The Challenges of Treating Sciatica Pain in Older Adults

Systematic review of guideline-recommended medications prescribed for treatment of low back pain

OBJECTIVE

To identify and descriptively compare medication recommendations among low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines (CPG).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, Index to Chiropractic Literature, AMED, CINAHL, and PEDro to identify CPGs that described the management of mechanical LBP in the prior five years. Two investigators independently screened titles and abstracts and potentially relevant full text were considered for eligibility. Four investigators independently applied the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument for critical appraisal. Data were extracted for pharmaceutical intervention, the strength of recommendation, and appropriateness for the duration of LBP.

RESULTS

316 citations were identified, 50 full-text articles were assessed, and nine guidelines with global representation met the eligibility criteria. These CPGs addressed pharmacological treatments with or without non-pharmacological treatments. All CPGS focused on the management of acute, chronic, or unspecified duration of LBP. The mean overall AGREE II score was 89.3% (SD 3.5%). The lowest domain mean score was for applicability, 80.4% (SD 5.2%), and the highest was Scope and Purpose, 94.0% (SD 2.4%). There were ten classifications of medications described in the included CPGs: acetaminophen, antibiotics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, oral corticosteroids, skeletal muscle relaxants (SMRs), and atypical opioids.

CONCLUSIONS

Nine CPGs, included ten medication classes for the management of LBP. NSAIDs were the most frequently recommended medication for the treatment of both acute and chronic LBP as a first line pharmacological therapy. Acetaminophen and SMRs were inconsistently recommended for acute LBP. Meanwhile, with less consensus among CPGs, acetaminophen and antidepressants were proposed as second-choice therapies for chronic LBP. There was significant heterogeneity of recommendations within many medication classes, although oral corticosteroids, benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, and antibiotics were not recommended by any CPGs for acute or chronic LBP.

The Association between Bodily Pain and Cognitive Impairment in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Background: Bodily pain is a common condition in older adults and interferes with individuals’ cognitive functioning. We aimed to evaluate the association between bodily pain and related locations and cognitive impairment among community-dwelling older adults in Taiwan. Method: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, we enrolled 2022 participants aged 60‒70 years, from the Taiwan Biobank. Mini-Mental State Examination was performed to assess cognitive impairment. Further, logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the relationship between bodily pain and cognitive impairment. Results: Overall, 161 participants had cognitive impairment. Multivariable analysis showed that older adults who reported bodily pain were more likely than those who did not have cognitive impairment (odds ratio 1.68). Moreover, the occurrence of cognitive impairment correlated with the presence of two or more pain locations and self-reported low back and waist pain or sciatica. Conclusion: Our study revealed that cognitive impairment was associated with bodily pain in community-dwelling older adults, particularly older adults with low back and waist pain or sciatica and those with two or more pain locations. To maintain the quality of older adults’ life, pain and cognitive decline need to be simultaneously assessed with considerably more precise and objective markers.

Clinical performance of a bone-anchored annular closure device in older adults

Background: Lumbar discectomy is a common surgical procedure in middle-aged adults. However, outcomes of lumbar discectomy among older adults are unclear. Methods: Lumbar discectomy patients with an annular defect ≥6 mm width were randomized to receive additional implantation with a bone-anchored annular closure device (ACD, n=272) or no additional implantation (controls, n=278). Over 3 years follow-up, main outcomes were symptomatic reherniation, reoperation, and the percentage of patients who achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) without a reoperation for leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score, and SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. Results were compared between older (≥60 years) and younger (<60 years) patients. We additionally analyzed data from two postmarket ACD registries to determine consistency of outcomes between the randomized trial and postmarket, real-world results. Results: Among all patients, older patients suffered from crippling or bed-bound preoperative disability more frequently than younger patients (57.9% vs 39.1%, p=0.03). Among controls, female sex, higher preoperative ODI, and current smoking status, but not age, were associated with greater risk of reherniation and reoperation. Compared to controls, the ACD group had lower risk of symptomatic reherniation (HR=0.45, p<0.001) and reoperation (HR=0.54, p=0.008), with risk reductions comparable in older vs younger patients. The percentage of patients achieving the MCID without a reoperation was higher in the ACD group for leg pain (81% vs 72%, p=0.04), ODI (82% vs 73%, p=0.03), PCS (85% vs 75%, p=0.01), and MCS (59% vs 46%, p=0.007), and this benefit was comparable in older versus younger patients. Comparable benefits in older patients were observed in the postmarket ACD registries. Conclusion: Outcomes with lumbar discectomy and additional bone-anchored ACD are superior to lumbar discectomy alone. Older patients derived similar benefits with additional bone-anchored ACD implantation as younger patients.

Aging of mouse intervertebral disc and association with back pain

With the increased burden of low back pain (LBP) in our globally aging population there is a need to develop preclinical models of LBP that capture clinically relevant features of physiological aging, degeneration, and disability. Here we assess the validity of using a mouse model system for age-related LBP by characterizing aging mice for features of intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration, molecular markers of peripheral sensitization, and behavioral signs of pain. Compared to three-month-old and one-year-old mice, two-year-old mice show features typical of IVD degeneration including loss of disc height, bulging, innervation and vascularization in the caudal lumbar IVDs. Aging is also associated with the loss of whole-body bone mineral density in both male and female mice, but not associated with percent lean mass or body fat. Additionally, two-year-old mice have an accumulation of TRPA1 channels and sodium channels NaV1.8 and NaV1.9 in the L4 and L5 lumbar dorsal root ganglia consistent with changes in nociceptive signaling. Lastly, the effect of age, sex, and weight on mobility, axial stretching and radiating pain measures was assessed in male and female mice ranging from two months to two years in a general linear model. The model revealed that regardless of sex or weight, increased age was a predictor of greater reluctance to perform axial stretching and sensitivity to cold, but not heat in mice.

Factors influencing the efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute low back pain. The results of the multicenter observational «CARAMBOL» (Clinical Analysis of Results of Analgesia by Meloxicam and its Safety in Acute Lumbodynia) study

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a main tool to treat acute nonspecific low back pain (NLBP). However, no factors that influence the efficacy of these drugs have been identified to the present day.

Objective: to evaluate the therapeutic effect of and tolerance to NSAIDs (meloxicam) in treating acute NLBS and to identify the factors influencing the efficacy of this drug.

Patients and methods. A study group consisted of 2078 patients (mean age 46.3±13.4 years; women 56.6%) with acute NLBS who had been treated in real clinical practice. The level of pain was estimated using a 0–10 point numerical rating scale (NRS). Initially, the pain level averaged 6.69±1.65 scores; 57.0% of patients were noted to have severe pain (≥7 NRS scores). Pain at rest persisted in 32.0% of patients; that at night was in 19.0%; sensation of stiffness in 60.7%, irradiation to the leg in 28.2%, and lumbar ischialgia in 9.6%. 70.2% of patients had been previously treated with NSAIDs for NLBS, while only 28.0% rated their efficacy as good. All the patients were prescribed meloxicam at a dose of 15 mg/day for a period of up to 2 weeks. 86.1% of the patients received meloxicam intramuscular for 2 days, then orally; 13.9% took the drug only orally. 52.3% of the patients also used muscle relaxants; 17.4% received oral or intramuscular B vitamins. The study estimated the rate of complete pain relief when NSAIDs were used for up to 2 weeks.

Results and discussion. Complete pain relief was achieved in 75.2% of patients. 83.7% of patients rated the effect of treatment as good or excellent. Undesired drug reactions were recorded in 4.6% of patients. Female gender had no effect on treatment outcome (odds ratio (OR)=0.967; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.795–1.177; p=0.763). Age over 65 years, the first NLBS episode, and a good NSAID effect in a history were associated with the best treatment result: OR=2.053 (95% CI, 1.5920–2.642), p<0.001; 1.415 (1.09–1.836), p=0.009; and 1.937 (1.513–2.481), p<0.001, respectively. Severe pain (≥7 NRS scores), persistent pain at rest and at night, and especially lumbar ischialgia indicated the worst result: OR=0.481 (95% CI, 0.393–0.588), p<0.001; 0.559 (0.441–0.709), p<0.001; 0.511 (0.413–0.631), p<0.001; and 0.346 (0.256–0.466), p<0.001, respectively. NSAIDs in combination with muscle relaxants and B vitamins versus NSAID monotherapy did not increase the likelihood of pain relief: OR=0.827 (95% CI, 0.594–0.889), p=0.02 and 0.917 (0.804–1.1201), p=0.452, respectively.

Conclusion. Meloxicam at a dose of 15 mg/day is an effective and safe drug to treat acute NLBS. Patient gender has no effect on treatment outcome. Age over 65 years, the first NLBS episode, and a good response to NSAIDs in a history are associated with the best treatment results; and severe pain, persistent pain at rest and at night, irradiation to the leg, and lumbar ischialgia are related to the worst result. NSAIDs in combination with muscle relaxants and B vitamins did not improve treatment outcomes. 

The profile of chiropractors managing patients with low back-related leg pain: analyses of 1907 chiropractors from the ACORN practice-based research network

Background

Approximately 60% of people with low back pain also have associated leg pain symptoms. Guidelines for low back pain recommend non-pharmacological approaches, including spinal manipulation - a therapy provided by chiropractors. However, limited empirical data has examined the characteristics of chiropractors managing patients with low back-related leg pain (LBRLP). Our objective is to describe the prevalence, profile and practice characteristics of Australian chiropractors who often treat LBRLP, compared to those who do not often treat LBRLP.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative sample from the Australian Chiropractic Research Network (ACORN). This study investigated the demographic and practice characteristics as well as clinical management of chiropractors who ‘often’ treated patients with LBRLP compared to those who treated LBRLP ‘never/rarely/sometimes’. Multiple logistic regression models identified independent factors associated with chiropractors who ‘often’ treated patients with LBRLP.

Results

A total of 1907 chiropractors reported treating patients experiencing LBRLP, with 80.9% of them ‘often’ treating LBRLP. Chiropractors who ‘often’ treated LBRLP were more likely to manage patients with multi-site pain including axial low back pain (OR = 21.1), referred/radicular neck pain (OR = 10.8) and referred/radicular thoracic pain (OR = 3.1). While no specific management strategies were identified, chiropractors who ‘often’ treated LBRLP were more likely to discuss medication (OR = 1.8), manage migraine (OR = 1.7) and degenerative spine conditions (OR = 1.5), and treat women during pregnancy (OR = 1.6) and people with work-related injuries (OR = 1.5), compared to those not treating LBRLP frequently.

Conclusions

Australian chiropractors frequently manage LBRLP, although the nature of specific management approaches for this condition remains unclear. Further research on the management of LBRLP can better inform policy makers and educators interested in upskilling chiropractors to deliver safe and effective treatment of LBRLP.

Paracetamol in Older People: Towards Evidence-Based Dosing?

Paracetamol is the most commonly used analgesic in older people, and is mainly dosed according to empirical dosing guidelines. However, the pharmacokinetics and thereby the effects of paracetamol can be influenced by physiological changes occurring with ageing. To investigate the steps needed to reach more evidence-based paracetamol dosing regimens in older people, we applied the concepts used in the paediatric study decision tree. A search was performed to retrieve studies on paracetamol pharmacokinetics and safety in older people (> 60 years) or studies that performed a (sub) analysis of pharmacokinetics and/or safety in older people. Of 6088 articles identified, 259 articles were retained after title and abstract screening. Further abstract and full-text screening identified 27 studies, of which 20 described pharmacokinetics and seven safety. These studies revealed no changes in absorption with ageing. A decreased (3.9-22.9%) volume of distribution (Vd) in robust older subjects and a further decreased Vd (20.3%) in frail older compared with younger subjects was apparent. Like Vd, age and frailty decreased paracetamol clearance (29-45.7 and 37.5%) compared with younger subjects. Due to limited and heterogeneous evidence, it was difficult to draw firm and meaningful conclusions on changed risk for paracetamol safety in older people. This review is a first step towards bridging knowledge gaps to move to evidence-based paracetamol dosing in older subjects. Remaining knowledge gaps are safety when using therapeutic dosages, pharmacokinetics changes in frail older people, and to what extent changes in paracetamol pharmacokinetics should lead to a change in dosage in frail and robust older people.