Outpatient pharmacotherapy and modes of administration for acute repetitive and prolonged seizures

ACVIM Consensus Statement on the management of status epilepticus and cluster seizures in dogs and cats

BACKGROUND

Seizure emergencies (ie, status epilepticus [SE] and cluster seizures [CS]), are common challenging disorders with complex pathophysiology, rapidly progressive drug-resistant and self-sustaining character, and high morbidity and mortality. Current treatment approaches are characterized by considerable variations, but official guidelines are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To establish evidence-based guidelines and an agreement among board-certified specialists for the appropriate management of SE and CS in dogs and cats.

ANIMALS

None.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A panel of 5 specialists was formed to assess and summarize evidence in the peer-reviewed literature with the aim to establish consensus clinical recommendations. Evidence from veterinary pharmacokinetic studies, basic research, and human medicine also was used to support the panel's recommendations, especially for the interventions where veterinary clinical evidence was lacking.

RESULTS

The majority of the evidence was on the first-line management (ie, benzodiazepines and their various administration routes) in both species. Overall, there was less evidence available on the management of emergency seizure disorders in cats in contrast to dogs. Most recommendations made by the panel were supported by a combination of a moderate level of veterinary clinical evidence and pharmacokinetic data as well as studies in humans and basic research studies.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Successful management of seizure emergencies should include an early, rapid, and stage-based treatment approach consisting of interventions with moderate to preferably high ACVIM recommendations; management of complications and underlying causes related to seizure emergencies should accompany antiseizure medications.

Out-of-hospital rescue medication in dogs with emergency seizure disorders: an owner perspective

Background

Emergency seizure disorders such as status epilepticus and cluster seizures are unlikely to cease spontaneously while prolonged seizure activity become progressively more resistant to treatment. Early administration of rescue medication in canine epileptic patients, in particular benzodiazepines, at seizure onset by the owners can be life-saving and brain protecting. Clinical studies in dogs evaluating the use of rescue medication in hospital environment exist, however, the owner perspective has not been assessed to date.

Hypothesis or objectives

To evaluate the use of rescue medication in dogs with seizure emergencies by the owner at home.

Method

Observational study based on online surveys of owners of dogs with emergency seizure disorders.

Results

The questionnaire was answered by 1,563 dog owners, of which 761 provided complete and accurate answers suitable for analysis. Of these, 71% administered diazepam, 19% midazolam, 6% levetiracetam, 3% lorazepam, and 4% more than one rescue or other medication. Overall, the success rates based on owners' perspective for intranasal midazolam and rectal diazepam were 97 and 63%, respectively. Owners reported a compliance level of 95 and 66% for intranasal midazolam and rectal diazepam administration, respectively.

Conclusions and clinical importance

Even though rectal diazepam was the most used rescue medication in this survey population, intranasal midazolam was perceived by the owners as a better option regarding effectiveness, time to seizure cessation and owner compliance.

Potential efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate oral loading in patients with epilepsy

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new antiseizure medication (ASM) approved as an adjunctive therapy or monotherapy for focal onset seizures. We performed this study to explore the potential efficacy and safety of ESL oral loading in selected patients with epilepsy. Thirty adult patients with status epilepticus or acute repetitive seizures were enrolled, and ESL was administered at a single loading dosage of 30 mg/kg. Plasma levels of an active metabolite of ESL, monohydroxy derivative (MHD), were measured at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after ESL oral loading. Two thirds of the patients reached a therapeutic level of MHD 2 h after ESL loading, and most of the patients achieved a therapeutic range within 12 h after loading. Plasma MHD levels did not rise above the supratherapeutic level in any patient throughout the study. The reported adverse effects included one patient with gaze-evoked nystagmus and another patient with a rash. No serious adverse events leading to drug discontinuation occurred. There was no discernible difference in sodium levels before and after ESL oral loading. Our study findings suggest that ESL oral loading could be a useful therapeutic option for patients with epilepsy who need rapid elevations in the therapeutic levels of ASMs.

Sublingual lorazepam as rescue therapy for seizure emergencies in adults

OBJECTIVE

Limited acute home treatments are available for patients with prolonged (>5 minutes) or repetitive (≥2 in 24 hours) seizures. While this early seizure treatment may reduce the need for emergency care, intermittent intranasal benzodiazepine formulations are expensive and rectal diazepam administration is often socially unacceptable. We determined whether caregivers could use sublingual lorazepam oral concentrate solution effectively as acute treatment for adults with prolonged and repetitive seizures.

METHODS

Patients prescribed sublingual lorazepam solution at the Johns Hopkins Epilepsy Center for acute seizure treatment during a 5-year period (2012-2017) were screened. We determined clinical history of seizure patterns and number of antiseizure medications (ASMs) through patient and caregiver surveys, and we verified this history in patients' medical records and charts. During a 2-year span (2017-2018), patients and caregivers were surveyed on responses to their most recent use of sublingual lorazepam solution, including seizure cessation (prolonged seizure stopping <5 minutes or ≤1 repetitive seizure), presence of sedation and adverse events within 24 hours of administration, and whether refrigeration limited use.

RESULTS

In total, 52 patients used sublingual lorazepam for treatment of acute seizures during the study period (median dose 1 mg, range 0.5 to 2 mg). Of them, 48 patients participated in treatment survey interviews. Family caregivers usually administered lorazepam (88%); 3 self-administered. Patients were surveyed on responses to their most recent use of sublingual lorazepam treatment: 66% (23/35) of patients with repetitive seizures reported no further seizure activity after administering treatment; 70% (7/10) with prolonged seizures reported seizure activity ceased within 5 minutes of treatment. Three patients treated auras and had no seizures. There were no serious adverse events during most recent use: 31% of patients developed moderate/severe sedation. Of note, 98% refrigerated lorazepam, often with coolers; 44%, however, said this limited treatment access. There was high treatment satisfaction; 79% reported that having the emergency treatment available made them feel safer.

SIGNIFICANCE

This patient survey and retrospective chart review demonstrates that home treatment with sublingual lorazepam solution may be effective for interrupting prolonged and repetitive seizures. No patients had sedation complications with home doses of 0.5 to 2 mg, and patients report high satisfaction with the treatment.

Dravet syndrome: A quick transition guide for the adult neurologist

INTRODUCTION

Dravet syndrome (DS) is still seen as a "pediatric disease", where patients receive excellent care in pediatric centers, but care is less than optimal in adult health care systems (HCS). This creates a barrier when young adults need to leave the family-centered pediatric system and enter the adult, patient-centered HCS. Here we create a guide to help with the transition from pediatric to adult for patients with DS.

METHODS

Experts in Dravet syndrome flagged the main barriers in caring for adults with DS and created a 2-page transition summary guide based on their expertise and a literature review.

RESULTS

The 2-page guide addresses: DS diagnosis in children and adults; clinical manifestations, including the differences in seizures types and frequencies between children and adults with DS; the natural history of intellectual disability, behavior, gait, motor disorders and dysautonomia; a review of optimal treatments (including medications not commonly used in adult epilepsy settings such as stiripentol and fenfluramine), as well as emergency seizure management; avoidance of triggers, preventive measures, and vaccine administration in adults with DS.

CONCLUSION

Several young adults with DS are still followed by their child neurologist. This 2-page transition guide should help facilitate the transition of patients with DS to the adult HCS and should be given to families as well as adult health care providers that may not be familiar with DS.

A systematic review of seizure clusters: Prevalence, risk factors, burden of disease and treatment patterns

Seizure clusters (SCs) are episodes of consecutive seizures that occur within a short period. The treatment patterns of rescue medications (RMs), as well as the burden of SCs, have not been assessed. A systematic literature search on Embase.com (in PubMed and Embase), supplemented with keyword-based and bibliographic searches, identified 44 articles for disease burden, three treatment guidelines, and three articles for treatment patterns. Common SC definitions were ≥3 seizures/24 h, ≥2/24 h and ≥2/6 h. The rate of SCs in prospective studies ranged from 21.7 %-42.5 %. The frequency of status epilepticus (SE) was higher in SC patients. SCs were associated with higher seizure frequency, higher risk of treatment resistance, and lower likelihood of seizure remission. Quality of life (QoL) was lower in children with SCs than in those with isolated seizures. Seizure-related hospitalization was more common in SC than non-SC patients. SCs adversely affected the productivity of patients and their caregivers. In outpatients with SCs, RMs were prescribed to 24.6 %-89.6 % and utilized by 15.6 %-44.5 %, with rates being higher in children. Key reasons for RM under-utilization were lack of seizure action plans, poor physician-patient communication, and concerns with administration route. In conclusion, SCs are associated with a higher risk of SE, treatment resistance, and low rate of seizure remission. They adversely affect patient and caregiver QoL and work productivity. However, RMs are under-prescribed, and there is an urgent need to improve recognition of SCs, improve use of seizure action plans, and remove barriers to RM use.

Seizure clusters

Acute repetitive seizures, also called seizure clusters, are common phenomena in patients with epilepsy. They are a burden on patients and their caregivers and may be very disruptive to the patients' lives. They may progress to prolonged seizures or status epilepticus if they are not aborted as soon as possible. However, their definition, recognition, and classification still suffer from a lack of consensus among healthcare professionals in the field. This review aims to shed light on various aspects of seizure clusters with particular attention to their treatments.

Efficacy of oral perampanel in status epilepticus and acute repetitive seizures in children at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand

Status epilepticus (SE) and acute repetitive seizure (ARS) are emergency conditions associated with significant morbidity and mortality in children. Anti-seizure medications (ASMs) need to terminate seizures to prevent brain damage and death. Common challenges that delay the management of SE and ARS in children at Phramongkutklao hospital are difficulty in accessing intravenous route for drug administration and inadequate number of intensive care units (which will be required in case of the use of adverse events to anesthetic ASMs). Oral, non-sedating ASMs could be a potential option to terminate seizures effectively in SE and ARS in children and further studies in this aspect are needed. We performed a prospective, descriptive study in children with SE or ARS < 18 years of age who had contraindication to or their seizures were refractory to the second-line ASMs after benzodiazepine and received oral perampanel. Demographic data, efficacy, and adverse effects of treatment were recorded. Fifteen patients with SE (13.3%) and acute repetitive seizure (86.6%) were enrolled. All patients received an oral perampanel loading dose and the maintenance dose depended on their body weight. The average loading and maintenance dose were 0.24 mg/kg/dose and 0.12 mg/kg/day, respectively. At 48 h after administration of loading dose of perampanel, eight of fifteen patients (53.3%) became seizure free, one patient had seizure reduction of >75% from baseline, and three patients had seizure reduction of 25-50% from baseline. No serious side effects were observed. These results indicate that oral perampanel may be potential treatment option for SE and ARS in children.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Seizures at the End of Life

Seizures are physically burdensome and emotionally distressing for patients, families, caregivers, and clinicians. Patients with neurological diseases are at increased risk of having complex, difficult-to-control seizures at the end of life. Palliative care (PC) clinicians asked to provide management of these seizures may not be familiar or comfortable with more complex seizures or epilepsy. A team of neurologists and PC specialists have compiled a list of tips to guide clinicians on how to care for patients having seizures and to support their families/caregivers.

A critical evaluation of midazolam nasal spray for the treatment of patients with seizure clusters

Introduction: Patients with epilepsy may experience seizure clusters (SCs), which are considered a medical emergency requiring immediate treatment. Besides seizures and seizure-related injuries, patients with SCs experience impaired quality of life and have a greater need for healthcare resources. Midazolam nasal spray (MDZ-NS) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of SCs in 2019, and was the first FDA-approved nasally administered formulation for treating SCs.Areas covered: This article provides a critical evaluation of MDZ-NS for the treatment of patients with SCs. It covers the chemistry, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of MDZ-NS, and safety, tolerability, and efficacy data from phase I and phase III trials. SC treatment guidelines in different countries and for alternative therapies are also discussed.Expert opinion: Midazolam is a well-established drug that is familiar to physicians. The newer MDZ-NS formulation offers the benefits of intranasal administration, which allows for outpatient treatment by caregivers and other non-healthcare professionals when an SC occurs, and may be particularly meaningful to patients with limited treatment options because other routes of administration are unsuitable. MDZ-NS is effective and patients are known to return to baseline alertness and psychomotor function within 240 minutes after administration.

Cost of epilepsy-related health care encounters in the United States

BACKGROUND: The cost of epilepsy is usually reported as total expenditure over a certain period. However, with the increased availability of acute treatments for use in the community setting, intermittent, single-seizure treatment is now possible in addition to the chronic epilepsy drug treatment paradigm. Data on the cost of discrete health care encounters are needed to substantiate the cost-benefit of these new treatments. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the health plan-paid costs of discrete epilepsy-related health care encounters in patients with epilepsy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims, Medicare Supplemental and Coordination of Benefits (Medicare patients with supplemental insurance), and Multi-State Medicaid research databases. The primary analysis determined health plan-paid cost (adjudicated claims) of discrete epilepsy-related health care encounters, defined as having a primary diagnosis code of epilepsy or convulsion, from 2013 to 2018, in patients with epilepsy aged ≥ 12 years. Costs were adjusted to 2018 prices. Epilepsy cases were defined using ICD-CM codes. We excluded patients on capitated insurance plans as their cost per health care encounter is unknown. RESULTS: In total, 353,530 commercially insured, 378,051 Medicaid, and 69,176 Medicare plus supplemental insurance patients with epilepsy were included. More than 160,000 epilepsy-related emergency transportations, 225,000 emergency department (ED) visits, 49,000 hospitalizations, 700 urgent care visits, and ~2.5 million office visits were analyzed. 37.4% of epilepsy-related hospitalizations included care in the intensive care unit (ICU). In commercially insured patients, epilepsy-related health care encounters had median health plan-paid costs of $22,305 (Q1-Q3 = $14,336-$36,096, hospitalization); $3,375 ($565-$9,095, ICU visit); $1,913 ($417-$4,163, ED visit); $687 ($415-$1,083, emergency transportation); $95 ($23-$232, office visit); and $57 ($0-$171, urgent care visit). The median length of stay for epilepsy-related hospitalizations in working age, commercially insured patients was 4 (Q1-Q3 = 2-5) days. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to report health plan-paid cost per epilepsy-related health care encounter. These data can serve as a basis for more granular cost-benefit analyses of not only chronic but also acute treatments of epilepsy. DISCLOSURES: This analysis was funded by UCB Pharma. The sponsor had a role in the identification, design, conduct, and reporting of the analysis. Borghs, Beaty, Boudiaf, and Loewendorf are employees of UCB Pharma. Kalilani and Parekh were employees of UCB Pharma at the time of the analysis. Borghs, Beaty, and Loewendorf have received UCB Pharma stock from their employment. Kalilani and Parekh had received UCB Pharma stock at the time of employment, but no longer hold any. This work was presented in part as a poster at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the American Epilepsy Society; December 7, 2019; Baltimore, MD.

A Short Review on the Intranasal Delivery of Diazepam for Treating Acute Repetitive Seizures

Benzodiazepines such as diazepam, lorazepam and midazolam remained the mainstay of treatment for acute repetitive seizures (ARS). The immediate care for ARS should often begin at home by a caregiver. This prevents the progression of ARS to prolonged seizures or status epilepticus. For a long time and despite social objections rectal diazepam gel remained only FDA-approved rescue medication. Intranasal administration of benzodiazepines is considered attractive and safe compared with rectal, buccal and sublingual routes. Intranasal delivery offers numerous advantages such as large absorptive surface area, bypass the first-pass metabolism and good patient acceptance as it is needle free and painless. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that diazepam nasal spray (NRL-1; Valtoco^®, Neurelis Inc.,San Diego, CA, USA) showed less pharmacokinetic variability and reliable bioavailability compared with the diazepam rectal gel. Diazepam nasal spray could be considered as a suitable alternative for treating seizure emergencies outside the hospital. This review summarizes the treatment options for ARS and findings from clinical studies involving intranasal diazepam for treating seizure emergencies.

Epilepsy Emergencies: Status Epilepticus, Acute Repetitive Seizures, and Autoimmune Encephalitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews epilepsy emergencies, including status epilepticus, acute repetitive seizures, autoimmune encephalitis, and the current perspective on their diagnosis and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent guidelines on the treatment of status epilepticus from the Neurocritical Care Society in 2012 and the American Epilepsy Society in 2016 highlight areas of consensus in the treatment of status epilepticus as well as areas of uncertainty. The TRENdS (Treatment of Recurrent Electrographic Nonconvulsive Seizures) trial is the first prospective randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of IV antiseizure medications in controlling nonconvulsive seizures on continuous EEG. It demonstrated that IV lacosamide is noninferior to fosphenytoin in this setting. Autoimmune encephalitis is an increasingly recognized cause of new-onset seizures or status epilepticus. Recently described scoring systems, the Antibody Prevalence in Epilepsy score and the Response to Immunotherapy in Epilepsy score, can help in the assessment of autoimmune encephalitis.

SUMMARY

Status epilepticus, acute repetitive seizures, and autoimmune encephalitis are neurologic emergencies. For all these conditions, rapid and appropriate treatment may influence patient prognosis and mitigate neuronal injury. For convulsive status epilepticus, there is reasonable consensus on the initial steps that need to be taken. There is less agreement about the management of acute repetitive seizures and nonconvulsive status epilepticus. An increasingly recognized etiology of status epilepticus is autoimmune encephalitis, which may not be as rare as previously thought.

Diazepam buccal film for the treatment of acute seizures

Benzodiazepines, including diazepam and midazolam, are the mainstay of treatment for seizure emergencies, including acute repetitive seizures. Nonparenteral dosage forms are used when parenteral (intravenous or intramuscular) dosing is not feasible. Currently available nonparenteral dosage forms have limitations in terms of usability, patient and caregiver acceptance, speed of action, and portability. Diazepam buccal film (DBF) is a compact, easily administered diazepam formulation. When placed onto the buccal mucosa inside the cheek, DBF adheres firmly and then rapidly dissolves, delivering diazepam transbucally and via the gastric route. In fasted healthy male volunteers, plasma levels were achieved rapidly after DBF placement in a linear dose-proportional fashion. Bioavailability in adult patients with epilepsy was not significantly different when DBF was applied interictally or periictally (within 5 min of a seizure). Diazepam buccal film was successfully placed and generally used without difficulty, even without patient cooperation immediately after a seizure. In a crossover comparative study with diazepam rectal gel (Diastat®) in adult patients with epilepsy, DBF performed equivalently to the rectal gel, but peak exposures were less variable. Diazepam buccal film is a convenient alternative for out-of-hospital treatment of seizure exacerbations. Proceedings of the 7th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures.

Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters: An open-label extension trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate safety- and seizure-related outcomes with repeated intermittent use of a novel formulation of midazolam administered as a single-dose nasal spray (MDZ-NS) in the outpatient treatment of patients experiencing seizure clusters (SCs).

METHODS

In this open-label extension trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01529034), patients aged ≥12 years and on a stable regimen of antiepileptic drugs who completed the original phase III, randomized controlled trial were enrolled. Caregivers administered MDZ-NS 5 mg when patients experienced SCs; a second dose could be given if seizures did not terminate within 10 minutes or recurred within 10 minutes-6 hours. Patients were monitored for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) throughout, and the main seizure-related outcome was treatment success, defined as seizure termination within 10 minutes and no recurrence 10 minutes-6 hours after drug administration.

RESULTS

Of 175 patients enrolled, 161 (92.0%) received ≥1 MDZ-NS dose, for a total of 1998 SC episodes. Median time spent by patients in the trial was 16.8 months (range = 1-55.7 months). TEAEs were experienced by 40.4% of patients within 2 days of drug administration and 57.1% overall. TEAEs reported by most patients (within 2 days and overall) were nasal discomfort (12.4%) and somnolence (9.3%). One patient each discontinued due to treatment-related nasal discomfort and somnolence. There were no patients with treatment-related respiratory depression, and none with TEAEs indicative of drug abuse or dependence. Treatment success criteria were met in 55% (1108/1998) of SC episodes after administration of a single 5-mg dose and in 80.2% (617/769) with the second dose. Treatment success was consistent over treated episode number.

SIGNIFICANCE

Repeated, intermittent, acute treatment of patients experiencing SCs with MDZ-NS in the outpatient setting was well tolerated over an extended period, with maintenance of efficacy suggesting lack of development of tolerance.

Safety and efficacy of midazolam nasal spray in the outpatient treatment of patients with seizure clusters-a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel formulation of midazolam administered as a single‐dose nasal spray (MDZ–NS) in the outpatient treatment of patients experiencing seizure clusters (SCs).

Methods

This was a phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01390220) with patients age ≥12 years on a stable regimen of antiepileptic drugs. Following an in‐clinic test dose phase (TDP), patients entered an outpatient comparative phase (CP) and were randomized (2:1) to receive double‐blind MDZ–NS 5 mg or placebo nasal spray, administered by caregivers when they experienced an SC. The primary efficacy end point was treatment success (seizure termination within 10 minutes and no recurrence 10 minutes to 6 hours after trial drug administration). Secondary efficacy end points were proportion of patients with seizure recurrence 10 minutes to 4 hours, and time‐to‐next seizure >10 minutes after double‐blind drug administration. Safety was monitored throughout.

Results

Of 292 patients administered a test dose, 262 patients were randomized, and 201 received double‐blind treatment for an SC (n = 134 MDZ–NS, n = 67 placebo, modified intent‐to‐treat population). A significantly greater proportion of MDZ–NS‐ than placebo‐treated patients achieved treatment success (53.7% vs 34.4%; P = 0.0109). Significantly, fewer MDZ–NS‐ than placebo‐treated patients experienced seizure recurrence (38.1% vs 59.7%; P = 0.0043). Time‐to‐next seizure analysis showed early separation (within 30 minutes) between MDZ–NS and placebo that was maintained throughout the 24‐hour observation period (21% difference at 24 hours; P = 0.0124). Sixteen patients (5.5%) discontinued because of a treatment‐emergent adverse event (TEAE) during the TDP and none during the CP. During the CP, 27.6% and 22.4% of patients in the MDZ–NS and placebo groups, respectively, experienced ≥1 TEAE.

Significance

MDZ–NS was superior to placebo in providing rapid, sustained seizure control when administered to patients experiencing an SC in the outpatient setting and was associated with a favorable safety profile.

Optimizing parents' performance in anticonvulsant rescue medication administration

OBJECTIVE

Parents of children with epilepsy are at risk of committing high-risk handling errors with a high potential to harm the patient when administering anticonvulsant rescue medication. We developed a training concept addressing identified high-risk handling errors and investigated its effects on parents' skills.

STUDY DESIGN

In a controlled prospective intervention study, parents of children with epilepsy were asked to demonstrate their administration of rescue medication by using dummy dolls. A clinical pharmacist monitored rectal or buccal administration and addressed errors in the intervention group with training and information sheets. Three to 6weeks later, intervention's sustainability was assessed at a home visit.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-one parents completed full study assessment: 92 in the intervention group and 69 in the control group. The number of processes with at least one handling error was reduced from 96.4% to 56.7% in rectal tube administration and from 66.7% to 13.5% in buccal administration (both p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

A one-time intervention for parents significantly and sustainably reduced high-risk handling errors. Dummy dolls and information sheet were adequate for an effective and feasible training to support the correct administration of anticonvulsant rescue medication.

Providing teachers with education on epilepsy increased their willingness to handle acute seizures in children from one to 10 years of age

AIM

In Germany, preschool teachers supervise children up to six years of age and are also responsible for supervising older pupils after school. This study explored the impact of a teaching session on epilepsy for teachers in charge of children from 1 to 10 years of age.

METHODS

We evaluated the benefit of a teaching session offered to all preschool teachers in Leipzig, Germany, in 2014-2015, by asking them to complete the same questionnaire 12-24 months pre-intervention, and 12 months postintervention.

RESULTS

Both questionnaires were completed by 123 teachers. The number of teachers who felt they were prepared to handle an acute seizure rose from 36 (29%) pre-intervention to 65 (53%) post-intervention (p < 0.001) and their willingness to administer a prescribed rescue medication rose from 66 (54%) to 93 (76%, p < 0.001). The session also increased the number of teachers who were prepared to take children with epilepsy on excursions under any circumstance from 38 (31%) to 52 (42%, p < 0.05). In addition, the number of teachers who would place a solid object in the child's mouth during an attack fell from 16 (13%) to seven (6%) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Providing a teaching session on epilepsy increased the teachers' knowledge and willingness to act and reduced obsolete, counterproductive measures.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of USL261, midazolam nasal spray: Randomized study in healthy geriatric and non-geriatric adults

AIM

Characterize pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety/tolerability of USL261 in geriatric adults to inform its potential for treating bouts of increased seizure activity.

METHODS

Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, 2-way crossover study in healthy geriatric (≥65years; n=18) and non-geriatric (18-40years; n=12) adults evaluated single USL261 doses (2.5 and 5.0mg) administered intranasally. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated for midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam (active metabolite), including area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentration (C_max), time to C_max (T_max), and half-life (t_1/2). Stanford Sleepiness Scale and Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation assessed sedation; Digit-Symbol Substitution Test assessed psychomotor performance.

RESULTS

Midazolam exposure and plasma concentrations were higher in geriatric versus non-geriatric adults (geometric mean AUC_0-∞ [ng*h/mL] 2.5mg: 70 vs 54, respectively; 5.0mg: 157 vs 110; C_max [ng/mL] 2.5mg: 27.1 vs 22.5; 5.0mg: 55.8 vs 46.1). USL261 was rapidly absorbed, with no differences in median T_max (14.5-17.3min); mean t_1/2 was longer in geriatric subjects. Similar age-related trends were observed for 1-hydroxymidazolam. Mean maximum observed pharmacodynamic effects were not significantly different between age groups, though were more pronounced following 5.0 versus 2.5mg (P<.05); return to baseline was generally achieved within 4h. USL261 was generally well tolerated, with similar adverse event rates between age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increased midazolam exposure in geriatric subjects, there were no differences between age groups in pharmacodynamic effects or adverse event rates. USL261 was rapidly absorbed and pharmacodynamic effects returned to baseline within ~4h, regardless of age. Dose-dependent pharmacokinetic and maximum pharmacodynamic effects were observed. Overall, pharmacokinetic findings for USL261 were similar to studies evaluating intravenous midazolam, whereas pharmacodynamic effects were less pronounced in the elderly than previously reported.

Increasing efficacy and reducing side effects in treatment of chronic anal fissures: A study of topical diazepam therapy

This is a single institution nonexperimental study intended to analyze the therapeutic efficacy of topical diazepam in treating symptoms of chronic anal fissures.Anal fissures are a common cause of anal pain. Conventional treatments include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, topical creams, such as nitroglycerin and nifedipine, and surgery. However, these treatments are usually suboptimally efficacious or have deterring side effects.Patients at an outpatient community center with a diagnosis of a chronic anal fissure were prescribed either topical 2% (n = 19) or 4% (n = 18) diazepam cream between January 2013 and February 2015. We retrospectively analyzed their responses to treatment.All 19 patients using 2% diazepam cream experienced a positive response in pain, whereas 47.4% experienced a complete response, with a numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 0 (0-10). Eighty-eight percent of patients using 4% dose had a positive response in pain, whereas 23.5% experienced a complete response. Ninety-four percent of patients using 2% dose had a positive response in anal bleeding, whereas 68.8% experienced a complete response with an anal bleeding score (ABS) of 2 (2-9). Ninety-four percent of patients using 4% dose had a positive response in anal bleeding, whereas 64.7% experienced a complete response. Only 1 patient reported a side effect from diazepam cream-perianal pruritus.Both 2% and 4% topical diazepam provided significant pain and bleeding relief from chronic anal fissures that were refractory to conventional therapies. There were insignificant differences when assessing independent comparisons for pain and bleeding between the doses.

New Non-Intravenous Routes for Benzodiazepines in Epilepsy: A Clinician Perspective

Benzodiazepines represent the first-line treatment for the acute management of epileptic seizures and status epilepticus. The emergency use of benzodiazepines must be timely, and because most seizures occur outside of the hospital environment, there is a significant need for delivery methods that are easy for nonclinical caregivers to use and administer quickly and safely. In addition, the ideal route of administration should be reliable in terms of absorption. Rectal diazepam is the only licensed formulation in the USA, whereas rectal diazepam and buccal midazolam are currently licensed in the EU. However, the sometimes unpredictable absorption with rectal and buccal administration means they are not ideal routes. Several alternative routes are currently being explored. This is a narrative review of data about delivery methods for benzodiazepines alternative to the intravenous and oral routes for the acute treatment of seizures. Unconventional delivery options such as direct delivery to the central nervous system or inhalers are reported. Data show that intranasal diazepam or midazolam and the intramuscular auto-injector for midazolam are as effective as rectal or intravenous diazepam. Head-to-head comparisons with buccal midazolam are urgently needed. In addition, the majority of trials focused on children and adolescents, and further trials in adults are warranted.

Treating epileptic emergencies - pharmacological advances

INTRODUCTION

Epileptic emergencies are frequently encountered and include ictal events as status epilepticus or seizure clusters, and non-ictal situations like postictal psychosis or acute drug side effects. The aim of this review was to describe recent pharmacological advances in the treatment of epileptic emergencies. Areas covered: Based on clinically relevant questions, a literature search was performed. The search showed that most pharmacological advances have been made in management of status epilepticus, where substantial literature has accumulated on several AEDs with potentially less side-effects than the traditional choices. The use of these drugs; valproate, levetiracetam, and lacosamide, was therefore made the main focus of this review. Pharmacological advances in treatment of other epileptic emergencies were scarce, and were therefore covered more briefly in the Expert Opinion section. Expert opinion: This section outlines our current practice in management of status epilepticus and seizures clusters. Our opinion is that valproate is an equal alternative as second line treatment to fosphenytoin, with levetiracetam considered a good choice in frail and elderly patients. Due to the lack of literature, lacosamide is used mainly as a 2^nd line drug after the failure of valproate, fosphenytoin and levetiracetam. Our review underlines the need for more research in management of epileptic emergencies.

Benzodiazepine use in seizure emergencies: A systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this review was to systematically examine safety and efficacy outcomes, as well as patient/caregiver satisfaction, from clinical studies in pediatric and adult patients treated with benzodiazepines (BZDs) through various administration routes in response to seizure emergencies.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted to identify articles describing the use of various routes of administration (RoAs) of BZDs for the treatment of seizure emergencies through April 21, 2015, using Embase™ and PubMed®. Eligible studies included (a) randomized controlled trials or (b) controlled nonrandomized clinical trials, either retrospective or prospective. Outcome assessments reviewed were 1) time to administration, 2) time to seizure termination, 3) rate of treatment failure, 4) prevention of seizure recurrence, 5) patient and caregiver treatment satisfaction, 6) adverse events related to BDZ treatment or RoA, and 7) respiratory adverse events.

RESULTS

Seventy-five studies evaluated safety and efficacy using individual or comparator BDZs of various RoAs for treating seizure emergencies in all-aged patients with epilepsy. Buccal, intranasal (IN), or intramuscular (IM) BZDs were often more rapidly administered compared with rectal and intravenous (IV) formulations. Time to seizure termination, seizure recurrence rates, and adverse events were generally similar among RoAs, whereas nonrectal RoAs resulted in greater patient and caregiver satisfaction compared with rectal RoA.

SIGNIFICANCE

Results of this systematic literature review suggest that nonrectal and non-IV BZD formulations provide equal or improved efficacy and safety outcomes compared with rectal and IV formulations for the treatment of seizure emergencies.

Administration of anticonvulsive rescue medication in children-discrepancies between parents' self-reports and limited practical performance

Quality of parents' performance in administering anticonvulsive rescue medication to their children suffering from seizures is unknown. After obtaining ethical approval, we used a questionnaire to ask parents of children with seizures, who had been prescribed rescue medications, about their experience in administering those. To assess the frequency of actually committed drug-handling errors, we let them administer rescue medications to dummy dolls. An expert panel rated the clinical risk of handling errors from "1" (lowest) to "6" (highest). Eighty-one parents completed the study. In the questionnaire, 85 % (100 %) of parents that already conducted rectal (buccal) administration reported that they had never experienced problems. The number of rectal administrations with at least one handling error (97 %, 58/60) was higher than in buccal administration (58 %; 14/24; p < 0.001). According to logistic regressions, previous use of rescue medication was not a predictor of the number of committed errors per process (n. s.). All errors were rated with a high clinical risk (class 4-6).

CONCLUSION

By observing parents' administration of rescue medication to dummy dolls, we found a high frequency of clinically relevant drug-handling errors. Most parents, however, self-reported to have never experienced problems while administering rescue medications to their children.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• For seizures with duration of more than 5 min, the administration of anticonvulsive rescue medication is recommended. • Outside the hospital, the administration of rescue medication to children is performed most frequently by their parents. What is New: • Most of the parents reported that they had never experienced problems in handling anticonvulsive rescue medication. • But in the observed drug-handling performances, identified errors committed by parents were alarmingly frequent and pose a high clinical risk according to an expert panel.

Perspectives on seizure clusters: Gaps in lexicon, awareness, and treatment

Seizure clusters in epilepsy can result in serious outcomes such as missed work or school, postictal psychosis, emergency room visits, or hospitalizations, and yet they are often not included in discussions between health-care professionals (HCPs) and their patients. The purpose of this paper was to describe and compare consumer (patient and caregivers) and professional understanding of seizure clusters and to describe how consumers and HCPs communicate regarding seizure clusters. We reviewed social media discussion sites to explore consumers' understanding of seizure clusters. We analyzed professional (medical) literature to explore the HCPs' understanding of seizure clusters. Major themes were revealed in one or both groups, including: communication about diagnosis; frequency, duration, and time frame; seizure type and pattern; severity; and self-management. When comparing discussions of professionals and consumers, both consumers and clinicians discussed the definition of seizure clusters. Discussions of HCPs were understandably clinically focused, and consumer discussions reflected the experience of seizure clusters; however, both groups struggled with a common lexicon. Seizure cluster events remain a problem associated with serious outcomes. Herein, we outline the lack of a common understanding and recommend the development of a common lexicon to improve communication regarding seizure clusters.

Single dose efficacy evaluation of two partial benzodiazepine receptor agonists in photosensitive epilepsy patients: A placebo-controlled pilot study

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are highly effective to suppress various types of seizures; however, their clinical use is limited due to adverse effects and tolerance and dependence liability. Drugs that act only as partial agonists at the BZD recognition site (initially termed "BZD receptor") of the GABAA receptor chloride ionophore complex or exhibit a GABAA receptor subtype-selectivity are thought to have advantages vs. full agonists such as diazepam and most other clinically used BZDs in that such compounds have less adverse effects and reduced or absent tolerance and dependence liability. One of such compounds, abecarnil, has been clinically evaluated as a novel anxiolytic drug, but, despite its potent preclinical anti-seizure activity, it has not yet been evaluated in patients with epilepsy. In the present proof-of-concept study, we performed a within-subject placebo-controlled, single oral dose study of abecarnil in patients with photosensitive epilepsy. Flumazenil, which is generally considered a BZD receptor antagonist, but has slight partial agonistic properties, was used for comparison. In total, 12 patients were enrolled in this study. Abecarnil, 5 or 10mg, completely abolished the photo-paroxysmal EEG response, while flumazenil, 30, 60 or 100mg, was less effective. The anti-epileptic effect of abecarnil was significantly different from both placebo and flumazenil. Sedative adverse effects were observed after abecarnil but not flumazenil. The study substantiates previous pre-clinical experiments that abecarnil exerts pronounced anti-seizure activity. Epilepsy is often associated with anxiety, so that the anxiolytic activity of abecarnil would be an added advantage when using this compound in epilepsy patients.

Medical management of epileptic seizures: challenges and solutions

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurologic illnesses. This condition afflicts 2.9 million adults and children in the US, leading to an economic impact amounting to $15.5 billion. Despite the significant burden epilepsy places on the population, it is not very well understood. As this understanding continues to evolve, it is important for clinicians to stay up to date with the latest advances to provide the best care for patients. In the last 20 years, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved 15 new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), with many more currently in development. Other advances have been achieved in terms of diagnostic modalities like electroencephalography technology, treatment devices like vagal nerve and deep-brain stimulators, novel alternate routes of drug administration, and improvement in surgical techniques. Specific patient populations, such as the pregnant, elderly, those with HIV/AIDS, and those with psychiatric illness, present their own unique challenges, with AED side effects, drug interactions, and medical-psychiatric comorbidities adding to the conundrum. The purpose of this article is to review the latest literature guiding the management of acute epileptic seizures, focusing on the current challenges across different practice settings, and it discusses studies in various patient populations, including the pregnant, geriatric, those with HIV/AIDS, comatose, psychiatric, and "pseudoseizure" patients, and offers possible evidence-based solutions or the expert opinion of the authors. Also included is information on newer AEDs, routes of administration, and significant AED-related drug-interaction tables. This review has tried to address only some of these issues that any practitioner who deals with the acute management of seizures may encounter. The document also highlights the numerous avenues for new research that would help practitioners optimize epilepsy management.