Signal Detection and Methodological Limitations in a Real-World Registry: Learnings from the Evaluation of Long-Term Safety Analyses in PSOLAR

Analysis of Predefined Safety Events Across Spesolimab Trials in Dermatological and Non-Dermatological Conditions

INTRODUCTION

Spesolimab, a selective, humanised monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-36 receptor, is approved for the treatment of generalised pustular psoriasis (GPP). As a result of the limited patient numbers in GPP trials of spesolimab, analysing safety events across dermatological and non-dermatological diseases helps to further characterise the known safety profile of spesolimab. Here, we analyse predefined safety events from nine randomised, placebo-controlled spesolimab trials across dermatological (including GPP) and gastrointestinal conditions.

METHODS

Predefined safety events were based on the known safety profile of spesolimab across all diseases investigated to date and potential risks of biological therapeutics, and included serious/severe/opportunistic infections, hypersensitivity, malignancies and peripheral neuropathy.

RESULTS

Including placebo-controlled trials and open-label periods/trials, 589 patients received ≥ 1 dose of spesolimab (772.2 patient-years; mean exposure 1.31 patient-years). Overall, 452 patients had long-term exposure (≥ 6 months) to spesolimab, with 31 patients up to ≥ 3 years. In placebo-controlled periods, 445 patients had exposure to spesolimab (162.0 patient-years; mean exposure 0.36 patient-years). Severe/serious/opportunistic infections occurred in 0-3.2% of spesolimab-treated patients and 0-14.3% of placebo-treated patients. Malignancies occurred infrequently across trials (0-6.7% in spesolimab, 0-2.3% in placebo). Peripheral neuropathy events also occurred infrequently, with single events reported in the placebo arm of EFFISAYIL® 2, and the spesolimab and placebo arms of palmoplantar pustulosis Study 2. Potential hypersensitivity events occurred in all trials, except for Crohn's disease, and were largely balanced between spesolimab (7.7-33.3%) and placebo (4.3-44.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Across placebo-controlled periods of spesolimab trials in dermatological and non-dermatological conditions, severe/serious/opportunistic infections, malignancies and peripheral neuropathy events were low, with no evidence for an increased risk with spesolimab versus placebo. Potential hypersensitivity events were similar between spesolimab and placebo. These results support the favourable safety profile of spesolimab observed in EFFISAYIL® 2, the largest GPP trial conducted to date.

A Systematic Overview of Contraindications and Special Warnings for Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: Establishing a Framework to Create a "Safety Checklist"

BACKGROUND/AIM

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the contraindications, special warnings, and boxed warnings with the aim to establish a framework to create a prescription safety checklist for a class of drugs or disease indication. This study covers biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs).

METHODS

We identified contraindications, boxed warnings, and special warnings provided by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The study included b/tsDMARDs approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) within the drug-classes anti-CD20, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin-1 inhibitors (IL-1i), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA) 4, interleukin-12/23 inhibitors (IL-12/23i), interleukin 6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ri), Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors (PDE4i), interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), and interleukin-23 inhibitors (IL-23i).

RESULTS

All drug classes, except PDE4i, had contraindications and/or warnings related to infections, including tuberculosis. A warning about herpes zoster was listed for anti-CD20, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, and JAKi, while a warning about hepatitis reactivation was listed for anti-CD20, TNFi, IL-1i, CTLA4-Ig, IL-6Ri, and JAKi. Malignancy risk was mentioned for all drug classes except PDE4i, IL-17i, and IL-23i. Other warnings included demyelinating disease (TNFi, CTLA4-Ig, and IL-6Ri), heart failure (anti-CD20 and TNFi), major adverse cardiac events (JAKi and IL-12/23) and venous thromboembolism (JAKi), hyperlipidemia (IL-6Ri and JAKi), liver impairment (TNFi, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, and JAKi), kidney impairment (IL-1i, JAKi, and PDE4i), inflammatory bowel disease (IL-17i), gastrointestinal perforation (IL-6Ri, JAKi), cytopenia (anti-CD20, TNFi, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, JAKi), and depression (PDE4i). Contraindications and warnings appeared to increase with the passage of time since the drug's approval.

CONCLUSION

This review provides an overview to establish the framework to create an easily accessible and actionable prescription safety checklist from individual medical product prescription information provided by regulatory medical authorities.

Treatment-emergent Candida infections in patients with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis treated with ixekizumab: an integrated safety analysis of 25 clinical studies

BACKGROUND

This safety analysis investigates treatment-emergent mucosal/cutaneous Candida infections in patients treated with ixekizumab (IXE), an anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, across the approved indications: psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Safety data were pooled from 25 clinical studies. Incidence rates (IRs) are expressed as per 100 patient-years (PY), using the entire duration of exposure.

RESULTS

Candida infections had an IR of 1.9 per 100 PY in patients with PsO (N = 6892; total PY = 18025.7), 2.0 per 100 PY in patients with PsA (N = 1401; total PY = 2247.7), and 1.2 per 100 PY in patients with axSpA (N = 932; total PY = 2097.7). The majority of treatment-emergent Candida infections were: (i) experienced only once by patients (IR = 1.3;IR = 1.6;IR = 1.0), (ii) mild/moderate in severity (IR = 0.8/0.9;IR = 1.5/0.4;IR = 0.8/0.5) as opposed to severe (IR = 0.0; IR = 0.0; IR = 0.0), (iii) oral Candida or genital Candida (IR = 0.9/0.6;IR = 1.0/0.7;IR = 0.4/0.6), (iv) marked as recovered/resolved during the studies (89.3%;93.8%;90.3%), (v) not leading to IXE discontinuation (0.0%;0.0%;0.1% discontinued), (vi) managed with topical (34.7%;22.2%;11.5%) or no anti-fungal medications (63.5%;77.8%;80.8%) as opposed to systemic therapies (1.5%;0.0%;7.7%), (vii) typically resolved before next visit.

CONCLUSIONS

This integrated safety analysis shows that the risk of developing Candida infections is low with IXE, and the severity is mild-to-moderate in most instances across the approved IXE indications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

A comprehensive list of the clinical trials and their registration numbers is reported in Table S1 of the supplemental material.

GRAPPA Debate: Targeted Small Molecules Versus Biologics as First-Line Systemic Therapy After Conventional Therapy for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis

In this debate at the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2023 annual meeting, arguments were made contrasting the first-line use of oral targeted small-molecule drugs vs biologic therapy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) after failure of conventional therapy. Arguments in favor of small-molecule drugs included good efficacy and safety, patient preference, cost savings, global health equity, and environmental stewardship. Arguments in favor of biologics included superior efficacy, excellent safety, availability of long-term data, pediatric regulatory approvals, and potential benefit for comorbidities. By the end of the debate, there was recognition of significant pros and cons of each approach. Both small-molecule drugs and biologic therapy are valuable options for PsO treatment, and their use can be tailored toward specific individuals or healthcare systems.

Choosing the right biologic treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: the impact of comorbidities

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease often associated with several comorbidities, such as psoriatic arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, diabetes mellitus or cardiovascular diseases, infections, or cancer, among others. With the progressive aging of the population, a growing number of patients with psoriasis can be expected to present multiple comorbidities. Currently, there is a wide range of biological treatments available for moderate to severe psoriasis, including tumor necrosis alpha (TNF) inhibitors, IL12/23 inhibitor, IL17 inhibitors, and IL23 inhibitors.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to describe the specific characteristics of these drugs in relation to psoriasis comorbidities, in order to facilitate decision-making in clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

Some of the biological treatments can influence comorbidities, in some cases even improving them. Therefore, comorbidities are a key factor when deciding on one biological treatment over another. The development of new drugs is expanding the therapeutic arsenal for psoriasis. A high level of expertise in the field with a detailed knowledge of the characteristics of every drug is imperative to provide personalized medicine.

Long-term safety of Ixekizumab in adults with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or axial spondyloarthritis: a post-hoc analysis of final safety data from 25 randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

We report long-term, end-of-study program safety outcomes from 25 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in adult patients with psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) [including ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA)] who received ≥ 1 dose of Ixekizumab (IXE) over 5 years (PsO) or up to 3 years (PsA, axSpA).

METHODS

This integrated safety analysis consists of data from patients who received any dose of IXE, across 25 RCTs (17 PsO, 4 PsA, 4 axSpA). Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs) and selected adverse events (AEs) of interest were analyzed for all pooled studies by years of therapy and overall, through March 2022. Results were reported as exposure-adjusted incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years (PY) overall and at successive year intervals.

RESULTS

Six thousand eight hundred ninety two adult patients with PsO, 1401 with PsA, and 932 with axSpA (including AS and nr-axSpA), with a cumulative IXE exposure of 22,371.1 PY were included. The most commonly reported TEAE across indications was nasopharyngitis (IRs per 100 PY: 8.8 (PsO), 9.0 (PsA), 8.4 (axSpA)). SAEs were reported by 969 patients with PsO (IR 5.4), 134 patients with PsA (IR 6.0), and 101 patients with axSpA (IR 4.8). Forty-five deaths were reported (PsO, n = 36, IR 0.2; PsA, n = 6, IR 0.3; axSpA, n = 3, IR 0.1). TEAEs did not increase during IXE exposure: IRs per 100 PY, PsO: 88.9 to 63.2 (year 0-1 to 4-5), PsA: 87 to 67.3 (year 0-1 to 2-3), axSpA: 82.1 to 55.4 (year 0-1 to >  = 2). IRs per 100 PY of discontinuation from IXE due to AE were 2.9 (PsO), 5.1 (PsA), and 3.1 (axSpA). IRs per 100 PY of injection site reactions were 5.9 (PsO), 11.6 (PsA) and 7.4 (axSpA); Candida: 1.9 (PsO), 2.0 (PsA), and 1.2 (axSpA); depression, major adverse cerebro-cardiovascular events and malignancies: ≤ 1.6 across all indications. Adjudicated IRs per 100 PY of inflammatory bowel disease were ≤ 0.8 across indications (0.1 [PsO]; 0.1 [PsA]; 0.8 [axSpA]).

CONCLUSIONS

In this integrated safety analysis, consisting of over 22,000 PY of exposure, the long-term safety profile of IXE was found to be consistent with previous, earlier reports, with no new safety signals identified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT registration numbers for RCTs included in this integrated analysis can be found in Additional File 1.

Detection of novel drug-adverse drug reaction signals in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: analysis of Korean real-world biologics registry data

This study aimed to detect signals of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and targeted therapies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. Utilizing the KOrean College of Rheumatology BIOlogics & Targeted Therapy Registry (KOBIO) data, we calculated relative risks, excluded previously reported drug-ADR pairs, and externally validated remaining pairs using US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and single centre's electronic health records (EHR) data. Analyzing data from 2279 RA and 1940 AS patients, we identified 35 significant drug-ADR pairs in RA and 26 in AS, previously unreported in drug labels. Among the novel drug-ADR pairs from KOBIO, 15 were also significant in the FAERS data. Additionally, 2 significant drug-laboratory abnormality pairs were found in RA using CDM MetaLAB analysis. Our findings contribute to the identification of 14 novel drug-ADR signals, expanding our understanding of potential adverse effects related to biological DMARDs and targeted therapies in RA and AS. These results emphasize the importance of ongoing pharmacovigilance for patient safety and optimal therapeutic interventions.

Role of ustekinumab in treatment of ulcerative colitis: a narrative review

The therapeutic armamentarium for gastroenterologists in treating ulcerative colitis (UC) has been rapidly growing since the introduction of monoclonal antibodies directed against anti-TNFs. Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody binding the shared p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23, and the inhibition of these two cytokines, implicated in host response to microbial pathogens, has demonstrated clinical efficacy in different immune-mediated diseases, including moderate-to-severe UC. This narrative review summarizes the newest clinical evidence regarding the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in moderate-to-severe UC, including specific situations (pregnancy, breastfeeding, elderly/pediatric populations, extraintestinal manifestations, acute severe UC, pouchitis and dual biological therapy). Finally, positioning is discussed in light of the existing evidence.