Sucroferric oxyhydroxide: a review in hyperphosphataemia in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing dialysis

Interaction and mechanisms in the phosphate-binding of iron(oxyhydr)oxide core-shell nanoparticles

HYPOTHESIS

The high binding affinity of iron(oxyhydr)oxides for phosphate has recently been used in medicine to treat hyperphosphatemia, an abnormally elevated phosphate concentration in the blood. For iron(oxyhydr)oxide nanoparticles, the composition of the organic shell has a more significant influence on their interaction with phosphate than is often assumed. This study shows different mechanisms in phosphate binding, using the example of two similar new phosphate-binding agents.

EXPERIMENTS

We characterized the phosphate-binding behavior of two iron(oxyhydr)oxide-based nanomaterials with similar composition and particle properties and investigated their binding mechanisms by spectroscopic methods.

FINDINGS

For the often prescribed Velphoro, we demonstrated a phosphate binding capacity of>210 mg/g. A similar active ingredient named C-PAM binds over 573 mg/g. Spectroscopic measurements highlighted differences in the binding mechanism. While Velphoro binds phosphate via surface complexation independent of pH and adsorbent concentration, C-PAM shows a strong concentration dependence. At low concentrations, phosphate is bound via complexation reactions. The iron(oxyhydr)oxide structure was dissolved at higher phosphate concentrations and formed various iron phosphate species. The substances behave differently upon interaction with phosphate, although being very similar in composition and crystal structure. Thus, we demonstrated a crucial influence of the ligands in the shell on the binding mechanism.

Serum Phosphorus and Pill Burden Among Hemodialysis Patients Prescribed Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide: One-Year Follow-Up on a Contemporary Cohort

Purpose

In prior analyses of real-world cohorts of hemodialysis patients switched from one phosphate binder (PB) to sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO), SO therapy has been associated with improvements in serum phosphorus (sP) and reductions in daily PB pill burden. To characterize how SO initiation patterns have changed over time, we examined the long-term effectiveness of SO in a contemporary (2018–2019) cohort.

Patients and Methods

Adult Fresenius Kidney Care hemodialysis patients first prescribed SO monotherapy as part of routine care between May 2018 and May 2019 (N = 1792) were followed for 1 year. All patients received a non-SO PB during a 91-day baseline period before SO prescription. Mean PB pills/day and laboratory parameters were compared before and during SO treatment. Results were divided into consecutive 91-day intervals (Q1–Q4) and analyzed using linear mixed-effects regression and Cochran’s Q test. These results were contrasted with findings from a historical (2014–2015) cohort (N = 530).

Results

The proportion of patients achieving sP ≤5.5 mg/dl increased after switching to SO (from 27.0% at baseline to 37.8%, 45.1%, 44.7%, and 44.0% at Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4, respectively; P < 0.0001 for all). The mean daily PB pill burden decreased from a baseline of 7.7 to 4.4, 4.6, 4.8, and 4.9, respectively, across quarters (P < 0.0001 for all). Patients in the contemporary cohort had improved sP control (27.0% achieving sP ≤5.5 mg/dl vs 17.7%) and lower daily PB pill burden (mean 7.7 vs 8.5 pills/day) at baseline than those in the historical cohort. Overall use of active vitamin D was similar between cohorts, although higher use of oral active vitamin D (63.9% vs 15.7%) and lower use of IV active vitamin D lower (23.4% vs 74.2%) was observed in the contemporary cohort.

Conclusion

Despite evolving treatment patterns, switching to SO resulted in improved sP control with fewer pills per day in this contemporary hemodialysis cohort.

Using iron-based phosphate binders in phosphate reduction and anemia improvement in patients receiving dialysis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

A study was conducted to determine whether iron-based phosphate binders (IBPBs) need to be preferred for hyperphosphatemia and anemia management in patients on dialysis.

METHODS

For this meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of IBPBs in decreasing phosphate and correcting anemia in dialysis patients.

RESULTS

Nineteen trials comprising 4719 participants were included. Compared with placebo, serum phosphate decreased significantly after treatment with ferric citrate (FC), fermagate (one study), and SBR759 (one study). Hemoglobin increased significantly after treatment with FC and sucroferric oxyhydroxide (PA21). In addition, FC and PA21 reduced serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and increased ferritin and transferrin saturation, but SBR759 did not. Compared with active treatment, the non-inferiority of IBPBs in reducing serum phosphate and iPTH was demonstrated. FC significantly improved serum hemoglobin and iron-related parameters and decreased the use of intravenous iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, whereas PA21 did not increase serum hemoglobin level. The incidences of infection and hospitalization were similar between the two groups, with FC having a higher risk of diarrhea than the placebo and active treatments.

CONCLUSION

FC was associated with the control of hyperphosphatemia and the improvement of anemia. However, PA21 did not show superiority for alleviating anemia compared with the active treatment. Other IBPBs, such as fermagate and SBR759, remained poorly understood due to the limited number of studies. Further trials are required to assess the effect of IBPBs on the risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality.

Phosphate binders for the treatment of chronic kidney disease: role of iron oxyhydroxide

Chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder is frequent in patients with renal failure. It is characterized by abnormalities in mineral and bone metabolism with resulting hyperphosphatemia, low serum vitamin D, secondary hyperparathyroidism, altered bone morphology and strength, higher risk of bone fractures, and development of vascular or other soft tissue calcifications. Besides the recommendation to reduce phosphorus dietary intake, many drugs are currently available for the treatment of calcium/phosphate imbalance. Among them, phosphate binders represent a milestone. Calcium-based binders (calcium carbonate, calcium acetate) are effective in lowering serum phosphate, but their use has been associated with an increased risk of hypercalcemia and calcifications. Calcium-free binders (sevelamer hydrochloride, sevelamer carbonate, and lanthanum carbonate) are equally or slightly less effective than calcium-containing compounds. They would not induce an increase in calcium levels but may have relevant side effects, including gastrointestinal symptoms for sevelamer and risk of tissue accumulation for lanthanum. Accordingly, new phosphate binders are under investigation and some of them have already been approved. A promising option is sucroferric oxyhydroxide (Velphoro(®), PA21), an iron-based phosphate binder consisting of a mixture of polynuclear iron(III)-oxyhydroxide, sucrose, and starches. The present review is focused on pharmacology, mode of action, and pharmacokinetics of sucroferric oxyhydroxide, with a discussion on comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability studies of this drug in chronic kidney disease and patient perspectives such as quality of life, satisfaction, and acceptability. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide has proven to be as effective as sevelamer in reducing phosphatemia with a similar safety profile and lower pill burden. Experimental and clinical studies have documented a minimal percentage of iron absorption without inducing toxicity. In conclusion, the overall benefit-risk balance of sucroferric oxyhydroxide is deemed to be positive, and this new drug may therefore represent a good alternative to traditional phosphate binders for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients.