first-line prescribing) could be considered as a first option. Children and adolescents considered at risk of suicide were frequently excluded from trials, so that we cannot be confident about the effects of these medications for these individuals. If an antidepressant is being considered for an individual, this should be done in consultation with the child/adolescent and their family/caregivers and it remains critical to ensure close monitoring of treatment effects and suicide-related outcomes (combined suicidal ideation and suicide attempt) in those treated with newer generation antidepressants, given findings that some of these medications may be associated with greater odds of these events. Consideration of psychotherapy, particularly cognitive behavioural therapy, as per guideline recommendations, remains important.

Therapy response prediction in major depressive disorder: current and novel genomic markers influencing pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

Major depressive disorder is connected with high rates of functional disability and mortality. About a third of the patients are at risk of therapy failure. Several pharmacogenetic markers especially located in CYP450 genes such as CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 are of relevance for therapy outcome prediction in major depressive disorder but a further optimization of predictive tools is warranted. The article summarizes the current knowledge on pharmacogenetic variants, therapy effects and side effects of important antidepressive therapeutics, and sheds light on new methodological approaches for therapy response estimation based on genetic markers with relevance for pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and disease pathology identified in genome-wide association study analyses, highlighting polygenic risk score analysis as a tool for further optimization of individualized therapy outcome prediction.

Dose-Related Concentrations of Neuroactive/Psychoactive Drugs Expected in Blood of Children and Adolescents

PURPOSE

Therapeutic drug monitoring is highly recommended for children and adolescents treated with neurotropic/psychotropic drugs. For interpretation of therapeutic drug monitoring results, drug concentrations (C/D) expected in a "normal" population are helpful to identify pharmacokinetic abnormalities or nonadherence. Using dose-related concentration (DRC) factors obtained from pharmacokinetic data, C/D ranges expected under steady state can be easily calculated by multiplication of DRC by the daily dose. DRC factors, however, are defined only for adults so far. Therefore, it was the aim of this study to estimate DRC factors for children and adolescents and compare them with those of adults.

METHODS

To obtain pharmacokinetic data (apparent total clearance of drugs from plasma after oral administration, elimination half-life, area under the curve, and minimum serum drug concentration) from children and adolescents treated with psychotropic drugs, a systematic review of published literature was performed, and the pharmaceutical companies that market these drugs were contacted. Available information was used for the calculation of DRC factors.

RESULTS

Fourteen of 26 drugs had similar DRC factors to those reported for adults; 8 and 4 had higher and lower factors, respectively. The antidepressants citalopram, clomipramine, fluvoxamine, and imipramine and the antipsychotics haloperidol and olanzapine showed higher DRC factors than those calculated for adults. The DRC factors of amphetamine and methylphenidate were higher in children (6-12 years) but not in adolescents (13-17 years). On the contrary, the antipsychotic quetiapine and the mood-stabilizing antiepileptics lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate showed lower DRC factors than those calculated for adults.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that concentrations of neuroactive/psychoactive drugs to be expected in blood for a given dose may differ between adults and children or adolescents, most probably owing to age-dependent differences in the elimination of these drugs.