1
|
Klein P, Bourikas D. Narrative Review of Brivaracetam: Preclinical Profile and Clinical Benefits in the Treatment of Patients with Epilepsy. Adv Ther 2024; 41:2682-2699. [PMID: 38811492 PMCID: PMC11213745 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02876-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
One third of patients with epilepsy will continue to have uncontrolled seizures despite treatment with antiseizure medications (ASMs). There is therefore a need to develop novel ASMs. Brivaracetam (BRV) is an ASM that was developed in a major drug discovery program aimed at identifying selective, high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) ligands, the target molecule of levetiracetam. BRV binds to SV2A with 15- to 30-fold higher affinity and greater selectivity than levetiracetam. BRV has broad-spectrum antiseizure activity in animal models of epilepsy, a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, few clinically relevant drug-drug interactions, and rapid brain penetration. BRV is available in oral and intravenous formulations and can be initiated at target dose without titration. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive BRV (50-200 mg/day) treatment of focal-onset seizures was demonstrated in three pivotal phase III trials (NCT00490035/NCT00464269/NCT01261325), including in patients who had previously failed levetiracetam. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive BRV were also demonstrated in adult Asian patients with focal-onset seizures (NCT03083665). In several open-label trials (NCT00150800/NCT00175916/NCT01339559), long-term safety and tolerability of adjunctive BRV was established, with efficacy maintained for up to 14 years, with high retention rates. Evidence from daily clinical practice highlights BRV effectiveness and tolerability in specific epilepsy patient populations with high unmet needs: the elderly (≥ 65 years of age), children (< 16 years of age), patients with cognitive impairment, patients with psychiatric comorbid conditions, and patients with acquired epilepsy of specific etiologies (post-stroke epilepsy/brain tumor related epilepsy/traumatic brain injury-related epilepsy). Here, we review the preclinical profile and clinical benefits of BRV from pivotal trials and recently published evidence from daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavel Klein
- Mid-Atlantic Epilepsy and Sleep Center, 6410 Rockledge Dr, Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mazzeo A, Cerulli Irelli E, Leodori G, Mancuso M, Morano A, Giallonardo AT, Di Bonaventura C. Resting-state electroencephalography microstates as a marker of photosensitivity in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Brain Commun 2024; 6:fcae054. [PMID: 38444911 PMCID: PMC10914451 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy is an idiopathic generalized epilepsy syndrome associated with photosensitivity in approximately 30-40% of cases. Microstates consist of a brief period of time during which the topography of the whole resting-state electroencephalography signal is characterized by a specific configuration. Previous neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies have suggested that Microstate B may represent activity within the visual network. In this case-control study, we aimed to investigate whether anatomical and functional alterations in the visual network observed in individuals with photosensitivity could lead to changes in Microstate B dynamics in photosensitive patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Resting-state electroencephalography microstate analysis was performed on 28 patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Of these, 15 patients exhibited photosensitivity, while the remaining 13 served as non-photosensitive controls. The two groups were carefully matched in terms of age, sex, seizure control and anti-seizure medications. Multivariate analysis of variance and repeated-measures analysis of variance were performed to assess significant differences in microstate metrics and syntax between the photosensitive and the non-photosensitive group. Post hoc false discovery rate adjusted unpaired t-tests were used to determine differences in specific microstate classes between the two groups. The four classical microstates (Classes A, B, C and D) accounted for 72.8% of the total electroencephalography signal variance in the photosensitive group and 75.64% in the non-photosensitive group. Multivariate analysis of variance revealed a statistically significant class-group interaction on microstate temporal metrics (P = 0.021). False discovery rate adjusted univariate analyses of variance indicated a significant class-group interaction for both mean occurrence (P = 0.002) and coverage (P = 0.03), but not for mean duration (P = 0.14). Post hoc false discovery rate adjusted unpaired t-tests showed significantly higher coverage (P = 0.02) and occurrence (P = 0.04) of Microstate B in photosensitive patients compared with non-photosensitive participants, along with an increased probability of transitioning from Microstates C (P = 0.04) and D (P = 0.02) to Microstate B. No significant differences were found concerning the other microstate classes between the two groups. Our study provides novel insights on resting-state electroencephalography microstate dynamics underlying photosensitivity in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. The increased representation of Microstate B in these patients might reflect the resting-state overactivation of the visual system underlying photosensitivity. Further research is warranted to investigate microstate dynamics in other photosensitive epilepsy syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adolfo Mazzeo
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University, Rome 00185, Italy
| | | | - Giorgio Leodori
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University, Rome 00185, Italy
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli 86077, Italy
| | - Marco Mancuso
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University, Rome 00185, Italy
| | - Alessandra Morano
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University, Rome 00185, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang SJ, Zhao MY, Zhao PC, Zhang W, Rao GW. Research Status, Synthesis and Clinical Application of Antiepileptic Drugs. Curr Med Chem 2024; 31:410-452. [PMID: 36650655 DOI: 10.2174/0929867330666230117160632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
According to the 2017 ILAE's official definition, epilepsy is a slow brain disease state characterized by recurrent episodes. Due to information released by ILAE in 2017, it can be divided into four types, including focal epilepsy, generalized epilepsy, combined generalized, and focal epilepsy, and unknown epilepsy. Since 1989, 24 new antiepileptic drugs have been approved to treat different types of epilepsy. Besides, there are a variety of antiepileptic medications under clinical monitoring. These novel antiepileptic drugs have plenty of advantages. Over the past 33 years, there have been many antiepileptic drugs on the mearket, but no one has been found that can completely cure epilepsy. In this paper, the mentioned drugs were classified according to their targets, and the essential information, and clinical studies of each drug were described. The structure-activity relationship of different chemical structures was summarized. This paper provides help for the follow-up research on epilepsy drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si-Jie Wang
- College of Pharmaceutical Science, Institute of Drug Development & Chemical Biology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, P.R. China
| | - Min-Yan Zhao
- College of Pharmaceutical Science, Institute of Drug Development & Chemical Biology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, P.R. China
| | - Peng-Cheng Zhao
- College of Pharmaceutical Science, Institute of Drug Development & Chemical Biology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, P.R. China
| | - Wen Zhang
- College of Pharmaceutical Science, Institute of Drug Development & Chemical Biology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, P.R. China
| | - Guo-Wu Rao
- College of Pharmaceutical Science, Institute of Drug Development & Chemical Biology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Celdran de Castro A, Nascimento FA, Beltran-Corbellini Á, Toledano R, Garcia-Morales I, Gil-Nagel A, Aledo-Serrano Á. Levetiracetam, from broad-spectrum use to precision prescription: A narrative review and expert opinion. Seizure 2023; 107:121-131. [PMID: 37023625 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiseizure medication (ASM) whose mechanism of action involves the modulation of neurotransmitters release through binding to the synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A. It is a broad-spectrum ASM displaying favorable pharmacokinetic and tolerability profiles. Since its introduction in 1999, it has been widely prescribed, becoming the first-line treatment for numerous epilepsy syndromes and clinical scenarios. However, this might have resulted in overuse. Increasing evidence, including the recently published SANAD II trials, suggests that other ASMs are reasonable therapeutic options for generalized and focal epilepsies. Not infrequently, these ASMs show better safety and effectiveness profiles compared to LEV (partially due to the latter's well-known cognitive and behavioral adverse effects, present in up to 20% of patients). Moreover, it has been shown that the underlying etiology of epilepsy is significantly linked to ASMs response in particular scenarios, highlighting the importance of an etiology-based ASM choice. In the case of LEV, it has demonstrated an optimal effectiveness in Alzheimer's disease, Down syndrome, and PCDH19-related epilepsies whereas, in other etiologies such as malformations of cortical development, it may show negligible effects. This narrative review analyzes the current evidence related to the use of LEV for the treatment of seizures. Illustrative clinical scenarios and practical decision-making approaches are also addressed, therefore aiming to define a rational use of this ASM.
Collapse
|
5
|
Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenite D, Reed RC. Brivaracetam or levetiracetam in status epilepticus?: Lessons from the photosensitivity model. Epilepsy Behav 2023; 138:109018. [PMID: 36528008 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.109018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
First, a short history is given of the use of the EEG as a biomarker of efficacy in anti-seizure medication (ASM) development. The generalized epileptiform EEG response to Intermittent Photic Stimulation (IPS), the photoparoxysmal EEG response or PPR, in particular, is a reliable reproducible measure since the 1950s. Over time, a "Photosensitivity Model", testing within the same patients the impact of potential new oral ASMs, along with dose-ranging data, on PPRs, has been developed successfully. The classical Photosensitivity Model consists of IPS and blood sampling for ASM measurement performed hourly between 8 AM and 5 PM over three consecutive days. This single-blind, placebo-controlled, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Model is now commonly utilized as a Proof-of-Concept Phase 2a trial. For Generalized Tonic-Clonic Status Epilepticus (GTCSE), it is especially relevant to know the time for CNS entry and effect minutes after i.v. ASM treatment, since "time is brain". We, therefore, adapted successfully the Model to a time-efficient Model with the determination of photosensitivity ranges in minutes after equivalent doses of iv brivaracetam (BRV) and levetiracetam (LEV). This modified design allows one to monitor the time to CNS effect (i.e., PPR elimination) of a quickly-acting FDA-approved ASM given i.v., a crucial element in status epilepticus treatment. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloqium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothee Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenite
- Department of Neurosurgery and Epilepsy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Nesmos Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Roma, Italy.
| | - Ronald C Reed
- Dept. of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, 1124 Health Science Center North, Morgantown, WV 26506-9520, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fisher RS, Acharya JN, Baumer FM, French JA, Parisi P, Solodar JH, Szaflarski JP, Thio LL, Tolchin B, Wilkins AJ, Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenité D. Visually sensitive seizures: An updated review by the Epilepsy Foundation. Epilepsia 2022; 63:739-768. [PMID: 35132632 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Light flashes, patterns, or color changes can provoke seizures in up to 1 in 4000 persons. Prevalence may be higher because of selection bias. The Epilepsy Foundation reviewed light-induced seizures in 2005. Since then, images on social media, virtual reality, three-dimensional (3D) movies, and the Internet have proliferated. Hundreds of studies have explored the mechanisms and presentations of photosensitive seizures, justifying an updated review. This literature summary derives from a nonsystematic literature review via PubMed using the terms "photosensitive" and "epilepsy." The photoparoxysmal response (PPR) is an electroencephalography (EEG) phenomenon, and photosensitive seizures (PS) are seizures provoked by visual stimulation. Photosensitivity is more common in the young and in specific forms of generalized epilepsy. PS can coexist with spontaneous seizures. PS are hereditable and linked to recently identified genes. Brain imaging usually is normal, but special studies imaging white matter tracts demonstrate abnormal connectivity. Occipital cortex and connected regions are hyperexcitable in subjects with light-provoked seizures. Mechanisms remain unclear. Video games, social media clips, occasional movies, and natural stimuli can provoke PS. Virtual reality and 3D images so far appear benign unless they contain specific provocative content, for example, flashes. Images with flashes brighter than 20 candelas/m2 at 3-60 (particularly 15-20) Hz occupying at least 10 to 25% of the visual field are a risk, as are red color flashes or oscillating stripes. Equipment to assay for these characteristics is probably underutilized. Prevention of seizures includes avoiding provocative stimuli, covering one eye, wearing dark glasses, sitting at least two meters from screens, reducing contrast, and taking certain antiseizure drugs. Measurement of PPR suppression in a photosensitivity model can screen putative antiseizure drugs. Some countries regulate media to reduce risk. Visually-induced seizures remain significant public health hazards so they warrant ongoing scientific and regulatory efforts and public education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S Fisher
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jayant N Acharya
- Department of Neurology, Penn State Health, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Fiona Mitchell Baumer
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jacqueline A French
- NYU Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Epilepsy Foundation, New York, New York, USA
| | - Pasquale Parisi
- Department of Neuroscience, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Jessica H Solodar
- American Medical Writers Association-New England Chapter, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jerzy P Szaflarski
- Department of Neurology, Neurobiology and Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Liu Lin Thio
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Benjamin Tolchin
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee K, Klein P, Dongre P, Choi EJ, Rhoney DH. Intravenous Brivaracetam in the Management of Acute Seizures in the Hospital Setting: A Scoping Review. J Intensive Care Med 2022; 37:1133-1145. [PMID: 35306914 PMCID: PMC9393655 DOI: 10.1177/08850666211073598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Clinical considerations for drug treatment of acute seizures involve
variables such as safety, tolerability, drug-drug interactions, dosage,
route of administration, and alterations in pharmacokinetics because of
critical illness. Therapy options that are easily and quickly administered
without dilution, well tolerated, and effective are needed for the treatment
of acute seizures. The objective of this review is to focus on the clinical
considerations relating to the use of intravenous brivaracetam (IV BRV) for
the treatment of acute seizures in the hospital, focusing on critically ill
patients. Methods This was a scoping literature review of PubMed from inception to April 13,
2021, and search of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) 2021 Annual
Meeting website for English language publications/conference abstracts
reporting the results of IV BRV use in hospitalized patients, particularly
in the critical care setting. Outcomes of interest relating to the clinical
pharmacology, safety, tolerability, efficacy, and effectiveness of IV BRV
were reviewed and are discussed. Results Twelve studies were included for analysis. One study showed that plasma
concentrations of IV BRV 15 min after the first dose were similar between
patients receiving IV BRV as bolus or infusion. IV BRV was generally well
tolerated in patients with acute seizures in the hospital setting, with a
low incidence of individual TEAEs classified as behavioral disorders. IV BRV
demonstrated efficacy and effectiveness and had a rapid onset, with clinical
and electrophysiological improvement in seizures observed within minutes.
Although outside of the approved label, findings from several studies
suggest that IV BRV reduces seizures and is generally well tolerated in
patients with status epilepticus. Conclusions IV BRV shows effectiveness, and is generally well tolerated in the management
of acute seizures in hospitalized patients where rapid administration is
needed, representing a clinically relevant antiseizure medication for
potential use in the critical care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiwon Lee
- Department of Neurology, Division of Stroke and Critical Care, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 12287Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Pavel Klein
- Mid-Atlantic Epilepsy and Sleep Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Denise H Rhoney
- 15521UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hung TY, Wu SN, Huang CW. The Integrated Effects of Brivaracetam, a Selective Analog of Levetiracetam, on Ionic Currents and Neuronal Excitability. Biomedicines 2021; 9:biomedicines9040369. [PMID: 33916190 PMCID: PMC8067033 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9040369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Brivaracetam (BRV) is recognized as a novel third-generation antiepileptic drug approved for the treatment of epilepsy. Emerging evidence has demonstrated that it has potentially better efficacy and tolerability than its analog, Levetiracetam (LEV). This, however, cannot be explained by their common synaptic vesicle-binding mechanism. Whether BRV can affect different ionic currents and concert these effects to alter neuronal excitability remains unclear. With the aid of patch clamp technology, we found that BRV concentration dependently inhibited the depolarization-induced M-type K+ current (IK(M)), decreased the delayed-rectifier K+ current (IK(DR)), and decreased the hyperpolarization-activated cation current in GH3 neurons. However, it had a concentration-dependent inhibition on voltage-gated Na+ current (INa). Under an inside-out patch configuration, a bath application of BRV increased the open probability of large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels. Furthermore, in mHippoE-14 hippocampal neurons, the whole-cell INa was effectively depressed by BRV. In simulated modeling of hippocampal neurons, BRV was observed to reduce the firing of the action potentials (APs) concurrently with decreases in the AP amplitude. In animal models, BRV ameliorated acute seizures in both OD-1 and lithium-pilocarpine epilepsy models. However, LEV had effects in the latter only. Collectively, our study demonstrated BRV’s multiple ionic mechanism in electrically excitable cells and a potential concerted effect on neuronal excitability and hyperexcitability disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Te-Yu Hung
- Department of Pediatrics, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan 71004, Taiwan;
| | - Sheng-Nan Wu
- Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (S.-N.W.); (C.-W.H.)
| | - Chin-Wei Huang
- Department of Neurology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (S.-N.W.); (C.-W.H.)
| |
Collapse
|