1
|
Satisfaction with Medications Prescribed for Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Patients and Their Physicians in the United States. Pain Ther 2022; 11:191-208. [PMID: 35028917 PMCID: PMC8861239 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00350-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Satisfaction with medications prescribed for osteoarthritis (OA) varies; this study aimed to determine the factors associated with satisfaction in US patients and their physicians. Methods This point-in-time study used the Adelphi OA Disease Specific Programme (physicians identified from public lists reported on nine consecutive patients diagnosed with OA [any joint]: physicians and patients completed questionnaires). Patient’s demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics associated with patient-reported and physician-rated overall satisfaction with, and expectations of effectiveness of, medication for OA were assessed using multivariate linear regression. Results Responses from 572 patients (mean age 64.9 years, 60.5% female) currently prescribed medication for OA and 153 physicians (81 primary care, 35 rheumatologists, 37 orthopedic surgeons) were analyzed. Pain intensity was moderate or severe for 59.4% of patients. Greater patient-reported overall satisfaction with medication was significantly associated with (standardized beta, 95% confidence interval) exercise (0.12, 0.03–0.20), comorbid other musculoskeletal or painful conditions (vs none) (0.15, 0.06–0.24), and physicians’ report that the best control had been achieved (0.12, 0.03–0.20); lack of efficacy was among factors associated with worse satisfaction. Greater patient-reported expectation of effectiveness was significantly associated with exercise (0.12, 0.03–0.21) and the most troublesome joint not being a knee, hip, or their back (0.08, 0.01–0.14). Greater physician-rated overall satisfaction with medication was significantly associated with their report that the best control had been achieved (0.18, 0.11–0.26), the most troublesome joint being a knee (0.08, 0.01–0.14), comorbid other musculoskeletal or painful conditions (0.07, 0.01–0.12), obesity (0.06, 0.00–0.11), and female patients (0.06, 0.00–0.11); lack of efficacy and adverse events/tolerability issues were among factors associated with worse satisfaction. For physicians, their report that the best control had been achieved (0.19, 0.11–0.27), the most troublesome joint being a knee (0.08, 0.00–0.15), improving (vs stable) OA (0.15, 0.07–0.24), and uncertain duration of OA (0.11, 0.02–0.21) were associated with greater perception that the medication was meeting patients’ efficacy expectations. Conclusion Although efficacy was strongly associated with both patients’ and physicians’ satisfaction with medication, other factors were also important, including exercise (for patients), tolerability (for physicians), and knee OA (for physicians). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-021-00350-0.
Collapse
|
2
|
Sharma G, Alle M, Chakraborty C, Kim JC. Strategies for transdermal drug delivery against bone disorders: A preclinical and clinical update. J Control Release 2021; 336:375-395. [PMID: 34175368 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.06.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
The transdermal drug delivery system is an exceptionally safe and well-tolerable therapeutic approach that has immense potential for delivering active components against bone-related pathologies. However, its use is limited in the current clinical practices due to the low skin permeability of most active drugs in the formulation. Thus, innovations in the methodologies of skin permeation enhancement techniques are suggested to overcome this limitation. Although various transdermal drug delivery systems are studied to date, there are insufficient studies comparing the therapeutic efficacy of transdermal delivery systems to oral delivery systems. Thus, creating a decision-making dilemma between oral or transdermal therapies. Therefore, a timely review is inevitable to develop a platform for future researchers to develop next-generation transdermal drug delivery strategies against skeletal diseases that must be convenient and cost-effective for the patients with improved therapeutic efficacy. Here, we will outline the most recent strategies that can overcome the choice limitation of the drug and enhance the transdermal adsorption of various types of drugs to treat bone disorders. For the first time, in this review paper, we will highlight the preclinical and clinical studies on the different transdermal delivery methods. Thus, providing insight into the current therapeutic approaches and suggesting new directions for the advancements in transdermal drug delivery systems against bone disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garima Sharma
- Department of Biomedical Science & Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea
| | - Madhusudhan Alle
- Institute of Forest Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea
| | - Chiranjib Chakraborty
- Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Adamas University, Barasat-Barrackpore Rd, Kolkata, West Bengal 700126, India
| | - Jin-Chul Kim
- Department of Biomedical Science & Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xue Q, Long H, Lin J, Du D, Zhou J, Chen J, Li S, Zhang Y, Cheng Y, Ma X, Zhang Z. Quality of life and treatment satisfaction with pharmacological interventions in Chinese adults with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:178. [PMID: 33583400 PMCID: PMC7882067 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04012-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Aim of this multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study was to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment satisfaction of current medications in Chinese knee OA patients. Methods Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQM-1.4), and HRQoL (EQ-5D-5L) were assessed in total of 601 OA of knee patients. Impact on QoL (EQ-5D-5L) and treatment satisfaction (TSQM-1.4) by BPI-Severity score (< 4 and ≥ 4) were presented using mean standard deviations (SDs) and were compared using a t-test. For each of self-assessed health EQ-5D-5L and TSQM, a linear regression model was used to estimate the regression coefficient along with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for BPI-Severity. Results Mean score of EQ-5D-5L of patients with BPI-Severity ≥4 was significantly lower than those with BPI-Severity < 4. All the scores of TSQM in 4 dimensions were lower in patients with BPI-Severity ≥4 than in those with BPI-Severity < 4. Both HRQoL scores and TSQM scores showed a statistically significant decreasing trend with increasing BPI-Severity pain score. Conclusion Chronic knee OA pain has a significant impact on patients’ HRQoL. More severe patients with OA were less satisfied with current treatments. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04012-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingyun Xue
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Huibin Long
- Arthritis Clinic and Research Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jianhao Lin
- Arthritis Clinic and Research Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dongping Du
- Department of Pain Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Jin Zhou
- Department of Pain Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinwei Chen
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Shu Li
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | | | - Yan Cheng
- Eli Lilly and Company, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Ma
- Eli Lilly and Company, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiyi Zhang
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Urits I, Pham C, Swanson D, Berardino K, Bandi P, Amgalan A, Kaye RJ, Jung JW, Kaye AD, Paladini A, Varrassi G, Kaye AM, Manchikanti L, Viswanath O. The utilization of buprenorphine in chronic pain. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2020; 34:355-368. [PMID: 33004153 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Reclassification of chronic pain as a disease may be helpful because patients with chronic pain require significant treatment and rehabilitation with a clear diagnosis. This can help address critical factors including suffering, quality of life, participation, and with family and social life, which continue to become more important in evaluating the quality of the health care we give our patients today. During the past decade of the opioid epidemic, methadone was the primary treatment for opioid addiction until buprenorphine was approved. Buprenorphine's high-affinity partial agonist properties make it a good alternative to methadone due to lower abuse potential and safer adverse effect profile while maintaining significant efficacy. Expanded out-patient prescribing options have allowed physician and physician extenders such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners to treat these patients that otherwise would have been required to utilize methadone. With unique pharmacological properties, buprenorphine is a safe and effective analgesic for chronic pain. The literature for buprenorphine shows great potential for its utilization in the treatment of chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Urits
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Cynthia Pham
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Daniel Swanson
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kevin Berardino
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Prudhvi Bandi
- University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Rachel J Kaye
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Jai Won Jung
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Alan D Kaye
- Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Department of Anesthesiology, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | | | | | - Adam M Kaye
- University of the Pacific, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Stockton, CA, USA
| | | | - Omar Viswanath
- University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Department of Anesthesiology, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Department of Anesthesiology, Shreveport, LA, USA; Valley Pain Consultants, Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Creighton University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Laha B, Basunia S, Hazra A. Transdermal buprenorphine versus intramuscular diclofenac for postoperative analgesia following upper abdominal surgery under general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2019. [DOI: 10.4103/jpp.jpp_6_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
6
|
Ueda K, Sasaki N, Goren A, Calhoun SR, Shinjo K, Enomoto H, Muneta T. Treatment satisfaction with pharmaceutical interventions in Japanese adults with osteoarthritis and chronic knee pain: an analysis of a web-based survey. Clin Interv Aging 2018; 13:2179-2191. [PMID: 30464427 PMCID: PMC6211312 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s176289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Patient satisfaction is an important outcome in successful osteoarthritis (OA) treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment satisfaction for medication (TSM) in people with knee OA (KOA), identify the factors predictive of treatment satisfaction, and describe the burden of illness. Patients and methods This cross-sectional, patient-reported study used an Internet-based survey and analyzed responses of respondents with KOA (N=400) on characteristics including pain sites and levels (including pain ratings using the Numerical Rating Scale and Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire), treatment satisfaction (Global, Effectiveness, and Convenience scores) based on the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9), and quality of life (QoL; based on the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale 2-Short Form). Respondents with only KOA (n=237) were compared with those having KOA and additional painful sites (KOA+; n=163). Factors predicting TSM were identified using multivariable linear regression analyses. Results Respondents with KOA were more likely to report intermittent pain for 3 months or more compared with those with KOA+ (58.6% vs 48.5%, respectively; P=0.044), while those with KOA+ were more likely to report consistent pain for 3 months or more (P=0.022). Respondents with KOA+ also had more difficulty due to their knee pain while sleeping (P=0.022) and resting (P=0.015). Reported TSM did not differ significantly across KOA vs KOA+ groups, with both groups reporting low satisfaction; all domains of QoL were worse for those with KOA+. Knee pain reduction by medication predicted higher satisfaction across domains, while lower pre-medication pain and post-medication pain matching expectations predicted higher TSQM-9 Global and Effectiveness scores. Conclusion Medication treatment satisfaction rates were low among Japanese respondents with KOA. Given that lower pain, greater pain reduction post-medication, and meeting pain management expectations were predictive of higher satisfaction, treatment strategies that can better address pain may prove beneficial for overall patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaname Ueda
- Health Outcomes/Health Technology Assessment/Real World Evidence, Eli Lilly Japan, Kobe, Japan,
| | - Nao Sasaki
- Bio-Medicines, Medicines Development Unit, Eli Lilly Japan, Kobe, Japan
| | - Amir Goren
- Health Outcomes, Kantar Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Katsuhiro Shinjo
- Bio-Medicines, Medicines Development Unit, Eli Lilly Japan, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Enomoto
- Bio-Medicines, Medicines Development Unit, Eli Lilly Japan, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Muneta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Disaster Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pergolizzi JV, LeQuang JA, Taylor R, Ossipov MH, Colucci D, Raffa RB. Designing safer analgesics: a focus on μ-opioid receptor pathways. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2018; 13:965-972. [DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2018.1511539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Michael H. Ossipov
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Daniel Colucci
- Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert B. Raffa
- University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pergolizzi JV, Coluzzi F, Taylor R. Transdermal buprenorphine for moderate chronic noncancer pain syndromes. Expert Rev Neurother 2018; 18:359-369. [PMID: 29667437 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2018.1462701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic noncancer pain has remained a challenging clinical problem. Opioid analgesics are effective, but they are known to be associated with opioid use disorder and potentially treatment-limiting side effects. Buprenorphine is a Schedule III synthetic opioid in the USA with a chemical structure similar to that of morphine but with a longer duration of action, greater potency, and other unique pharmacological attributes. Its role in treatment of chronic noncancer pain may be broader than currently thought.Areas covered: The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of transdermal buprenorphine in moderate chronic noncancer pain syndromes patients will be discussed.Expert commentary: Buprenorphine offers effective analgesia in the form of a Schedule III drug (rather than Schedule II such as oxycodone or morphine) and transdermal buprenorphine is a convenient, accepted, around-the-clock pain reliever. Its lower potential for abuse should make it a more desirable pain reliever but many payers do not reimburse buprenorphine, driving prescribers and their patients to generic versions of the riskier Schedule II oral opioids such as oxycodone and morphine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Flaminia Coluzzi
- Department Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|