1
|
Zhang J, Liu R, Bi R, Li X, Xu M, Li L, Su Y, Yan W. Comparison of ciprofol-alfentanil and propofol-alfentanil sedation during bidirectional endoscopy: A prospective, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis 2024; 56:663-671. [PMID: 37813808 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although propofol is widely used for gastrointestinal endoscopic sedation, cardiopulmonary adverse events remain common. Ciprofol is a new intravenous anaesthetic agent demonstrating respiratory and hemodynamic stability. AIMS This study aimed to clarify the benefits of ciprofol combined with alfentanil in bidirectional endoscopy (esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by colonoscopy) to reduce adverse events and improve post-endoscopic recovery. METHODS A total of 185 patients scheduled to undergo bidirectional endoscopy were randomly divided into two groups: ciprofol combined with alfentanil or propofol combined with alfentanil. All patients received 7 µg/kg alfentanil intravenously before the study drugs were administered. The propofol group received a bolus of 1.2 mg/kg (0.12 ml/kg) propofol intravenously, whereas the ciprofol group received a bolus of 0.3 mg/kg (0.12 ml/kg) ciprofol intravenously. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with cardiopulmonary adverse events (i.e., any one of the airway obstruction, apnoea, hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia or arrhythmias). RESULTS Compared with propofol, ciprofol reduced cardiopulmonary adverse events by 43.51 % (34.4% vs. 60.9 %, P <0.001), mitigated respiratory adverse events by 54.74 % (17.2% vs. 38.0 %, P = 0.002) overall and by 59.05 % (12.9% vs. 31.5 %, P = 0.002) during the induction period. CONCLUSIONS Ciprofol can significantly decrease respiratory depression events and provides a better sedative efficacy than propofol with higher recovery quality and satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiqiang Zhang
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ruijuan Liu
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, No. 204 Dong-gang West Road, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China; Ningxia Medical University School of Clinical Medicine, Yinchuan, China
| | - Ruirui Bi
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, No. 204 Dong-gang West Road, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China
| | - Xia Li
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, No. 204 Dong-gang West Road, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China
| | - Mengjun Xu
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, No. 204 Dong-gang West Road, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China
| | - Lijuan Li
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, No. 204 Dong-gang West Road, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China; First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yuxi Su
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, No. 204 Dong-gang West Road, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China
| | - Wenjun Yan
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, No. 204 Dong-gang West Road, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kinoshita M, Borges do Nascimento IJ, Styrmisdóttir L, Bruschettini M. Systemic opioid regimens for postoperative pain in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 4:CD015016. [PMID: 37018131 PMCID: PMC10075508 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015016.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pain clinical management in neonates has always been a challenging medical issue. Worldwide, several systemic opioid regimens are available for pediatricians, neonatologists, and general practitioners to control pain in neonates undergoing surgical procedures. However, the most effective and safe regimen is still unknown in the current body of literature. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of different regimens of systemic opioid analgesics in neonates submitted to surgery on all-cause mortality, pain, and significant neurodevelopmental disability. Potentially assessed regimens might include: different doses of the same opioid, different routes of administration of the same opioid, continuous infusion versus bolus administration, or 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration. SEARCH METHODS Searches were conducted in June 2022 using the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL], PubMed, and CINAHL. Trial registration records were identified via CENTRAL and an independent search of the ISRCTN registry. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-randomized, cluster-randomized, and cross-over controlled trials evaluating systemic opioid regimens' effects on postoperative pain in neonates (pre-term or full-term). We considered suitable for inclusion: I) studies evaluating different doses of the same opioid; 2) studies evaluating different routes of administration of the same opioid; 3) studies evaluating the effectiveness of continuous infusion versus bolus infusion; and 4) studies establishing an assessment of an 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS According to Cochrane methods, two investigators independently screened retrieved records, extracted data, and appraised the risk of bias. We stratified meta-analysis by the type of intervention: studies evaluating the use of opioids for postoperative pain in neonates through continuous infusion versus bolus infusion and studies assessing the 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration. We used the fixed-effect model with risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data and mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), median, and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous data. Finally, we used the GRADEpro approach for primary outcomes to evaluate the quality of the evidence across included studies. MAIN RESULTS In this review, we included seven randomized controlled clinical trials (504 infants) from 1996 to 2020. We identified no studies comparing different doses of the same opioid, or different routes. The administration of continuous opioid infusion versus bolus administration of opioids was evaluated in six studies, while one study compared 'as needed' versus 'as scheduled' administration of morphine given by parents or nurses. Overall, the effectiveness of continuous infusion of opioids over bolus infusion as measured by the visual analog scale (MD 0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.23 to 0.23; 133 participants, 2 studies; I² = 0); or using the COMFORT scale (MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.89 to 0.75; 133 participants, 2 studies; I² = 0), remains unclear due to study designs' limitations, such as the unclear risk of attrition, reporting bias, and imprecision among reported results (very low certainty of the evidence). None of the included studies reported data on other clinically important outcomes such as all-cause mortality rate during hospitalization, major neurodevelopmental disability, the incidence of severe retinopathy of prematurity or intraventricular hemorrhage, and cognitive- and educational-related outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence is available on continuous infusion compared to intermittent boluses of systemic opioids. We are uncertain whether continuous opioid infusion reduces pain compared with intermittent opioid boluses; none of the studies reported the other primary outcomes of this review, i.e. all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization, significant neurodevelopmental disability, or cognitive and educational outcomes among children older than five years old. Only one small study reported on morphine infusion with parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Kinoshita
- Department of Pediatrics, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Fetal Medicine Research Center, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Israel Junior Borges do Nascimento
- School of Medicine and University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Matteo Bruschettini
- Paediatrics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Cochrane Sweden, Department of Research and Education, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kinoshita M, Stempel KS, Borges do Nascimento IJ, Bruschettini M. Systemic opioids versus other analgesics and sedatives for postoperative pain in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 3:CD014876. [PMID: 36870076 PMCID: PMC9983301 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014876.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neonates may undergo surgery because of malformations such as diaphragmatic hernia, gastroschisis, congenital heart disease, and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, or complications of prematurity, such as necrotizing enterocolitis, spontaneous intestinal perforation, and retinopathy of prematurity that require surgical treatment. Options for treatment of postoperative pain include opioids, non-pharmacological interventions, and other drugs. Morphine, fentanyl, and remifentanil are the opioids most often used in neonates. However, negative impact of opioids on the structure and function of the developing brain has been reported. The assessment of the effects of opioids is of utmost importance, especially for neonates in substantial pain during the postoperative period. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of systemic opioid analgesics in neonates who underwent surgery on all-cause mortality, pain, and significant neurodevelopmental disability compared to no intervention, placebo, non-pharmacological interventions, different types of opioids, or other drugs. SEARCH METHODS We searched Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE via PubMed and CINAHL in May 2021. We searched the WHO ICTRP, clinicaltrials.gov, and ICTRP trial registries. We searched conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for RCTs and quasi-RCTs. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in preterm and term infants of a postmenstrual age up to 46 weeks and 0 days with postoperative pain where systemic opioids were compared to 1) placebo or no intervention; 2) non-pharmacological interventions; 3) different types of opioids; or 4) other drugs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were pain assessed with validated methods, all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization, major neurodevelopmental disability, and cognitive and educational outcomes in children more than five years old. We used the fixed-effect model with risk ratio (RR) and risk difference (RD) for dichotomous data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS We included four RCTs enrolling 331 infants in four countries across different continents. Most studies considered patients undergoing large or medium surgical procedures (including major thoracic or abdominal surgery), who potentially required pain control through opioid administration after surgery. The randomized trials did not consider patients undergoing minor surgery (including inguinal hernia repair) and those individuals exposed to opioids before the beginning of the trial. Two RCTs compared opioids with placebo; one fentanyl with tramadol; and one morphine with paracetamol. No meta-analyses could be performed because the included RCTs reported no more than three outcomes within the prespecified comparisons. Certainty of the evidence was very low for all outcomes due to imprecision of the estimates (downgrade by two levels) and study limitations (downgrade by one level). Comparison 1: opioids versus no treatment or placebo Two trials were included in this comparison, comparing either tramadol or tapentadol with placebo. No data were reported on the following critical outcomes: pain; major neurodevelopmental disability; or cognitive and educational outcomes in children more than five years old. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of tramadol compared with placebo on all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization (RR 0.32, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.01 to 7.70; RD -0.03, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.05, 71 participants, 1 study; I² = not applicable). No data were reported on: retinopathy of prematurity; or intraventricular hemorrhage. Comparison 2: opioids versus non-pharmacological interventions No trials were included in this comparison. Comparison 3: head-to-head comparisons of different opioids One trial comparing fentanyl with tramadol was included in this comparison. No data were reported on the following critical outcomes: pain; major neurodevelopmental disability; or cognitive and educational outcomes in children more than five years old. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of fentanyl compared with tramadol on all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.64; RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.13, 171 participants, 1 study; I² = not applicable). No data were reported on: retinopathy of prematurity; or intraventricular hemorrhage. Comparison 4: opioids versus other analgesics and sedatives One trial comparing morphine with paracetamol was included in this comparison. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of morphine compared with paracetamol on COMFORT pain scores (MD 0.10, 95% CI -0.85 to 1.05; 71 participants, 1 study; I² = not applicable). No data were reported on the other critical outcomes, i.e. major neurodevelopmental disability; cognitive and educational outcomes in children more than five years old, all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization; retinopathy of prematurity; or intraventricular hemorrhage. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Limited evidence is available on opioid administration for postoperative pain in newborn infants compared to either placebo, other opioids, or paracetamol. We are uncertain whether tramadol reduces mortality compared to placebo; none of the studies reported pain scores, major neurodevelopmental disability, cognitive and educational outcomes in children older than five years old, retinopathy of prematurity, or intraventricular hemorrhage. We are uncertain whether fentanyl reduces mortality compared to tramadol; none of the studies reported pain scores, major neurodevelopmental disability, cognitive and educational outcomes in children older than five years old, retinopathy of prematurity, or intraventricular hemorrhage. We are uncertain whether morphine reduces pain compared to paracetamol; none of the studies reported major neurodevelopmental disability, cognitive and educational outcomes in children more than five years old, all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization, retinopathy of prematurity, or intraventricular hemorrhage. We identified no studies comparing opioids versus non-pharmacological interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Kinoshita
- Department of Pediatrics, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Fetal Medicine Research Center, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Israel Junior Borges do Nascimento
- School of Medicine and University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Matteo Bruschettini
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Paediatrics, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Cochrane Sweden, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kinoshita M, Borges do Nascimento IJ, Styrmisdóttir L, Bruschettini M. Systemic opioid regimens for postoperative pain in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 1:CD015016. [PMID: 36645224 PMCID: PMC9841767 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015016.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pain clinical management in neonates has always been a challenging medical issue. Worldwide, several systemic opioid regimens are available for pediatricians, neonatologists, and general practitioners to control pain in neonates undergoing surgical procedures. However, the most effective and safe regimen is still unknown in the current body of literature. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of different regimens of systemic opioid analgesics in neonates submitted to surgery on all-cause mortality, pain, and significant neurodevelopmental disability. Potentially assessed regimens might include: different doses of the same opioid, different routes of administration of the same opioid, continuous infusion versus bolus administration, or 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration. SEARCH METHODS Searches were conducted in June 2022 using the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL], PubMed, and CINAHL. Trial registration records were identified via CENTRAL and an independent search of the ISRCTN registry. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-randomized, cluster-randomized, and cross-over controlled trials evaluating systemic opioid regimens' effects on postoperative pain in neonates (pre-term or full-term). We considered suitable for inclusion: I) studies evaluating different doses of the same opioid; 2) studies evaluating different routes of administration of the same opioid; 3) studies evaluating the effectiveness of continuous infusion versus bolus infusion; and 4) studies establishing an assessment of an 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS According to Cochrane methods, two investigators independently screened retrieved records, extracted data, and appraised the risk of bias. We stratified meta-analysis by the type of intervention: studies evaluating the use of opioids for postoperative pain in neonates through continuous infusion versus bolus infusion and studies assessing the 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration. We used the fixed-effect model with risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data and mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), median, and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous data. Finally, we used the GRADEpro approach for primary outcomes to evaluate the quality of the evidence across included studies. MAIN RESULTS In this review, we included seven randomized controlled clinical trials (504 infants) from 1996 to 2020. We identified no studies comparing different doses of the same opioid, or different routes. The administration of continuous opioid infusion versus bolus administration of opioids was evaluated in six studies, while one study compared 'as needed' versus 'as scheduled' administration of morphine given by parents or nurses. Overall, the effectiveness of continuous infusion of opioids over bolus infusion as measured by the visual analog scale (MD 0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.23 to 0.23; 133 participants, 2 studies; I² = 0); or using the COMFORT scale (MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.89 to 0.75; 133 participants, 2 studies; I² = 0), remains unclear due to study designs' limitations, such as the unclear risk of attrition, reporting bias, and imprecision among reported results (very low certainty of the evidence). None of the included studies reported data on other clinically important outcomes such as all-cause mortality rate during hospitalization, major neurodevelopmental disability, the incidence of severe retinopathy of prematurity or intraventricular hemorrhage, and cognitive- and educational-related outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence is available on continuous infusion compared to intermittent boluses of systemic opioids. We are uncertain whether continuous opioid infusion reduces pain compared with intermittent opioid boluses; none of the studies reported the other primary outcomes of this review, i.e. all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization, significant neurodevelopmental disability, or cognitive and educational outcomes among children older than five years old. Only one small study reported on morphine infusion with parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Kinoshita
- Department of Pediatrics, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Fetal Medicine Research Center, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Israel Junior Borges do Nascimento
- School of Medicine and University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Matteo Bruschettini
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Paediatrics, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Cochrane Sweden, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu G, Zhang L, Wang HS, Lin Y, Jin HQ, Wang XD, Qiao WN, Zhang YT, Sun JQ, Liu ZN. Dexmededomidine in pediatric unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:7376-7385. [PMID: 36157988 PMCID: PMC9353900 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Safe and effective analgesia strategy remains one of the priorities for pediatric inguinal hernia treatment.
AIM To explore safety and efficacy of dexmededomidine monotherapy for postoperative analgesia in children who received laparoscopic unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation.
METHODS This randomized single-center controlled trial included 390 children (aged 1-3 years, ASA grade I-II), randomly divided into a dexmededomidine group (D group), a dexmededomidine + sufentanil group (DS group), and a sufentanil group (S group). The primary endpoint was percentage of children with the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) score ≤ 3 points 2 h after surgery.
RESULTS The comparisons of the FLACC scores at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h were not significantly different among the three groups (P > 0.05). The sedative effects in the D group were significantly better than those in the S group (P > 0.05), but not significantly different from those in the DS group. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in the D group than in the S group and DS group (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION Analgesic effects of dexmededomidine monotherapy are comparable to those of sufentanil alone or in combination with dexmededomidine for children who underwent laparoscopic unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation, with better sedative effects and a lower incidence of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guang Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Baoding Children's Hospital, Baoding 071000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Ling Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Baoding Children's Hospital, Baoding 071000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Hui-Se Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Baoding Children's Hospital, Baoding 071000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Yi Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Baoding Children's Hospital, Baoding 071000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Hong-Quan Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Baoding Children's Hospital, Baoding 071000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Xiao-Dan Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Baoding Children's Hospital, Baoding 071000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Wei-Na Qiao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Baoding Children's Hospital, Baoding 071000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Ya-Tao Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Baoding Children's Hospital, Baoding 071000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Jiao-Qian Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology, Baoding Children's Hospital, Baoding 071000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Zhi-Na Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Baoding Children's Hospital, Baoding 071000, Hebei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sllamniku S, Beqo BP, Krasniqi I, Tërshana A, Murtezani A, Quehenberger F, Haxhija EQ. Splint Duration and Not the Mode of Anesthesia Is the Main Factor Influencing Avascular Necrosis After Closed Reduction for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Kosovo. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:850605. [PMID: 35558375 PMCID: PMC9090470 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.850605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of analgesia and sedation (AS) as opposed to general anesthesia (GA) for closed reduction and spica casting of children with severe developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) influenced the long-term incidence of avascular necrosis (AVN). In a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial we investigated 100 pediatric patients with DDH type IIIa, IIIb, and IV (according to Graf classification), who were randomly assigned into the group receiving AS, and the group receiving GA. Baseline demographics, splint duration, and type of DDH were carefully assessed. The presence of AVN was assessed at the follow-up visits at 1 and 7 years after the end of treatment. The AS-group consisted of 50 patients (46 girls) with 76 hips affected (n = 11/Type-IIIa, n = 32/Type-IIIb, and n = 33/Type-IV). The GA-group consisted also of 50 patients (44 girls) with 78 hips involved (n = 15/Type-IIIa, n = 34/Type-IIIb, and n = 29/Type-IV). At 7-years follow-up, AVN was diagnosed in 9 of 154 hips (5.8%), 5 hips in the AS-group and 4 hips in the GA group. The logistic regression model showed no significant difference in AVN incidence between the AS and GA groups at 7-years follow-up (p = 0.27). The multivariate regression analysis showed that neither the type of DDH nor the age at diagnosis influenced the incidence of AVN (p = 0.48 and p = 0.28, respectively). Splint duration was identified as the only significant factor for the long-term incidence of AVN in the treatment of severe DDH. For every month of longer splint duration, the odds of AVN at 7-years follow-up increased by a factor of 3.81 (95%CI: 1.35-13.73, p = 0.02). Closed reduction and spica casting of children with severe DDH under AS can be considered a feasible alternative to management under GA. All efforts must be made to diagnose patients with DDH as early as possible and shorten the duration of splint treatment to prevent the development of AVN. Level of Evidence. Level II-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabit Sllamniku
- Orthopedic Department, University Clinical Center of Kosovo, Prishtina, Republic of Kosovo
| | - Besiana P. Beqo
- Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, Global Clinical Scholars Research Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Islam Krasniqi
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Clinical Center of Kosovo, Prishtina, Republic of Kosovo
| | - Azem Tërshana
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical Faculty of Prishtina University, Prishtina, Republic of Kosovo
| | - Ardiana Murtezani
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, University Clinical Center of Kosovo, Prishtina, Republic of Kosovo
| | - Franz Quehenberger
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Emir Q. Haxhija
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rosen DM, Alcock MM, Palmer GM. Opioids for acute pain management in children. Anaesth Intensive Care 2022; 50:81-94. [PMID: 35172638 DOI: 10.1177/0310057x211065769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Opioids are integral to multimodal analgesic regimens in children with moderate to severe acute pain. Throughout normal childhood there are marked changes in physiology, and social and psychological development that influence the perception and expression of pain, the pharmacology of opioids, and how they are used. A multidimensional pain assessment is key to guiding appropriate opioid prescribing. Most of the commonly used opioids in adults are used in children, with the increasing exception of codeine (as a result of regulatory change), and are generally well tolerated. Patient groups at increased risk of ventilatory impairment include neonates and those with obstructive sleep apnoea, severe neurodevelopmental conditions, trisomy 21, and severe epilepsy. Slow-release opioids are not recommended for general use, but may be used in select populations, for example, following scoliosis surgery, major trauma or burns. Prescribing and administration errors are a major issue in paediatrics generally; the potential consequences of opioid prescribing or administration errors are serious, particularly following hospital discharge. Opioids prescribed at discharge are frequently in excess of a child's analgesic requirements; three to five days supply appears sufficient for the majority of common paediatric operations. Discharge opioid prescriptions have been linked to long-term opioid use in adolescents with risk factors. Misuse of prescription opioids by adolescents is also concerning, with prevalence estimates ranging from 1.1% to 20%. Caregivers have a tendency to underdose opioids in their children; caregiver education may improve appropriate administration. Caregivers must also be provided with instructions on safe storage and disposal of unused opioids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek M Rosen
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,University of Queensland, Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Mark M Alcock
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,University of Queensland, Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Greta M Palmer
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To determine the effects of different regimens of systemic opioid analgesics in neonates (term or preterm) undergoing surgery, on mortality, pain and major neurodevelopmental disability. These different regimens may include: different doses of the same opioid; different routes of administration of the same opioid; continuous infusion versus bolus administration; or 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kinoshita M, Stempel KS, Borges do Nascimento IJ, Bruschettini M. Systemic opioids versus other analgesics and sedatives for postoperative pain in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Kinoshita
- Fetal Medicine Research Center; University of Barcelona; Barcelona Spain
- Department of Pediatrics; Lund University; Lund Sweden
| | | | - Israel Junior Borges do Nascimento
- School of Medicine and University Hospital; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); Belo Horizonte Brazil
- Department of Medicine; Medical College of Wisconsin; Milwaukee Wisconsin USA
| | - Matteo Bruschettini
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Paediatrics; Lund University, Skåne University Hospital; Lund Sweden
- Cochrane Sweden; Lund University, Skåne University Hospital; Lund Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kinoshita M, Stempel K, do Nascimento IJB, Vejayaram DN, Norman E, Bruschettini M. Opioids and alpha-2-agonists for analgesia and sedation in newborn infants: protocol of a systematic review. Syst Rev 2020; 9:183. [PMID: 32819417 PMCID: PMC7441710 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01436-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospitalized newborn infants may require analgesia and sedation either for the management of procedural pain, during or after surgery, and other painful conditions. The benefits and harms of opioids administered at different doses and routes of administration have been reported in numerous trials and systematic reviews. The use of alpha-2-agonists such as clonidine and dexmedetomidine in newborn infants is more recent, and they might be prescribed to reduce the total amount of opioids which are thought to have more side effects. Moreover, alpha-2-agonists might play an important role in the management of agitation and discomfort. METHODS We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of opioids, alpha-2-agonists, or the combination of both drugs. We will include randomized controlled trials to assess benefits and harms and observational studies to assess adverse events and pharmacokinetics; preterm and term infants; studies on any opioids or alpha-2-agonists administered for any indication and by any route except spinal, intraosseous, or administration for nerve blocks and wound infusions. The use of opioids or alpha-2-agonists will be compared to no intervention; placebo with normal saline or other non-sedative, non-analgesic drug; control with oral sugar solution or non-pharmacological intervention; same drug of different dose or route; or a different drug (not limiting to opioids and alpha-2-agonists) or combinations of such drugs. The primary outcomes for this review will be all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization and hypotension requiring medical therapy. We will conduct a search in the following databases: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. Two review authors will independently screen records for inclusion, undertake data abstraction using a data extraction form and assess the risk of bias of all included trials using the Cochrane "Risk of bias" tool. DISCUSSION This systematic review will summarize and update our knowledge about neonatal analgesia and sedation including pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and provide a platform for developing evidence-based guidelines that we can immediately apply to our clinical practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020170852.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Kinoshita
- Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. .,Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | | | - Israel Junior Borges do Nascimento
- School of Medicine at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.,Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | - Elisabeth Norman
- Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Pediatrics, Lund, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jones NS, Comparin JH. Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019. Forensic Sci Int Synerg 2020; 2:608-669. [PMID: 33385148 PMCID: PMC7770462 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This review paper covers the forensic-relevant literature in controlled substances from 2016 to 2019 as a part of the 19th Interpol International Forensic Science Managers Symposium. The review papers are also available at the Interpol website at: https://www.interpol.int/content/download/14458/file/Interpol%20Review%20Papers%202019.pdf.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole S. Jones
- RTI International, Applied Justice Research Division, Center for Forensic Sciences, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC, 22709-2194, USA
| | - Jeffrey H. Comparin
- United States Drug Enforcement Administration, Special Testing and Research Laboratory, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Maharaj AR, Wu H, Zimmerman KO, Speicher DG, Sullivan JE, Watt K, Al-Uzri A, Payne EH, Erinjeri J, Lin S, Harper B, Melloni C, Hornik CP. Dosing of Continuous Fentanyl Infusions in Obese Children: A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis. J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 60:636-647. [PMID: 31814149 PMCID: PMC7591270 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Differences in fentanyl pharmacokinetics (PK) between obese and nonobese adults have previously been reported; however, the impact of childhood obesity on fentanyl PK is relatively unknown. We developed a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model using opportunistically collected samples from a cohort of predominately obese children receiving fentanyl per the standard of care. Using a probability-based approach, we evaluated the ability of different continuous infusion strategies to provide steady-state concentrations (Css ) within an analgesic concentration range (1-3 ng/mL). Fifty-three samples from 32 children were used for PopPK model development. Median (range) age and body weight of study participants were 13 years (2-19 years) and 52 kg (16-164 kg), respectively. The majority of children (94%) were obese. A 2-compartment model allometrically scaled by total body weight provided an appropriate fit to the data. Estimated typical clearance was 32.5 L/h (scaled to 70 kg). A fixed dose rate infusion of 1 µg/kg/h was associated with probabilities between 49% and 58% for achieving Css within target; however, the risk of achieving Css > 3 ng/mL increased with increasing body weight (15% at 16 kg vs 43% at 164 kg). A proposed model-based infusion strategy maintained consistent probabilities across the examined weight range for achieving Css within (58%) and above (20%) target. Use of an allometric relationship between weight and clearance was appropriate for describing the PK of intravenous fentanyl in our cohort of predominately obese children. Our proposed model-derived continuous infusion strategy maximized the probability of achieving target Css in children of varying weights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil R. Maharaj
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Huali Wu
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kanecia O. Zimmerman
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David G. Speicher
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Janice E. Sullivan
- University of Louisville, Kosair Charities Pediatric Clinical Research Unit, and Norton Children’s Hospital, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Kevin Watt
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Amira Al-Uzri
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | | - Susan Lin
- The Emmes Company, LLC, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Barrie Harper
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Chiara Melloni
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Christoph P. Hornik
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Völler S, Flint RB, Andriessen P, Allegaert K, Zimmermann LJI, Liem KD, Koch BCP, Simons SHP, Knibbe CAJ. Rapidly maturing fentanyl clearance in preterm neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2019; 104:F598-F603. [PMID: 31498775 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/31/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fentanyl is frequently used off-label in preterm newborns. Due to very limited pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, fentanyl dosing is mostly based on bodyweight. This study describes the maturation of the pharmacokinetics in preterm neonates born before 32 weeks of gestation. METHODS 442 plasma samples from 98 preterm neonates (median gestational age: 26.9 (range 23.9-31.9) weeks, postnatal age: 3 (range 0-68) days, bodyweight 1.00 (range 0.39-2.37) kg) were collected in an opportunistic trial and fentanyl plasma levels were determined. NONMEM V.7.3 was used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and to perform simulations. RESULTS Fentanyl pharmacokinetics was best described by a two-compartment model. A pronounced non-linear influence of postnatal and gestational age on clearance was identified. Clearance (L/hour/kg) increased threefold, 1.3-fold and 1.01-fold in the first, second and third weeks of life, respectively. In addition, clearance (L/hour/kg) was 1.4-fold and 1.7-fold higher in case of a gestational age of 28 and 31 weeks, respectively, compared with 25 weeks. Volume of distribution changed linearly with bodyweight and was 8.7 L/kg. To achieve similar exposure across the entire population, a continuous infusion (µg/kg/hour) dose should be reduced by 50% and 25% in preterm neonates with a postnatal age of 0-4 days and 5-9 days in comparison to 10 days and older. CONCLUSION Because of low clearance, bodyweight-based dosages may result in fentanyl accumulation in neonates with the lowest postnatal and gestational ages which may require dose reduction. Together with additional information on the pharmacodynamics, the results of this study can be used to guide dosing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swantje Völler
- Division of Pharmacology, Division Systems Pharmacology and Biomedicine, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Robert B Flint
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Andriessen
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Karel Allegaert
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luc J I Zimmermann
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kian D Liem
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Birgit C P Koch
- Department of Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sinno H P Simons
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Catherijne A J Knibbe
- Division of Pharmacology, Division Systems Pharmacology and Biomedicine, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|