Single-Dose Dalbavancin: A Review in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

Outpatient care concept and potential inpatient cost savings associated with the administration of dalbavancin - A real-world data and retrospective cost analysis

BACKGROUND

The treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) usually involves intravenous (i.v.) antibiotics requiring hospitalisation and increasing hospital costs. Since 2014, dalbavancin is approved for ABSSSIs treatment. However, evidence of its health economic impact on the German healthcare system is still limited.

METHODS

Diagnosis-related groups (DRG) based cost analysis was used to evaluate real-world data (RWD) from a German tertiary care center. All patients treated with i.v. antibiotics in the Department of Dermatology and Venereology at the University Hospital of Cologne were included to detect potential cost savings from a payer perspective. Thus, for the inpatient care German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) tariffs, length of stay (LOS), main- and secondary DRG-diagnoses and for the outpatient setting 'Einheitlicher Bewertungsmaßstab' (EBM) codes were evaluated.

RESULTS

This retrospective study identified 480 inpatient cases treated for ABSSSI between January 2016 until December 2020. Complete cost data were available for 433 cases and the detection of long-hospital-stay patients based on surcharges for exceeding the upper limit LOS led to 125 cases (29%) including 67 females (54%) and 58 males (46%) with an overall mean age of 63.6 years; all treated for International Classification of Diseases (ICD -10th revision) code A46 'erysipelas'. A sub-analysis focussed on DRG J64B with a total of 92 cases exceeding the upper limit LOS by a median of 3 days resulted in a median surcharge of €636 (mean value €749; SD €589; IQR €459-€785) per case. In comparison, we calculated outpatient treatment costs of approximately €55 per case. Thus, further treatment of these patients in an outpatient setting before exceeding the upper limit LOS might result in a cost-saving potential of approximately €581 per case.

CONCLUSION

Dalbavancin appears a cost-efficient option to reduce inpatient treatment costs by transitioning to an outpatient setting of patients with ABSSSI potentially exceeding the upper limit LOS.

Dalbavancin in clinical practice in Spain: a 2 year retrospective study

Objectives

Dalbavancin is approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) in adults. Its unique pharmacokinetic properties allow daily dosing to be avoided. The objective was to describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients treated with dalbavancin in Spain, and to evaluate its effectiveness and safety in real-world settings.

Patients and methods

This non-interventional, retrospective, observational and multicentre study included patients who received at least one dose between 2018 and 2019 in seven Spanish hospitals.

Results

In total, 187 patients were included. The most common comorbidities were cardiovascular disease (27.4%) and diabetes mellitus (23.5%). Dalbavancin was used to treat osteoarticular infections (28.3%), ABSSSIs (22.5%), cardiovascular infections (20.9%) and catheter-related infections (18.2%). The most prevalent pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (34.2%), CoNS (32.6%), and enterococci (12.8%). The main reason for use was early hospital discharge (65.8%). Most patients were treated with 1500 mg in a single dose (35.3%) and the median duration of treatment was 2 weeks. The treatment was clinically successful in 91.4% of cases. Six patients (3.2%) reported adverse events. Physicians agreed on the potential reduction of hospitalization days (85.3%). A subanalysis of patient characteristics and type of pathogen showed similar results in terms of efficacy and safety.

Conclusions

Dalbavancin seems to be effective and safe as second-line treatment in severe Gram-positive infections. It improves treatment adherence and allows outpatient management. Furthermore, the effectiveness and safety profile are maintained against diverse microorganisms in Gram-positive infections and regardless of the patients' comorbidities at baseline, or age.

Pathway with single-dose long-acting intravenous antibiotic reduces emergency department hospitalizations of patients with skin infections

OBJECTIVES

Emergency department (ED) patients with serious skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are often hospitalized to receive intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Appropriate patients may avoid admission following a single-dose, long-acting IV antibiotic.

METHODS

We conducted a preintervention versus postintervention design trial at 11 U.S. EDs comparing hospitalization rates under usual care to those using a clinical pathway that included a single IV dalbavancin dose. We enrolled adults with cellulitis, abscess, or wound infection with an infected area of ≥75 cm² without other indications for hospitalization. Clinical pathway participants discharged from the ED received a 24-hour follow-up telephone call and had a 48- to 72-hour in-person visit. We hypothesized that, compared to usual care, the clinical pathway would result in a significant reduction in the initial hospitalization rate.

RESULTS

Of 156 and 153 participants in usual care and clinical pathway periods, median infection areas were 255.0 (interquartile range [IQR] = 150.0 to 500.0) cm² and 289.0 (IQR = 161.3 to 555.0) cm² , respectively. During their initial care, 60 (38.5%) usual care participants were hospitalized and 27 (17.6%) pathway participants were hospitalized (difference = 20.8 percentage points [PP], 95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.4 to 31.2 PP). Over 44 days, 70 (44.9%) usual care and 44 (28.8%) pathway participants were hospitalized (difference = 16.1 PP, 95% CI = 4.9 to 27.4 PP).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an ED SSTI clinical pathway for patient selection and follow-up that included use of a single-dose, long-acting IV antibiotic was associated with a significant reduction in hospitalization rate for stable patients with moderately severe infections. Registration: NCT02961764.

Antimicrobial activity of dalbavancin and comparators against Staphylococcus aureus causing pneumonia in patients with and without cystic fibrosis

The activities of dalbavancin and comparator agents were evaluated against Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the lower respiratory tract of cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF patients with pneumonia. Bacterial isolates (n = 357) were collected from CF patients in 36 medical centers worldwide (2018-2019) and susceptibility tested using reference broth microdilution. Susceptibility results from these isolates were compared with those for 725 S. aureus isolates consecutively collected from non-CF patients with pneumonia from the same medical centers over the same period. Only isolates determined to be the probable cause of pneumonia were included in the study. Susceptibility profiles were very similar among isolates from CF and non-CF patients. Dalbavancin exhibited potent activity (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.03 mg/L) and complete coverage (100.0% susceptibility) against isolates from CF and non-CF patients. Ceftaroline (MIC50/90, 0.25/1 mg/L) was active against 97.8% and 98.1% of isolates from CF and non-CF patients, respectively. Oxacillin resistance (MRSA) rates were 27.7% among CF and 28.7% among non-CF patients. Among MRSA isolates from CF/non-CF patients (n = 99/208), susceptibility to ceftaroline, clindamycin, levofloxacin, and tetracycline were 91.9%/93.3%, 58.6%/64.4%, 40.4%/29.3%, and 83.8%/89.4%, respectively. Dalbavancin demonstrated high potency against S. aureus from CF and non-CF patients and may represent a valuable treatment option for CF patients with MRSA pulmonary infection.

Antimicrobial activity of dalbavancin against clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci from the USA and Europe stratified by species

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the in vitro activity of dalbavancin compared with vancomycin, daptomycin and other agents against a large collection of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) isolates.

METHODS

A total of 5088 CoNS causing clinically significant infection were consecutively collected from 122 medical centres in the USA and Europe over 6 years (2014-2019). Isolates were tested for susceptibility by the reference broth microdilution method. Species identification was confirmed by MALDI-TOF. Most isolates were from bloodstream infections (BSIs) (53.5%) or skin/skin structure infections (28.5%).

RESULTS

Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common species overall (54.6%) and for BSI (61.3%). The second most common species were Staphylococcus lugdunensis overall (12.3%) and Staphylococcus hominis for BSI (14.7%). Dalbavancin (MIC_50/90, 0.03/0.06 mg/L) inhibited >99.9% of CoNS isolates at ≤0.25 mg/L (susceptible breakpoint for Staphylococcus aureus per CLSI). All species were inhibited at ≤0.25 mg/L dalbavancin, except some S. epidermidis (>99.9%) and Staphylococcus warneri (98.9%) isolates. Staphylococcus capitis and Staphylococcus simulans exhibited the lowest dalbavancin MIC_50/90 values (0.015/0.03 mg/L) and Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus saprophyticus the highest (MIC_50/90, 0.06/0.12 mg/L); 47.8% of S. epidermidis and 34.7% of S. haemolyticus exhibited decreased susceptibility to vancomycin (MIC ≥ 2 mg/L) and 23.2% of S. capitis and 28.4% of S. warneri showed decreased susceptibility to daptomycin (MIC ≥ 1 mg/L).

CONCLUSION

Antimicrobial susceptibility varied widely among CoNS species. Dalbavancin inhibited >99.9% and 99.1% of isolates at the US-FDA and EUCAST breakpoints, respectively. Clinical studies of dalbavancin for treatment of CoNS infections should be considered based on these in vitro data.

Update on the in vitro activity of dalbavancin against indicated species (Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, β-hemolytic streptococci, and Streptococcus anginosus group) collected from United States hospitals in 2017-2019

This study updates dalbavancin activity against contemporary (2017-2019) isolates of indicated species/groups (n = 16,451). Isolates from 71 hospitals were tested by broth microdilution method. All isolates were susceptible to dalbavancin. Dalbavancin MIC_50/90 values remained stable for Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis, β-hemolytic streptococci, and Streptococcus anginosus group since its clinical approval.

Antimicrobial activity of dalbavancin tested against Gram-positive organisms isolated from patients with infective endocarditis in US and European medical centres

BACKGROUND

The management of endocarditis requires aggressive and prolonged antimicrobial treatment. We evaluated the in vitro activity of dalbavancin against bacteria from patients with infective endocarditis.

METHODS

A total of 626 Gram-positive organisms were collected from patients with a diagnosis of bacterial endocarditis in the USA (n = 222) and Europe (n = 404) from 2007 to 2017 via the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program and were tested for susceptibility to dalbavancin and comparators by broth microdilution.

RESULTS

The most common organisms were Staphylococcus aureus (48.4%), Enterococcus faecalis (19.6%) and viridans group streptococci (VGS; 12.5%). Dalbavancin and daptomycin showed complete activity (100.0% susceptibility per CLSI criteria) against S. aureus, but dalbavancin MIC values were 4- to 8-fold lower. Vancomycin, linezolid and teicoplanin were also active against all S. aureus when CLSI criteria were applied. Ceftaroline was active against all MSSA (MIC90 0.25 mg/L) and 78.4% of MRSA isolates at ≤1 mg/L. All E. faecalis isolates were susceptible to ampicillin, daptomycin and linezolid, whereas 97.6% of isolates were susceptible to dalbavancin (MIC90 0.06 mg/L) and 96.7% were susceptible to vancomycin (MIC90 2 mg/L). All VGS and CoNS isolates were susceptible to dalbavancin, daptomycin, vancomycin and linezolid. Against Enterococcus faecium, 65.7% of isolates were inhibited by ≤0.25 mg/L dalbavancin and 62.9% were vancomycin susceptible.

CONCLUSIONS

Dalbavancin exhibited potent in vitro activity against a large collection of Gram-positive isolates recovered from patients with endocarditis in US and European medical centres. These results support further investigations to determine the role of dalbavancin in the treatment of infective endocarditis.

The role of dalbavancin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs)

Introduction: Acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSI) are a subgroup of skin and soft tissue infections and are a common source of morbidity in both the community and the hospital setting. The most common cause of ABSSSI is Staphylococcus aureus, which also includes methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), together with beta-hemolytic streptococci, enterococci, and Gram-negative bacteria. Since the emergence of MRSA, the management of ABSSSI has become more challenging. Novel therapies alternative to teicoplanin and vancomycin, intravenous agents commonly used against MRSA and employed in hospitalized patients, and to other antibiotics which are used as standard of care for MRSA infection, with a higher efficacy and safer profile are worth evaluating.Areas covered: This review presents and discusses current evidence on the use of dalbavancin in the treatment of ABSSSI.Expert opinion: Dalbavancin represents a promising therapeutic choice in patients with ABSSSI, thanks to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile, valuable antimicrobial spectrum, and good safety profile.

Dalbavancin Reduces Hospital Stay and Improves Productivity for Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: The ENHANCE Trial

INTRODUCTION

Admissions for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) are often prolonged because of intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Use of a long-acting IV antibiotic may reduce length of stay (LOS) on a hospitalist service. The ENHANCE ABSSSI trial sought to determine the impact on LOS and work productivity in patients treated with a long-acting IV antibiotic, dalbavancin, vs. usual care at an urban tertiary-care center.

METHODS

A single-center, pre- vs. post-period pragmatic trial at Weill-Cornell Medical Center assessed usual care for consecutively enrolled admitted ABSSSI patients during an observational period (pre-period). Identification and treatment of eligible admitted ABSSSI patients with dalbavancin were implemented in the post-period. Those with life-threatening infections, requiring multiple antibiotics/intensive care, or with unstable comorbidities were excluded. Outcomes were assessed over a 44-day follow-up period.

RESULTS

Of 48 and 43 patients enrolled, respectively, in the pre- and post-periods, mean infection-related LOS was reduced in the post-period (3.2 days vs. 4.8 days; P = 0.003). Similar results were found in an adjusted LOS analysis. Work productivity and activity impairment outcomes significantly improved in the post-period (P ≤ 0.01). Complete response rates were similar: 50% (pre-period) and 57% (post-period). Among AEs identified, 17% (n = 7) were found to have possible causal relation to dalbavancin in the post-period. Few AEs were serious (n = 3; 7% post-period versus n = 1; 2% pre-period).

CONCLUSION

After implementing the ENHANCE ABSSSI pathway, LOS was significantly reduced by almost 2 days, with potential improvements in work productivity and ability to complete daily activities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03233438.

FUNDING

Allergan plc.

Use of a telehealth follow-up system to facilitate treatment and discharge of emergency department patients with severe cellulitis

INTRODUCTION

Novel long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotics allow for the treatment and discharge of selected emergency department (ED) patients with cellulitis who require intravenous antibiotics. Telehealth systems have shown success in remote management of dermatologic conditions; we implemented a telehealth follow-up program for patients diagnosed with cellulitis in the ED, treated with single-dose dalbavancin, and discharged.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multi-center observational study. Patients were included based on clinical criteria and ability to complete follow-up using a smartphone and enroll in an online care portal. We examined the rate of successful telehealth follow-up at 24- and 72-hour intervals from discharge. We also examined the ED return rate within 14 days, reviewed any visits to determine cause of return, and for admission.

RESULTS

55 patients were enrolled. 54/55 patients completed at least one telehealth follow up encounter (98.2%). 13 patients (23.6%) had a return ED visit within 14 days; no patients required admission for worsening cellulitis. Patient engagement in the telehealth program decreased over time; there was an approximately 11% decrease in engagement between the 24 and 72-hour follow-up call, and a 15% decrease in engagement between the 24 and 72-hour image upload. Patients over 65 had a lower rate of image upload (31%) than younger patients (80.6%).

DISCUSSION

A telehealth follow-up system for discharged emergency department patients with cellulitis demonstrated high rates of engagement. In these patients who -may have otherwise required admission for intravenous antibiotics, telehealth-facilitated outpatient management resulted in a low ED return rate and no inpatient admissions for cellulitis.

Finding the niche: An interprofessional approach to defining oritavancin use criteria in the emergency department

INTRODUCTION

Cellulitis is commonly treated in the emergency department (ED). Oritavancin is a novel, broad-spectrum antibiotic which provides an entire treatment course for cellulitis with one dose. However, optimal ED prescribing scenarios for oritavancin have not been well defined. The purpose of this study was to identify a population of ED patients with cellulitis who would be most appropriate to receive oritavancin.

METHODS

This was a descriptive, retrospective study conducted at a Midwest healthcare system with two EDs. Over a 1 year period, all adult patients admitted from the ED to an inpatient ward with an ICD-10 diagnosis for cellulitis were reviewed using a priori defined criteria to identify potentially avoidable admissions (PAA). Potentially avoidable admissions were further characterized and compared to the non-avoidable admission population. Identified patient-specific criteria for PAAs were used to develop oritavancin inclusion/exclusion criteria and a case selection flowchart.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were identified during the study period. Nine patients (10.5%) were deemed a PAA. A majority of the PAA population had at least one risk factor for treatment failure (55% with diabetes mellitus) and this group was significantly younger than the non-PAA group (42.2 vs 58.6 years; P = 0.01). There were no differences between the PAA group and the non-PAA group in regard to non-age demographics, other risk factors for outpatient treatment failure, comorbidities, or length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Oritavancin is an outpatient treatment alternative for cellulitis patients whose only justification for planned admission is the presence of one or more risk factors for treatment failure.

From natural products to drugs

It is frequently assumed, particularly in the last 15 plus years, that “Natural Product Structures” are no longer a source of drugs in the twenty-first century. In fact, this is not at all true. Even today, in the search for novel agents against manifold diseases, natural product structures, some quite old and some quite recent, are behind the compounds that are either recently (last 5–10 years) approved or that are now in clinical trials against manifold diseases of man. This chapter will cover agents approved since 2010 to the end of 2017 by the US FDA and its equivalent in other countries, plus selected agents that have entered clinical trials against major diseases such as cancer and infections that have “in their chemical pedigree” a natural product structure, even if the final product may be totally synthetic in nature.

Antimicrobial Activity of Dalbavancin against Staphylococcus aureus with Decreased Susceptibility to Glycopeptides, Daptomycin, and/or Linezolid from U.S. Medical Centers

Dalbavancin activity was assessed against a large collection of Staphylococcus aureus isolates (n = 59,903), including isolates with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin (MIC, ≥2 mg/liter; n = 1,141), daptomycin (MIC, ≥2 mg/liter; n = 48), telavancin (MIC, ≥0.12 mg/liter; n = 52), teicoplanin (MIC, ≥4 mg/liter; n = 143), and/or linezolid (MIC, ≥8 mg/liter; n = 25). Dalbavancin displayed susceptibility rates ranging from 90.4% (isolates with telavancin MIC ≥0.12 mg/liter) to 100.0% (linezolid-resistant isolates) and lower MIC values than the comparators against these resistant subsets.

Dalbavancin treatment in a deep sternal wound MRSA infection after coronary artery bypass surgery: a case report

BACKGROUND

A deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) can become a severe complication after cardiac surgery, with in-hospital mortality rates reaching up to 35%. Staphylococci, particularly methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), play important roles in its etiology.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case report presents a patient who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery, and suffered postoperatively from a DSWI caused by MRSA. The pathogen was susceptible to vancomycin and rifampicin in vitro; however, this therapy was clinically ineffective. Both clinical improvement and MRSA eradication were achieved after surgical debridement of the wound and the intravenous administration of dalbavancin.

CONCLUSIONS

We decided to administer dalbavancin because of its convenient pharmacological profile. The patient's tolerance of the antimicrobial was good, the biochemical markers of inflammation returned to the normal ranges, and the microbiological results one week after the dalbavancin administration were negative. A good clinical outcome was achieved with both the surgery and antimicrobial administration. In this case, dalbavancin was more effective in the treatment of the sternal and surrounding tissue infections caused by MRSA, when compared to vancomycin.

Novel 3-fluoro-6-methoxyquinoline derivatives as inhibitors of bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV

Novel (non-fluoroquinolone) inhibitors of bacterial type II topoisomerases (NBTIs) are an emerging class of antibacterial agents. We report an optimized series of cyclobutylaryl-substituted NBTIs. Compound 14 demonstrated excellent activity both in vitro (S. aureus MIC₉₀=0.125μg/mL) and in vivo (systemic and tissue infections). Enhanced inhibition of Topoisomerase IV correlated with improved activity in S. aureus strains with mutations conferring resistance to NBTIs. Compound 14 also displayed an improved hERG IC₅₀ of 85.9μM and a favorable profile in the anesthetized guinea pig model.