1
|
Bjørndal LD, Tauqeer F, Heiervang KS, Clausen HK, Heitmann K, Lupattelli A. Perceived risk of neurodevelopmental outcomes in offspring related to psychotropic and mental illness exposures in pregnancy and breastfeeding: a cross-sectional survey of women with past or current mental illness. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061159. [PMID: 36180118 PMCID: PMC9528661 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the perceived risk of psychotropic and mental illness exposures (1) during pregnancy or (2) while breastfeeding on offspring neurodevelopment, and factors associated with this perception in women with past/current mental illness. DESIGN Cross-sectional, web-based study. SETTING Nationwide in Norway, June 2020-June 2021. PARTICIPANTS Women aged 18-55 years who were pregnant, recent mothers or planning a pregnancy, and had been offered antidepressants in the last 5 years. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Perceived risk of prenatal and breastmilk exposure to psychotropic medications and maternal mental illness on offspring neurodevelopmental outcomes. RESULTS We included 448 women: 234 pregnant, 146 mothers and 68 planning a pregnancy. On a 0-10 scale, women perceived antidepressants as least harmful both (1) in pregnancy (mean score 4.2, 95% CI 3.6 to 4.8) and (2) while breastfeeding (mean score 3.8, 95% CI 3.3 to 4.4), relative to antipsychotics, anxiety/sleeping medication or antiepileptics (mean score range: 6.3-6.5 during pregnancy, 5.5-6.2 while breastfeeding). Many participants were unfamiliar with psychotropics other than antidepressants. The perceived risk of mental illness exposure exceeded that of antidepressants (mean score range 5.6-5.9) in both exposure periods. Using general linear models, factors associated with greater antidepressant risk perception in both exposure periods included having lower education, non-Norwegian native language, and employment status (range mean score difference (β): 2.07-6.07). For pregnant women and mothers, there was an inverse association between perceived risk and the perceived antidepressant effectiveness in both exposure periods (range of β: -0.18 to -0.25). CONCLUSIONS In women with past/current mental illness, the perceived risk of antidepressant exposure on child neurodevelopment was lower than that for maternal mental illness. Other psychotropic medications were perceived as more harmful. As medication risk perception influences the decision-making regarding treatment of mental illness, pre- and pregnancy counselling should target women with characteristics associated with higher perceived risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludvig D Bjørndal
- PROMENTA Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- PharmacoEpidemiology and Drug Safety Research Group, Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fatima Tauqeer
- PharmacoEpidemiology and Drug Safety Research Group, Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin S Heiervang
- Department of Research and Development, Mental Health Services, Akershus Universitetssykehus HF, Lorenskog, Norway
| | - Hanne K Clausen
- Department of Research and Development, Mental Health Services, Akershus Universitetssykehus HF, Lorenskog, Norway
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Concurrent Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders and Mental Health Division, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway
| | - Kristine Heitmann
- Regional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Centre (RELIS Vest), Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland Universitetssjukehus, Bergen, Norway
| | - Angela Lupattelli
- PharmacoEpidemiology and Drug Safety Research Group, Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pressman K, Müller R, Krstić N, Običan S. A novel clinic structure for exposure counseling during pregnancy. Birth Defects Res 2022; 114:855-862. [PMID: 35912974 DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.2069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Congenital malformations and adverse fetal outcomes secondary to teratogenic exposures are major public health concerns. We review all inquiries made to the Florida MotherToBaby service center as well as the novel Exposure Clinic, which offers direct patient counseling. METHODS We completed a retrospective review of all inquiries made to the MotherToBaby Florida service and the Exposure Clinic consults between its inception January 2019 through December 2021. All de-identified data was collected at the time of the inquiry and stored in the OTIS database. Aggregate data was then extracted and descriptive statistics were performed. A p value of less than .05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS In 2019, there were 163 total inquiries, 265 in 2020, and 1,279 in 2021. These 1,707 inquiries covered 2,809 unique exposures. In the Exposure Clinic, 49 patients were seen in 2019, 140 in 2020, and 263 in 2021. The clinic's geographical reach increased over time with patients from 22 different counties being seen in 2021. Of all individual exposures, 45% were evaluated in 452 unique encounters in the Exposure Clinic and 55% were evaluated in 1255 unique encounters via traditional modes of contact. The average number of exposures discussed at each clinic appointment 2.8 versus 1.2 in inquiries via traditional methods. The majority of all exposures were regarding prescription medications, specifically psychiatric medications, followed by immunizations. The exposure with the single most inquiries was the COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSIONS This novel clinic structure allows for complex counseling and clinical recommendations regarding exposures during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Pressman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Réka Müller
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Nevena Krstić
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Sarah Običan
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Factors that influence how adults select oral over-the-counter analgesics: A systematic review. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2022; 62:1113-1123.e8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
4
|
Shroukh WA, Steinke DT, Willis SC. Risk management of teratogenic medicines: A systematic review. Birth Defects Res 2020; 112:1755-1786. [DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.1799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wejdan A. Shroukh
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences The University of Manchester Manchester UK
| | - Douglas T. Steinke
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences The University of Manchester Manchester UK
| | - Sarah C. Willis
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences The University of Manchester Manchester UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Donald S, Sharples K, Barson D, Horsburgh S, Parkin L. Patterns of prescription medicine dispensing before and during pregnancy in New Zealand, 2005-2015. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0234153. [PMID: 32484824 PMCID: PMC7266349 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To describe prescription medicine dispensing before and during pregnancy in New Zealand, 2005–2015. Methods Members of the New Zealand Pregnancy Cohort were linked with their dispensing records in a national database of prescription products dispensed from community pharmacies. We identified the proportion of pregnancies during which at least one prescription medicine was dispensed, the number of different medicines used and the most commonly dispensed medicine groups both during pregnancy and in the 270 days before conception. Dispensing during pregnancy was assessed by several maternal characteristics. Results 874,884 pregnancies were included. Over the study timeframe, the proportion of pregnancies exposed to a non-supplement prescription medicine increased from 38.5% to 67.2%. The mean number of different non-supplement medicines dispensed during pregnancy increased from 2.5 to 3.2. Dispensing during pregnancy was weakly associated with body mass index, smoking status and ethnicity. Pregnancy exposure was highest for Antibacterials (26.0%), Analgesics (16.7%) and Antinausea & Vertigo Agents (11.0%). Conclusions From 2005–2015, both the proportion of exposed pregnancies and the number of different medicines dispensed to pregnant women in New Zealand increased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Donald
- Pharmacoepidemiology Research Network, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
- * E-mail:
| | - Katrina Sharples
- Pharmacoepidemiology Research Network, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - David Barson
- Pharmacoepidemiology Research Network, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Simon Horsburgh
- Pharmacoepidemiology Research Network, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Lianne Parkin
- Pharmacoepidemiology Research Network, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Heitmann K, Schjøtt J. SafeMotherMedicine: Aiming to Increase Women's Empowerment in Use of Medications During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding. Matern Child Health J 2020; 24:531-536. [PMID: 32185571 PMCID: PMC7170983 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-020-02903-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Approximately 80% of pregnant women use medications. There is a need for evidence based medicines information that provide realistic risk estimates as pregnant and breastfeeding women tend to overestimate the risk of medications. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and future perspectives of an innovative medicines information service aiming to increase empowerment among pregnant and breastfeeding women. Description SafeMotherMedicine (SMM) (www.tryggmammamedisin.no) is a Norwegian medicines information service for pregnant and breastfeeding women. Established in 2011, the service was initially web-based only, in contrast to most teratology information services that at the time mainly operated using telephone and/or e-mail. Assessment During the last eight years, SMM has provided close to 30,000 answers promoting appropriate medication use among pregnant and breastfeeding women. SMM launched a telephone-service in 2016, however, the annual number of questions received through the web-based service continues to increase. Conclusion The service seems to have fulfilled a previously unmet need of evidence-based, individually tailored information about medications to pregnant and breastfeeding women in Norway. SMM empowers the women to make informed decisions regarding medication use in pregnancy and breastfeeding, thus contributing to person-centred medicine. The web-based design of the service may represent the pregnant and breastfeeding women’s preferred way of communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine Heitmann
- Regional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Centre (RELIS Vest), Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Jan Schjøtt
- Regional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Centre (RELIS Vest), Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, 5021, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ceulemans M, Lupattelli A, Nordeng H, Odalovic M, Twigg M, Foulon V. Women's Beliefs About Medicines and Adherence to Pharmacotherapy in Pregnancy: Opportunities for Community Pharmacists. Curr Pharm Des 2020; 25:469-482. [PMID: 30907309 DOI: 10.2174/1381612825666190321110420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During pregnancy, women might weigh the benefits of treatment against potential risks to the unborn child. However, non-adherence to necessary treatment can adversely affect both mother and child. To optimize pregnant women's beliefs and medication adherence, community pharmacists are ideally positioned to play an important role in primary care. OBJECTIVE This narrative review aimed to summarize the evidence on 1) pregnant women's beliefs, 2) medication adherence in pregnancy and 3) community pharmacists' counselling during pregnancy. METHODS Three search strategies were used in Medline and Embase to find original studies evaluating women's beliefs, medication adherence and community pharmacists' counselling during pregnancy. All original descriptive and analytic epidemiological studies performed in Europe, North America and Australia, written in English and published from 2000 onwards were included. RESULTS We included 14 studies reporting on women's beliefs, 11 studies on medication adherence and 9 on community pharmacists' counselling during pregnancy. Women are more reluctant to use medicines during pregnancy and tend to overestimate the teratogenic risk of medicines. The risk perception varies with the type of medicine, level of health literacy, education level and occupation. Furthermore, low medication adherence during pregnancy is common. Finally, limited evidence showed that the current community pharmacists' counselling is insufficient. Barriers hindering pharmacists are insufficient knowledge and limited access to reliable information. CONCLUSION Concerns about medication use and non-adherence are widespread among pregnant women. Community pharmacists' counselling during pregnancy is insufficient. Further education, training and research are required to support community pharmacists in fulfilling all the opportunities they have when counselling pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Ceulemans
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Angela Lupattelli
- PharmacoEpidemiology and Drug Safety Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hedvig Nordeng
- PharmacoEpidemiology and Drug Safety Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marina Odalovic
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Michael Twigg
- School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR47PQ, United Kingdom
| | - Veerle Foulon
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Perceptions of medicine use among pregnant women: an interview-based study. Int J Clin Pharm 2019; 41:1021-1030. [PMID: 31104187 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-019-00840-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 04/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background When women are in a condition that requires medicines during pregnancy they have to balance the health benefits of the medical treatment against the potential risk of harming their unborn child. Too high teratogenic risk perceptions among pregnant women can lead them to stop taking the medicine, worsening the symptoms for the mother and even harming their foetus. Many women today who use over-the-counter and prescribed medicines have been shown to change their medical behaviour when they become pregnant. Objective To explore in depth the perceptions of medication use among women during their pregnancy. Setting The Capital Region of Denmark. Methods Participants were recruited from social network groups on Facebook and from participants in lectures and antenatal classes for pregnant women in two hospitals. Two focus groups interviews and three individual semi-structured interviews were conducted. The interview guides were based on existing literature and relatively unstructured, with an emphasis on open-ended questions. Interview transcripts were analysed using the phenomenological approach of meaning condensation. Main Outcome measure Pregnant women's' perceptions of medicine including aspects related to their safety feeling of medicines and perceived support from health care professionals. Results The women believed that it is less safe to take medicines during pregnancy, largely due to the risk of the child getting a disease in the future, but also due to the risk of malformation. Lack of clinical tests and uncertainty about how the unborn child reacts to medications were reported causes of these concerns. Most participants were concerned about using medicines and avoided them if possible, including over-the counter medicines. Conversations with physicians had a calming effect although the physicians appeared to be unclear in their guidance regarding dietary supplements. Some women received conflicting information on the Internet. Several suggestions were made about how to reduce uncertainties about the safety of taking medicines during pregnancy. Conclusion Many pregnant women are concerned about how to use medicines. To reduce these concerns and ensure the appropriate use of medicines during pregnancy, initiatives are needed to strengthen evidence-based advice from health care professionals, especially during the first trimester.
Collapse
|
9
|
Schjøtt J. Norwegian drug information centres strongly promote person-centred and personalised medicine: a brief report on the achievements and strategy. EPMA J 2019; 10:109-114. [PMID: 31258816 DOI: 10.1007/s13167-019-00167-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The Norwegian network of drug information centres (RELIS) has achievements in person-centred and personalised medicine. RELIS receive questions from physicians, pharmacists, nurses and other health professionals and provide decision support in all aspects of pharmacotherapy. Questions associated with person-centred medicine often include problems with unrealistic risk perception and poor adherence among patients. Questions associated with personalised medicine frequently concern comorbidity, biomarkers and pharmacogenetics. The questions frequently include a mix of problems related to health and disease care. The RELIS staff addresses each question in a problem-oriented approach with expertise in pharmacology and skills in searching and critical evaluation of the literature. A written answer can describe decision support concerning patient empowerment, further diagnostics and preferences in pharmacotherapy including advice with regard to choice of drug and dose to a patient. Links to online resources and attached references for further reading are often included in the answers. The question-answer service is documented in a full-text, searchable question-answer database. Additional drug information activities towards clinicians and patients, and a multi-professional staff with pharmacists and clinical pharmacologists, are important elements in RELIS drug information strategy, and it is essentially relevant to predictive, preventive and personalised medicine (PPPM).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Schjøtt
- 1Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.,2Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Amundsen S, Øvrebø TG, Amble NMS, Poole AC, Nordeng H. Risk perception, beliefs about medicines and medical adherence among pregnant and breastfeeding women with migraine: findings from a cross-sectional study in Norway. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026690. [PMID: 30819714 PMCID: PMC6398664 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine risk perception, beliefs about migraine medications and medical adherence among pregnant and breastfeeding women with migraine. DESIGN AND SETTING Cross-sectional study conducted in Norway from October 2013 to February 2014. Data were collected via an anonymous, electronic questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS Women with migraine, either pregnant or having delivered within the previous 18 months. MAIN OUTCOMES Women's perception of teratogenic risk (numeric rating scale 0-10) was obtained for 14 different drugs/substances, including medications commonly used in the acute treatment of migraine. Women's perspectives on migraine drug therapy were assessed by 10 statements from the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ-Specific) and six pregnancy/breastfeeding-specific statements. Adherence to migraine treatment during pregnancy and breastfeeding period was assessed by maternal self-report. RESULTS The study population included 401 women with migraine, of which 140 were pregnant and 261 were new mothers. More than 70% of the women reported use of migraine medications during pregnancy. Still, the majority severely overestimated the risk associated with migraine medications and were concerned about using medications to manage their migraine during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Almost 9 out of 10 women had at some point deliberately avoided using migraine medications during their pregnancy. Women reporting use of migraine medications, however, were more positive and overestimated to a lesser extent the risks of using such medications in pregnancy compared with their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS Women with migraine severely overestimated the risk associated with migraine pharmacotherapy in pregnancy. The majority of women were concerned about use of migraine medications during pregnancy and breastfeeding and reported non-adherence to needed treatment. More attention should be focused on women's beliefs and concerns regarding migraine pharmacotherapy during pregnancy and breastfeeding in order to improve management of disease, reduce unfounded concerns and enhance adherence to needed treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siri Amundsen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | | | | | - Hedvig Nordeng
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schjøtt J, Spigset O. Drug information centres and their provision of decision support: The Scandinavian experience. J Clin Pharm Ther 2019; 44:489-492. [PMID: 30710370 DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Revised: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE Appraisal of drug information centres (DICs) is mainly by word of mouth communication and surveys of overall user satisfaction. Efforts to study the impact of this type of informatics and decision support systematically are generally lacking within the healthcare system. COMMENT Scandinavian DICs question-answering databases are relevant sources for identifying recurring problems in pharmacotherapy, including drug safety questions, and for re-use of previous answers. Recent studies in this setting have shown that high-quality answers demand easily accessible literature sources, skills in literature search and critical assessment of the retrieved documentation. Furthermore, patient-specific advice in clinical cases presented within a requested time frame is appraised by clinicians. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS Effective decision support by Scandinavian DICs depends on skills among staff and technological resources. Our experience could motivate further studies investigating methods and evaluating the impact of DICs in the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Schjøtt
- Department of Medical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Olav Spigset
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,Regional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Centre (RELIS Midt-Norge), Department of Clinical Pharmacology, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Niethe M, Whitfield K. Psychotropic medication use during pregnancy. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda Niethe
- School of Pharmacy; The University of Queensland; Woolloongabba Australia
| | - Karen Whitfield
- School of Pharmacy; The University of Queensland; Woolloongabba Australia
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital; Brisbane Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Leung HY, Saini B, Ritchie HE. Medications and pregnancy: The role of community pharmacists - A descriptive study. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0195101. [PMID: 29742159 PMCID: PMC5942805 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 03/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Safe use of medications during pregnancy requires a comprehensive understanding of risk-benefit profiles for individual treatments. Pharmacists are supported in this aspect by clinical information agencies (e.g. MotherSafe, a telephone-based teratogen information service) and reference texts. To what extent and for what reasons Australian pharmacists utilise these services/resources are yet unknown. Further, debate on replacement of conventionally defined medication safety in pregnancy categories (A, B1-3, C, D, X) by narratively stated safety evidence may affect pharmacists’ routine practice. This study aimed to gauge pharmacists’ experiences and resource needs in undertaking support roles regarding gestational drug use. Methods Semi-structured interviews (audio-recorded or documented using field notes) were performed with community pharmacists in Australia and transcribed verbatim. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted using the NVivo software (Version 11, QSR International). Results Data saturation was achieved with 24 interviews. Qualitative data yielded 5 emergent themes: barriers to effective counselling, patient trust, risk perception, role definition and practice support needs. Overall, participants relied on pregnancy categories, were risk averse and cautious in offering advice. Currently available data for unclassified and category B therapeutic agents (limited human data) were deemed inadequate. Reluctance to use the proposed narrative system was also expressed. Discussion This study highlights key barriers in the provision of maternal care by pharmacists and the potential tension present if the existing category system is replaced by a narrative one. These need to be addressed through training and development of practice support resources to enhance pharmacists’ skills in evidence-based risk estimation and communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoi Ying Leung
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bandana Saini
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Helen E. Ritchie
- Discipline of Biomedical Science, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mulder B, Bijlsma MJ, Schuiling-Veninga CCM, Morssink LP, van Puijenbroek E, Aarnoudse JG, Hak E, de Vries TW. Risks versus benefits of medication use during pregnancy: what do women perceive? Patient Prefer Adherence 2018; 12:1-8. [PMID: 29302186 PMCID: PMC5741981 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s146091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding perception of risks and benefits is essential for informed patient choices regarding medical care. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the perception of risks and benefits of 9 drug classes during pregnancy and associations with women's characteristics. METHODS Questionnaires were distributed to pregnant women who attended a Dutch Obstetric Care facility (first- and second-line care). Mean perceived risk and benefit scores were computed for 9 different drug classes (paracetamol, antacids, antibiotics, antifungal medication, drugs against nausea and vomiting, histamine-2 receptor antagonists/proton pump inhibitors, antidepressants, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and sedatives/anxiolytics). For each participant, we computed weighted risk and benefit sum scores with principal component analysis. In addition, major concerns regarding medication use were evaluated. RESULTS The questionnaire was completed by 136 women (response rate 77%). Pregnant women were most concerned about having a child with a birth defect (35%), a miscarriage (35%), or their child developing an allergic disease (23%), respectively, as a result of drug use. The majority of studied drug classes were perceived relatively low in risk and high in benefit. Higher risk scores were reported if women were in their first trimesters of pregnancy (p=0.007). Lower benefit scores were reported if women were single (p=0.014), smoking (p=0.028), nulliparous (p=0.006), or did not have a family history of birth defects (p=0.005). CONCLUSION Pregnant women's concerns regarding potential drug adverse effects were not only focused on congenital birth defects but also included a wider range of adverse outcomes. This study showed that most of the studied drug classes were perceived relatively low in risk and high in benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Mulder
- Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Unit PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Correspondence: Bianca Mulder, Department of PharmacoEpidemiology and PharmacoEconomics, University Centre of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, PO Box XB45, A Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, the Netherlands, Tel +31 50 361 7576, Email
| | - Maarten J Bijlsma
- Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Unit PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Catharina CM Schuiling-Veninga
- Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Unit PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Leonard P Morssink
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Eugene van Puijenbroek
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, ′s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
- Unit of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan G Aarnoudse
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Eelko Hak
- Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Unit PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Tjalling W de Vries
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Widnes SF, Schjøtt J. Risk perception regarding drug use in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216:375-378. [PMID: 27988271 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Revised: 10/18/2016] [Accepted: 12/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Pregnant women, but also physicians, have unrealistically high perceptions of teratogenic drug effects. This may result in suboptimal treatment of disease and even influence decisions of whether to continue pregnancy. To attain more realistic teratogenic risk perceptions, several factors that influence this issue should be considered, and these are further discussed in this Clinical Opinion. Importantly, drug use may have several benefits, both for the pregnant woman's health and to avoid negative fetal effects of untreated maternal disease. A greater focus on this aspect may act to balance risk perceptions. Furthermore, both pregnant women and physicians need access to drug information sources that provide realistic risk estimates to increase confidence in appropriate drug use and prescribing. We suggest that access to decision support and individually tailored information provided by drug information centers may contribute to this goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia F Widnes
- Regional Medicines and Pharmacovigilance Centre (RELIS Vest), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Jan Schjøtt
- Regional Medicines and Pharmacovigilance Centre (RELIS Vest), Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Section of Clinical Pharmacology, Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Section of Pharmacology, Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sedov ID, Goodman SH, Tomfohr-Madsen LM. Insomnia Treatment Preferences During Pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2017; 46:e95-e104. [PMID: 28343943 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2017.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/01/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine pregnant women's preferences for the treatment of insomnia: cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT-I), pharmacotherapy, or acupuncture. DESIGN A cross-sectional survey of pregnant women. SETTING We recruited participants in person at a low-risk maternity clinic and a pregnancy and infant trade show and invited them to complete an online questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS The sample (N = 187) was primarily White (70%), married or common-law married (96%), and on average 31 years of age; the mean gestational age was 28 weeks. METHODS Participants read expert-validated descriptions of CBT-I, pharmacotherapy, and acupuncture and then indicated their preferences and perceptions of each approach. RESULTS Participants indicated that if they experienced insomnia, they preferred CBT-I to other approaches, χ2(2) = 38.10, p < .001. They rated CBT-I as the most credible treatment (η2partial = .22, p < .001) and had stronger positive reactions to it than to the other two approaches (η2partial = .37, p < .001). CONCLUSION Participants preferred CBT-I for insomnia during pregnancy. This preference is similar to previously reported preferences for psychotherapy for treatment of depression and anxiety during pregnancy. It is important for clinicians to consider women's preferences when discussing possible treatment for insomnia.
Collapse
|
17
|
Gils C, Pottegård A, Ennis ZN, Damkier P. Perception of drug teratogenicity among general practitioners and specialists in obstetrics/gynecology: a regional and national questionnaire-based survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16:226. [PMID: 27531162 PMCID: PMC4988043 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-1025-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2015] [Accepted: 06/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Estimating the true risk of fetal malformations attributable to the use of medications is difficult and perception of risk by health professionals will impact their counseling and treatment of patients who need medication during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to assess the perception of the teratogenic risk of 9 commonly and 3 rarely prescribed drugs among general practitioners and specialists in obstetrics/gynecology. METHODS All 811 general practitioners in the Region of Southern Denmark and all 502 specialist obstetricians/gynecologists in Denmark as a whole were invited to participate in the study based on an online questionnaire. Medians and interpercentile ranges of the perceived background risk and perceived risks for each of the drugs were included in the questionnaire. RESULTS One hundred forty three (18 %) general practitioners and 138 (27 %) obstetricians/gynecologists participated. Estimates provided by the participants were generally in accordance with current knowledge of drugs with established safety during pregnancy. Perceptions of risks associated with warfarin and retinoid exposure were severely underestimated. CONCLUSIONS Understanding of teratogenic background risk and specific risks associated with in utero exposure to 12 different drugs generally approached the established knowledge. The risk associated with warfarin and retinoid exposure was severely underestimated by both groups of health care professionals, while general practitioners specifically overestimated the risk of sertraline and citalopram to some extent. In Denmark, general practitioners can prescribe antidepressants, and even minor misconceptions of the teratogenic potential of citalopram and sertraline may be of clinical relevance. In Denmark, systemic retinoids can only be prescribed by a dermatologist, and warfarin treatment is only rarely initiated in women of the fertile age without involvement of specialists in internal medicine. Hence, the active knowledge on the teratogenic potential of these drugs is likely to be less accurate among general practitioners and obstetricians/gynecologists; although still of clinical importance since these specialists are largely involved in the counselling of pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Gils
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry & Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anton Pottegård
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry & Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmaceutics, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Zandra Nymand Ennis
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry & Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmaceutics, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Per Damkier
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry & Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. .,Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmaceutics, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bakkebø T, Widnes SF, Aamlid SS, Schjøtt J. Physicians’ Perception of Teratogenic Risk and Confidence in Prescribing Drugs in Pregnancy—Influence of Norwegian Drug Information Centers. Clin Ther 2016; 38:1102-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2015] [Revised: 01/29/2016] [Accepted: 02/17/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
19
|
Schjøtt J. Challenges in psychopharmacology: a drug information centre perspective. J Clin Pharm Ther 2016; 41:4-6. [DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2015] [Accepted: 12/15/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J. Schjøtt
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology; Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry; Haukeland University Hospital; Bergen Norway
- Regional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Centre (RELIS Vest); Haukeland University Hospital; Bergen Norway
- Department of Clinical Science; Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
| |
Collapse
|