Selecting Rational Drug Combinations in Epilepsy

Effectiveness analysis of three-drug combination therapies for refractory focal epilepsy

Selecting appropriate antiseizure medications (ASMs) for combination therapy in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is a complex task that requires an empirical approach, especially in patients receiving polytherapy. We aimed to analyze the effectiveness of various three-drug combinations in a group of patients with DRE under real-world conditions. This single-center, longitudinal observational study investigated patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who received three-drug regimens in the outpatient clinic of Tongji Hospital from September 2019 to December 2022. The effectiveness of each triple regimen was evaluated by the seizure-free rate and within-patient ratio of the seizure frequency (a seizure frequency ratio [SFR]<1 indicated superior efficacy). The independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used for effectiveness analysis, and P values were adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons. A total of 511 triple trials comprising 76 different regimens were conducted among 323 enrolled patients. Among these triple regimens, lamotrigine (LTG)/valproic acid (VPA)/topiramate (TPM) was the most frequently prescribed (29.4%, n ​= ​95). At the last clinical visit, 14.9% (n ​= ​48) of patients achieved seizure freedom after receiving triple therapy. LTG/VPA/TPM and LTG/VPA/levetiracetam (LEV) exhibited the highest seizure-free rates at 17.9% and 12.8%, respectively. These two regimens also had significantly lower median SFRs of 0.48 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.17-0.85; adjusted P ​< ​0.001) and 0.63 (IQR, 0.21-1.04; adjusted P ​< ​0.01), respectively. LTG/VPA/perampanel (PER) was another promising regimen that showed marginal effectiveness (median SFR ​= ​0.67; adjusted P ​= ​0.053). LTG/VPA/phenobarbital had the highest incidence of regimen-specific side effects (40.0%, 4/10), while the incidence of side effects from LTG/VPA/LEV was minimal (5.1%, 2/39). In conclusion, LTG/VPA/TPM and LTG/VPA/LEV exhibited superior efficacy and good tolerability in treating patients with DRE. Our results provide preliminary insights into the selection of ASMs for three-drug combination therapies in this clinically challenging population.

Identification of Guaifenesin-Andrographolide as a Novel Combinatorial Drug Therapy for Epilepsy Using Network Virtual Screening and Experimental Validation

Combinatorial drug therapy has attracted substantial attention as an emerging strategy for the treatment of diseases with complex pathological mechanisms. We previously developed a potentially universal computational screening approach for combination drugs and used this approach to successfully identify some beneficial combinations for the treatment of heart failure. Herein, this screening approach was used to identify novel combination drugs for the treatment of epilepsy in an approved drug library. The combination of guaifenesin-andrographolide was first discovered as a promising therapy with synergistic anticonvulsant activities in maximal electroshock (MES)- and subcutaneous pentylenetetrazol (sc-PTZ)-induced epilepsy models in vivo. The studies of network analysis, fluorescence imaging, and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-induced cytotoxicity further revealed that guaifenesin-andrographolide might synergistically affect NMDA receptors and then alleviate the pathogenesis of epilepsy. Therefore, we report that the combination of guaifenesin-andrographolide exerts effects against epilepsy through a novel synergistic mechanism and is thus a potential treatment for epilepsy, providing a promising mechanism for the design of novel combinatorial drug treatments against epilepsy.

Response to antiseizure medications in epileptic patients with malformation of cortical development

Background

Malformation of cortical development (MCD) is one of the most common causes of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Improving the knowledge of antiseizure medications (ASMs) treatment response in epileptic patients with MCD is crucial for optimal treatment options, either pharmacological therapy or non-pharmacological intervention.

Aim

To investigate the patterns of medical treatment outcome and the predictors for seizure freedom (SF) with ASM regimens in epilepsy caused by MCD.

Methods

The epileptic patients with MCD were consecutively enrolled from March 2013 to June 2019. SF was defined as no seizures for at least 12 months or three times the longest pretreatment inter-seizure interval, whichever was longer. Outcomes were classified into three patterns: pattern A: patients achieved SF at one point and remained so throughout follow-up; pattern B: patients' seizures fluctuated between periods of SF and relapse; pattern C: SF never attained. The terminal SF was defined if the patients remained SF at the last follow-up visit.

Results

A total of 164 epileptic patients with MCD were included. Pattern A was observed in 22, pattern B in 42, and pattern C in 100 patients. SF was ever achieved in 64 (pattern A and B) patients. Twenty-nine patients had terminal SF after a median follow-up time of 4.3 years. With continuing ASM treatment, seizure relapse risk was very low after a 5-year seizure-free period. The pretreatment seizure frequency was the only independent predictor for pattern A and seizure relapse. Sodium channel blockers monotherapy (33.8%) was more effective than levetiracetam (4.5%) in rendering SF in the initial ASM regimen.

Conclusion

Medical treatment can be successful in a minority of epileptic patients with MCD, and pretreatment seizure frequency helps to predict the treatment outcome. An unequal efficacy of ASMs in epilepsy caused by MCD suggests etiological evaluation is vital in the management of focal epilepsy.

How much can medical management alone improve the outcome of adult drug-resistant epilepsy? An exploratory study on possibilities and limitations of combining multiple therapeutic actions

PURPOSE

Failure to control epileptic seizures with two medications, adequately chosen and dosed, indicates drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The chance of pharmacologically controlling seizures is low for patients with DRE and uncontrolled seizures who are not candidates for surgery, who have already undergone surgery, or who already had a vagus nerve stimulator (VNS) placed. Patients experiencing these conditions must instead rely on medical management of their seizures, and there is no breakthrough solution on the horizon. Medical care of DRE might be optimized by systematically considering factors that promote and inhibit breakthrough seizures. For example, seizure control could be enhanced through measures such as increasing the frequency of follow-up visits, tracking treatment plan compliance, treating sleep disorders, rational polypharmacy, adjusting drug administration to achieve higher levels when seizures are more likely and educating patients on seizure triggers. A systematic and simultaneous implementation of all of these measures is likely to yield a sizable, clinically relevant, improvement. This paper presents an exploratory study on the effects of implementing such an approach, specifically evaluating this method's impact on seizure frequency.

METHODS

I performed a retrospective chart review of 659 consecutive adult patients with epilepsy followed up at the University of Utah and at the Salt Lake City VA Medical center using the multimodal approach described above. I identified 27 patients who had DRE and uncontrolled seizures and in whom a medical management optimization protocol was implemented. I measured these patients' seizure frequency at the beginning and the end of the study period and compared the results with those of a matching control group of 48 patients.

RESULTS

The optimization protocol did not increase the number of seizure-free patients with DRE; however, it was effective in minimizing seizure frequency in patients whose seizures remained uncontrolled. Among these patients, the median seizure frequency dropped by 64% in the optimization group but did not change in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high occurrence of DRE, there is no accepted protocol for the related medical management. This paper describes an effective approach that can be implemented in a clinically relevant and readily achievable manner.

Selection of antiseizure medications for first add-on use: A consensus paper

INTRODUCTION

When monotherapy used alone or sequentially fails to achieve seizure control, a trial of combination therapy may be considered.

OBJECTIVE

To define optimal criteria to guide choice of an antiseizure medication (ASM) for use as first add-on.

METHODS

A standardized Delphi procedure was applied to produce a list of consensus statements. First, an Expert Board consisting of 5 epileptologists agreed on a set of 46 statements relevant to the objective. The statements were then finalized through an iterative process by a Delphi Panel of 84 Italian pediatric and adult neurologists with expertise in the management of epilepsy. Panel members provided anonymous ratings of their level of agreement with each statement on a 9-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Consensus, defined as agreement by at least 80% of Panel members, was reached for 36 statements. Medication-related factors considered to be important for drug selection included efficacy, tolerability and safety, interaction potential, mechanism of action, and ease of use. The need to optimize adherence and to tailor drug selection to individual characteristics was emphasized.

CONCLUSIONS

Choice of an ASM for first add-on requires consideration of many factors, many of which also apply to choose initial treatment. Factors more specifically relevant to add-on use include drug interaction potential and the preference for an ASM with a different mechanism of action.

Evaluation of Factors Impacting the Efficacy of Single or Combination Therapies of Valproic Acid, Carbamazepine, and Oxcarbazepine: A Longitudinal Observation Study

Objective: This study aimed to determine the efficacy and clinical factors related to the pharmacodynamics of single or combination therapies of valproic acid (VPA), carbamazepine (CBZ), and oxcarbazepine (OXC), three commonly used anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) in China.

Methods: The study evaluated the records of 2027 outpatients in a Changsha hospital, located in China, from December 23, 2015 to October 28, 2019. The baseline seizure frequency was assessed during the first visit. AED efficacy was determined based on the reduction in seizures from baseline at the subsequent visits. Multivariable ordinal regression analysis was used to determine the association between the clinical factors (demographic characteristics, clinical features, and medication situation) and AED efficacy. For validation, the clinical efficacies of AEDs were compared as both single agents and in combinations. Differences in adverse effect (AEs) categories were analyzed by Chi-square between AED groups.

Results: Records of patients receiving VPA, CBZ, and OXC were evaluated. Serum concentrations of VPA and CBZ is significantly correlated with efficacy (OR 1.030 [1.024–1.037], p < 0 0.0001; OR 1.250 [1.146–1.63], p < 0.0001, respectively) and OXC efficacy correlated to the serum concentration of the metabolite 10,11-dihydro-10-hydroxy-carbazepine (monohydroxy derivative, MHD) serum concentrations (OR 1.060 [1.031–1.089], p < 0.0001). Significant differences existed between females and males in VPA efficacy (OR 1.318 [1.033–1.682], p = 0.027). After validation, VPA, in combination with OXC (OR 1.93 [1.38–2.70], p<0.001), or with VGB (Vigabatrin) (OR 2.36 [1.38–2.70], p = 0.002), showed significantly better efficacy than as a single agent. OXC efficacy was also affected by the duration of epilepsy (OR 0.965 [0.946–0.984], p < 0.001). Additionally, the efficacies of OXC and VPA were also affected by the seizure type. Seizure reduction improved significantly with an increasing number of pharmacists’ educations in the first three visits period. There were no differences in AEs incidence among these 3 AEDs except for Psychiatric (0.02) and nervous system disorders (0.0001).

Conclusion: Serum concentrations of VPA and CBZ may positively affect their efficacies, while OXC efficacies are correlated to MHD serum concentrations. The efficacy of VPA was higher in females compared to males. VPA-OXC and VPA-VGB combinations had higher efficacies compared to monotherapy. Besides, OXC efficacy is probably reducing by the duration of epilepsy. Additionally, VPA efficacy for focal or generalized seizures is superior to mixed-type seizures. OXC was more effective for focal seizures compared to mixed-type ones. Education provided by pharmacists improved the seizures to some extent, and there were no significant differences between most categories of adverse effects for the investigated AEDs.

Developing precision treatments for epilepsy using patient and animal models

Introduction: Phenytoin was the first antiepileptic drug (AED) discovered in an animal model of seizures whose clinical efficacy was subsequently confirmed. This clearly indicated that a search for other AEDs had to consider animal studies.Areas covered: Main seizure tests used for the evaluation of possible anticonvulsive activity of potential anticonvulsants and their predictive values have been reviewed. Procedures used for the estimation of antiepileptogenic effects have been also included.Expert opinion: First-line seizure models comprise maximal electroshock (MES)-, pentylenetetrazol (PTZ)- and kindling-induced convulsions in rodents. The MES test may be considered as a convenient and easy model of generalized tonic-clonic seizures, PTZ test - as a model of generalized myoclonic seizures and to a certain degree - absence seizures. Kindled seizures (for example, from amygdala) may be regarded as a model of focal seizures. Some tests have been suggested for the search of AEDs effective in drug-resistant seizures - for instance, 6 Hz (44 mA) test or intrahippocampal kainate model of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. There are also recommendations from experimental epileptology on synergistic AED combinations for patients with drug-resistant seizures. The clinical evidence on this issue is scarce and favors a combined treatment with valproate + lamotrigine.

Biochemical aspects and therapeutic mechanisms of cannabidiol in epilepsy

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disease characterized by recurrent epileptic seizures. Studies have shown the complexity of epileptogenesis and ictogenesis, in which immunological processes and epigenetic and structural changes in neuronal tissues have been identified as triggering epilepsy. Cannabidiol (CBD) is a major active component of the Cannabis plant and the source of CBD-enriched products for the treatment of epilepsy and associated diseases. In this review, we provide an up-to-date discussion on cellular and molecular mechanisms triggered during epilepsy crises, and the phytochemical characteristics of CBD that make it an attractive candidate for controlling rare syndromes, with excellent therapeutic properties. We also discuss possible CBD anticonvulsant mechanisms and molecular targets in neurodegenerative disorders and epilepsy. Based on these arguments, we conclude that CBD presents a biotecnological potential in the anticonvulsant process, including decreasing dependence on health care in hospitals, and could make the patient's life more stable, with regard to neurological conditions.

Clinical opinion: Earlier employment of polytherapy in sequential pharmacotherapy of epilepsy

Modern pharmacotherapy for epilepsy consists of orderly, sequential drug trials, in which antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are chosen under the concept of individual patient-oriented (or - tailored) pharmacotherapy. Although monotherapy has been established as the preferred mode of AEDs therapy in both newly diagnosed and drug resistant epilepsies, there are still lack of evidence to favor either monotherapy or polytherapy in epilepsy, which has generated continuing controversies on the preferred mode of pharmacotherapy. However, each mode of pharmacotherapy may have both advantages and disadvantages, which are different and variable related to individual case scenario. We conducted a brief comparative overview between monotherapy and polytherapy to provide clues for earlier employment of polytherapy in each steps of sequential drug trials. Previous claims about the advantages of monotherapy over polytherapy are not supported but gradually losing its ground by the introduction of a large number of drugs carrying pharmacological advantages for combination therapy. Current evidence stresses the importance of combining drugs having synergistic interactions for better outcome of polytherapy, which has not been considered in previous clinical investigations comparing monotherapy and polytherapy. It is likely that a significant improvement in the outcome of current AEDs therapy is feasible by earlier employment of polytherapy as well as identification of combination drug regimens carrying synergistic interactions. At present, lamotrigine(LTG) and valproate(VPA) combination regimen is the only well documented synergistic regimen, but there are a long-list of candidate regimens requiring future trials in appropriate designs.

Brivaracetam efficacy and safety in focal epilepsy

Introduction: Brivaracetam (BRV) is an analog of levetiracetam (LEV) with 15-30 times greater affinity to SV2A and greater brain permeability than LEV. These properties have stimulated interest in its clinical trial data and post-marketing experience. Areas covered: The authors provide a background on epilepsy and its treatment, discuss the racetam family of antiepileptic drugs to which BRV belongs, and then discuss BRV properties and its efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of epilepsy. Expert opinion: While preclinical data suggest a broad spectrum of efficacy, BRV is only approved for focal epilepsy. The recommended starting dose is 100 mg per day, but in the absence of urgency, it may be prudent to start at 50 mg per day, considered the lowest effective dose. There was no added benefit when BRV was used adjunctively with LEV in clinical trials. However, post-marketing data suggest that some patients may experience improved seizure control when switching from LEV. Behavioral adverse effects seemed less common than with LEV, and most patients switched to BRV after experiencing behavioral adverse effects on LEV reported improvement. Prior or anticipated intolerability to LEV is the strongest indication for BRV in clinical practice.

Mode of seizure inhibition by sodium channel blockers, an SV2A ligand, and an AMPA receptor antagonist in a rat amygdala kindling model

PURPOSE

A number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with a variety of modes of action, are effective in treating focal seizures. Several AEDs, such as perampanel (PER), levetiracetam (LEV), lacosamide (LCM), lamotrigine (LTG), and carbamazepine (CBZ), have been shown to elevate the seizure threshold in kindling models. These AEDs are clinically effective, but differences exist in the anti-seizure profiles of drugs with similar modes of action. Therefore, we hypothesized that there are differences in how these AEDs affect seizures. Here, we evaluated the effects of AEDs on various seizure parameters in a rat amygdala kindling model upon stimulation at the after-discharge threshold (ADT) and at three-times the ADT (3xADT) to characterize the differences in the effects of these AEDs.

METHODS

PER, LEV, LCM, LTG, CBZ, or vehicle was administered intraperitoneally to fully kindled rats. Changes in Racine seizure score, after-discharge duration (ADD), and latency to Racine score 4 generalized seizure (S₄L) were measured to assess differences in the modes of seizure inhibition among the AEDs. Stimulation at 3xADT was used to eliminate the influence of any AED-induced elevation of the seizure threshold on these parameters.

RESULTS

PER, LEV, LCM, LTG, and CBZ significantly reduced the seizure score from Racine score 5 after stimulation at the ADT; this effect was lost with LEV and LTG after stimulation at 3xADT. PER and LEV significantly shortened the ADD when the seizure focus was stimulated at the ADT, whereas LCM, LTG, and CBZ did not. LEV, LCM, LTG, and CBZ failed to shorten the ADD upon stimulation at 3xADT. PER dose-dependently and significantly increased S₄L, even at doses that were ineffective for seizure score reduction, after stimulation at both the ADT and 3xADT. LEV and LTG significantly increased S₄L after stimulation at the ADT, whereas LCM and CBZ did not significantly increase S₄L at any of the doses tested.

CONCLUSIONS

The sodium channel blockers (LCM, LTG, and CBZ) appeared to act by elevation of the seizure threshold via reduction of neuronal excitability, whereas the AMPA receptor antagonist (PER) and the SV2A ligand (LEV), as well as LTG, exerted their effects through the weakening of synaptic transmission in neuronal networks at the seizure focus. Maintenance of the effect of PER even at 3xADT suggests direct and strong modulation of excitatory synaptic transmission by PER, both at the focus and along the seizure propagation route. These findings may provide further rationale for usage of AEDs beyond their respective modes of action.

A viewpoint on rational and irrational fixed-drug combinations

INTRODUCTION

Considering that there are around 30% of patients with epilepsy resistant to monotherapy, the use of synergistic combinations of antiepileptic drugs is of particular importance. This review shows most beneficial as well as irrational combined treatments both from an experimental and clinical point of view. Areas covered: Preferably, experimental data derived from studies evaluating synergy, additivity, or antagonism by relevant methods, in terms of anticonvulsant or neurotoxic effects and pharmacokinetic data have been considered. Although there have been no randomized clinical trials on this issue, the clinical data have been analyzed from studies on considerable numbers of patients. Case-report studies have been not considered. Expert commentary: The experimental data provide a strong support that co-administration of lamotrigine with carbamazepine is negative, considering the anticonvulsant and neurotoxic effects. Clinical reports do not entirely support this conclusion. Other experimentally documented negative combinations comprise lamotrigine+ oxcarbazepine and oxcarbazepine+ phenytoin. From the experimental and clinical point of view, a combination of lamotrigine+ valproate may deserve recommendation. Other most positive experimental and clinical combinations include carbamazepine+valproate, phenytoin+phenobarbital, carbamazepine+gabapentin, carbamazepine+topiramate, levetiracetam+valproate, levetiracetam+carbamazepine. Certainly, experimental data have some limitations (non-epileptic animals, acute administration of antiepileptic drugs) so all experimental recommendations need a careful clinical evaluation.

Amiodarone, a multi-channel blocker, enhances anticonvulsive effect of carbamazepine in the mouse maximal electroshock model

Cardiac arrhythmia may occur in the course of epilepsy. Simultaneous therapy of the two diseases might be complicated by drug interactions since antiarrhythmic and antiepileptic agents share some molecular targets. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of amiodarone, an antiarrhythmic drug working as a multi-channel blocker, on the protective activity of four classical antiepileptic drugs in the maximal electroshock test in mice. Amiodarone at doses up to 75 mg/kg did not affect the electroconvulsive threshold in mice. Acute amiodarone at the dose of 75 mg/kg significantly potentiated the anticonvulsive effect of carbamazepine, but not that of valproate, phenytoin or phenobarbital in the maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice. The antiarrhythmic agent and its combinations with antiepileptic drugs did not impair motor performance or long-term memory in mice, except for the combination of amiodarone and phenobarbital. Brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs were not changed. Despite favourable impact of amiodarone on the anticonvulsive action of carbamazepine in the maximal electroshock, co-administration of the two drugs should be carefully monitored in clinical conditions. Further studies are necessary to evaluate effects of chronic treatment with amiodarone on seizure activity and the action of antiepileptic drugs.