Association Between Intravitreal Aflibercept and Serious Non-ocular Haemorrhage Compared with Intravitreal Ranibizumab: A Multicentre Observational Cohort Study

Real-World Research on Retinal Diseases Using Health Claims Database: A Narrative Review

Real-world data (RWD) has emerged as a crucial component in understanding and improving patient outcomes across various medical conditions, including retinal diseases. Health claims databases, generated from healthcare reimbursement claims, offer a comprehensive source of RWD, providing insights into patient outcomes, healthcare utilization, and treatment effectiveness. However, the use of these databases for research also presents unique challenges. This narrative review explores the role of real-world research on retinal diseases using health claims databases, highlighting their advantages, limitations, and potential contributions to advancing our understanding and management of the diseases. The review examines the applications of health claims databases in retinal disease research, including epidemiological studies, comparative effectiveness and safety analyses, economic burden assessments, and evaluations of patient outcomes and quality of care. Previous findings demonstrate the value of these databases in generating prevalence and incidence estimates, identifying risk factors and predictors, evaluating treatment effectiveness and safety, and understanding healthcare utilization patterns and costs associated with retinal diseases. Despite their strengths, health claims databases face challenges related to data limitations, biases, privacy concerns, and methodological issues. Accordingly, the review also explores future directions and opportunities, including advancements in data collection and analysis, integration with electronic health records, collaborative research networks and consortia, and the evolving regulatory landscape. These developments are expected to enhance the utility of health claims databases for retinal disease research, resulting in more comprehensive and impactful findings across diverse retinal disorders and robust real-world insights from a large population.

Thrombotic and bleeding risk of angiogenesis inhibitors in patients with and without malignancy

Over the past two decades, therapies targeting angiogenesis have developed into a major class of cancer therapeutics. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family of signaling proteins, a group of potent angiogenic growth factors, and their receptors represent the main targets of this therapeutic class. To date, 16 antiangiogenic agents have been approved in the United States for the treatment of cancer and several more are in development. An important consideration with antiangiogenic therapy is toxicity, in particular thrombotic and bleeding risks. These complications have emerged as a major clinical concern that may affect the use of these agents in patients both with and without cancer who may already have an elevated risk of thrombosis and bleeding. Although these agents are frequently considered together as a class when contemplating their bleeding and thrombotic risks, in fact the risks for venous thromboembolism, arterial thrombosis, and bleeding vary significantly between different classes of antiangiogenic agents and even among different agents within a class. In this narrative review, we describe the literature investigating the venous and arterial thrombotic and bleeding risks associated with the currently available antiangiogenic drugs. In addition, we discuss these specific complications in the context of both cancer therapy as well as the management of nonmalignant disorders now managed with antiangiogenic agents, including hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Assessing intravitreal anti-VEGF drug safety using real-world data: methodological challenges in observational research

INTRODUCTION

It is generally acknowledged that the ocular safety profile of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs is acceptable, while the burden of systemic safety of these intravitreal agents is still being debated. The evaluation of the systemic safety of these drugs using real-world data (RWD), such as spontaneous reporting systems (SRS), electronic medical records (EMRs) and claims databases has several advantages, including the capture of outcomes among real-world populations over long observation periods. Nevertheless, there is a relatively small body of research exploring the post-marketing safety of these drugs.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this scoping review is to outline and discuss some of the methodological challenges to be faced when investigating the systemic safety of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs using different sources of RWD.

EXPERT OPINION

Such challenges include the selection of the most suitable data source, taking into account how well drug utilization is captured and whether the outcomes and covariates of interest can be captured. The strengths and limitations of some analytic methods that can be used to quantify risk, such as the intention-to-treat approach and the as-treated approach, complement each other, and using these together provides a more balanced analysis.