1
|
Sabin J, Salas E, Martín-Martínez J, Candeliere-Merlicco A, Barrero Hernández FJ, Alonso Torres AM, Sánchez-Menoyo JL, Borrega L, Rodríguez-Rodríguez M, Gómez-Gutiérrez M, Eichau S, Hernández-Pérez MÁ, Calles C, Fernandez-Diaz E, Carmona O, Orviz A, López-Real A, López-Muñoz P, Mendoza Rodríguez A, Aguera-Morales E, Maurino J. Decisional Conflict Regarding Disease-Modifying Treatment Choices Among Patients with Mid-Stage Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Patient Prefer Adherence 2024; 18:1163-1171. [PMID: 38863945 PMCID: PMC11166147 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s459242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Shared decision-making is critical in multiple sclerosis (MS) due to the uncertainty of the disease trajectory over time and the large number of treatment options with differing efficacy, safety and administration characteristics. The aim of this study was to assess patients' decisional conflict regarding the choice of a disease-modifying therapy and its associated factors in patients with mid-stage relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods A multicenter, non-interventional study was conducted. Adult patients with a diagnosis of RRMS (2017 revised McDonald criteria) and disease duration of 3 to 8 years were included. The level of uncertainty experienced by a patient when faced with making a treatment choice was assessed using the 4-item Decisional Conflict Scale. A battery of patient-reported and clinician-rated measures was administered to obtain information on symptom severity, illness perception, illness-related uncertainty, regret, MS knowledge, risk taking behavior, preferred role in the decision-making process, cognition, and self-management. Patients were recruited during routine follow-up visits and completed all questionnaires online using electronic tablets at the hospital. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted. Results A total of 201 patients were studied. Mean age (Standard deviation) was 38.7 (8.4) years and 74.1% were female. Median disease duration (Interquartile range) was 6.0 (4.0-7.0) years. Median EDSS score was 1.0 (0-2.0). Sixty-seven (33.3%) patients reported a decisional conflict. These patients had lower MS knowledge and more illness uncertainty, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, subjective symptom severity, a threatening illness perception, and poorer quality of life than their counterparts. Lack of decisional conflict was associated with MS knowledge (Odds ratio [OR]=1.195, 95% CI 1.045, 1.383, p=0.013), self-management (OR=1.049, 95% CI 1.013, 1.093, p=0.018), and regret after a healthcare decision (OR=0.860, 95% CI 0.756, 0.973, p=0.018) in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion Decisional conflict regarding the selection of a disease-modifying therapy was a common phenomenon in patients with mid-stage RRMS. Identifying factors associated with decisional conflict may be useful to implement preventive strategies that help patients better understand their condition and strengthen their self-management resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Sabin
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisa Salas
- Medical Department, Roche Farma, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Laura Borrega
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Spain
| | | | | | - Sara Eichau
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Carmen Calles
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Eva Fernandez-Diaz
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain
| | - Olga Carmona
- Department of Neurology, Fundació Salut Empordà, Figueres, Spain
| | - Aida Orviz
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana López-Real
- Department of Neurology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Delayed cognitive processing and treatment status quo bias in early-stage multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 68:104138. [PMID: 36029707 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evolving therapeutic landscape requires more participation of patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to assess the association between patient's self-perception, cognitive impairment and behavioral factors in treatment choices in a cohort of patients at an early stage of RRMS. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, non-interventional study including adult patients with a diagnosis of RRMS, a disease duration ≤18 months and receiving care at one of the 21 participating MS centers from across Spain. We used patient-reported measures to gather information on fatigue, mood, quality of life, and perception of severity of their MS. Functional metrics (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS], cognitive function by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test [SDMT], 25-foot walk test) and clinical and radiological data were provided by the treating neurologist. The primary outcome of the study was status quo (SQ) bias, defined as participant's tendency to continue taking a previously selected but inferior treatment when intensification was warranted. SQ bias was assessed based on participants treatment preference in six simulated RRMS case scenarios with evidence of clinical relapses and radiological disease progression. RESULTS Of 189 participants who met the inclusion criteria, 188 (99.5%) fully completed the study. The mean age was 36.6 ± 9.5 years, 70.7% female, mean disease duration: 1.2 ± 0.8 years, median EDSS score: 1.0 [IQR=0.0-2.0]). Overall, 43.1% patients (n = 81/188) had an abnormal SDMT (≤49 correct answers). SQ bias was observed in at least one case scenario in 72.3% (137/188). Participant's perception of their MS severity was associated with higher SQ bias (β coeff 0.042; 95% CI 0.0074-0.076) among those with delayed cognitive processing. Higher baseline EDSS and number of T2 lesions were predictors of delayed processing speed (OR EDSS=1.57, 95% CI: 1.11-2.21, p = 0.011; OR T2 lesions=1.50, 95% CI: 1.11-2.03, p<0.01). Bayesian multilevel model accounting for clustering showed that delayed cognitive processing (exp coeff 1.06; 95% CI 1.04-1.09) and MS symptoms severity (exp coeff 1.28; 95% CI 1.22-1.33) were associated with SQ bias. CONCLUSION Over 40% of patients in earlier stages of RRMS experience delays in cognitive processing that might affect their decision-making ability. Our findings suggest that patients' self-perception of disease severity combined with a delay in cognitive processing would affect treatment choices leading to status quo bias early in the course of their disease.
Collapse
|