Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Oncogene-Driven Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The Immune Suppressor IGSF1 as a Potential Target for Cancer Immunotherapy

The development of first-generation immune-checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 ushered in a new era in anticancer therapy. Although immune-checkpoint blockade therapies have shown clinical success, a substantial number of patients yet fail to benefit. Many studies are under way to discover next-generation immunotherapeutic targets. Immunoglobulin superfamily member 1 (IGSF1) is a membrane glycoprotein proposed to regulate thyroid function. Despite containing 12 immunoglobin domains, a possible role for IGSF1, in immune response, remains unknown. Here, our studies revealed that IGSF1 is predominantly expressed in tumors but not normal tissues, and increased expression is observed in PD-L1low non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells as compared with PD-L1high cells. Subsequently, we developed and characterized an IGSF1-specific human monoclonal antibody, WM-A1, that effectively promoted antitumor immunity and overcame the limitations of first-generation immune-checkpoint inhibitors, likely via a distinct mechanism of action. We further demonstrated high WM-A1 efficacy in humanized peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and syngeneic mouse models, finding additive efficacy in combination with an anti-PD-1 (a well-characterized checkpoint inhibitor). These findings support IGSF1 as an immune target that might complement existing cancer immunotherapeutics.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in "Special" NSCLC Populations: A Viable Approach?

Over the last decade, the therapeutic scenario for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a major paradigm shift. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown a meaningful clinical and survival improvement in different settings of the disease. However, the real benefit of this therapeutic approach remains controversial in selected NSCLC subsets, such as those of the elderly with active brain metastases or oncogene-addicted mutations. This is mainly due to the exclusion or underrepresentation of these patient subpopulations in most pivotal phase III studies; this precludes the generalization of ICI efficacy in this context. Moreover, no predictive biomarkers of ICI response exist that can help with patient selection for this therapeutic approach. Here, we critically summarize the current state of ICI efficacy in the most common "special" NSCLC subpopulations.

Non-small-cell lung cancer: how to manage EGFR-mutated disease

The treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring EGFR mutations has witnessed some major breakthroughs in the last years. On the one hand, the recent advent of the third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) osimertinib has reshaped the therapeutic algorithm both in the first-line and adjuvant settings for patients with common activating Ex19del and L858R EGFR mutations. On the other hand, the availability of new comprehensive next-generation sequencing panels, to be used on tumour tissue or on liquid biopsy, has revealed the existence of uncommon as well as compound mutations that partially explain the onset of resistance. Nevertheless, dissecting the biological mechanisms underlying primary and secondary resistance to EGFR-TKIs is crucial to developing alternative therapeutic strategies and further improving patient outcomes. Herein, we provide an updated and comprehensive summary of the latest advancements in the quest for compounds targeting EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, discussing the biological rationale underlying the development of a forefront combination of TKI and/or new antibody-drug conjugates. We also suggest a treatment algorithm that could be followed considering the latest published data.

Targeting the ERβ/HER Oncogenic Network in KRAS Mutant Lung Cancer Modulates the Tumor Microenvironment and Is Synergistic with Sequential Immunotherapy

High ERβ/HER oncogenic signaling defines lung tumors with an aggressive biology. We previously showed that combining the anti-estrogen fulvestrant with the pan-HER inhibitor dacomitinib reduced ER/HER crosstalk and produced synergistic anti-tumor effects in immunocompromised lung cancer models, including KRAS mutant adenocarcinoma. How this combination affects the tumor microenvironment (TME) is not known. We evaluated the effects of fulvestrant and dacomitinib on murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) and CD8+ T cells, and tested the efficacy of the combination in vivo, using the KRAS mutant syngeneic lung adenocarcinoma model, FVBW-17. While this combination synergistically inhibited proliferation of FVBW-17 cells, it had unwanted effects on immune cells, by reducing CD8+ T cell activity and phagocytosis in BMDMs and inducing PD-1. The effects were largely attributed to dacomitinib, which caused downregulation of Src family kinases and Syk in immune cells. In a subcutaneous flank model, the combination induced an inflamed TME with increased myeloid cells and CD8+ T cells and enhanced PD-1 expression in the splenic compartment. Concomitant administration of anti-PD-1 antibody with fulvestrant and dacomitinib was more efficacious than fulvestrant plus dacomitinib alone. Administering anti-PD-1 sequentially after fulvestrant plus dacomitinib was synergistic, with a two-fold greater tumor inhibitory effect compared to concomitant therapy, in both the flank model and in a lung metastasis model. Sequential triple therapy has potential for treating lung cancer that shows limited response to current therapies, such as KRAS mutant lung adenocarcinoma.

Endu combined with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIB-IVA cervical squamous cell carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the incidence of cervical cancer has increased with increasing life pressures and changes in women's social roles, posing a serious threat to women's physical and mental health.

AIM

To explore the clinical effect of Endo combined with concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients admitted to the oncology department of our hospital were selected as the research subjects. They were equally divided into the test group and the control group (60 patients each) with a random number table. The test group was treated with Endo combined with concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and the control group was treated with concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy. We compared the serum thymidine kinase 1 (TK1), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and squamous cell carcinoma-associated antigen (SCC-Ag) levels, the clinical effects and survival before and after radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the quality score, and the 3-year follow-up outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS

After chemotherapy, the complete remission + partial remission rate was 85.00% in the test group and 68.33% in the control group; the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Before chemotherapy, the serum TK1, HE4, VEGF, and SCC-Ag levels of the two groups were not significantly different (P > 0.05). After chemotherapy, the levels of serum TK1 (1.27 ± 0.40 pmol/L), HE4 (81.4 ± 24.0 pmol/L), VEGF (235.1 ± 38.0 pg/mL), and SCC-Ag (1.76 ± 0.55 ng/mL) were lower than those in the control group [TK1 (1.58 ± 0.51 pmol/L), HE4 (98.0 ± 28.6) pmol/L, VEGF (284.2 ± 54.1 pg/mL), and SCC-Ag (2.34 ± 0.78 ng/mL)]. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Before chemotherapy, there were no significant differences in the physical, role, mood, cognition, social and symptom scale scores of the two groups (P > 0.05). After chemotherapy, the physical, role, mood, cognitive and social scores were higher in the test group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The symptom scale scores of the test group were all lower than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 43.33% in the test group and 26.67% in the control group; the overall survival (OS) rate was 48.33% in the test group and 33.33% in the control group; the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The 3-year PFS time of the test group was 20.0 mo, which was longer than that of the control group (15.0 mo), and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). The OS time of the test group was 30.0 mo, which was longer than that of the control group (18.0 mo), and the difference was significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Endo combined with concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma has a positive effect on reducing the level of tumor markers in patients, prolonging the PFS and OS times of patients, and improving the quality of life.