1
|
Mansilla-Polo M, Morgado-Carrasco D. Biologics Versus JAK Inhibitors. Part I: Cancer Risk. A Narrative Review. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2024; 14:1389-1442. [PMID: 38763966 PMCID: PMC11169156 DOI: 10.1007/s13555-024-01166-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biological drugs (BD) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have revolutionized the treatment of diverse dermatoses. However, there are concerns regarding their safety, especially the risk of cancer and opportunistic infections. Here, we discuss the risk of cancer associated with the BD and JAKi used in dermatology. METHODS A narrative review was carried out. All relevant articles evaluating the risk of cancer associated with BD or JAKi and published between January 2010 and February 2024 were selected. RESULTS Multiple large studies have evaluated the association between BD, JAKi and cancer risk. However, there is a lack of prospective, comparative studies. Overall, patients undergoing BD and JAKi present a cutaneous cancer incidence similar to that in the general population. The drugs more strongly associated with non-skin cancer risk were anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNFs) agents and JAKi (especially tofacitinib and oral ruxolitinib). This risk appears to increase with age, the presence of other factors (such as chronic immunosuppression from previous drugs or other comorbidities), and specific diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and myelodysplastic syndrome. Conversely, BD such as interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors may even reduce the risk of some visceral and hematological malignancies. In patients with dermatological conditions such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, the risk of malignancies may be lower than in other subgroups, and probably comparable to the general population. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of cancer in patients undergoing BD or JAKi is generally low. This incidence can be higher in elderly patients with RA or myelodysplastic syndrome, and in those undergoing prolonged therapy with tofacitinib or ruxolitinib (oral), or anti-TNF agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Mansilla-Polo
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IIS) La Fe, Valencia, Spain
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat de València, Villarroel 170, 08036, Valencia, Spain
| | - Daniel Morgado-Carrasco
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital de Figueres, Fundació Alt Empurdà, Figueres, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anderson E, Beier S, Desmarais J. Certolizumab pegol in the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis. Immunotherapy 2024. [PMID: 38530074 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2023-0225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Axial spondyloarthritis is a chronic, immune-mediated systemic inflammatory disease encompassing ankylosing spondylitis and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis. TNF inhibitors are the preferred second line therapy for patients with active axial spondyloarthritis. Certolizumab pegol is a TNF inhibitor approved for treatment of both. Three large phase III trials (RAPID-axSpA, C-axSpAnd and C-OPTIMISE) and one large phase IV trial (CIMAX) establish its clinical efficacy in treatment of active disease and maintenance of remission for both diseases. Real world evidence demonstrates clinical efficacy and benefits including reduced bone loss, reduced risk of uveitis, safety in pregnancy and lactation and index drug survival of 10 years. It is generally well tolerated, though can be associated with increased risk of serious infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Anderson
- Oregon Health & Sciences University, Division of Rheumatology, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Secia Beier
- Oregon Health & Sciences University, Department of Pharmacy Services, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Julianna Desmarais
- Oregon Health & Sciences University, Division of Rheumatology, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Convertino I, Cazzato M, Tillati S, Giometto S, Gini R, Valdiserra G, Cappello E, Ferraro S, Bonaso M, Bartolini C, Paoletti O, Lorenzoni V, Trieste L, Filippi M, Turchetti G, Cristofano M, Blandizzi C, Mosca M, Lucenteforte E, Tuccori M. Assessing disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis patients and drug-utilization patterns of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the Tuscany region, Italy. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1244486. [PMID: 37818193 PMCID: PMC10561246 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1244486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The disease activity associated with the drug-utilization patterns of biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) is poorly investigated in real-world studies on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. To investigate the relationship between biologic DMARD initiation/discontinuations in RA patients identified in the healthcare administrative databases of Tuscany and the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) reported in the medical charts. Methods: This retrospective population-based study included RA's first-ever biologic DMARD users of the Pisa University Hospital from 2014 to 2016. Patients were followed up until 31 December 2019. We evaluated the DAS28 recorded before (T0) and after (T1) the biologic DMARD initiation and before (TD0) and after (TD1) discontinuations. Patients were classified as "off-target" (DAS28 > 3.2) or "in-target" (DAS28 ≤ 3.2). We described the disease activity trends at initiation and discontinuation. Results: Ninety-five users were included (73 women, mean age 59.6). Among 70 patients (74%) with at least three DAS28 measures, 28 (40.0%) were off-target at T0 and 38 (54.3%) in-target at T1. Thirty-three (47%) patients had at least one discontinuation, among those with at least three DAS28 assessments. In the disease activity trend, disease stability or improvement was observed in 28 out of 37 (75.7%) patients at initiation and in 24 out of 37 (64.9%) at discontinuation. Discussion: Biologic DMARD discontinuations identified in the healthcare administrative databasese of Tuscany are frequently observed in situations of controlled RA disease. Further studies are warranted to confirm that these events can be used in studies using healthcare administrative databases as proxies of treatment effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irma Convertino
- Unit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Tillati
- Unit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Sabrina Giometto
- Unit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Rosa Gini
- Tuscan Regional Healthcare Agency, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Valdiserra
- Unit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Emiliano Cappello
- Unit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Sara Ferraro
- Unit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marco Bonaso
- Unit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Leopoldo Trieste
- Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Matteo Filippi
- Direzione Medica di Presidio, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | - Corrado Blandizzi
- Unit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Unit of Adverse Drug Reactions Monitoring, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marta Mosca
- Unit of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Ersilia Lucenteforte
- Unit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marco Tuccori
- Unit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Unit of Adverse Drug Reactions Monitoring, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Convertino I, Giometto S, Gini R, Cazzato M, Fornili M, Valdiserra G, Cappello E, Ferraro S, Bartolini C, Paoletti O, Tillati S, Baglietto L, Turchetti G, Trieste L, Lorenzoni V, Blandizzi C, Mosca M, Tuccori M, Lucenteforte E. Trajectories of Adherence to Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs in Tuscan Administrative Databases: The Pathfinder Study. J Clin Med 2021; 10:5743. [PMID: 34945038 PMCID: PMC8708974 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10245743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Scanty information on clustering longitudinal real-world data is available in the medical literature about the adherence implementation phase in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To identify and characterize trajectories by analyzing the implementation phase of adherence to biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs), we conducted a retrospective cohort drug-utilization study using Tuscan administrative databases. RA patients were identified by a validated algorithm, including the first biologic DMARD supply from 2010 to 2015, RA specialist visit in the year before or after the first supply date and RA diagnosis in the five years before or in the year after the first supply date. We observed users for three years or until death, neoplasia, or pregnancy. We evaluated adherence quarterly through the Medication Possession Ratio. Firstly, we identified adherence trajectories and described the baseline characteristics; then, we focused on the trajectory most populated to distinguish the related sub-trajectories. We identified 952 first ever-biologic DMARD users in RA (712 females, mean age 52.7 years old, standard deviation 18.8). The biologic DMARD mostly supplied was etanercept (387 users) followed by adalimumab (233). Among 935 users with at least 3 adherence values, we identified 49 fully-adherent users, 829 continuous users, and 57 early-discontinuing users. Significant differences were observed among the index drugs. After focusing on the continuous users, three sub-trajectories were identified: continuous-steady users (556), continuous-alternate users (207), and continuous-declining users (66). No relevant differences emerged at the baseline. The majority of first ever-biologic DMARD users showed a continuous adherence behavior in RA. The role of adherence potential predictors and the association with effectiveness and safety outcomes should be explored by further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irma Convertino
- Unit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (I.C.); (G.V.); (E.C.); (S.F.); (C.B.); (M.T.)
| | - Sabrina Giometto
- Unit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (S.G.); (M.F.); (S.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Rosa Gini
- Unit of Pharmacoepidemiology, Tuscan Regional Healthcare Agency, 50100 Florence, Italy; (R.G.); (C.B.); (O.P.)
| | - Massimiliano Cazzato
- Unit of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (M.M.)
| | - Marco Fornili
- Unit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (S.G.); (M.F.); (S.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Giulia Valdiserra
- Unit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (I.C.); (G.V.); (E.C.); (S.F.); (C.B.); (M.T.)
| | - Emiliano Cappello
- Unit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (I.C.); (G.V.); (E.C.); (S.F.); (C.B.); (M.T.)
| | - Sara Ferraro
- Unit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (I.C.); (G.V.); (E.C.); (S.F.); (C.B.); (M.T.)
| | - Claudia Bartolini
- Unit of Pharmacoepidemiology, Tuscan Regional Healthcare Agency, 50100 Florence, Italy; (R.G.); (C.B.); (O.P.)
| | - Olga Paoletti
- Unit of Pharmacoepidemiology, Tuscan Regional Healthcare Agency, 50100 Florence, Italy; (R.G.); (C.B.); (O.P.)
| | - Silvia Tillati
- Unit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (S.G.); (M.F.); (S.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Laura Baglietto
- Unit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (S.G.); (M.F.); (S.T.); (L.B.)
| | - Giuseppe Turchetti
- Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy; (G.T.); (L.T.); (V.L.)
| | - Leopoldo Trieste
- Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy; (G.T.); (L.T.); (V.L.)
| | - Valentina Lorenzoni
- Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy; (G.T.); (L.T.); (V.L.)
| | - Corrado Blandizzi
- Unit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (I.C.); (G.V.); (E.C.); (S.F.); (C.B.); (M.T.)
- Unit of Adverse Drug Reactions Monitoring, University Hospital of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy
| | - Marta Mosca
- Unit of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (M.M.)
| | - Marco Tuccori
- Unit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (I.C.); (G.V.); (E.C.); (S.F.); (C.B.); (M.T.)
- Unit of Adverse Drug Reactions Monitoring, University Hospital of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy
| | - Ersilia Lucenteforte
- Unit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (S.G.); (M.F.); (S.T.); (L.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lasa JS, Olivera PA, Bonovas S, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Safety of S1P Modulators in Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Drug Saf 2021; 44:645-660. [PMID: 33666900 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-021-01057-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators are approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and are under development for other immune-mediated conditions; however, safety concerns have arisen. OBJECTIVE The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the safety profile of S1P modulators in patients with multiple sclerosis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, psoriasis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 January, 1990 through 1 April, 2020. We also performed a manual review of conference databases from 2017 through 2020. The primary outcome was the occurrence of adverse events and serious adverse events. We also estimated the occurrence of serious infections, herpes zoster infection, malignancy, bradycardia, atrio-ventricular block, and macular edema. We performed a meta-analysis of controlled studies to assess the risks of such events. RESULTS We identified 3843 citations; of these, 26 studies were finally included, comprising 9604 patients who were exposed to a sphingosine-1-phosphate modulator. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials showed an increased risk in herpes zoster infection [risk ratio, 1.75 (95% confidence interval 1.09-2.80)], bradycardia [2.64 (1.77-3.96)], and atrio-ventricular block [1.73 (1.03-2.91)] among subjects exposed to sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators as compared with a placebo or an active comparator. CONCLUSIONS We found an increased risk of herpes zoster infection, and transient cardiovascular events among patients treated with sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020172575.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan S Lasa
- IBD Unit, Gastroenterology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigación Clínica (CEMIC), Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Pablo A Olivera
- IBD Unit, Gastroenterology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigación Clínica (CEMIC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Stefanos Bonovas
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,IBD Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvio Danese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,IBD Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, INSERM NGERE, Nancy University Hospital, Lorraine University, Allée du Morvan, 54511, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Davis JS, Ferreira D, Paige E, Gedye C, Boyle M. Infectious Complications of Biological and Small Molecule Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapies. Clin Microbiol Rev 2020; 33:e00035-19. [PMID: 32522746 PMCID: PMC7289788 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00035-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The past 2 decades have seen a revolution in our approach to therapeutic immunosuppression. We have moved from relying on broadly active traditional medications, such as prednisolone or methotrexate, toward more specific agents that often target a single receptor, cytokine, or cell type, using monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins, or targeted small molecules. This change has transformed the treatment of many conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, cancers, asthma, and inflammatory bowel disease, but along with the benefits have come risks. Contrary to the hope that these more specific agents would have minimal and predictable infectious sequelae, infectious complications have emerged as a major stumbling block for many of these agents. Furthermore, the growing number and complexity of available biologic agents makes it difficult for clinicians to maintain current knowledge, and most review articles focus on a particular target disease or class of agent. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge about infectious complications of biologic and small molecule immunomodulatory agents, aiming to create a single resource relevant to a broad range of clinicians and researchers. For each of 19 classes of agent, we discuss the mechanism of action, the risk and types of infectious complications, and recommendations for prevention of infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua S Davis
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - David Ferreira
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Emma Paige
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Craig Gedye
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Oncology, Calvary Mater Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Boyle
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Olivera PA, Lasa JS, Bonovas S, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases or Other Immune-mediated Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology 2020; 158:1554-1573.e12. [PMID: 31926171 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 177] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Revised: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Inhibitors of Janus kinases (JAKs) are being developed for treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases and other immune-mediated diseases. Tofacitinib is effective in treatment of ulcerative colitis, but there are safety concerns. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the safety profile of tofacitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib, and baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, psoriasis, or ankylosing spondylitis. METHODS We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1990, through July 1, 2019. We performed a manual review of conference databases from 2012 through 2018. The primary outcome was incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. We also estimated incidence rates of serious infections, herpes zoster infection, non-melanoma skin cancer, other malignancies, major cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism, and mortality. We performed a meta-analysis, which included controlled studies, to assess the relative risk of these events. RESULTS We identified 973 studies; of these, 82 were included in the final analysis, comprising 66,159 patients with immune-mediated diseases who were exposed to a JAK inhibitor. Two-thirds of the included studies were randomized controlled trials. The incidence rate of AEs was 42.65 per 100 person-years and of serious AEs was 9.88 per 100 person-years. Incidence rates of serious infections, herpes zoster infection, malignancy, and major cardiovascular events were 2.81 per 100 person-years, 2.67 per 100 person-years, 0.89 per 100 person-years, and 0.48 per 100 person-years, respectively. Mortality was not increased in patients treated with JAK inhibitors compared with patients given placebo or active comparator (relative risk 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.40-1.28). The meta-analysis showed a significant increase in risk of herpes zoster infection among patients who received JAK inhibitors (relative risk 1.57; 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.37). CONCLUSIONS In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found an increased risk of herpes zoster infection among patients with immune-mediated diseases treated with JAK inhibitors. All other AEs were not increased among patients treated with JAK inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo A Olivera
- Gastroenterology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas (CEMIC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Juan S Lasa
- Gastroenterology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas (CEMIC), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Stefanos Bonovas
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvio Danese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- INSERM NGERE and Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, Lorraine University, Vandoeuvre-lés-Nancy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts (ESGICH) Consensus Document on the safety of targeted and biological therapies: an infectious diseases perspective (Soluble immune effector molecules [I]: anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents). Clin Microbiol Infect 2018; 24 Suppl 2:S10-S20. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2017] [Revised: 12/25/2017] [Accepted: 12/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
9
|
D'Angelo S, Carriero A, Gilio M, Ursini F, Leccese P, Palazzi C. Safety of treatment options for spondyloarthritis: a narrative review. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2018; 17:475-486. [PMID: 29505325 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2018.1448785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spondyloarthritis (SpA) are chronic inflammatory diseases with overlapping pathogenic mechanisms and clinical features. Treatment armamentarium against SpA includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs, including sulfasalazine, methotrexate, leflunomide, cyclosporine), targeted synthetic DMARDs (apremilast) and biological DMARDs (TNF inhibitors, anti-IL 12/23 and anti-IL-17 agents). AREAS COVERED A narrative review of published literature on safety profile of available SpA treatment options was performed. Readers will be provided with a comprehensive overview on frequent and rare adverse events associated with each drug listed in current SpA treatment recommendations. EXPERT OPINION The overall safety profile of such molecules is good and serious adverse events are rare but need to be promptly recognized and treated. However, the monitoring of adverse events is a major challenge for clinicians because it is not adequately addressed by current treatment recommendations. A tailored treatment is crucial and rheumatologists must accurately select patients in order to identify those more susceptible to develop adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore D'Angelo
- a Rheumatology Institute of Lucania (IReL) - Rheumatology Department of Lucania , San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera , Potenza , Italy.,b Basilicata Ricerca Biomedica (BRB) Foundation , Potenza , Italy
| | - Antonio Carriero
- a Rheumatology Institute of Lucania (IReL) - Rheumatology Department of Lucania , San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera , Potenza , Italy.,c Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences , University of Foggia , Foggia , Italy
| | - Michele Gilio
- a Rheumatology Institute of Lucania (IReL) - Rheumatology Department of Lucania , San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera , Potenza , Italy
| | - Francesco Ursini
- d Department of Health Sciences , University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia" , Catanzaro , Italy
| | - Pietro Leccese
- a Rheumatology Institute of Lucania (IReL) - Rheumatology Department of Lucania , San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera , Potenza , Italy
| | - Carlo Palazzi
- a Rheumatology Institute of Lucania (IReL) - Rheumatology Department of Lucania , San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera , Potenza , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Goodman SM, Springer B, Guyatt G, Abdel MP, Dasa V, George M, Gewurz-Singer O, Giles JT, Johnson B, Lee S, Mandl LA, Mont MA, Sculco P, Sporer S, Stryker L, Turgunbaev M, Brause B, Chen AF, Gililland J, Goodman M, Hurley-Rosenblatt A, Kirou K, Losina E, MacKenzie R, Michaud K, Mikuls T, Russell L, Sah A, Miller AS, Singh JA, Yates A. 2017 American College of Rheumatology/American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Guideline for the Perioperative Management of Antirheumatic Medication in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017. [PMID: 28629905 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This collaboration between the American College of Rheumatology and the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons developed an evidence-based guideline for the perioperative management of antirheumatic drug therapy for adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) including ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) undergoing elective total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS A panel of rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons specializing in hip and knee arthroplasty, and methodologists was convened to construct the key clinical questions to be answered in the guideline. A multi-step systematic literature review was then conducted, from which evidence was synthesized for continuing versus withholding antirheumatic drug therapy and for optimal glucocorticoid management in the perioperative period. A Patient Panel was convened to determine patient values and preferences, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations, using a group consensus process through a convened Voting Panel of rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons. The strength of the recommendation reflects the degree of certainty that benefits outweigh harms of the intervention, or vice versa, considering the quality of available evidence and the variability in patient values and preferences. RESULTS The guideline addresses the perioperative use of antirheumatic drug therapy including traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, biologic agents, tofacitinib, and glucocorticoids in adults with RA, SpA, JIA, or SLE who are undergoing elective THA or TKA. It provides recommendations regarding when to continue, when to withhold, and when to restart these medications, and the optimal perioperative dosing of glucocorticoids. The guideline includes 7 recommendations, all of which are conditional and based on low- or moderate-quality evidence. CONCLUSION This guideline should help decision-making by clinicians and patients regarding perioperative antirheumatic medication management at the time of elective THA or TKA. These conditional recommendations reflect the paucity of high-quality direct randomized controlled trial data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Goodman
- Susan M. Goodman, MD, Lisa A. Mandl, MD, MPH, Peter Sculco, MD, Barry Brause, MD, Kyriakos Kirou, MD, Ronald MacKenzie, MD, Linda Russell, MD: Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
| | - Bryan Springer
- Bryan Springer, MD: OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Gordon Guyatt
- Gordon Guyatt, MD: McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Vinod Dasa
- Vinod Dasa, MD: Louisiana State University, New Orleans
| | - Michael George
- Michael George, MD: University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | | | - Jon T Giles
- Jon T. Giles, MD, MPH: Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Beverly Johnson
- Beverly Johnson, MD: Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Steve Lee
- Steve Lee, DO: Kaiser Permanente, Fontana, California
| | - Lisa A Mandl
- Susan M. Goodman, MD, Lisa A. Mandl, MD, MPH, Peter Sculco, MD, Barry Brause, MD, Kyriakos Kirou, MD, Ronald MacKenzie, MD, Linda Russell, MD: Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Peter Sculco
- Susan M. Goodman, MD, Lisa A. Mandl, MD, MPH, Peter Sculco, MD, Barry Brause, MD, Kyriakos Kirou, MD, Ronald MacKenzie, MD, Linda Russell, MD: Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Scott Sporer
- Scott Sporer, MD: Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Louis Stryker
- Louis Stryker, MD: University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
| | - Marat Turgunbaev
- Marat Turgunbaev, MD, MPH, Amy S. Miller: American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Barry Brause
- Susan M. Goodman, MD, Lisa A. Mandl, MD, MPH, Peter Sculco, MD, Barry Brause, MD, Kyriakos Kirou, MD, Ronald MacKenzie, MD, Linda Russell, MD: Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Antonia F Chen
- Antonia F. Chen, MD, MBA: Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Mark Goodman
- Mark Goodman, MD, Adolph Yates, MD: University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Kyriakos Kirou
- Susan M. Goodman, MD, Lisa A. Mandl, MD, MPH, Peter Sculco, MD, Barry Brause, MD, Kyriakos Kirou, MD, Ronald MacKenzie, MD, Linda Russell, MD: Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Elena Losina
- Elena Losina, PhD: Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ronald MacKenzie
- Susan M. Goodman, MD, Lisa A. Mandl, MD, MPH, Peter Sculco, MD, Barry Brause, MD, Kyriakos Kirou, MD, Ronald MacKenzie, MD, Linda Russell, MD: Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Kaleb Michaud
- Kaleb Michaud, PhD: National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas and University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
| | - Ted Mikuls
- Ted Mikuls, MD, MSPH: University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
| | - Linda Russell
- Susan M. Goodman, MD, Lisa A. Mandl, MD, MPH, Peter Sculco, MD, Barry Brause, MD, Kyriakos Kirou, MD, Ronald MacKenzie, MD, Linda Russell, MD: Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Alexander Sah
- Alexander Sah, MD: Dearborn-Sah Institute for Joint Restoration, Fremont, California
| | - Amy S Miller
- Marat Turgunbaev, MD, MPH, Amy S. Miller: American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Adolph Yates
- Mark Goodman, MD, Adolph Yates, MD: University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Goodman SM, Springer B, Guyatt G, Abdel MP, Dasa V, George M, Gewurz-Singer O, Giles JT, Johnson B, Lee S, Mandl LA, Mont MA, Sculco P, Sporer S, Stryker L, Turgunbaev M, Brause B, Chen AF, Gililland J, Goodman M, Hurley-Rosenblatt A, Kirou K, Losina E, MacKenzie R, Michaud K, Mikuls T, Russell L, Sah A, Miller AS, Singh JA, Yates A. 2017 American College of Rheumatology/American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Guideline for the Perioperative Management of Antirheumatic Medication in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheumatol 2017. [PMID: 28620948 DOI: 10.1002/art.40149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This collaboration between the American College of Rheumatology and the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons developed an evidence-based guideline for the perioperative management of antirheumatic drug therapy for adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) including ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) undergoing elective total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS A panel of rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons specializing in hip and knee arthroplasty, and methodologists was convened to construct the key clinical questions to be answered in the guideline. A multi-step systematic literature review was then conducted, from which evidence was synthesized for continuing versus withholding antirheumatic drug therapy and for optimal glucocorticoid management in the perioperative period. A Patient Panel was convened to determine patient values and preferences, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations, using a group consensus process through a convened Voting Panel of rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons. The strength of the recommendation reflects the degree of certainty that benefits outweigh harms of the intervention, or vice versa, considering the quality of available evidence and the variability in patient values and preferences. RESULTS The guideline addresses the perioperative use of antirheumatic drug therapy including traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, biologic agents, tofacitinib, and glucocorticoids in adults with RA, SpA, JIA, or SLE who are undergoing elective THA or TKA. It provides recommendations regarding when to continue, when to withhold, and when to restart these medications, and the optimal perioperative dosing of glucocorticoids. The guideline includes 7 recommendations, all of which are conditional and based on low- or moderate-quality evidence. CONCLUSION This guideline should help decision-making by clinicians and patients regarding perioperative antirheumatic medication management at the time of elective THA or TKA. These conditional recommendations reflect the paucity of high-quality direct randomized controlled trial data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Goodman
- Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Bryan Springer
- OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Steve Lee
- Kaiser Permanente, Fontana, California
| | - Lisa A Mandl
- Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Peter Sculco
- Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Barry Brause
- Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Antonia F Chen
- Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Mark Goodman
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Kyriakos Kirou
- Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Elena Losina
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ronald MacKenzie
- Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Kaleb Michaud
- National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas, and University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
| | - Ted Mikuls
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha
| | - Linda Russell
- Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Alexander Sah
- Dearborn-Sah Institute for Joint Restoration, Fremont, California
| | - Amy S Miller
- American College of Rheumatology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Adolph Yates
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Goodman SM, Springer B, Guyatt G, Abdel MP, Dasa V, George M, Gewurz‐Singer O, Giles JT, Johnson B, Lee S, Mandl LA, Mont MA, Sculco P, Sporer S, Stryker L, Turgunbaev M, Brause B, Chen AF, Gililland J, Goodman M, Hurley‐Rosenblatt A, Kirou K, Losina E, MacKenzie R, Michaud K, Mikuls T, Russell L, Sah A, Miller AS, Singh JA, Yates A. 2017 American College of Rheumatology/American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Guideline for the Perioperative Management of Antirheumatic Medication in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/acr.23274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M. Goodman
- Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell MedicineNew York New York
| | - Bryan Springer
- OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee CenterCharlotte North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lisa A. Mandl
- Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell MedicineNew York New York
| | | | - Peter Sculco
- Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell MedicineNew York New York
| | | | | | | | - Barry Brause
- Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell MedicineNew York New York
| | - Antonia F. Chen
- Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University HospitalPhiladelphia Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | - Kyriakos Kirou
- Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell MedicineNew York New York
| | - Elena Losina
- Brigham and Women's HospitalBoston Massachusetts
| | - Ronald MacKenzie
- Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell MedicineNew York New York
| | - Kaleb Michaud
- National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas and University of Nebraska Medical CenterOmaha
| | - Ted Mikuls
- University of Nebraska Medical CenterOmaha
| | - Linda Russell
- Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell MedicineNew York New York
| | - Alexander Sah
- Dearborn‐Sah Institute for Joint RestorationFremont California
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Treatment with biologic agents, in particular tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors, is associated with an increased risk of tuberculosis (TB), and screening and treatment for latent TB infection (LTBI) in patients undergoing such treatment is therefore indicated. The risk of TB associated with different biologics varies significantly, with the highest relative risks, 29.3 and 18.6, associated with adalimumab and infliximab, respectively. The risk of TB with newer TNF-α inhibitors and other biologics appears to be lower. Performance of LTBI screening tests is affected by immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and immunosuppressive therapy in patients due to commence TNF-α inhibitor treatment. Interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) have a higher specificity than the tuberculin skin test (TST) in patients with Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccination and have probably a better sensitivity than TST in immunosuppressed patients. LTBI screening programs prior to commencement of anti-TNF-α treatment significantly reduce the incidence of TB, but the optimal screening algorithm, in particular the question of whether a combination of IGRA and TST or a single test only should be used, is a matter of ongoing debate. Use of TST in combination with IGRA is justified to increase sensitivity. Repeat testing for LTBI should be limited to patients at increased risk of TB. If TB develops during anti-TNF-α treatment, it is more likely to be disseminated and extrapulmonary than are other TB cases. Discontinuation of anti-TNF-α treatment in patients diagnosed with TB is associated with an increased risk of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, which is probably best managed by reintroduction of anti-TNF-α treatment.
Collapse
|