Extended and Continuous Infusion of Novel Protected β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Narrative Review

Prolonged versus intermittent β-lactam infusion in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The two latest studies on prolonged versus intermittent use of β-lactam antibiotics in patients with sepsis did not reach consistent conclusions, further contributing to the controversy surrounding the effectiveness of the prolonged β-lactam antibiotics infusion strategy. We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prolonged and intermittent β-lactam infusion in adult patients with sepsis.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for original randomized controlled trials comparing prolonged and intermittent β-lactam infusion in sepsis patients. A random-effects model was used to evaluate mortality, clinical success, microbiological success, and adverse events. We also conducted subgroup analyses to explore the impact of various factors on the mortality rates. Relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the overall effect sizes for dichotomous outcomes. This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023463905).

RESULTS

We assessed 15 studies involving 2130 patients. In our comprehensive assessment, we found a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR, 0.83; 95% CI 0.72-0.97; P = 0.02) and a notable improvement in clinical success (RR, 1.16; 95% CI 1.03-1.31; P = 0.02) in the prolonged infusion group compared to the intermittent infusion group, whereas microbiological success did not yield statistically significant results (RR, 1.10; 95% CI 0.98-1.23; P = 0.11). No significant differences in adverse events were observed between the two groups (RR, 0.91; 95% CI 0.64-1.29; P = 0.60). Additionally, remarkable conclusions were drawn from subgroup analyses including studies with sample sizes exceeding 20 individuals per group (RR, 0.84; 95%CI 0.72-0.98; P = 0.03), research conducted post-2010 (RR, 0.84; 95%CI 0.72-0.98; P = 0.03), cases involving infections predominantly caused by Gram-negative bacteria (RR, 0.81; 95%CI 0.68-0.96; P = 0.02), as well as the administration of a loading dose (RR, 0.84; 95% CI 0.72-0.97; P = 0.02) and the use of penicillin (RR, 0.61; 95% CI 0.38-0.98; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to intermittent infusion, prolonged infusion of β-lactam antibiotics significantly decreases all-cause mortality among patients with sepsis and enhances clinical success without increasing adverse events.

Prolonged vs intermittent intravenous infusion of β-lactam antibiotics for patients with sepsis: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

The prolonged β-lactam antibiotics infusion has been an attractive strategy in severe infections, because it provides a more stable free drug concentration and a longer duration of free drug concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). We conducted this systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to compare the effects of prolonged vs intermittent intravenous infusion of β-lactam antibiotics for patients with sepsis.

METHODS

This study was prospectively registered on PROSPERO database (CRD42023447692). We searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library to identify eligible studies (up to July 6, 2023). Any study meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria would be included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 30 days. Two authors independently screened studies and extracted data. When the I2 values < 50%, we used fixed-effect mode. Otherwise, the random effects model was used. TSA was also performed to search for the possibility of false-positive (type I error) or false-negative (type II error) results.

RESULTS

A total of 4355 studies were identified in our search, and nine studies with 1762 patients were finally included. The pooled results showed that, compared with intermittent intravenous infusion, prolonged intravenous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics resulted in a significant reduction in all-cause mortality within 30 days in patients with sepsis (RR 0.82; 95%CI 0.70-0.96; P = 0.01; TSA-adjusted CI 0.62-1.07). However, the certainty of the evidence was rated as low, and the TSA results suggested that more studies were needed to further confirm our conclusion. In addition, it is associated with lower hospital mortality, ICU mortality, and higher clinical cure. No significant reduction in 90-day mortality or the emergence of resistance bacteria was detected between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged intravenous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics in patients with sepsis was associated with short-term survival benefits and higher clinical cure. However, the TSA results suggested that more studies are needed to reach a definitive conclusion. In terms of long-term survival benefits, we could not show an improvement.

Stability Studies of Antipseudomonal Beta Lactam Agents for Outpatient Therapy

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is a useful treatment strategy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other multidrug-resistant bacteria. However, it is hindered by the lack of stability data for the administration of antibiotics under OPAT conditions. Our objective was to investigate the stability of nine antipseudomonal and broad-spectrum beta lactam antibiotics (aztreonam, cefepime, cefiderocol, ceftazidime, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, and piperacillin/tazobactam) to allow the spread of OPAT programs. All the antibiotics were diluted in 500 mL 0.9% sodium chloride and stored at 4, 25, 32, and 37 °C for 72 h in two different devices (infusion bags and elastomeric pumps). The solutions were considered stable if the color, clearness, and pH remained unchanged and if the percentage of intact drug was ≥90%. All the antimicrobials remained stable 72 h under refrigerated conditions and at least 30 h at 25 °C. At 32 °C, all the antibiotics except for meropenem and meropenem/vaborbactam remained stable for 24 h or more. At 37 °C, only aztreonam, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, cefiderocol, and ceftolozane/tazobactam were stable for at least 24 h. The stability results were the same in the two devices tested. All the antibiotics studied are actual alternatives for the treatment of antipseudomonal or multidrug-resistant infections in OPAT programs, although the temperature of the devices is crucial to ensure antibiotic stability.

Real-Life Experience of Continuously Infused Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in Patients with Bronchiectasis and Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in the Outpatient Setting

(1) Background: Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor with excellent activity against the multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa. Continuous infusion (CI) dosing allows the optimization of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties of β-lactam antibiotics and may support patients' treatment as outpatients. (2) Methods: Adult patients receiving their entire course of C/T as a CI in the outpatient setting were retrospectively included in the study. The primary outcome evaluated was clinical resolution. The secondary outcomes evaluated were PK/PD target attainment (ƒT > 4 × MIC) and microbiologic clearance at the end of treatment. Therapeutic drug monitoring to assess C/T concentration was performed. (3) Results: Three patients were enrolled in the study and received 9 g of C/T in CI every 24 h. One patient received an additional course of antimicrobial therapy due to disease exacerbation six months after initial treatment, accounting for four evaluated treatments. The primary outcome was achieved in 3/4 treatments and the secondary outcome was achieved in 4/4 and 3/3, respectively. In all patients, free ceftolozane concentrations were >10 times higher than the EUCAST breakpoint (4 mg/L). (4) Conclusions: Elastomeric infusion of C/T delivered in CI can be an effective and convenient way to treat acute diseases caused by MDR-P. aeruginosa, avoid hospital admission, and contribute to infection control strategies. Despite the small number of enrolled patients, clinical and microbiological results support this strategy.