Clinical Pharmacokinetic Monitoring of Leflunomide in Renal Transplant Recipients with BK Virus Reactivation: A Review of the Literature

Leflunomide as adjunct therapy for BK viremia management in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

BK viremia after kidney transplantation (KT) poses significant risk for BK virus-associated nephropathy and impacts graft survival. Conventional treatment involves reduction of immunosuppression, which in turn may increase risk for rejection. To address this dilemma, use of anti-viral therapy with immunosuppressive properties such as leflunomide is an attractive option.

METHODS

We performed a multi-center, retrospective chart review to report tolerability and effectiveness of leflunomide use for the eradication of BK viremia and prevention of BK virus-associated nephropathy in pediatric KT recipients.

RESULTS

Seventy patients prescribed leflunomide were included and were followed up from initiation until 1 year following leflunomide completion. BK viremia was eradicated in 64 (91.4%) patients including 8 of 11 with nephropathy (BKVN) on initial biopsy. Reduced anti-proliferative medication (AP) dosing was not associated with increase in biopsy proven rejection (BPAR). However, complete discontinuation of AP during leflunomide therapy was associated with increase in BPAR in uni- and multivariate logistic regression, as was targeted reduction in calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) trough goals. One graft was lost to BKVN. There was no significant association found between time to BK eradication and leflunomide trough concentration, mycophenolate dose reduction, or steroid use (univariate logistic regression). Few leflunomide adverse drug reactions (ADR) were reported (most commonly: gastrointestinal, hematologic).

CONCLUSION

Leflunomide is a promising adjunctive treatment to immunosuppression reduction for BK virus eradication with minimal ADR. AP reduction, not discontinuation, and judicious reduction in CNI trough goals with close monitoring, is a promising strategy for treatment of BK viremia with concomitant use of leflunomide therapy.

Saliva as Blood Alternative in Therapeutic Monitoring of Teriflunomide-Development and Validation of the Novel Analytical Method

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is extremely helpful in individualizing dosage regimen of drugs with narrow therapeutic ranges. It may also be beneficial in the case of drugs characterized by serious side effects and marked interpatient pharmacokinetic variability observed with leflunomide and its biologically active metabolite, teriflunomide. One of the most popular matrices used for TDM is blood. A more readily accessible body fluid is saliva, which can be collected in a much safer way comparing to blood. This makes it especially advantageous alternative to blood during life-threatening SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, drug’s saliva concentration is not always a good representation of its blood concentration. The aim of this study was to verify whether saliva can be used in TDM of teriflunomide. We also developed and validated the first reliable and robust LC-MS/MS method for quantification of teriflunomide in saliva. Additionally, the effect of salivary flow and swab absorptive material from the collector device on teriflunomide concentration in saliva was evaluated. Good linear correlation was obtained between the concentration of teriflunomide in plasma and resting saliva (p < 0.000016, r = 0.88), and even better between plasma and the stimulated saliva concentrations (p < 0.000001, r = 0.95) confirming the effectiveness of this non-invasive method of teriflunomide’s TDM. The analyzed validation criteria were fulfilled. No significant influence of salivary flow (p = 0.198) or type of swab in the Salivette device on saliva’s teriflunomide concentration was detected. However, to reduce variability the use of stimulated saliva and synthetic swabs is advised.

Pharmacovigilance of Herb-Drug Interactions: A Pharmacokinetic Study on the Combined Administration of Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets and Leflunomide Tablets in Rats by LC-MS/MS

A popular and widely used combination therapy of leflunomide (LEF) and Tripterygium glycosides tablets (TGTS) has become a valuable clinical tool in China for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. This regimen has not been evaluated either in terms of interaction or toxicity, even given the rising concerns about LEF’s prolonged elimination half-life and TGT’s narrow therapeutic index, in addition to the current trend of using high doses of LEF. Thus, this study determines the potential adverse drug reactions between these two medicines. Reliable validated LC-MS/MS methods were used for the determination of teriflunomide (TER, the only active metabolite of LEF), and the main components of TGT: wilforlide A, wilforgine, wilfortrine, wilfordine, and wilforine. The results obtained from this investigation, as paralleled with the control groups, revealed that the Cmax and AUC0-t of TER were significantly decreased with separate co-administration, as the Cmax and AUC0-t were 30.17 ± 1.55 μg/mL and 24.47 ± 2.50 μg/mL, 374.55 ± 15.54 μg h/mL and 336.94 ± 21.19 μg h/mL, respectively (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the pharmacokinetic profiles of the main components of TGT have also been affected by separate co-administration in rats. Therefore, herb−drug interactions between LEF and TGT have been proven.

Frequency and impact of DHODH, ABCG2 and CYP2C19 SNPs on the therapeutic efficacy, tolerability and toxicity of leflunomide

Introduction: Leflunomide is one of the commonly used drugs in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which on administration is converted into its active metabolite teriflunomide. Aim: Our aim is to evaluate the frequencies of dihydrooroate dehydrogenase (DHODH) (rs3213422), ABCG2 (rs2231142) and CYP2C19 (rs4244285) allele distribution among patients receiving leflunomide for RA and their possible impact on leflunomide performance in disease control. Patients & methods: Patients (>18 years) who fulfilled the 2010 ACR classification criteria for RA receiving leflunomide (20 mg/day) were included in the study. Disease activity score 28 was used to assess patients disease activity. Blood samples were collected for full blood count and blood chemistry. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood. The selection of SNPs was based on the criteria of minor allele frequency among Caucasians. Results: A significant association between the therapeutic outcome of leflunomide and DHODH genotyping was observed but not with CYP2C19 and ABCG2. Importantly, there is a significant association between DHODH (rs3213422) CC genotype and the number of patients with controlled disease. Conclusion: We strongly suggest that polymorphisms in the DHODH are the major factor affecting leflunomide pharmacogenetics and therapeutic efficacy.

Development of a simple HPLC-MS/MS method to simultaneously determine teriflunomide and its metabolite in human plasma and urine: Application to clinical pharmacokinetic study of teriflunomide sodium and leflunomide

A simple high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and fully validated to simultaneously determine teriflunomide (TER) and its metabolite 4-trifluoro-methylaniline oxanilic acid (4-TMOA) in human plasma and urine. Merely 50 μL plasma and 20 μL urine were employed in sample preparation using protein precipitation and direct dilution method, respectively. An Agilent Zorbax eclipse plus C₁₈ column was selected to achieve rapid separation for TER and 4-TMOA within 3 min. Electrospray ionization under multiple reaction monitoring was used to monitor the ion transitions for TER (m/z 269.0 → 159.9), 4-TMOA (m/z 231.9 → 160.0), internal standard teriflunomide-d4 (m/z 273.0 → 164.0) and 2-amino-4-trifluoromethyl benzoic acid (m/z 203.8 → 120.1), operating in the negative ion mode. This method proved to have better accuracy and precision over concentration range of 10-5000 ng/mL in plasma as well as 10-10,000 ng/mL in urine. After a full validation, this method was successfully applied in a pharmacokinetic study of teriflunomide sodium and leflunomide in Chinese healthy volunteers.

Revolutionizing Therapeutic Drug Monitoring with the Use of Interstitial Fluid and Microneedles Technology

While therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) that uses blood as the biological matrix is the traditional gold standard, this practice may be impossible, impractical, or unethical for some patient populations (e.g., elderly, pediatric, anemic) and those with fragile veins. In the context of finding an alternative biological matrix for TDM, this manuscript will provide a qualitative review on: (1) the principles of TDM; (2) alternative matrices for TDM; (3) current evidence supporting the use of interstitial fluid (ISF) for TDM in clinical models; (4) the use of microneedle technologies, which is potentially minimally invasive and pain-free, for the collection of ISF; and (5) future directions. The current state of knowledge on the use of ISF for TDM in humans is still limited. A thorough literature review indicates that only a few drug classes have been investigated (i.e., anti-infectives, anticonvulsants, and miscellaneous other agents). Studies have successfully demonstrated techniques for ISF extraction from the skin but have failed to demonstrate commercial feasibility of ISF extraction followed by analysis of its content outside the ISF-collecting microneedle device. In contrast, microneedle-integrated biosensors built to extract ISF and perform the biomolecule analysis on-device, with a key feature of not needing to transfer ISF to a separate instrument, have yielded promising results that need to be validated in pre-clinical and clinical studies. The most promising applications for microneedle-integrated biosensors is continuous monitoring of biomolecules from the skin's ISF. Conducting TDM using ISF is at the stage where its clinical utility should be investigated. Based on the advancements described in the current review, the immediate future direction for this area of research is to establish the suitability of using ISF for TDM in human models for drugs that have been found suitable in pre-clinical experiments.