Individual Case Safety Report Replication: An Analysis of Case Reporting Transmission Networks

The evolving role of disproportionality analysis in pharmacovigilance

INTRODUCTION

From 2009 to 2015, the IMI PROTECT conducted rigorous studies addressing questions about optimal implementation and significance of disproportionality analyses, leading to the development of Good Signal Detection Practices. The ensuing period witnessed the independent exploration of research paths proposed by IMI PROTECT, accumulating valuable experience and insights that have yet to be seamlessly integrated.

AREAS COVERED

This state-of-the-art review integrates IMI PROTECT recommendations with recent acquisitions and evolving challenges. It deals with defining the object of study, disproportionality methods, subgrouping, masking, drug-drug interaction, duplication, expectedness, the debated use of disproportionality results as risk measures, integration with other types of data.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the ongoing skepticism regarding the usefulness of disproportionality analyses and individual case safety reports, their ability to timely detect safety signals regarding rare and unpredictable adverse reactions remains unparalleled. Moreover, recent exploration into their potential for characterizing safety signals revealed valuable insights concerning potential risk factors and the patient's perspective. To fully realize their potential beyond hypothesis generation and achieve a comprehensive evidence synthesis with other kinds of data and studies, each with their unique limitations and contributions, we need to investigate methods for more transparently communicating disproportionality results and mapping and addressing pharmacovigilance biases.

Misuse, Abuse and Medication Errors' Adverse Events Associated with Opioids-A Systematic Review

Opioids are the strongest analgesics available and are crucial in the treatment of acute and chronic pain. The line between these critical medications and how they are used beyond standard therapeutics in cases such as abuse, misuse, and medication errors needs to be understood, as it affects their safety, efficacy, and manner of use. The aim of this systematic review was to identify what is known about the adverse events resulting from the abuse, misuse, and medication errors associated with opioid use. A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed®, Scopus® and, EBSCO® databases to retrieve studies from the inception to December 2023 reporting abuse, misuse, and medication errors associated with medicinal opioid use. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts and full text according to eligibility using Covidence® software. Full articles were examined by two independent reviewers, and disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. The risk of bias was assessed by the JBI's critical appraisal tools. A total of 934 articles were screened by their title and abstract. Then, 151 articles were selected for full text screening. Of these, 34 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. The included studies varied significantly in their population sizes, ranging from 9 individuals to 298,433 patients, and encompassed a diverse demographic, including all ages and both sexes. The studies consistently reported a range of adverse events associated with opioid use. Fentanyl, morphine, oxycodone, tramadol, and hydrocodone were frequently implicated. The data heterogeneity in this field resulted in challenges in drawing conclusions. The review highlights that some opioids, particularly fentanyl, morphine, and oxycodone, are frequently associated with preventable adverse drug reactions, abuse, and medication errors, underscoring the need for robust preventative measures and ongoing research to mitigate opioid-related harm.

Navigating duplication in pharmacovigilance databases: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Pharmacovigilance databases play a critical role in monitoring drug safety. The duplication of reports in pharmacovigilance databases, however, undermines their data integrity. This scoping review sought to provide a comprehensive understanding of duplication in pharmacovigilance databases worldwide.

DESIGN

A scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

Reviewers comprehensively searched the literature in PubMed, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar and other relevant websites.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Peer-reviewed publications and grey literature, without language restriction, describing duplication and/or methods relevant to duplication in pharmacovigilance databases from inception to 1 September 2023.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

We used the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews and conformed with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts. One reviewer extracted the data and performed descriptive analysis, which the second reviewer assessed. Disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus or in consultation with a third reviewer.

RESULTS

We screened 22 745 unique titles and 156 were eligible for full-text review. Of the 156 titles, 58 (47 peer-reviewed; 11 grey literature) fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the scoping review. Included titles addressed the extent (5 papers), prevention strategies (15 papers), causes (32 papers), detection methods (25 papers), management strategies (24 papers) and implications (14 papers) of duplication in pharmacovigilance databases. The papers overlapped, discussing more than one field. Advances in artificial intelligence, particularly natural language processing, hold promise in enhancing the efficiency and precision of deduplication of large and complex pharmacovigilance databases.

CONCLUSION

Duplication in pharmacovigilance databases compromises risk assessment and decision-making, potentially threatening patient safety. Therefore, efficient duplicate prevention, detection and management are essential for more reliable pharmacovigilance data. To minimise duplication, consistent use of worldwide unique identifiers as the key case identifiers is recommended alongside recent advances in artificial intelligence.

Harmonization of individual case safety reports transmission requirements among PAHO reference authorities: a review of their current regulation

To perform optimal monitoring of the safety profile in the postmarketing phase, Marketing Authorization Holders and National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) must evaluate the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that occurred and characterize their nature, frequency, and severity. Management is possible through Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs), which are the reports of organized and processed data. Globally, the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) E2B guideline suggests harmonized activities for the ICSR electronic content and transmission. In America, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) is the agency responsible to implement cooperation among its members, which are recognized as National Regulatory Authorities of Reference (NRARs) such as Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Mexico, and the United States. PAHO published the 'Good Pharmacovigilance Practices for the Americas' suggesting improvement and harmonization in the region. After reviewing the regulatory framework, it is assumed that all NRARs have a regulated ICSR transmission system (i.e. a systematic vigilance system for collecting, analyzing, and disseminating information from ADRs). However, significant differences exist, such as the requirement for social media vigilance, expedited and non-expedited ICSRs, coding, severity, and transmission. The volume of ICSRs has significantly increased, due to using electronic standards managed by the NRAs, which facilitates early identification of new ADRs, allowing the implementation of novel minimization activities, contributing to the continuous assessment of the benefit-risk balance of medicines. Nevertheless, there is still area for improvement, especially in Latin America.

Pharmacovigilance Agreements: Negotiating Safety Data Exchange Timelines: To Agree to Disagree? That is the Question

Pharmaceutical companies often enter into contractual arrangements with other companies to advance the development or expand patient access of licensed medicines. These partnerships include specific agreements detailing the exchange of safety-related data between the companies. Such agreements are used to fulfil regulatory reporting obligations, thereby ensuring timely awareness of potential safety considerations and formal maintenance of clinical trial applications and marketing authorisations. The authors conducted potentially the first benchmarking survey of contracts covering safety data exchange within the pharmaceutical industry. Data were analysed to establish the most common types of safety data exchanged, and the associated data exchange timelines. These data may provide an opportunity for companies to assess how their own timelines compare with others, and to consider whether there are actions they may take that could potentially improve negotiation and procedural efficiency. Ninety percent of the recipients responded to the survey, providing information from 378 individual contracts which included data from clinical trials and from postmarketing sources. Results showed less variability in the safety data exchange timelines of clinical trial ICSRs compared to the timelines of postmarketing ICSRs; these results may reflect greater harmonisation of regulatory reporting requirements for clinical trials. The variability captured in the benchmarking data reflects the challenges that contribute to the complexity of safety data exchange agreements between partner companies. The goal of the survey was to serve as a basis for future research and pursuit of additional insights that foster transparency. The aim was also to encourage the consideration of alternative approaches to address some of the challenges that we identified. Use of technology could facilitate the process of recording, tracking, and monitoring of safety data exchange within a partnership, improve efficiency through real time monitoring, and provide further insights. A proactive approach to developing agreements is essential for improved patient access and to maintain patient safety.